Liverpool Law Review

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 233–257 | Cite as

What Lies Beneath: Exploring Links Between Asylum Policy and Hate Crime in the UK

Article
  • 704 Downloads

Abstract

This paper explores the link between increasing incidents of hate crime and the asylum policy of successive British governments with its central emphasis on deterrence. The constant problematisation of asylum seekers in the media and political discourse ensures that ‘anti-immigrant’ prejudice becomes mainstreamed as a common-sense response. The victims are not only the asylum seekers hoping for a better life but democratic society itself with its inherent values of pluralism and tolerance debased and destabilised.

Keywords

Hate crime Asylum Discrimination Racism 

References

  1. A v SS for Health. 2009. EWCA Civ 225.Google Scholar
  2. Administrator. 2008. “Europe: No asylum, now go to jail” crime and justice international. Houston: Sam Houston State University.Google Scholar
  3. Agence France Presse. 2010. 6 Jan 2010.Google Scholar
  4. Anthias, F., N. Yoval-Davis, and H. Cain. 1993. Racialized boundaries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Association of London Authorities. 1993. Racial abuse: An everyday experience for some Londoners. Submission to the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee inquiry into racially-motivated attacks and harassment. London: Association of London Authorities.Google Scholar
  6. Article 19 Project. 2003. University of Cardiff. Available at: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/research/researchgroups/racerepresentationandculturalidentity/fundedprojects/article19project.html. Accessed 14 July 2010.
  7. Aspinall, P., and C. Watters. 2010. Refugees and asylum seekers. A review from an equality and human rights perspective. Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  8. Bailey, O.G., and R. Harindranath. 2005. Racialised ‘othering’. In Journalism: Critical issues, ed. S. Allen, 274–286. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Banks, J. 2009. ‘Unmasking deviance: The visual construction of asylum seekers and refugees’, The European society of criminology conference. Slovenia: University of Ljubljana.Google Scholar
  10. Bleich, E. 2007. Hate crime policy in Western Europe. American Behavioural Scientist 51(2): 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Booth, R. 2010. Rise in hate crime follows BNP council election victories. The Guardian. 15 Jan.Google Scholar
  12. Bowling, B., and C. Phillips. 2002. Racism, crime and justice. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  13. BBC. 2009. 1 Question time. 22 Oct.Google Scholar
  14. Bjorgo, T. 1993a. Role of the media in racist violence. In Racist violence in Europe, ed. T. Bjorgo and R. Witte, 96–112. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  15. Bjorgo, T. 1993b. Terrorist violence against immigrants and refugees in Scandinavia: Patters and motives. In Racist violence in Europe, ed. T. Bjorgo and R. Witte, 29–46. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  16. Bjorgo, T., and R. Witte. 1993. Racist violence in Europe. Palgrave: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  17. British Crime Survey. 2009. Crime in England and Wales 2008–2009. London: Home Office Statistical Bulletin.Google Scholar
  18. Brogan v UK. 1989. 11 EHRR 117.Google Scholar
  19. Cantle, T. 2002. Community cohesion: A report of the independent review. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  20. Capdevila, R., and J. Callaghan. 2008. It’s not racist. It’s common sense. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 18: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Children’s Commissioner. 2010. The arrest and detention of children subject to immigration control. London: The Children’s Commissioner.Google Scholar
  22. Cohen, S. 2003. No One is Illegal. Stoke-On-Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  23. Coleman, D. 1996. UK immigration policy: ‘Firm but fair’ and failing? Policy Studies 17(3): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coole, C. 2002. A warm welcome? Scottish and UK media reporting of an asylum seeker murder. Media Culture and Society 24(6): 839–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cornelisse, G. 2004. Human rights for immigration detainees in Strasbourg: Limited sovereignty or a limited discourse. EJML 6: 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crown Prosecution Service. 2010. Racist and religious crime-CPS prosecution policy. London: CPS.Google Scholar
