Possible Ideas of Necessity in Indian Logic
- 125 Downloads
It is often remarked that Indian logic (IL) has no conception of necessity. But what kind of necessity is absent in this system? Logical necessity is presumably absent: the structure of the logical argument in IL is often given as a reason for this claim. However even a cursory understanding of IL illustrates an abiding attempt to formulate the idea of necessity. In Dharmakīrti's classification of inferences, one can detect the formal process of entailment in the inferences arising from class inclusion. In Western philosophy, Leibniz's invocation of 'contingent necessity' as distinguished from the 'necessary necessity' is part of a tradition that finds value in the idea of contingent necessity. In contemporary philosophy, this has been championed by Armstrong, specifically in the context of understanding the necessity inherent in scientific laws. In IL, the analysis of 'invariable concomitance' (vyāpti) is of crucial importance and its definitions are very complex. This paper argues how vyāpti can be understood in terms of contingent necessity and also how the complex definitions can be interpreted as an attempt to define contingent necessity in terms of 'logical' necessity.
KeywordsNecessity Analyticity Vyāpti Pervasion Invariable concomitance Everpresent properties Possible worlds Scientific law Absence Limitors
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Armstrong, D. M. (1985). What is a law of nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 3.Bhattacharyya, S. (1987). Doubt, belief and knowledge. Delhi: ICPR.Google Scholar
- 8.Chatterjee, A. (1996). Natural laws, accidental generalizations and vyāpti (pp. 123–150). III: Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
- 9.Dunne, J. (2004). Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s philosophy. Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
- 10.Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 12.Ganeri, J. (2009). Analytic philosophy in early modern India. Retrieved December 24, 2009 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/early-modern-india/.
- 13.Grayling, A. C. (1997). An introduction to philosophical logic. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- 14.Guha, D. C. (1979). Navya Nyāya system of logic. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
- 15.Itzykson, C., & Zuber, J.-B. (1980). Quantum field theory. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
- 18.Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 20.Matilal, B. K. (1968). The Navya-nyāya doctrine of negation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 21.Matilal, B. K. (1985). Logic, language and reality. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
- 22.Matilal, B. K. (1999). In J. Ganeri & H. Tiwari (Eds.), The character of logic in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 23.Matilal, B. K. (2004). In H. Tiwari (Ed.), Necessity and Indian logic. Delhi: Chronicle Books.Google Scholar
- 26.Phillips, S., & Tatacharya, R. (2002). Gaṅgeśa on the upadhi. Delhi: ICPR.Google Scholar
- 29.Quine, W. V. (1961). Two dogmas of empiricism. In W. V. Quine (Ed.), From a logical point of view (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 30.Sarukkai, S. (2004). Philosophy of symmetry. Shimla: IIAS.Google Scholar
- 31.Sarukkai, S. (2005). Indian philosophy and philosophy of science. Delhi: CSC/Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
- 32.Sarukkai, S. (2008). A semiotic interpretation of Indian logic. In M. K. Chakraborti et al. (Eds.), Logic, Navya-Nyāya & applications (pp. 287–304). London: College Publications.Google Scholar