Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 201–221 | Cite as

Color adjectives and radical contextualism

  • Nathaniel HansenEmail author
Research Article


Radical contextualists have observed that the content of what is said by the utterance of a sentence is shaped in far-reaching ways by the context of utterance. And they have argued that the ways in which the content of what is said is shaped by context cannot be explained by semantic theory. A striking number of the examples that radical contextualists use to support their view involve sentences containing color adjectives (“red”, “green”, etc.). In this paper, I show how the most sophisticated analysis of color adjectives within the explanatory framework of compositional truth conditional semantics—recently developed by Kennedy and McNally (Synthese 174(1):79–98 2010)—needs to be modified to handle the full range of contextual variation displayed by color adjectives.


Contextualism Context Color Adjectives Gradability Ambiguity Predicates of personal taste 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albers J. (2006) Interaction of color. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin J.L. (1962) Sense and sensibilia. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bach K. (2002) Seemingly semantic intuitions. In: Campbell J.K., O’Rourke M., Shier D. (eds) Meaning and truth.. Seven Bridges Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker C. (2002) The dynamics of vagueness. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(1): 1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezuidenhout A. (2002) Truth conditional pragmatics. Noûs 36(16): 105–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brogaard B. (2009) Perspectival truth and color perception. In: Wright C., Pedersen N. (eds) New waves in truth. Palgrave MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Cappelen H., Lepore E. (2005) Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speechact pluralism. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Chomsky N. (2000) Language and interpretation. In New horizons in the study of language and mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen J. (2004) Color properties and color ascriptions: A relationalist manifesto. The Philosophical Review 113(4): 451–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crary A. (2007) Beyond moral judgment. Harvard University Press., Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans R. (1948) An introduction to color. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans R. (1974) The perception of color. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Fodor J. (2003) Hume variations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Glanzberg M. (2007) Context, content, and relativism. Philosophical Studies 136(1): 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardin C.L. (1983) Colors, normal observers, and standard conditions. The Journal of Philosophy 80(12): 806–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hardin C.L. (1988) Color for philosophers: Unweaving the rainbow. Hackett, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  17. Jameso D., Hurvich L.M. (1975) From contrast to assimilation: In art and in the rye. Leonardo 8(2): 125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kennedy C. (1999) Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Garland Publishing, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Kennedy C. (2007) Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1): 1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennedy C., McNally L. (2005) Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81(2): 345–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kennedy C., McNally L. (2010) Color, context, and compositionality. Synthese 174(1): 79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein E. (1980) A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(1): 1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lasersohn P. (2005) Context dependence, disagreement and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(6): 643–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacFarlane J. (2007) Semantic minimalism and nonindexical contextualism. In: Preyer G., Peter G. (eds) Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: New essays on semantics and pragmatics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. MacFarlane J. (2009) Nonindexical contextualism. Synthese 166(2): 231–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moltmann F. (2005) Part structures in situations: The semantics of individual and whole. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(5): 599–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Noë A. (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  28. Predelli S. (2005) Painted leaves, context, and semantic analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 28(3): 351–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Recanati F. (2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  30. Rothschild D., Segal G. (2009) Indexical predicates. Mind & Language 24(4): 467–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruskin J. (1876) The elements of drawing. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Sainsbury R.M. (2001) Two ways to smoke a cigarette. Ratio 14(44): 386–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Searle J.R. (1978) Literal meaning. Erkenntnis 13(1): 207–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stephenson T. (2007) Judge dependence, epistemic modals and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(4): 487–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stojanovic I. (2007) Talking about taste: Disagreement, implicit arguments and relative truth. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(6): 691–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sundell T. (2010) Disagreements about taste. Philosophical Studies 155(2): 267–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Szabó Z.G. (2000) Problems of compositionality. Garland Publishing, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Szabó Z.G. (2001) Adjectives in context. In: Kenesei I., Harnish R.M. (eds) Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics, and discourse. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  39. Travis C. (1975) Saying and understanding: A generative theory of illocutions. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  40. Travis C. (1981) The true and the false: The domain of the pragmatic. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  41. Travis C. (1985a) On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15(2): 345–366Google Scholar
  42. Travis C. (1985b) Vagueness, observation, and sorites. Mind 94(375): 345–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Travis C. (1989) The uses of sense: Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Travis C. (1994) On constraints of generality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94: 165–188Google Scholar
  45. Travis C. (1997) Pragmatics. In: Hale B., Wright C. (eds) A companion to the philosophy of language. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Travis C. (2000) Unshadowed thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  47. Travis C. (2006) Thought’s footing. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilson M. (2006) Wandering significance. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wittgenstein L. (1967) Zettel. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Jean-NicodParisFrance

Personalised recommendations