Perceived interplay between flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and student wellbeing
- 1.8k Downloads
In recognition of the evolving learning needs of twenty-first century school students, changes to teaching practices and the incorporation of technology are increasingly accompanied by modifications to the built classroom environment. Typically rows of desk and chairs are replaced with a range of furniture that can be configured in various ways to facilitate teaching and learning. This article explores the perceived relationship between these flexible learning spaces and teaching, learning and wellbeing outcomes. The perceptions and experiences of 12 school principals, 35 teachers and 85 students from four primary and four secondary schools in Australia were examined. Flexible learning spaces were reported to facilitate student-centred pedagogy and selfregulation, collaboration, and student autonomy and engagement. Modified spaces were reportedly more enjoyable, comfortable and inclusive and allowed greater interaction. The findings are discussed in light of Beaton’s five key design principles of student-centred learning environments to explore the connection between the physical classroom environment and teaching and learning. Self-Determination Theory is used to interpret how elements of the physical space facilitate the creation of a social environment that encourages greater motivation to learn and increases student wellbeing. The research contributes to an understanding of how flexible learning spaces are used and with what effect, thereby addressing a present gap in the literature.
KeywordsAutonomy Collaboration Engagement Learning environment Physical environment Student-centred Wellbeing
We acknowledge the Futures Learning Unit of the NSW Department of Education and Training, especially Kathleen Donohoe and Robert Fraser, for their support and funding. We also thank the participating schools, principals, teachers and students who shared their views with us. This research was conducted with the support of an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.
- Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. Victoria: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.Google Scholar
- Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Carson, V., Cliff, D. P., Janssen, X., & Okely, A. D. (2013). Longitudinal levels and bouts of sedentary time among adolescent girls. BMC Pediatrics, 13(173), 1–6.Google Scholar
- Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation (CESE). (2015). Student wellbeing: Literature review. Sydney, NSW: NSW Government, Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Chandler, W. L. (2009). “A” teacher space or a learner place? Reconsidering the classroom environment. International Journal of Learning, 16(9), 261–267.Google Scholar
- Cleveland, B. (2016). Addressing the spatial to catalyse socio-pedagogical reform in middle years education. In K. Fisher (Ed.), The translational design of schools: An evidence-based approach to aligning pedagogy and learning environments (pp. 27–50). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
- Fisher, K. D. (2005). Linking pedagogy and space. http://www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/knowledgebank/pdfs/linking_pedagogy_and_space.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2017.
- Fisher, K. D. (2010). Technology-enabled active learning environments: An appraisal. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Gifford, R. (2002). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice. Colville: Optimal Books.Google Scholar
- Green Building Council of Australia (GBCA). (2017). Green schools. Green Building Council of Australia. https://www.gbca.org.au/uploads/221/3293/Green%20Schools_Lowres.pdf. Accessed 14 September 2017.
- Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. Newcastle: Centre for Learning and Teaching School of Education, Communication and Language Science, University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
- Imms, W., Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2016). Pursuing that elusive evidence about what works in learning environment design. In W. Imms, B. Cleveland, & K. Fisher (Eds.), Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge (pp. 3–18). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jonassen, D., & Land, S. (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO LLC.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Niemiec, C., & Ryan, R. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.Google Scholar
- NSW Government, Department of Education. (2015). First look at NSW classrooms of the future. Media Release. http://www.dec.nsw.gov.au/about-us/news-at-det/media-releases1/first-look-at-nsw-classrooms-of-the-future.
- NSW Government, Department of Education. Futures Learning Unit. (2016). Learning space. https://education.nsw.gov.au/futures-learning/learning-space.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
- Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Dorman, J., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C., et al. (2013). Personalised learning: Lessons to be learnt. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 654–676.Google Scholar
- Ritchie, J. L., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
- Rose-Munero, L. (2016). Evaluating learning environments for the inclusion of students with hearing difficulties. In W. Imms, B. Cleveland, & K. Fisher (Eds.), Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge (pp. 131–144). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
- Wingrat, K., & Exner, C. (2005). The impact of school furniture on fourth grade children’s on-task and sitting behaviour in the classroom: A pilot study. Work, 25(3), 263–272.Google Scholar