  27. Daily Express. 2009. Asylum system engulfed in chaos. June 16 2009.Google Scholar
  28. Daily Express. 2010. Now asylum if you’re gay. July 7 2010.Google Scholar
  29. Daily Mail. 2002. ID cards lead war on asylum cheats. July 1.Google Scholar
  30. Daily Mail. 2010. Iraqi asylum cheat. June 26.Google Scholar
  31. Daily Record. 2004. Surge in race hate. March 9.Google Scholar
  32. Dale, I. 2000. Conservative party general manifesto’s 1900–1997. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Dixon, L., and L. Ray. 2007. Current issues and developments in race hate crime. Probation Journal. The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice 45(2): 109–124.Google Scholar
  34. Doward. 2004. “BNP to allow black recruits” The Observer. 1 Aug.Google Scholar
  35. Dummett, A. 1998. British race relations in a European context. In Race relations in Britain: A developing agenda, ed. T. Blackstone, B.C. Parekh, and P. Sanders, 204–220. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. European Council for Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) Press release. 2008. Returns directive: European parliament and member states risk compromising respect for migrants’ rights. 20 May 2000.Google Scholar
  37. European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance. (2010). Report on the United Kingdom. CRI (2010) 4. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  38. EuroActiv News. 2008. 29 January 2008 and response of 27 June 2008. Available at: http://www.euractiv.com/en/socialeurope/spain-explains-directive-shame-latin-america/article-173727. Accessed on: 11 Dec 2010.
  39. European Council. 2008a. The council’s framework decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law. Council of the EU Brussels, 26 Feb 2008 16771/07.Google Scholar
  40. European Council. 2008b. Common standards and procedures in member states for returning illegally staying third-country nationals. 18 June 2008.Google Scholar
  41. European Parliament. 2010. Regulation of the European parliament and council on the citizens’ initiative 2010/0074 (COD) Brussels. 31 March.Google Scholar
  42. Fekete, L. 2009. A suitable enemy. London: Institute of Race Relations.Google Scholar
  43. Fiss, O. 1996. The irony of free speech. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Frost, D. 2007. The ‘enemy within’? Asylum, racial violence and ‘race hate’ in Britain today. 21st Century Society 2(3): 227–248.Google Scholar
  45. Gadd, D. 2004. Hate and bias crime: Criminologically congruent law? A review of Barbara Perry’s hate and bias crime: A reader. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 37(1): 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ginn, E. 2009. Intercollegiate briefing paper: Significant harm—the effects of administrative detention on the health of children, young people and their families. Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Paediatrics and Children’s Health, Royal College of Pyschiatrists and the UK faculty of Public Health. Available at: http://www.medicaljustice.org.uk/images/stories/texts/significant%20harm%20intercollegiate%20statement%20dec09.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2010.
  47. Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Goodman, S. 2008. Justifying harsh treatment of asylum seekers through the support of social cohesion. Annual Review of Critical Psychology 6: 110–124.Google Scholar
  49. Green, D.P., L.H. McFalls, and K. Smith. 2001. Hate crime: An emergent research agenda. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Greenwald, A, and L.H. Krieger. 2006. Implicit bias: Scientific foundations. 945 CAL L REV 945.Google Scholar
  51. Grillo, R. 2005. Saldtean can’t cope’ protests against asylum-seekers in an English seaside suburb. Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(2): 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hall, N. 1995. Hate crime. Abingdon: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Harmit, A. 2010. Protests follow deaths in Glasgow. London: Institute of Race Relations News.Google Scholar
  54. Harris, J. 2010. Labour’s new motto: Immigration, immigration, immigration. The Guardian. 22 May.Google Scholar
  55. Hayter, T. 2000. The case against immigration controls. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  56. HM Government. 2009. Hate crime-cross government action plan. London: HMSO. Available at: http://library.npia.police.uk/docs/homeoffice/hate-crime-action-plan.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2010.
