Skip to main content

Sub-Seabed Carbon Sequestration: Building the Legal Platform

Liverpool Law Review volume 30, Article number: 131 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Under the threat of the disruptions of climate change, there is growing interest in clean coal technology in the UK. This paper reviews the technologies underpinning the capture, transportation and storage of CO2. In the case of the UK, the storage of CO2 is planned in the sub seabed of the North Sea Continental Shelf. This being so, the paper goes on to analyse the rapid changes made at International, EU and UK level to shape a legal framework, the contours of which, if not the precise topography, is now visibly recognisable. It explores the linkages between regimes on climate change and marine protection and it concludes that the viability of the technology may ultimately be dependent on one element of that regulatory structure, namely the EU Emissions Trading Scheme since, ultimately, the price of carbon will determine levels of investment in the technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Yowell and Ferrell (2005).

  2. 2.

    Hoegh-Guldberg et al. (2007).

  3. 3.

    Ibid.

  4. 4.

    Rayfuse (2008) and Peterson (1995).

  5. 5.

    Bill, Clause 77(1)(d).

  6. 6.

    Defra Consultation (2009).

  7. 7.

    Eckert and McKellar (2008), McLaren and Fahey (2005), Bankes et al. (2008), Brodeen (2007) and Brewster Weeks (2007).

  8. 8.

    IEA (2008).

  9. 9.

    Technical details below are taken from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2005).

  10. 10.

    Webb (2009).

  11. 11.

    Stromberg et al. (2009).

  12. 12.

    For an account of EOR see Haggerty (2003), Dubois (2006) and Marston and Moore (2008).

  13. 13.

    Nettles and Conner (2008).

  14. 14.

    Lee (2009).

  15. 15.

    Greenpeace International (2007).

  16. 16.

    Scott (2005), Purdy and Macrory (2004) and Purdy (2006).

  17. 17.

    Brewster Weeks (2007).

  18. 18.

    Friedrich (2007).

  19. 19.

    Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and other Matter, 13 November 1972, 11 I.L.M. 1291.

  20. 20.

    1996 Protocol to the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, 8 November 1996, 36 I.L.M. 1, 7-21.

  21. 21.

    On 1 December 1998.

  22. 22.

    Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic, 22 September1992, 32 I.L.M. 1072.

  23. 23.

    This interpretation point has been specifically endorsed by the OSPAR Commission (2004).

  24. 24.

    OSPAR Commission (2004).

  25. 25.

    Haefeli et al. (2004).

  26. 26.

    Directive 2009/31/EC on the geological storage of carbon dioxide.

  27. 27.

    Directive 96/61/EC concerning Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC).

  28. 28.

    Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the environmental impact of certain projects (EIA).

  29. 29.

    Directive 2004/35/EC on Environmental Liability.

  30. 30.

    IPCC (2005).

  31. 31.

    For discussion as to liability and liability regimes see Lo Baugh and Troutman (2009), Klass and Wilson (2008) and Moore (2007).

  32. 32.

    The USA Energy Plan is also seeking to build five public/private partnership CCS facilities—see Lo Baugh and Troutman (2009).

  33. 33.

    For a fuller review see Stallworthy (2009).

  34. 34.

    1995 for other greenhouse gases.

  35. 35.

    [2009] EWCA Civ 810.

  36. 36.

    CCC (2008).

  37. 37.

    DTI (2006).

  38. 38.

    Anderson (2009), Nettles and Conner (2008), Campbell et al. (2008) and Wilson and de Figueiredo (2006).

  39. 39.

    McKinsey and Co. (2008).

References

  1. AEA. 2009. Future value of coal carbon abatement technologies to UK industry. UK: DECC.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, O.L. 2009. Geological CO2 sequestration: Who owns the pore space? Wyoming Law Review 9 (1): 97–138.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bankes, N., J. Poschwatta, and E.M. Shier. 2008. The legal framework for carbon capture and storage in Alberta. Alberta Law Review 45: 585–630.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brewster Weeks, A. 2007. Subseabed carbon dioxide sequestration as a climate mitigation option for the Eastern United States: A preliminary assessment of technology and law. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 12 (2): 245–267.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brodeen, E.C. 2007. Sequestration, science, and the law: An analysis of the sequestration component of the California and Northeastern States’ plans to curb global warming. Environmental Law 37: 1217–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell, T.A., R.A. James, and J. Hutchings. 2008. Carbon capture and storage project development: An overview of property rights acquisition, permitting, and operational liability issues. Texas Environmental Law Journal 38: 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Committee on Climate Change. 2008. Building a low carbon economy—the UK’s contribution to tackling climate change. UK: CCC.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Defra Consultation. 2009. Consultation on secondary legislation for England and Wales under the Marine and Coastal Access Bill: Part 4 marine licensing, Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London. Available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/marine-bill/index.htm.

