The evaluation of physical learning environments: a critical review of the literature
- 2.9k Downloads
This article critically reviews the methodologies and methods that have been used for the evaluation of physical learning environments. To contextualize discussion about the evaluation of learning spaces, we initially chart the development of post-occupancy evaluation (POE) for non-domestic buildings. We then discuss the recent evolution of POE into the broader evaluative framework of building performance evaluation. Subsequently, a selection of approaches used to evaluate higher education and school learning environments are compared and critically analyzed in view of contemporary approaches to teaching and learning. Gaps in these evaluative approaches are identified and an argument is put forward for the evaluation of physical learning environments from a more rigorous pedagogical perspective.
KeywordsContemporary education Evaluation Methodologies Methods Pedagogies Physical learning environment Post-occupancy evaluation
We would like to thank Professor Tom Kvan, Dean of Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning at The University of Melbourne and Director of the Learning Environments Applied Research Network (LEaRN) for commissioning this literature review. In addition, we would like to thank LEaRN partners Catholic Education Office Melbourne and Karolinska Institute, for their support. We are indebted to Associate Professor Clare Newton and LEaRN Executive Officer Alan Gilmour and for their editorial advice and general support during the writing of this article.
- Beare, H. (2000). Creating the future school. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
- CABE. (2005). Picturing school design. A visual guide to secondary school buildings and their surroundings using the Design Quality Indicator for Schools. London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.Google Scholar
- CABE. (2006). Assessing secondary school quality: Research report. London: Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment.Google Scholar
- CDE. (1978). Facilities performance profile: An instrument to evaluate school facilities. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.Google Scholar
- CERD. (2010). Learning landscapes in higher education. Lincoln: Centre for Educational Research and Development, University of Lincoln.Google Scholar
- CIC. (2011, September). Design quality indicators for schools. London: Construction Industry Council. http://www.dqi.org.uk/website/dqiforschools/default.aspa. Accessed 12/7/11.
- Clarke, H. (2001, September). Building education: The role of the physical environment in enhancing teaching and learning. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association annual conference, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
- Cleveland, B. (2009). Engaging spaces: An investigation into middle school educational opportunities provided by innovative built environments: A new approach to understanding the relationship between learning and space. The International Journal of Learning, 16, 385–397.Google Scholar
- Cleveland, B. (2011). Engaging spaces: Innovative learning environments, pedagogies and student engagement in the middle years of school. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Cohen, R., Standeven, M., Bordass, W., & Leaman, A. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process. Building Research & Information, 29(2), 85–102.Google Scholar
- Comber, C., & Wall, D. (2001). The classroom environment: A framework for learning. In C. Paechter, R. Edwards, R. Harrison, & T. Twining (Eds.), Learning, space and identity (pp. 87–101). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1966). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1971). The child and the curriculum. The school and society (11th ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Dudek, M. (2008). Schools and kindergartens—A design manual. Berlin: Birhauser.Google Scholar
- Fisher, K. (2002). Schools as ‘prisons of learning’ or, as a ‘pedagogy of architectural encounters’: A manifesto for a critical psychological spatiality of learning. Unpublished PhD thesis, Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide.Google Scholar
- Fisher, K. (2005). Linking pedagogy and space: Planning principles for Victorian schools based on the principles of teaching and learning. www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/assetman/bf/Linking_Pedagogy_and_Space.pdf. Accessed 25/8/11.
- FNI. (2011). Educational Facilities Effectiveness Instrument. Lutz, FL: Fielding Nair International. http://goodschooldesign.com/Default.aspx. Accessed 6/6/11.
- Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
- Hartnell-Young, E. (2006). Teachers’ roles and professional learning in communities of practice supported by technology in schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 461–480.Google Scholar
- HEFCE. (2006). Guide to post occupancy evaluation. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar
- Heppell, S., Chapman, C., Millwood, R., Constable, M., & Furness, J. (2004). Building learning futures. Building futures. www.buildingfutures.org.uk. Accessed 4/8/08.
- Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Wooler, P., & McCaughey, C. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review. London: The Design Council. www.design-council.org.uk. Accessed 5/4/10.
- Hirst, P. (2005). Foucault and architecture. In P. Hirst (Ed.), Space and power: Politics, war and architecture (pp. 155–178). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Hunley, S., & Schaller, M. (2006). Assessing learning spaces. In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces (pp. 1–11). Washington, DC: Educause.Google Scholar
- Jamieson, P., Dane, J., & Lippman, P. C. (2005). Moving beyond the classroom: Accommodating the changing pedagogy of higher education. Paper presented at the Forum of the Australian Association for Institutional Research. Retrieved from http://www.aair.org.au/pages/forum-2005. Accessed 11/8/11.
- JISC. (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning: A guide to 21st century learning space design. Joint Information Systems Committee Development Group. www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/learningspaces.pdf. Accessed 31/5/11.
- Joseph, J. (2003). Social theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Lackney, J. A. (1999). Assessing school facilities for learning/Assessing the impact of the physical environment on the educational process. Paper presented at the Urban Educational Facilities for the 21st Century: CEFPI North East Chapter First Annual Conference, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ.Google Scholar
- Lee, N., & Tan, S. (2011). A comprehensive learning space evaluation model. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Teaching and Learning Council.Google Scholar
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Lippman, P. C. (2007). Developing a theoretical approach for the design of learning environments. Paper presented at the Connected: International Conference of Design Education, University of New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
- Massey, D. (1999). Power geometrics and the politics of space-time: Hetter Lecture. Heidelberg: University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- McLaren, P. (2007). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Monahan, T. (2000). Built pedagogies and technology practices: Designing for participatory learning. Paper presented at the Participatory Design Conference, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
- Monahan, T. (2002). Flexible space and built pedagogy: Emerging IT embodiments. Inventio, 4(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Monahan, T. (2005). Globalization, technological change, and public education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
- Newmann, F. (1992). Higher-order thinking and prospects for classroom thoughtfulness. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 62–91). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Newton, C., & Fisher, K. (2009). Take 8, Learning spaces: The transformation of educational environments for the 21st Century. Manuka, ACT: Australian Institute of Architects.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2006). Design quality indicator for schools in the United Kingdom. PEB Exchange, 8, 1–3.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2009a). OECD Centre for Effective Learning Environments (CELE, formerly PEB). International pilot study on the evaluation of quality in educational spaces (EQES), User manual. Final version. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2009b). Evaluating quality in educational spaces: OECD/CELE pilot project. CELE Exchange, 9, 1–6.Google Scholar
- Ornstien, S. W., Moreira, N. S., Ono, R., Franca, A. J. G. L., & Nogueira, R. A. M. F. (2009). Improving the quality of school facilities through building performance assessment: Educational reform and school building quality in Sao Pauol, Brazil. Journal of Educational Administration, 47, 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pearshouse, I., Bligh, B., Brown, E., Lewthwaite, S., Graber, R., Hartnell-Young, E., et al. (2009). A study of effective models and practices for technology supported physical learning spaces (JELS). Nottingham: JISC.Google Scholar
- Powell, D. (2008). Evaluation and the pedagogy-space-technology framework. In D. Radcliffe, W. Wilson, D. Powell, & B. Tibbetts (Eds.), Learning spaces in higher education. Positive outcomes by design: Proceedings of the next generation learning spaces 2008 colloquium. St Lucia, QLD: The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
- Preiser, W. (2001). The evolution of post-occupancy evaluation: Toward building performance and universal design evaluation. In J. Vischer (Ed.), Post-occupancy evaluation: A multifaceted tool for building improvement, learning from our buildings: A state-of-the-practice summary of post-occupancy evaluation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Preiser, W. F. E. (2002). Toward universal design evaluation. Paper presented at the 17th conference international association for people-environment studies; culture, quality of life and globalization: Problems and challenges for the new millennium, Corunna, Spain.Google Scholar
- Preiser, W. F. E., & Nasar, J. L. (2008). Assessing building performance: Its evolution from post-occupancy evaluation. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), 84–99.Google Scholar
- Preiser, W. F. E., & Vischer, J. (2005). The evolution of building performance evaluation: An introduction. In W. Preiser & J. Vischer (Eds.), Assessing building performance (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Radcliffe, D. (2008). A pedagogy-space-technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. In D. Radcliffe, W. Wilson, D. Powell, & B. Tibbetts (Eds.), Learning spaces in higher education: Positive outcomes by design. St Lucia, QLD: The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
- Radcliffe, D., Wilson, W., Powell, D., & Tibbetts, B. (Eds.). (2008). Learning spaces in higher education. Positive outcomes by design: Proceedings of the next generation learning spaces 2008 colloquium. St Lucia, QLD: The University of Queensland.Google Scholar
- Sanoff, H. (2001). School building assessment methods. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.Google Scholar
- SFC. (2006). Spaces for learning: A review of learning spaces in further and higher education. Edinburgh: Scottish Funding Council.Google Scholar
- Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Stevenson, K. (2007). Educational trends shaping school planning and design: 2007. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.Google Scholar
- Tanner, C. K., & Lackney, J. A. (2006). Educational facilities planning. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Taylor, A. (2009). Linking architecture and education: Sustainable design for learning environments. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
- Temple, P. (2007). Learning spaces for the 21st century: A review of the literature. London: London Centre for Higher Education Studies, Institute of Education, University of London.Google Scholar
- Upitis, R. (2010). Raising a school: Foundations for school architecture. South Frontenac, ON: Wintergreen Studios Press.Google Scholar
- Vischer, J. (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation: A multifaceted tool for building improvement, learning from our buildings: A state-of-the-practice summary of post-occupancy evaluation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Wall, K., Dockrell, J., & Peacey, N. (2008). Primary schools: The built environment (Primary Review Research Survey 6/1). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
- Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Zhang, Y., & Barrett, P. (2010). Findings from a post-occupancy evaluation in the UK primary schools sector. Facilities, 28(13/14), 641–656.Google Scholar