  57. Home Office. 2007. Attitudes, perceptions and risks of crime: Supplementary Volume 1 to crime in England and Wales 2006/7 19/07 29 Nov. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  58. Home Office. 2010. Control of immigration. Quarterly statistical summary. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  59. Homelessness Link. 2000. Homelessness amongst migrant groups. March. Available at: http://www.homless.org.uk/migration-project.
  60. Hopkins Burke, R., and E. Pollock. 2004. A tale of two anomies: Some observations on the contribution of (sociological) criminological theory to explaining hate crime motivation. Internet Journal of Criminology. Google Scholar
  61. House of Commons, Home Affairs Committee. 2009. The detention of children in the immigration system. 2009–2000 24 Nov (2009) HC 73. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  62. Human Rights First. 2008a. 2008 hate crime survey: Racism and xenophobia. New York: Human Rights First.Google Scholar
  63. Human Rights First. 2008b. Violence based on racism and xenophobia. New York: Human Rights First.Google Scholar
  64. Hurd, H. 2001. Hate crime legislation. Law and Philosophy 20(1): 215–232.Google Scholar
  65. ICAR (Information centre about asylum seekers and refugees). 2004. Media image, community impact. London: Information Centre on Asylum seekers and Refugees, Kings College.Google Scholar
  66. Iganksi, P. (Ed.). 2002. The hate debate. London: Institute for Jewish Policy Research, Profile Books.Google Scholar
  67. Iganksi, P. 2008. Hate crime and the city. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  68. Independent Asylum Commission. 2008. Saving sanctuary: The independent asylum commissions’ first report of conclusions and recommendations. London: IAC.Google Scholar
  69. IRR. 2010. Institute of race relations European race audit “direct democracy racism and the extreme right”, Briefing paper no. 2. Feb 2010, London.Google Scholar
  70. Institute of Race Relations (IRR). 2006. Driven to desperate measures. Institute of Race Relations.Google Scholar
  71. Kahan, D. 2001. Two liberal fallacies in the hate crimes debate. Law and Philosophy 20(2): 175–193.Google Scholar
  72. Karapin, R. 1998. Radical-right and neo-fascist political parties in Western Europe. Comparative Politics 30(2): 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Karapin, R. 1999. The politics of migration control in Britain and Germany: Subnational politicians and social movements. Comparative Politics 31(4): 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. King, R., and N. Woods. 2001. Media and migration: constructions of mobility and difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Labour Party Manifesto. 2010. A future fair for all. Available at http://www.Labour.org.uk.
  76. Levin, J. 2002. Hatemongers, dabblers, sympathizers and spectators: A typology of offenders. In The hate debate, ed. P. Iganksi, 71–87. London: Institute for Jewish Policy Research, Profile Books.Google Scholar
  77. Lido, C.R., R. Calitri, A. Samson, and R. Brown. (2006). Effects of the media priming positive and negative asylum-seeker stereotypes on thoughts and behaviours. ESRC funded project, res 000-22-0773.Google Scholar
  78. Litwa v Poland. 2000. App no. 26629/95 4.4.2000.Google Scholar
  79. Mason, G. 2005. Hate crime and the image of the stranger. British Journal of Criminology 45(6): 837–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Moon, G. 2002. The hate debate: Should hate be punished as a crime? EHRLR 4: 555–556.Google Scholar
  81. New Statesman. 2010. Refugee and migrant justice placed into administration. New Statesman. 15 June 2010.Google Scholar
  82. O’Nions, H. 2006. The erosion of the right to seek asylum. Web JCLI 2. Google Scholar
  83. O’Nions, H. 2008. No right to liberty: The detention of asylum seekers for administrative convenience. European Journal of Migration and the Law 10(2): 149–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. OSCE. 2009. Decision No 9/09 combating hate crimes. Athens: OSCE.Google Scholar
  85. Ottewell, D. 2007. MP to slam asylum policy. Manchester Evening News. June 13.Google Scholar
  86. Parker, O., and J. Brassett. 2005. Contingent borders, ambiguous ethics: Migrants in (international) political theory. International Studies Quarterly. 49: 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Parliamentary Assembly. 2010. On detention of asylum seekers and irregular migrants in Europe res 1708 (2010).Google Scholar
  88. Perry, B. 2001. In the name of hate. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Press Complaints Commission. 2003. Code of practice http://www.pcc.org.
