Definite descriptions of events: progressive interpretation in Ga (Kwa)
This paper demonstrates that the progressive interpretation in Ga is an effect of the interaction between the imperfective aspect and a definite description of events. Crucially, the data from Ga point to the consequences of the view that definite descriptions of events encode the familiarity of the discourse referent and its uniqueness in bearing the property in question. Namely, they yield direct evidentiality and the necessary ongoingness of the event at the topic time. Thus, the paper identifies previously unattested variation in the semantics of the progressive in a cross-linguistic perspective and shows that not only lexical but also grammatical aspect exhibits striking parallelisms with the nominal domain.
KeywordsProgressive aspect Definite descriptions Fieldwork semantics Ga language Evidentiality
- Büring, D. (2011). Conditional exhaustivity presuppositions in clefts (and definites). Ms., Universität Wien.Google Scholar
- Casati, R., & Varzi, A. (1999). Parts and places: The structures of spatial representation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dakubu, M. E. K. (1992). Contrast in context: Topic, focus, and definiteness in Ga. Journal of West African Languages, 22(2), 3–16.Google Scholar
- Dakubu, M. E. K. (2005). The syntax of focus in Ga and the significance of related constructions. Paper presented at the conference on Focus in African Languages, Humboldt University, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Deo, A. (to appear). Imperfectivity. In L. Matthewson, C. Meier, H. Rullmann, & T. E. Zimmermann (Eds.), Blackwell companion to semantics. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Deo, A. (2015). The semantic and pragmatic underpinings of grammaticalization paths: The progressive to imperfective shift. Semantics and Pragmatics, 8(14), 1–52.Google Scholar
- Destruel, E. (2013). An empirical study on the meaning and use of the French c’est-clefts. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
- Dowty, D. (1986). The effects of Aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics? Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 37–61.Google Scholar
- Elbourne, P. (2005). Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Faller, M. T. (2002). Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Ferreira, M. (2005). Event quantification and plurality. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In D. Davidson & G. H. Harman (Eds.), The logic of grammar (pp. 64–75). Encino, CA: Dickenson Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Grubic, M. (2015). Focus and alternative sensitivity in Ngamo (West Chadic). Ph.D. thesis, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
- Grubic, M., & Zimmermann, M. (2011). Conventional and free association with focus in Ngamo (West Chadic). Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 15, 291–305. Retrieved from https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/sub/index.php/sub/article/view/382.
- Heim, I. (1991). Artikel und Definitheit. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantik: ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung (pp. 487–535). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Hinrichs, E. (1981). Temporal anaphora in discourse of English. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1), 63–82.Google Scholar
- Horn, L. (1984). Ambiguity, negation and the London School of Parsimony. In C. Jones, & P. Sells (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 14) (pp. 108–131). Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
- Izvorski, R. (1997). The present perfect as an epistemic modal. In A. Lawson, & E. Cho (Eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 7 (pp. 222–239). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
- Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kratzer, A. (1998). More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In D. Strolovitch & A. Lawson (Eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 8 (pp. 92–110). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
- Kratzer, A. (2007). Situation semantics in natural language semantics. In E. Zalda (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Spring 2007 edition. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/situations-semantics/.
- Kratzer, A. (2008). On the plurality of verbs. In J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow, & M. Schäfer (Eds.), Language context and cognition (pp. 269–299). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Krifka, M. (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In I. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp. 29–53). Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
- Landman, F. (1997). Plurality. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Larson, R. K. (2003). Event descriptions in Fon and Haitian Creole. In D. Adon (Ed.), Recent development in Creole studies (pp. 67–90). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Moens, M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics, 14(2), 15–28.Google Scholar
- Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Partee, B. H. (1986). Noun Phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (pp. 115–143). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
- Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
- Renans, A. (2016a). A cross-categorial definite determiner: Evidence from Ga (Kwa). In M. Moroney, C.-R. Little, J. Collard, & D. Burgdorf (Eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26 (pp. 23–42). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
- Renans, A. (2016b). Exhaustivity. On exclusive particles, clefts, and progressive aspect in Ga (Kwa). Ph.D. thesis, Universität Potsdam.Google Scholar
- Renans, A. (2016c). Modeling the exhaustivity inference of clefts: evidence from Ga (Kwa). Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 20, 569–588. Retrieved from https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/sub/index.php/sub/article/view/282.
- Schein, B. (1993). Plurals and events. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, F. (2009). Two types of definites in natural language. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.