Abstract
This study examined emotional climate in relation to the teaching and learning of grade 7 science. A multi-method and multi-theoretic approach used sociocultural frameworks as a foundation for interpretive research, conversation analysis, prosody analysis, and studies of nonverbal conduct. Emotional climate varied continuously throughout a lesson. Dialogues occurred and afforded learning when interactions between the teacher and students were fluent and included humour and collective effervescence. Emotional climate was negatively valenced when the teacher and/or students endeavoured to establish and maintain power by restricting others’ participation to spectator roles. The teacher’s endeavours to maintain and establish control over students were potentially detrimental to teaching and learning, teachers and learners. This type of teaching gradually evolved into a form we referred to as cranky teaching, whereby the teacher and her students showed signs of frustration and the enacted teaching and learning roles lacked fluency. The methods we pioneered in the present study might be helpful for other teachers who wish to participate in research on their classes to ascertain what works and should be strengthened, and identify practices and rituals that are deleterious and in need of change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakhtin, M. (1988). Rabelais and his world (trans: Iswolsky, H.). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Becker, R. R. (2000). The critical role of students’ questions in literacy development. The Educational Forum, 64, 261–271.
Berman Brown, R., & Brooks, I. (2002). Emotion at work. Identifying the emotional climate of night nursing. Journal of Management in Medicine, 16, 327–344.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Davis, J. M. (2007). Taking the mickey. The Fine Print, 4, 20–27. http://www.emendediting.com/html/ezine/issue4/PDFs/TFP4links.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2010.
Dewey, J. (1895). The theory of emotion II: The significance of emotions. Psychological Review, 2, 13–32.
Durkheim, E. (1995/1912). The elementary forms of religious life (trans: Fields, K.E.). New York: Free Press.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
Fraser, B. J. (2009). Science classroom learning environments. In S. M. Ritchie (Ed.). The world of science education: Handbook of research in Australia (Vol. 2, pp. 117–135). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.
Grining, C. L., Raver, C. C., Champion, K., Sardin, L., Metzger, M., & Jones, S. M. (2010). Understanding and improving classroom emotional climate and behavior management in the “real world”: The role of head start teachers’ psychosocial stressors. Early Education & Development, 21, 65–94.
Harrigan, J., Rosenthal, R., & Scherer, K. R. (Eds.). (2005). The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kaberman, Z., & Dori, Y. J. (2009). Metacognition in chemical education: Question posing in the case-based computerized learning environment. Instructional Science, 37, 403–436.
Kanyangara, P., Rime, B., Philippot, P., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Collective rituals, emotional climate and intergroup perception: Participation in “Gacaca” tribunals and assimilation of the Rwandan genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 387–403.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Madison, G. (1988). The hermeneutics of postmodernity: Figures and themes. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Olitsky, S. (2007). Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 33–56.
Sewell, W. H., Jr. (2005). Logics of history: Social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Szczepek Reed, B. (2006). Prosodic orientation in English conversation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thomas, G. P. (2003). Conceptualization, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the metacognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments: The metacognitive orientation learning environment scale–Science (MOLES-S). Learning Environments Research, 6, 175–197.
Tobin, K. (2006). Qualitative research in classrooms: Pushing the boundaries of theory and methodology. In K. Tobin & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Doing educational research: A handbook (pp. 15–59). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Teaching to learn: A view from the field. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Turner, J. H. (2002). Face to face: Toward a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
Turner, J. H. (2007). Human emotions: A sociological theory. New York: Routledge.
Acknowledgments
The Australian Research Council Discovery Grant, DP0984394, administered by the Queensland University of Technology, funded the research reported in this study. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tobin, K., Ritchie, S.M., Oakley, J.L. et al. Relationships between emotional climate and the fluency of classroom interactions. Learning Environ Res 16, 71–89 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9125-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9125-y