  9. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). 2009. A framework for the development of clean coal. UK: H. M. Government.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Department of Trade and Industry. 2006. The energy challenge. UK: H. M. Government.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dubois, L. 2006. Curiosity and carbon: Examining the future of carbon sequestration and the accompanying jurisdictional issues as outlined in the Indian energy title of the 2005 Energy Policy Act. Energy Law Journal 27: 603–620.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eckert, S., and R. McKellar. 2008. Securing rights to carbon sequestration: The Western Australian experience. Sustainable Development Law and Policy 8: 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Friedrich, J. 2007. Carbon capture and storage: A new challenge for international environmental law. Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 67: 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenpeace International. 2007. Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) and coal-fired power briefing, October 2007.

  15. Haefeli, S., M. Bosi, and C. Philibert. 2004. Carbon capture and storage issues: Accounting and baselines under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Paris: International Energy Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Haggerty, S.M. 2003. Legal requirements for widespread implementation of CO2 sequestration in depleted oil reserve’. Pace Environmental Law Review 21: 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoegh-Guldberg, O., et al. 2007. Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318 (5857): 1737–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. International Energy Authority (IEA). 2008. World energy outlook. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. IPCC. 2005. Special report on carbon capture and storage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klass, A.B., and E.J. Wilson. 2008. Climate change and carbon sequestration: Assessing a liability regime for long-term storage of carbon dioxide. Emory Law Journal 58: 103–151.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, R. 2009. Storage solutions. The Chemical Engineer TCE, (July/August 2009) 19–20.

  22. Lo Baugh, L., and W.L. Troutman. 2009. Assessing the challenges of geologic carbon capture and sequestration: A California guide to the cost of reducing CO2 emissions. Sustainable Development Law and Policy 9: 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Marston, P.M., and P.A. Moore. 2008. From EOR to CCS: The evolving legal and regulatory framework for carbon capture and storage. Energy Law Journal 29: 421–490.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McKinsey and Co. 2008. Carbon capture and storage: Assessing the economics. Chicago: McKinsey Climate Change Initiative series.

    Google Scholar 

  25. McLaren, J., and J. Fahey. 2005. Key legal and regulatory considerations for the geosequestration of carbon dioxide in Australia. Australian Resources and Energy Law Journal 24: 46–75.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moore, J. 2007. The potential law of on-shore geological sequestration of CO2 captured from coal fired power plants. Energy Law Journal 28: 443.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nettles, L., and M. Conner. 2008. Carbon dioxide sequestration–transportation, storage and other infrastructure issues. Texas Journal of Oil, Gas and Energy Law 4: 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  28. OSPAR Commission. 2004. Report from the group of jurists and linguists on placement of carbon dioxide in the OSPAR maritime area, in summary record, OSPAR 2004, OSPAR 04/2371.E, Annex 12 at para 20.

  29. Peterson, J. 1995. Can algae save civilisation? A look at technology law and policy regarding iron fertilization of the ocean to counteract the greenhouse effects. Colombia Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 6: 61.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Purdy, R. 2006. The legal implications of carbon capture and storage under the sea. Sustainable Development Law and Policy 7: 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Purdy, R., and R. Macrory. 2004. Geological carbon sequestration: Critical legal issues. UK: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rayfuse, R. 2008. Drowning our sorrows to secure a carbon free future? Some international legal considerations relating to sequestering carbon by fertilising the oceans. University of New South Wales Law Journal 31: 919–930.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Scott, K. 2005. The day after tomorrow: Ocean CO2 sequestration and the future of climate change. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 18: 57–108.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Service, R. 2004. The carbon conundrum. Science 305: 962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stallworthy, M. 2009. Legislating against climate change: A UK perspective on a sisyphean challenge. Modern Law Review 72 (3): 412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stromberg, L., et al. 2009. Update on Vattenfall’s 30 MWth oxyfuel pilot plant in Schwarze Pumpe. Energy Procedia 1: 581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Webb, T. 2009. Scottish power tests carbon capture technology. Guardian 29 May 2009.

  38. Wilson, E.J., and M.A. de Figueiredo. 2006. Geologic CO2 sequestration: An analysis of subsurface property law. Environmental Law Reporter 35: 10114–10124.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yowell, M.A., and J.K. Ferrell. 2005–2006. Using carbon sequestration projects to offset greenhouse gas emissions. Natural Resources and Environment 20: 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society (BRASS), Cardiff University, 55 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK

    Robert G. Lee

Authors
  1. Robert G. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, R.G. Sub-Seabed Carbon Sequestration: Building the Legal Platform. Liverpool Law Rev 30, 131 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-009-9060-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Climate change
  • Marine protection