Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 455–485 | Cite as

Conditional assertion, denial, and supposition as illocutionary acts

Research Article
  • 151 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Jackson, Mind, method and conditionals. London: Routledge (1998).Google Scholar
  2. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Girotto, V. & Legrenzi, P. (1999). Modelli mentali: Una guida facile per il profano, Sistemi Intelligenti, 9, 63–83. [“Mental models: a gentle guide for outsiders”]Google Scholar
  3. J.T. Kearns, Propositional logic of supposition and assertion. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (1997) 325-349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. J.T. Kearns, An illocutionary logical explanation of the surprise execution. History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (2000) 195-214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kearns, J. T. (2001). The rationality of reasoning: Commitment and coherence. In: B. Brogaard & B. Smith (Eds). Rationality and irrationality, proceedings of the 23rd international wittgensteinsymposium. Kirchberg-am-Wechsel (Austria) 2001. pp. 192–198.Google Scholar
  6. J.T. Kearns, Logic is the study of a human activity. In: T. Childers and O. Majer (eds.) The logica yearbook 2001. Prague: Filosofia (2002) pp. 101-110Google Scholar
  7. J.T. Kearns, The logic of coherent fiction. In: T. Childers and O. Majer (eds.) The logica yearbook 2002. Prague: Filosofia (2003) pp. 133-146Google Scholar
  8. J.T. Kearns, An illocutionary analysis of conditional assertions. In: L. Behounek (ed.) The logica yearbook 2003. Prague: Filosofia (2004) pp. 159-169Google Scholar
  9. Mackie J.L. (1973). Conditionals. In: Truth, probability and paradox, studies in philosophical logic. pp. 64–119, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. R.N. McLaughlin, On the logic of ordinary conditionals. Albany, N. Y: State University of New York Press (1990).Google Scholar
  11. G.E. Moore, Moore’s paradox. In: T. Baldwin (ed.) Selected writings. London: Routledge (1944) pp. 207-212Google Scholar
  12. D.H. Sanford, If P then Q. London and New York: Routledge (1989).Google Scholar
  13. D. Vanderveken and J. Searle, Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1985).Google Scholar
  14. D. Vanderveken, Meaning and speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1990).Google Scholar
  15. Vanderveken D. (2002). Success, satisfaction and truth in the logic of speech acts and formal semantics. In: Davis S., Gillan B. (eds). A reader in semantics. Forthcoming from Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. D.N. Walton and E.C.W. Krabbe, Commitment in dialogue, basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press (1995).Google Scholar
  17. D.N. Walton, One-sided arguments. Albany, N.Y: State University of New York Press (1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Center for Cognitive ScienceUniversity at BuffaloSUNY BuffaloNYUSA

Personalised recommendations