In recognition of the evolving learning needs of twenty-first century school students, changes to teaching practices and the incorporation of technology are increasingly accompanied by modifications to the built classroom environment. Typically rows of desk and chairs are replaced with a range of furniture that can be configured in various ways to facilitate teaching and learning. This article explores the perceived relationship between these flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and wellbeing outcomes. The perceptions and experiences of 12 school principals, 35 teachers and 85 students from four primary and four secondary schools in Australia were examined. Flexible learning spaces were reported to facilitate student-centred pedagogy and selfregulation, collaboration, and student autonomy and engagement. Modified spaces were reportedly more enjoyable, comfortable and inclusive and allowed greater interaction. The findings are discussed in light of Beaton’s five key design principles of student-centred learning environments to explore the connection between the physical classroom environment and teaching and learning. Self-Determination Theory is used to interpret how elements of the physical space facilitate the creation of a social environment that encourages greater motivation to learn and increases student wellbeing. The research contributes to an understanding of how flexible learning spaces are used and with what effect, thereby addressing a present gap in the literature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Project-based learning is engaging students in investigation. Within this framework, students pursue solutions to non-trivial problems by asking and refining questions, debating ideas, making predictions, designing plans and/or experiments, collecting and analysing data, drawing conclusions, communicating their ideas and findings to others, asking new questions and creating artefacts (Blumenfeld et al. 1991).
Differentiated instruction is an organised, yet flexible, way of proactively adjusting teaching and learning methods to accommodate each child's learning needs and preferences to achieve maximum growth (Tomlinson 2014).
Aminian, S., Hinckson, E. A., & Stewart, T. (2015). Modifying the classroom environment to increase standing and reduce sitting. Building Research and Information, 43(5), 631–645.
Awartani, M., Whitman, C., & Gordon, J. (2008). Developing instruments to capture young people’s perceptions of how school as a learning environment affects their well-being. European Journal of Education, 43(1), 51–70.
Baeten, M., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., Parmentier, E., & Vanderbruggen, A. (2016). Student-centred learning environments: An investigation into student teachers’ instructional preferences and approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 19, 43–62.
Barrett, P., Dvies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133.
Benware, C. A., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755–765.
Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. Victoria: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369–398.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Byers, T., et al. (2014). Making the case for space: The effect of learning spaces on teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching, 29(1), 1–14.
Carson, V., Cliff, D. P., Janssen, X., & Okely, A. D. (2013). Longitudinal levels and bouts of sedentary time among adolescent girls. BMC Pediatrics, 13(173), 1–6.
Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation (CESE). (2015). Student wellbeing: Literature review. Sydney, NSW: NSW Government, Department of Education.
Chandler, W. L. (2009). “A” teacher space or a learner place? Reconsidering the classroom environment. International Journal of Learning, 16(9), 261–267.
Chandra, V., & Mills, K. A. (2015). Transforming the core business of teaching and learning in classrooms through ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 285–301.
Cleveland, B. (2016). Addressing the spatial to catalyse socio-pedagogical reform in middle years education. In K. Fisher (Ed.), The translational design of schools: An evidence-based approach to aligning pedagogy and learning environments (pp. 27–50). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17(1), 1–28.
Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. London: Fontana.
Fisher, K. D. (2005). Linking pedagogy and space. http://www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/knowledgebank/pdfs/linking_pedagogy_and_space.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2017.
Fisher, K. D. (2010). Technology-enabled active learning environments: An appraisal. Paris: OECD.
Fisher, K. (2016). The translational design of schools: An evidence-based approach to aligning pedagogy and learning environments. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Gifford, R. (2002). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. Colville: Optimal Books.
Gislason, N. (2009). Mapping school design: A qualitative study of the relations among facilities design, curriculum delivery, and school climate. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(4), 17–33.
Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA). (2017). Green schools. Green Building Council of Australia. https://www.gbca.org.au/uploads/221/3293/Green%20Schools_Lowres.pdf. Accessed 14 September 2017.
Harrington, D. M., Dowd, K. P., Bourke, A. K., & Donnelly, A. E. (2011). Cross-sectional analysis of levels and patterns of objectively measured sedentary time in adolescent females. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 120.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London: Routledge.
Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. Newcastle: Centre for Learning and Teaching School of Education, Communication and Language Science, University of Newcastle.
Imms, W., Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2016). Pursuing that elusive evidence about what works in learning environment design. In W. Imms, B. Cleveland, & K. Fisher (Eds.), Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge (pp. 3–18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Jonassen, D., & Land, S. (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO LLC.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Niemiec, C., & Ryan, R. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.
NSW Government, Department of Education. (2015). First look at NSW classrooms of the future. Media Release. http://www.dec.nsw.gov.au/about-us/news-at-det/media-releases1/first-look-at-nsw-classrooms-of-the-future.
NSW Government, Department of Education. Futures Learning Unit. (2016). Learning space. https://education.nsw.gov.au/futures-learning/learning-space.
Owen, N., Salmon, J., Koohsari, M. J., Turrel, G., & Giles-Corti, B. (2014). Sedentary behaviour and health: Mapping environmental and social contexts to underpin chronic disease prevention. British Journal of Sports Medecine, 48, 174–177.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Dorman, J., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C., et al. (2013). Personalised learning: Lessons to be learnt. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 654–676.
Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C., Keeffe, M., et al. (2015). Characterising personalised learning. In V. Prain et al. (Eds.), Personalising learning in open-plan schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Ritchie, J. L., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
Rose-Munero, L. (2016). Evaluating learning environments for the inclusion of students with hearing difficulties. In W. Imms, B. Cleveland, & K. Fisher (Eds.), Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge (pp. 131–144). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Ryan, R., & Deci, L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
Stern, N., & Etheridge, R. (2008). Flexible learning spaces: The integration of pedagogy, physical design, and instructional technology. Marketing Education Review, 18(1), 47–53.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2010). Teach as you preach: The effects of student-centred versus lecture-based teaching on student teachers’ approaches to teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 43–64.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Ucci, M., Law, S., Andrews, R., Fisher, A., Smith, L., Sawyer, A., et al. (2015). Indoor school environments, physical activity, sitting behaviour and pedagogy: A scoping review. Building Research and Information, 43(5), 566–581.
Wingrat, K., & Exner, C. (2005). The impact of school furniture on fourth grade children’s on-task and sitting behaviour in the classroom: A pilot study. Work, 25(3), 263–272.
We acknowledge the Futures Learning Unit of the NSW Department of Education and Training, especially Kathleen Donohoe and Robert Fraser, for their support and funding. We also thank the participating schools, principals, teachers and students who shared their views with us. This research was conducted with the support of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.
About this article
Cite this article
Kariippanon, K.E., Cliff, D.P., Lancaster, S.L. et al. Perceived interplay between flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and student wellbeing. Learning Environ Res 21, 301–320 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9254-9
- Learning environment
- Physical environment