This study reports on children’s observed responses to natural features introduced in the redevelopment of a childcare centre garden. Using an action research approach, the redevelopment was based on the preferences of the director, staff and 18 three- to four-year-olds, as expressed through interviews, conversations, photographs and drawings. Adults and children overwhelmingly preferred natural elements. The kindergarten teacher and assistant observed children’s responses to the implementation of features including a teepee, mulch, greenery, flowers, and loose organic materials. In follow-up interviews, they reported positive child responses including: richer imaginative play; increased physical activity; calmer, more focused play; and positive social interactions. These findings provide further evidence of the importance of providing children with naturalized outdoor play spaces.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bilton, H. (2005). Learning outdoors: Improving the quality of young children’s play outdoors. London: David Fulton.
Casey, T. (2007). Environments for outdoor play: A practical guide to making space for children. London: Sage.
Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2005). Spaces to play: More listening to young children using the Mosaic approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.
Crook, S. (2005). Just improvise! Innovative play experiences for children under eight. Melbourne: Tertiary Press.
Curtis, D., & Carter, M. (2003). Designs for living and learning. St Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
Elliot, S., & Davis, J. (2008). Why natural outdoor playspaces. In S. Elliot (Ed.), The outdoor playspace naturally for children birth to five years (pp. 1–14). Castle Hill, NSW: Pademelon Press.
Fjortoft, I. (2001). The natural environment as a playground for children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 111–117.
Fjortoft, I., & Sageie, J. (2000). The natural environment as a playground for children: Landscape description and analysis of a natural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48(1–2), 83–97.
Franklin, M. B. (2008). Words in play: Children’s use of language in pretend. In E. Goodenough (Ed.), A place for play. A companion volume to the Michigan television film “Where do the children play?”.
Goodenough, E. (2008). Foreward. In E. Goodenough (Ed.), A place for play. A companion volume to the Michigan television film “Where do the children play” (pp. 65–83). Michigan: The National Institute for Play.
Grahn, P., Martensson, F., Linblad, B., Nilsson, P., & Ekeman, A. (1997). Outdoors at day-care. City and Country, 145, 20–27.
Greenfield, C. (2004). Can run, play on bikes, jump the zoom slide, and play on swings: Exploring the value of outdoor play. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 29, 1–5.
Heft, H. (1988). Affordances of children’s environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5, 29–37.
Herrington, S., & Studtmann, K. (1998). Landscape interventions: New directions for the design of children’s outdoor play environments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42(2–4), 191–205.
Hofferth, S. L. (2008). American children’s outdoor and indoor leisure time. In E. Goodenough (Ed.), A place for play. A companion volume to the Michigan television film “Where do the children play? (pp. 41–44). The National Institute for Play.
Holly, M. L., Arhar, J., & Kasten, W. (2005). Action research for teachers: Traveling the yellow brick road. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Kellert, S. R. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human nature connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University.
Kirkby, M. A. (1989). Nature as refuge in children’s environments. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 6, 7–12.
Lambert, E. B. (2006). The outdoor learning environment: contextualised research. In E. B. Lambert (Ed.), Introducing research to early childhood students (pp. 31–61). South Melbourne, Vic: Thomson.
Little, H., & Wyver, S. (2008). Outdoor play: Does avoiding the risks reduce the benefits? Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(2), 33–40.
Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.
MacDonald, A. (2009). Drawing stories: The power of children’s drawings to communicate the lived experience of starting school. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(3), 40–49.
Moore, R. C., & Wong, H. H. (1997). Natural learning: Creating environments for rediscovering nature’s way of teaching. Berkeley, CA: MIG Communications.
Perry, J. P. (2008). Children’s experience of security and mastery on the playground. In E. Goodenough (Ed.), A place for play. A companion volume to the Michigan Television film “Where do the children play”. The National Institute for Play.
Richardson, G. R. (2008). Creating a space to grow: Developing your outdoor learning environment. London: David Fulton.
Rivkin, M. S. (1995). The great outdoors: Restoring children’s right to play outside. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Tarr, K. (2008). Enhancing environmental awareness through the arts. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 33, 19–26.
Taylor, A. F., Wiley, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (1998). Growing up in the inner city: Green spaces as places to grow. Environment and Behaviour, 30(1), 3–27.
Titman, W. (1994). Special places: Special people: The hidden curriculum of school grounds. Toronto: Green Brick Road.
Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behaviour, 32, 311–330.
Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: a buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behaviour, 35, 311–330.
White, R. (2001). Moving from biophobia to biophilia: developmentally appropriate environmental education for children. Retrieved from http://www.whitehutchinson.com/children/articles/biophilia.shtml. Accessed 11 February 2013.
White, R. (2004). Young children’s relationship with nature: Its importance to children’s development and the earth’s future. Retrieved from http://www.whitehutchinson.com/children/articles/childrennature.shtml. Accessed 11 February 2013.
White, R., & Stoecklin, V. (2008). Children’s outdoor play and learning: returning to nature. Retrieved from http://www.whitehutchinson.com/children/articles/outdoor.shtml. Accessed 11 February 2013.