  90. Press Gazette. 2004. Express staff call in PCC over anti-gypsy articles. 30 Jan 2004.Google Scholar
  91. Ray, L., and D. Smith. (2002). Hate crime, violence and cultures of racism. In The hate debate, ed. P. Iganski, 88–102. London: Institute for Jewish Policy Research, Profile Books.Google Scholar
  92. Ray, L., D. Smith, and L. Wastell. 2003. Understanding racist violence. In The meanings of violence, ed. E.A. Stanko, 112–129. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Refugee Action. 2002. Is it safe here?. London: Refugee Action.Google Scholar
  94. Russell B. 2007. Jobs for every Briton’ says Brown in crackdown on migrant workers’. The Independent. Monday 10 Sept.Google Scholar
  95. Refugee Action. 2006. News release “Plymouth refugees tell the truth about asylum”. London: Refugee Action.Google Scholar
  96. Saadi v UK. 2008. App 13229/03, Grand chamber of the European court of human rights judgment of 29 Jan 2008.Google Scholar
  97. Sales, R. 2002. The deserving and the undeserving? Refugees, asylum seekers and welfare in Britain. Critical Social Policy 22(3): 456–478.Google Scholar
  98. Saxton, A. 2003. I certainly don’t want people like that here: The discursive construction of asylum seekers. Media International Australia 109–120.Google Scholar
  99. Scottish Executive. 2004. Working group on hate crime. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.Google Scholar
  100. Sibbitt, R. 1997. The perpetrators of racial harassment and racial violence. Home Office research study 176. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  101. Spencer, S. 1998. The impact of immigration policy on race relations. In Race relations in Britain: A developing agenda, ed. T. Blackstone, B.C. Parekh, and P. Sanders, 204–220. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. Stabile, S. 2009. Othering’ and the law. University of St Thomas legal studies research paper no. 08–37.Google Scholar
  103. Stewart, S. 2007. Asylum seekers targeted by gangs. BBC News March 2.Google Scholar
  104. Summers, D. 2009. Brown stands for British jobs for British workers. Jan 30 Guardian Unlimited. Google Scholar
  105. Telegraph. 2008. Phil Woolas accuses asylum seeker lawyers and charities of ‘playing the system’. The Telegraph 18 Nov 2008.Google Scholar
  106. The Guardian. 2010. Protests over ‘gay asylum’ coverage. 15 July 2010.Google Scholar
  107. Townsend, M. 2010. UK ignoring evidence of torture among asylum seekers. The Observer. 14 March.Google Scholar
  108. Travis, A. 2010a. Home Office to opt out of asylum claims EU directive. Guardian Unlimited. 24 Feb. Google Scholar
  109. Travis, A. 2010b. UK detention centre to double capacity. The Guardian. 26 May.Google Scholar
  110. Tuitt, P. 1996. The law’s construction of the refugee. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  111. UNHCR. 2006. Asylum ‘madness’’ in the UK. Refugees 142(1): 10–11.Google Scholar
  112. UNHCR. 2010. Asylum levels and trends in industrialized countries in 2009: statistical overview. UHHCR. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org.uk/news-and-views/news-list/news-detail/article/number-of-asylum-seekers-remains-stable-over-2009-unhcr-figures-show.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2010.
  113. Van Dijk, T.A. 1992. Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse and Society 3: 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Van Dijk, T.A. 1993. Elite discourses and racism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  115. Veenkamp, T., T. Bentley, and A. Buonfino. 2003. People flow. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  116. Verkaik, R. 2010. Refugees ‘denied vital health care services. The Independent. 9 March.Google Scholar
  117. Wetherell, M. 2003. Racism and the analysis of cultural resources in interviews. In Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview, ed. H. Vanden Berg, M. Wetherell, and H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, 11–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Wurie Khan, A. 2008. Countering media hegemony, negative representations, the ‘bad citizen’: Asylum seekers’ battle for the hearts and minds of Scotland. Social Engagement, Empowerment and Change. 11. Google Scholar
  119. YouGov. 2003. Surveys for the sun 2003; for The Daily Mail December 2004.Google Scholar
  120. YouGov survey for Commission for Racial equality: Racial Equality. 2004. Available at: http://www.youcov.co.uk/corportae/archives/press-archives-social-Main.asp?dID=2005.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham Law SchoolNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations