This paper argues that NPs with case as head noun stand for situations in their role as truthmakers within a sentential or epistemic case space. The paper develops a unified semantic analysis of case-constructions of the various sorts within a truthmaker-based version of alternative semantics.
Aloni, M. (2007). Free choice, modals and imperatives. Natural Language Semantics,15, 65–94.
Armstrong, D. (1997). A world of states of affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. (2004). Truth and truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1950). ‘Truth’. Aristotelian Society Supplement, 24, 111–129. (Reprinted in Philosophical papers, by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock, Ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford).
Austin, J. L. (1961). Unfair to facts. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (Eds.), Philosophical papers (pp. 102–222). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1981). Semantic innocence and uncompromising situations. Midwest Studies in Philosophy,6(1), 387–404.
Carlson, G. (1977a). A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy,1, 413–457.
Carlson, G. (1977b). Amount relatives. Language,53, 520–542.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
Ciardelli, I., Roloefsen, F., & Theiler, N. (2017). Composing alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy,40, 1–36.
Cinque, G. (2015). Three phenomena discriminating between “raising” and “matching” relative clauses. Semantics–Syntax Interface,2(1), 1–27.
Fine, K. (1982). First-order modal theories III: Facts. Synthese,53, 43–112.
Fine, K. (2012). Counterfactuals without possible worlds. Journal of Philosophy,109(3), 221–246.
Fine, K. (2014). Truthmaker semantics for intuitionistic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic,43(2–3), 549–577.
Fine, K. (2017). Truthmaker semantics. In B. Hale, C. Wright, & A. Miller (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of language (Vol. 2, pp. 556–577). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fine, K. (2018a). Compliance and command I. Review of Symbolic Logic 11(4), 609–633.
Fine, K. (2018b). Compliance and command II. Review of Symbolic Logic 11(4), 634–664.
Hamblin, C. L. (1973). Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language,10(1), 41–53.
Higgins, R. (1979). The pseudo-cleft construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Horwich, P. (1990). Truth. Oxford: Blackwell.
Karttunen, L. (1972). Possible and must. In J. Kimball (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 1, pp. 1–20). New York: Academic Press.
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, R. (2010). Why isn’t this a complementizer? In R. Kayne (Ed.), Comparisons and contrasts(pp. 190–227). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kratzer, A. (2002). Facts: Particulars or information units. Linguistics and Philosophy,25(5–6), 655–670.
Kratzer, A. (2014). Situations in natural language semantics. In E. Zalda (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/situations-semantics/.
Kratzer, A., & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the third Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (pp. 1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Lewis, D. (1975). Adverbs of quantification. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language(pp. 178–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lowe, J. (2006). The four-category ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merricks, T. (2007). Truth and ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Moltmann, F. (2007). Events, tropes and truthmaking. Philosophical Studies,134, 363–403.
Moltmann, F. (2013a). Abstract objects and the semantics of natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moltmann, F. (2013b). The semantics of existence. Linguistics and Philosophy,36(1), 31–63.
Moltmann, F. (2014). Propositions, attitudinal objects, and the distinction between actions and products. Canadian Journal of Philosophy,43(5–6), 679–701.
Moltmann, F. (2015a). Truth predicates in natural language. In D. Achourioti, et?al. (Eds.), Unifying the philosophy of truth (pp. 57–83). Dordrecht: Springer.
Moltmann, F. (2015b). A predicativist semantics of modals based on modal objects. In T. Brochagen, F. Roloefson & N. Theiler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Amsterdam colloquium (pp. 296–302). Amsterdam: ILLC.
Moltmann, F. (2015c). Quantification with intentional and with intensional verbs. In A. Torza (Ed.), Quantifiers, quantifiers, and quantifiers (pp. 141–168). Dordrecht: Springer.
Moltmann, F. (2017a). Cognitive products and the semantics of attitude verbs and deontic modals. In F. Moltmann & M. Textor (Eds.), Act-based conceptions of propositional content. Contemporary and historical perspectives (pp. 254–289). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moltmann, F. (2017b). On the ontology of cases. In N. Flaux, P. Haas, V. Mostrov, K. Paykina É, & F. Tayalati (Eds.), De la Passion du Sense en Linguistique. Hommage à Danile van de Velde (pp. 171–186). Valenciennes: Presses Universitaires de Valenciennes.
Moltmann, F. (2018a). An object-based truthmaker semantics for modals’. Philosophical Issues,28(1), 255–288.
Moltmann, F. (2018b). Existence predicates. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1847-z.
Moltmann, F. (to appear a). Abstract objects and the core-periphery distinction in the ontological and conceptual domain of natural language. In J. L. Falguera & C. Martinez (Eds.), Abstract objects. For and against. Dordrecht: Springer.
Moltmann, F. (to appear b). Variable objects and truthmaking. In M. Dumitru (Ed.), The philosophy of Kit Fine. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mulligan, K., & Correira, F. (2017). Facts. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/facts/.
Mulligan, K., Simons, P., & Smith, B. (1984). Truthmakers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,44, 287–321.
Papafragou, A. (2006). Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua,116, 1688–1702.
Priest, G. (2005). Towards non-being: The logic and metaphysics of intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics,1(1), 75–116.
Santorio, P. (2018). Alternatives and truthmakers in conditional semantics. Journal of Philosophy,115, 10.
Sider, T. (2001). Four-dimensionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stoljar, D., & Damnjanovic, N. (2014). The deflationary theory of truth. In E. Zalda (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/truth-deflationary/.
Strawson, P. F. (1949). Truth. Analysis,9(6), 83–97.
Van de Velde, D. (ms). Cas et Fait. Ms University of Lille.
Vergnaud, J.-R. (1974). French relative clauses. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Von Fintel, K., & Gillies, A. (2010). Must…stay…strong! Natural Language Semantics,18, 351–383.
Woltersdorff, N. (1970). On universals. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Yablo, S. (to appear). Relevance without minimality. In A. Egan, P. van Elswyk, & D. Kinderman (Eds.), Unstructured content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The paper has benefitted from the audiences at presentations of material of this paper at the Conference Truth Makers and Proof Objects, organized by P. Martin-Loef, École Normale Supérieure, Paris (2011), Kit Fine’s seminar Truthmaker Semantics at NYU (2012), the City University of Hong Kong (2012), the University of Göttingen (2012), the University of Chicago (2012), the workshop Truth, Existence and Fundamentality, organized by T. Sattig and A. Torza, Tübingen (2013), the University of Padua (2013), the Symposium on Truthmaking, organized by M. Traynor, Arché, St Andrews (2014), the University of Düsseldorf (2018), the New York Philosophy of Language Workshop at NYU (2019), and the conference Truthmmaker Semantics: Applications in Philosophy and Linguistics, organized by S. Kraemer, Hamburg (2019). I would like to thank the audiences for lots of fruitful discussions. I would also like to thank Lucas Champollion, Richard Kayne, Adam Przepiórkowski, Craige Roberts, Susan Rothstein, and especially Kit Fine for comments on previous versions of this paper and stimulating discussions of the material.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Moltmann, F. Situations, alternatives, and the semantics of ‘cases’. Linguist and Philos (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-019-09282-7
- Situation semantics
- Alternative semantics
- Association with focus
- Truthmaker semantics
- Propositional attitudes
- Clausal complements