Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imputation for semiparametric transformation models with biased-sampling data

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Widely recognized in many fields including economics, engineering, epidemiology, health sciences, technology and wildlife management, length-biased sampling generates biased and right-censored data but often provide the best information available for statistical inference. Different from traditional right-censored data, length-biased data have unique aspects resulting from their sampling procedures. We exploit these unique aspects and propose a general imputation-based estimation method for analyzing length-biased data under a class of flexible semiparametric transformation models. We present new computational algorithms that can jointly estimate the regression coefficients and the baseline function semiparametrically. The imputation-based method under the transformation model provides an unbiased estimator regardless whether the censoring is independent or not on the covariates. We establish large-sample properties using the empirical processes method. Simulation studies show that under small to moderate sample sizes, the proposed procedure has smaller mean square errors than two existing estimation procedures. Finally, we demonstrate the estimation procedure by a real data example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asgharian M, Wolfson DB (2005) Asymptotic behavior of the unconditional NPMLE of the length-biased survivor function from right censored prevalent cohort data. Ann Stat 33(5): 2109–2131

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Asgharian M, M’Lan CE, Wolfson DB (2002) Length-biased sampling with right censoring: an unconditional approach. J Am Stat Assoc 97(457): 201–209

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Asgharian M, Wolfson DB, Zhang X (2006) Checking stationarity of the incidence rate using prevalent cohort survival data. Stat Med 25(10): 1751–1767

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley J, James L (1979) Linear regression with censored data. Biometrika 66(3): 429–436

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH (2009) Weighted breslow-type and maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric transformation models. Biometrika 96(3): 591–600

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Lin DY, Zeng D (2012) Checking semiparametric transformation models with censored data. Biostatistics 13(1): 18–31

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng SC, Wei LJ, Ying Z (1995) Analysis of transformation models with censored data. Biometrika 82: 835–845

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng SC, Wei LJ, Ying Z (1997) Predicting survival probabilities with semiparametric transformation models. J Am Stat Assoc 92(437): 227–235

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton DG, Cuzick J (1985) Multivariate generalizations of the proportional hazards model. J R Stat Soc A 148(2): 82–117

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1962) Renewal theory. Methuen, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1969) Some sampling problems in technology. In: Johnson UL, Smith H (eds) New developments in survey sampling. Wiley Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowska DM, Doksum KA (1988) Estimation and testing in a two-sample generalized odds-rate model. J Am Stat Assoc 83: 744–749

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • de Una-Álvarez J, Otero-Giráldez MS, Álvarez-Llorente G (2003) Estimation under length-bias and right-censoring: An application to unemployment duration analysis for married women. J Appl Stat 30(3): 283–291

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Devroye L (1986) Non-uniform random variate generation. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta RC, Keating JP (1986) Relations for reliability measures under length biased sampling. Scand J Stat 13(1): 49–56

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data, 2nd edn. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keiding N (1992) Independent delayed entry. In: Klein JP, Goel P (eds) Survival analysis: state of the art. Kluwer, Boston, pp 309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvam P (2008) Length bias in the measurements of carbon nanotubes. Technometrics 50(4): 462–467

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lai TL, Ying Z (1991) Large sample theory of a modified buckley-james estimator for regression analysis with censored data. Ann Stat 19: 1370–1402

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lange K (2010) Numerical analysis for statisticians, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin DY (2000) On fitting cox’s proportional hazards models to survey data. Biometrika 87(1): 37–47

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin DY, Wei LJ, Yang I, Ying Z (2000) Semiparametric regression for the mean and rate functions of recurrent events. J R Stat Soc B 62(4): 711–730

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mauldon M (1998) Estimating mean fracture trace length and density from observations in convex windows. Rock Mech Rock Eng 31(4): 201–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell C, Stanley LR (1991) Length-biased sampling in mall intercept surveys. J Market Res 28(4): 475–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell C, Evans MA, McDonald L (1988) Length-biased sampling in contingent valuation studies. Land Econ 64(4): 367–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega JM, Rheinboldt WC (2000) Iterative solution of nonlinear equations in several variables, Academic Press 1970 edn. Classics in applied mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

  • Otis DL, McDonald LL, Evans MA (1993) Parameter estimation in encounter sampling surveys. J Wildl Manag 57(3): 543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin J, Shen Y (2010) Statistical methods for analyzing right-censored length-biased data under Cox model. Biometrics 66(2): 382–392

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Scheike TH, Keiding N (2006) Design and analysis of time-to-pregnancy. Stat Methods Med Res 15(2): 127–140

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Y, Ning J, Qin J (2009) Analyzing length-biased data with semiparametric transformation and accelerated failure time models. J Am Stat Assoc 104(487): 1192–1202

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Simon R (1980) Length biased sampling in etiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol 111(4): 444–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TMF (1993) Populations and selection: limitations of statistics. J R Stat Soc A (Stat Soc) 156(2): 144–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwilliger JD, Shannon WD, Lathrop GM, Nolan JP, Goldin LR, Chase GA, Weeks DE (1997) True and false positive peaks in genomewide scans: Applications of length-biased sampling to linkage mapping. Am J Hum Genet 61(2): 430–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricomi FG (1985) Integral equations. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vaart A (1998) Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge Series in statistical and probabilistic mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vaart AW, Wellner JA (1996) Weak convergence and empirical processes. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Varadhan R, Frangakis CF (2004) Revealing and addressing length bias and heterogeneous effects in frequency case-crossover studies. Am J Epidemiol 159(6): 596–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi Y (1982) Nonparametric estimation in the presence of length bias. Ann Stat 10(2): 616–620

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vardi Y (1989) Multiplicative censoring, renewal processes, deconvolution and decreasing density: Nonparametric estimation. Biometrika 76: 751–761

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ventura V, Davison AC, Boniface SJ (1998) Statistical inference for the effect of magnetic brain stimulation on a motoneurone. J R Stat Soc C 47(1): 77–94

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang MC (1991) Nonparametric estimation from cross-sectional survival data. J Am Stat Assoc 86: 130–143

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang MC (1996) Hazards regression analysis for length-biased data. Biometrika 83(2): 343–354

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang MC, Brookmeyer R, Jewell NP (1993) Statistical models for prevalent cohort data. Biometrics 49(1): 1–11

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidman MI, Batra SK, Sasser PE (1991) Determining short fiber content in cotton. Part I: Some theoretical fundamentals. Text Res J 61(1): 21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelen M (2004) Forward and backward recurrence times and length biased+ sampling: Age specific models. Lifet Data Anal 10(4): 325–334

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zelen M, Feinleib M (1969) On the theory of screening for chronic diseases. Biometrika 56: 601–614

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng D, Lin DY (2007) Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric regression models with censored data. J R Stat Soc B 69(4): 507–564

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Liu.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.

ESM 1 (PDF 128 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, H., Qin, J. & Shen, Y. Imputation for semiparametric transformation models with biased-sampling data. Lifetime Data Anal 18, 470–503 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-012-9225-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-012-9225-5

Keywords

Navigation