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Young, T. (2008). Creating specific features to foster nature connections. In S. Elliot (Ed.), The outdoor playspace naturally for children birth to five years (pp. 44–74). Castle Hill, NSW: Pademelon Press.
Appendix: Open-ended questions for staff
Appendix: Open-ended questions for staff
Based on your observations of the children, what specific types of play do you think the teepee is fostering? For example, imaginative play, gross motor play, etc. In what ways is this happening?
Have you noticed any positive changes in the children’s play/learning/discovery since the teepee was built? Consider the ways children played in that area of the garden before the teepee was implemented, as compared to the ways they are playing there now.
Have you noticed any negative changes in the children’s play or learning since the teepee was built? Please explain.
Did the children respond to the implementation of the teepee in ways that you expected, or did their responses come as a surprise to you? Please explain.
How do you personally feel about the new teepee being in your teaching environment? This extends beyond your observations of the children playing with the teepee to consider your personal feelings about having a structure like this in your teaching environment. Consider how you felt about the structure being implemented before it was there in relation to how you feel about it now. Have your feelings changed or remained the same?
Do you think that, in the future, the teepee should be modified or changed in some way (apart from the inevitable repairs needed over time for wear-and-tear or damage caused by wind and rain).
The concrete path
What do you think of the garden now that the long part of the concrete path has been removed? In answering this question, consider your personal views and values about what constitutes a high quality garden for children.
Have you noticed any positive changes in the children’s play or play-based behaviours since the path was shortened and replaced with mulch? Please explain.
Have you noticed any negative changes in the children’s play or play-based behaviours since the path was shortened and replaced with mulch? Please explain.
Do you feel that the removal of the path benefits or hinders the children’s opportunities for play? Consider whether you would prefer the children to play on a concrete surface or mulch surface.
In which ways, if any, has the children’s play changed or developed since the removal of the concrete? In answering this question, consider the different categories or ‘types’ of play.
Have the children’s responses to the removal of the concrete path surprised or intrigued you in any way?
Considering your personal beliefs about what constitutes a rich outdoor learning environment for children, how do you feel about the new blackboard wall?
Based on your observations, how have the children as a group been interacting with the new blackboard?
Were you expecting the children to respond to the black board in this way, or did their responses surprise or intrigue you in some ways?
What do you think are some of the benefits of having this fixed art space/blackboard in the garden?
From time to time, blackboards and similar art-based boards have been used in the indoor learning environment. Do you feel the ways children interact in this learning experience is different or the same as they would indoors?
Do you feel there are any long-term benefits for the children of being provided the opportunity to make marks on the blackboard outside? Please explain, relating your response to the fact that the blackboard in outside, not inside.
How have the children responded to the new mirrors in the garden? Consider their behaviours in relation to the mirrors.
Do you think the mirrors hold any benefits for the children? In writing your answer, consider the fact that the mirrors in this case are outside not inside, i.e. do the mirrors complement the naturalistic, outdoor setting? Please explain.
Did the children respond to the mirrors in ways you thought they would, or did their responses surprise or intrigue you? Please explain.
Do you feel there are any negative aspects of the mirrors?
The sound makers
Based on your observations of the children at play, how have they responded to the new sound makers?
Now that the sound makers have been put in place, are you pleased that they were implemented or would you rather that the idea had been abandoned or that the structure had been implemented differently?
Based on your observations of the children playing with the sound makers, what do you feel are the benefits of this for the children in their learning or discovery.
Did the children respond to the sound makers in ways you had expected, or did their responses surprise or intrigue you?
How have the children responded to the new green plantings around the garden? Consider your observations of the children’s play and discovery.
Did the children respond to the plantings in ways you had expected they would, or did their responses surprise or intrigue you? Please explain.
In the future as the plantings grow and the garden becomes even greener, what do you feel will be some of the benefits or negatives of this for children.
In retrospect, do you feel the plantings could have been implemented differently to provide greater opportunities for the children?
Based on your observations of the children at play, how did they respond to the new flower plantings?
Did the children respond to the new flower plantings in ways you had expected, or did their responses surprise or intrigue you? Please explain.
Based on your observations of the children at play, what do you feel are some of the benefits of the new flowers?
In retrospect, do you feel the flowers could have been implemented differently to provide greater opportunities for the children?
Natural loose parts
How have the children responded to the new loose parts (wood stumps, rocks, pebbles, thick tree branch off-cuts, gum nuts, pine cones) in terms of the types of play they have been engaging in, i.e. have the loose parts enhanced a specific type of play in any way?
Did the children’s responses to the natural loose parts surprise or intrigue you in any way? Please explain.
Based on your observations of the children at play, do you feel that the children benefited by being provided a range of natural loose parts? Please explain.
About this article
Cite this article
Nedovic, S., Morrissey, AM. Calm active and focused: Children’s responses to an organic outdoor learning environment. Learning Environ Res 16, 281–295 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9127-9
- Early childhood
- Natural and organic learning environments
- Outdoor play spaces