MODAL MONSTERS AND TALK ABOUT FICTION
- 172 Downloads
This paper argues in favor of a treatment of discourse about fiction in terms of operators on character, that is, Kaplanesque ‘monsters’. The first three sections criticize the traditional analysis of ‘according to the fiction’ as an intensional operator, and the approach to fictional discourse grounded on the notion of contextual shifts. The final sections explain how an analysis in terms of monsters yields the correct readings for a variety of examples involving modal and temporal indexicals.
Key wordsfictional narrative historical remarks semantic analysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bach, K.: 1987, Thought and Reference, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Crossley, J. N. and Humberstone, L.: 1977, The logic of “actually”, Reports on Mathematical Logic 8, 11–29.Google Scholar
- Israel, D. and Perry, J.: 1996, Where Monsters Dwell, in J. Seligman and D. Westerstahl (eds.), Logic, Language and Computation, volume 1, CSLI, Stanford, CA, pp. 303–316.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, D.: 1977, Demonstratives, in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 481–563.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D.: 1970, Anselm and actuality, Nous 4, 175–188 (reprinted in Lewis, D.: 1983, Philosophical Papers I, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 10–25).Google Scholar
- Lewis, D.: 1978, Truth in fiction, American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 37–46.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D.: 1980, Index, context, and content, in S. Kanger and S. Ohman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht (reprinted in Lewis, D.: 1997, Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 21–44).Google Scholar
- Predelli, S.: 2005, Contexts. Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar