Abstract
The present study was the first in Greece in which educational effectiveness theory constituted a knowledge base for investigating the impact of chemistry classroom environment in 10 Grade students’ enjoyment of class. An interpretive heuristic schema was developed and utilised in order to incorporate two factors of teacher behaviour at classroom level, namely, ‘content coverage’ and ‘cognitive teaching processes’, with the patterns of a typology of classroom environments. The latter was drawn from data collected in Attica (a region in Greece) using a new and valid instrument, the How Chemistry Class is Working, while the Enjoyment of Chemistry Lessons scale was used to measure students’ attitudes. A two-step cluster analysis revealed four patterns of the typology that were adaptable to the heuristic schema. The relationship between the patterns and students’ gender, as well the variation in the level of students’ enjoyment among the patterns, were explored. The traditional chemistry classroom environments were found to prevail and to be less enjoyable for the students, especially for the girls. It was found also that students enjoy chemistry lessons more when their goals are taken into account and they have an active role in learning process.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References
Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3, 101–134.
Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, I. T. C. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Australia and Taiwan. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 48–62.
Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, C. P., & Chen, C. C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 37–55.
Aldridge, J. M., Laugksch, C. R., Seopa, A. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2006). Development and validation of an instrument to monitor outcomes-based learning environments in science classrooms in South Africa. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 45–70.
Baumert, J., Blum, W., & Neubrand, M. (2001, May). Surveying the instructional conditions and domain-specific individual prerequisites for the development of mathematical competencies. Paper presented at the special meeting on the co-ordination of national teacher components for PISA 2003, Munich.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (Eds). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
Brislin, R. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.
Brophy, J. (2001). Generic aspects of effective teaching. In M. C. Wang & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Tomorrow’s teachers (pp. 3–15). Chicago: McCutchan Publishing Company.
Byrne, D. B., Hattie, J. A., & Fraser, B. J. (1986). Student perceptions of preferred classroom environment. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 10–18.
Creemers, B. P. M. (1994a). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
Creemers, B. P. M. (1994b). Effective instruction: An empirical basis for a theory of educational effectiveness. In D. Reynolds, et al. (Eds.), Advances in school effectiveness research and practice (pp. 189–205). Oxford: Pergamon.
Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
Creemers, B. P. M., Kyriakides, L., & Sammons, P. (2010). Methodological advances in educational effectiveness research. London: Taylor & Francis.
Creemers, P. M. B., Stoll, L., Reezigt, G., & The ESI Team. (2007). Effective school improvement: Ingredients for success: The results of an international comparative study of best practice case studies. In C. Evertson, & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 825–838). New York: Springer.
Creemers, B. P. M., & Reezigt, G. J. (1999). The role of school and classroom climate in elementary school learning environments. In H. J. Freiberg (Ed.), School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments (pp. 31–47). London: Falmer Press.
de Jong, O. (2006, August). Making chemistry meaningful: Conditions for improving context-based chemistry education. Paper based on the plenary lecture presented at the 19th ICCE, Seoul.
de Jong, R., Westerhof, K. J., & Kruiter, J. H. (2004). Empirical evidence of a comprehensive model of school effectiveness: A multilevel study in mathematics in the first year of junior general education in the Netherlands. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 3–31.
den Brok, P., Fisher, D., Richards, T., & Bull, E. (2006). Californian science students’ perceptions of their classroom learning environments. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 3–25.
Driessen, G., & Sleegers, P. (2000). Consistency of teaching approach and student achievement: An empirical test. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 57–79.
Everitt, S. B., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (1983). Validity and use of classroom environment scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 5, 261–271.
Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of science related attitudes. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fraser, B. J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research. In B. J. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences (pp. 3–27). London: Pergamon Press.
Fraser, B. J. (1994). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 451–493). New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B. J. (1998). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 527–564). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fraser, B. J. (2007). Classroom learning environments. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 103–124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1239). New York: Springer.
Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996, April). Development, validation, and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1991). Educational environments and effects: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences. Oxford: Pergamon.
Fraser, B. J., Walberg, H. J., Welch, W. W., & Hattie, J. A. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 145–252.
Giallousi, M., Gialamas, V., Spyrellis, N., & Pavlatou, A. E. (2010). Development, validation and use of a Greek-language questionnaire for assessing learning environments in grade 10 chemistry classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 761–782.
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 957–975.
Gordon, A. R. (1987). Social desirability bias: A demonstration and technique for its reduction. Teaching of Psychology, 14, 40–42.
Hartman, H. (2002). Human learning and instruction. New York: City College of City University of New York.
Haussler, P., & Hoffmann, L. (2002). An intervention study to enhance girls’ interest, self-concept, and achievement in physics classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 870–888.
Haydey, C. D., Zakaluk, L. B., & Straw, S. (2010). The changing face of content area teaching. Journal of Applied Research on Learning, 3, 1–29.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.
Knuver, A. W. M., & Brandsma, H. P. (1993). Cognitive and affective outcomes in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 189–203.
Koballa, R. T., & Glynn, Jr. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 75–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Konu, A. I., Litonen, T. P., & Autio, V. J. (2002). Evaluation of well-being in schools: A multilevel analysis of general subjective well-being. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 187–200.
Krogh, L. B., & Thomsen, P. V. (2005). Studying students’ attitudes towards science from a cultural perspective but with a quantitative methodology: Border crossing into the physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 281–302.
Krosnick, A. J., Judd, M. Ch., & Wittenbrink, B. (2005). The measurement of attitudes. In D. Albarracin, T. B. Johnson, & P. M. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 21–78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kyriakides, L. (2006). Using international comparative studies to develop a theoretical framework of educational effectiveness research: A secondary analysis of TIMSS 1999 data. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 513–534.
Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Gagatsis, A. (2000). The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers’ comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 501–529.
Kyriakides, L., & Tsangaridou, N. (2004, April). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in physical education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Kyriakydes, L. (2005). Extending the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness by an empirical investigation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(2), 103–152.
Matsagouras, I. (1999). School classroom, space, group, discipline, method. Athens: Gregory. (In Greek).
Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedures, measures, findings and policy implications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moos, H., & Trickett, J. (1987). Classroom environment scale manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London: Sage.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ogbuehi, I. P., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Learning environment, attitudes and conceptual development associated with innovative strategies in middle-school mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 10, 101–114.
Olson, J., & Platt, J. (2000). Teaching children and adolescents with special needs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Opdenakker, M. C., & Van Damme, J. (2000). Effects of schools, teaching staff and classes on achievement and well-being in secondary education: Similarities and differences between school outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 165–196.
Osborne, J. (2006, July). E-NARST. News, 49(2), 3.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College.
Owens, L., & Straton, R. (1980). The development of a cooperative, competitive, and individualized learning preference scale for students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 147–163.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.
Podsakoff, M. P., McKenzie, B. S., & Lee, J.-Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Podsakoff, M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 69–82.
Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Townsend, T., & Van Damme, J. (2011). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state of the art review. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Cyprus.
Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Raych, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Journal of Social Work Research, 27, 94–104.
Samdal, O., Wold, B., & Bronis, M. (1999). Relationship between students’ perceptions of school environment, their satisfaction with school and perceived academic achievement: an international study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 296–320.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.
Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77, 454–499.
Skordoulis, C., & Sotirakou, L. (2005). Environment, science and education. Athens: Leader Books.
Taylor, P. C., & Campbell-Williams, M. (1993). Discourse toward balanced rationality in the high school mathematics classroom: Ideas from Habermas’s critical theory. In J. A. Malone, & P. C. S. Taylor (Eds.), Constructivist interpretations of teaching and learning mathematics. Proceeding of topic group 10 at the seventh international congress on mathematical education, pp. 135–148. Perth, Western Australia: Curtin University of Technology.
Taylor, P. C., Dawson, V., & Fraser, B. J. (1995a, April). Classroom learning environments under transformation: A constructivist perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Taylor, P. C., Dawson, V., & Fraser, B. J. (1995b). A constructivist perspective on monitoring learning environments under transformation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293–302.
Teddlie, C. (1994). The integration of classroom and school process data in school effectiveness research. In D. Reynolds, et al. (Eds.), Advances in school effectiveness research and practice (pp. 111–133). Oxford: Pergamon.
Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.
Teddlie, C., & Sammons, P. (2010). Applications of mixed methods to the field of educational effectiveness research. In B. P. M. Creemers, L. Kyriakides, & P. Sammons (Eds.), Methodological advances in educational effectiveness research (pp. 115–152). London: Taylor Francis.
Tobin, K., Tippins, J. D., & Gallard, J. A. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 45–93). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Tsaparlis, G. (2008). The rivalry among the separate science subjects for dominance in secondary education: The case of Greece and beyond. In R. K. Coll & N. Taylor (Eds.), Science education in context: An international examination of the influence of the context on science curricula development and implementation (pp. 145–159). Rotterdam: Sense.
Vamvakeros, X., Pavlatou, A. E., & Spyrellis, N. (2010). Survey exploring views of scientists on current trends in chemistry education. Science & Education, 19, 119–145.
van de Gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2006). Tracking and the effects of school-related attitudes on the language achievement of boys and girls. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 293–309.
Varelas, M., et al. (2005). Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities. Science Teacher Education. Retrieved from http://www.interscience.wiley.com.
Walberg, H. J. (1983). Scientific literacy and economic productivity in international perspective. Daedalus, 112, 1–28.
Wheldall, K., & Glynn, T. (1989). Effective classroom learning: A behavioural interactionist approach to teaching. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1–26.
Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artefact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 462–468.
Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., & van Tartwijk, J. (2006). An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In C. Evertson & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 1161–1191). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wubbels, Th., & Levy, J. (Eds.). (1993). Do you know what you look like: Interpersonal relationships in education. London: Falmer Press.
Zounhia, K., Kostas, E., Kossiva, I., & Hatziharistos, D. (2002). Perceived effectiveness of Greek secondary school teachers. European Journal of Physical Education, 7, 19–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Giallousi, M., Gialamas, V. & Pavlatou, E.A. A typology of chemistry classroom environments: Exploring the relationships between 10th grade students’ perceptions, attitudes and gender. Learning Environ Res 16, 349–366 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9133-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9133-y
Keywords
- Attitudes
- Chemistry
- Classroom environment
- Educational effectiveness
- Heuristic schema
- Secondary education