Abstract
The Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) is a teacher–student relationship measure whose underlying two-dimensional structure is represented in a circumplex model with eight sectors. Using Smallest Space Analysis (SSA), this study examined the circumplex structure of the Chinese version of the QTI among a convenience sample of 731 primary-school students in Hong Kong. The study revealed that the SSA solution fits the circumplex structure of the Model for Interpersonal Teacher Behavior and uncovered a two-dimensional solution yielding five sectors in a clockwise direction: Strict, Leadership-Helpful/Friendly-Understanding, Student Responsibility/Freedom, Uncertain, and Admonishing-Dissatisfied. While the Leadership-Helpful/Friendly-Understanding sector was the largest, the Student Responsibility/Freedom sector was the smallest, with few items constituting it. For the two dimensions, the vertical dimension was named Structure Clarity, with adherence to external structure (Strict sector) at one extreme and lack of structure (Uncertain sector and Student Responsibility/Freedom sector) at the other extreme. The horizontal axis was labelled Attitude Valence, with benevolent valence (Leadership sector, Helpful/Friendly sector and Understanding sector) at one end and malevolent valence (Admonishing sector and Dissatisfied sector) at the other end of the axis. The positioning of the five sectors in the present study is in line with the factor structure that was often found in previous research on the circumplex model. By presenting a somewhat different interpretation of the two dimensions and some additional items, we hope that future research will verify our suggestions across different sociocultural settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Brekelmans, M., Mainhard, T., den Brok, P., & Wubbels, T. (2011). Teacher control and affiliation: Do students and teachers agree? Journal of Classroom Interaction, 46(1), 17–26.
den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behavior and student outcomes. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 15(3), 407–442.
den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2006a). Multilevel issues in research using students’ perceptions of learning environments: The case of the Questionnaire of Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research, 9, 199–213.
den Brok, P., Fisher, D., Brekelmans, M., Rickards, T., Wubbels, Th., Levy, J., & Waldrip, B. (2003, March). Students’ perceptions of secondary science teachers’ interpersonal style in six countries: A study on the cross national validity of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED475164.
den Brok, P., Fisher, D., Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Rickards, T. (2006b). Secondary teachers’ interpersonal behavior in Singapore, Brunei and Australia: A cross-national comparison. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26, 79–95.
den Brok, P., Tartwijk, J., Wubbels, T., & Veldman, I. (2010). The differential effect of the teacher–student interpersonal relationship on student outcomes for students with different ethnic backgrounds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 199–221.
Fisher, D., den Brok, P., Waldrip, B., & Dorman, J. (2011). Interpersonal behaviour styles of primary education teachers during science lessons. Learning Environments Research, 14, 187–204.
Goh, S. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1996). Validation of an elementary school version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Psychological Reports, 79, 515–522.
Gurtman, M. B. (2009). Exploring personality with the interpersonal circumplex. Social Psychology Compass. Retrieved from http://ocean.otr.usm.edu/~w535680/Gurtman%20(2009).pdf.
Guttman, L. (1966). Order analysis of correlation matrices. In R. B. Cattell (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 438–458). New York: Rand McNally.
Guttman, L. (1968). A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points. Psychometrika, 33, 469–506.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
Kim, H. B., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Classroom environment and teacher interpersonal behavior in secondary science classes in Korea. Evaluation and Research in Education, 14, 3–22.
Kokkinos, C. M., Charalambous, K., & Davazoglou, A. (2009). Interpersonal teacher behaviour in primary school classrooms: A cross-cultural validation of a Greek translation of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Learning Environments Research, 12, 101–114.
Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: A numerical method. Psychometrika, 29(2), 115–129.
Leary, T. (1957). An interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press Company.
Lee, J. C., Yin, H., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Exploring the influences of the classroom environment and self-regulated learning in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 219–232.
Lingoes, J. C. (1973). The Guttman-Lingoes nonmetric program series. Ann Arbor: Mathesis Press.
Pennings, J. M., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2014). A nonliniear dynamical systems approach to real-time teacher behavior: Differences between teachers. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 18(1), 23–45.
Scott, R. H., & Fisher, D. L. (2004). Development, validation and application of a Malay translation of an elementary version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Research in Science Education, 34, 173–194.
Sivan, A., & Chan, D. W. K. (2013a). Teacher interpersonal behaviour and secondary students’ cognitive, affective and moral outcomes in Hong Kong. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 23–36.
Sivan, A., & Chan, D. W. K. (2013b). Teacher–student relationships and students’ learning outcomes. In S. Phillipson, K. Ku, & S. Phillipson (Eds.), Constructing educational achievement: A sociocultural perspective (pp. 136–147). London: Routledge.
Sivan, A. & Chan, D. W. K. (2014, April). A qualitative study of students’ perceptions of their teachers’ interpersonal behaviour in Hong Kong. Paper presented at 34th International Society for Teacher Education (ISfTE) Conference, Antalya, Turkey.
Sivan, A., Chan, D. W. K., & Kwan, Y. W. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (C–QTI) in Hong Kong. Psychological Reports: Measures & Statistics, 114(3), 1–20.
van Tartwijk, J., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Students’ perceptions of teacher interpersonal style: The front of the classroom as the teacher’s stage. Teaching and Teacher Education, 267, 1–11.
Wei, M., den Brok, P., & Zhou, Y. (2009). Teacher interpersonal behaviour and student achievement in English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms in China. Learning Environments Research, 12, 157–174.
Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. M. Grove & D. Cicchetti (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 89–113)., Personality and Psychopathology Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6–24.
Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Hooymayers, H. (1991). Interpersonal teacher behavior in the classroom. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 141–160). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., van Tartwijk, J., & Admiral, W. (1997). Interpersonal relationships between teachers and students in the classroom. In H. C. Waxman & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), New directions for teaching practice and research (pp. 151–170). Berkeley: McCutchan.
Wubbels, T., Creton, H., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1985). Discipline problems of beginning teachers: Interactional behavior mapped out. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC document reproduction service no. ED260040).
Wubbels, T., Creton, H. A., Levy, J., & Hooymayers, H. P. (1993). The model for interpersonal teacher behaviour. In T. Wubbels & J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like?: Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 13–28). London: Falmer Press.
Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (1991). A comparison of interpersonal behavior of Dutch and American teachers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 1–18.
Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (Eds.). (1993). Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relations in education. London: The Falmer Press.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Hong Kong Baptist University Teaching Development Grant (No. TDG/0708/IV/08). The authors would like to thank Professor Theo Wubbels for his constructive comments on the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sivan, A., Cohen, A., Chan, D.W.K. et al. The circumplex model of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction among Hong Kong students: a multidimensional scaling solution. Learning Environ Res 20, 189–198 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9230-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-017-9230-4