Evaluation of engineering and technology activities in primary schools in terms of learning environment, attitudes and understanding
Because the importance of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education continues to be recognised around the world, we developed and validated an instrument to assess the learning environment and student attitudes in STEM classrooms, with a specific focus on engineering and technology (E&T) activities in primary schools. When a four-scale instrument assessing classroom cooperation and involvement and student enjoyment and career interest was administered to 1095 grade 4–7 students in 36 classes in 10 schools, data analyses supported its factorial validity and reliability. When the new questionnaire and understanding scales were used to evaluate E&T activities, statistically-significant pretest–posttest changes in career interest and understanding (with large effect sizes ranging from 0.70 to 0.81 standard deviations) supported the efficacy of the instructional activities.
KeywordsAttitudes Learning environment Primary education STEM education
- ACARA (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority). (2011). The Australian Curriculum. www.acara.edu.au.
- ACER (Australian Council for Educational Research). (2016a, December 6). Latest PISA results: Australia at the cross-road. [Media release]. Retrieved from: https://www.acer.edu.au/about-us/media/media-releases/latest-pisa-results-australia-at-the-crossroad.
- ACER (Australian Council for Educational Research). (2016b). TIMSS 2015: A first look at Australia’s results. Retrieved from: https://www.research.acer.edu.au.
- Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Outcomes-focused learning environments. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Sebela, M. P. (2004). Using teacher action research to promote constructivist learning environments in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 24(4), 245–253.Google Scholar
- Australian National Engineering Taskforce. (2010). Scoping our future: Addressing Australia’s engineering skills shortage. www.anet.org.au.
- Bundy, A. (1999). 21st century literacy…Still no single measure. Incite, 20(5), 8. Retrieved from: http://archive.alia.org.au/incite/1999/05/literacy.html.
- Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.Google Scholar
- Early Childhood STEM Working Group. (2017). Early STEM matters: Providing high-quality experiences for all young learners. Retrieved from: http://ecstem.uchicago.edu.
- Fraser, B. J. (1981b). Test of science-related attitude (TOSRA). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Fraser, B. J. (2014). Classroom learning environments: Historical and contemporary perspectives. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (II ed., pp. 104–119). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fraser, B. J., & Tobin, K. G. (Eds.). (1987). Exemplary practice in science and mathematics education. Perth: Key Centre for Teaching and Research in School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Goodrum, D., & Rennie, L. J. (2007). Australian school science education national action plan 2008–2012. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/94684C4C-7997-4970-ACAC-5E46F87118D3/18317/Volume1final_28August2008.pdf.
- Goss, P., Sonnemann, J., Chisholm, C., & Nelson, L. (2016). Widening gaps: What NAPLAN tells us about student progress (Grattan Institute Report No. 2016-3). Retrieved from: http://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/937-Widening-gaps.pdf.
- Harris, K. L., & (for the Australian Council of Deans of Science). (2012). A background in science: What science means for Australian society. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. I. (2014). Engaging students in S.T.E.M. education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258. Retrieved from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1044508.pdf.
- Khine, M. S. (Ed.). (2015). Attitude measurements in science education: Classic and contemporary approaches. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Koul, R., Fraser, B. J., Maynard, N., Tade, M., & Henderson, D. (2016). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) teaching to primary-school students. In R. V. Nata (Ed.), Progress in education (pp. 97–119). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Lachapelle, C. P., & Cunningham, C. M. (2007, March). Engineering is elementary: Children’s changing understanding of science and engineering. Paper presented at the 114th American Society for engineering education annual conference and exposition, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
- Masny, D., & Cole, D. (2007). Applying multiple literacies in Australian and Canadian contexts. In A. Simpson (Ed.), Future directions in literacy: International conversations conference proceedings (pp. 190–211). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
- Milliken, D., & Adams, J. (2010). Recommendations for science, technology, engineering and mathematics education (Report by STEM Work Group). Retrieved from: http://www.k12.wa.us/publications.
- Murcia, K. (2009). Science in the news: An evaluation of students’ scientific literacy. Teaching Science, 55(3). Retrieved from: http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks/577/.
- Naisbitt, J., & Aburdene, P. (1990). Megatrends 2000. London: Sidwick & Jackson.Google Scholar
- Norton, B. (2007). Critical literacy and international development. In L. Mario & T. M. de Souza (Eds.), Critical literacy: Theories and practices (Vol. 1, pp. 6–15). Nottingham: Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
- Office of Chief Scientist. (2016). Australia’s STEM workforce. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
- Office of the Chief Scientist. (November 2014). Benchmarking Australian science, technology, engineering and mathematics. www.chiefscientist.gov.au.
- Schibeci, R. (2011). Productive partnerships: Advancing STEM education in Western Australian schools (A report to the Science Education Committee of Western Australian Technology & Industry Advisory Council, TIAC). Perth: Murdoch University.Google Scholar
- Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Overview: Research on students’ preinstructional conceptions—The driving force for improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.), improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 1–14). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, P. J. (2001). The teaching and learning of technology in Australian primary and secondary schools (Department of Education, Science and Technology Working Report). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum. (2017). Realizing human potential in the fourth industrial revolution: An agenda for leaders to shape the future of education, gender and work. Switzerland. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EGW_Whitepaper.pdf.