Abstract
It has been argued by both educationalists and social researchers that visual methods are particularly appropriate for the investigation of people’s experiences of the school environment. The current and expected building work taking place in British schools provides an opportunity for exploration of methods, as well as a need to establish ways to achieve this involvement of a range of school users, including students. This article describes a consultation that was undertaken in a UK secondary school as part of a participatory design process centred on the rebuilding of the school. A range of visual methods, based on photographs and maps, was used to investigate the views of a diverse sample of school users, including students, teachers, technical and support staff and the wider community. Reported here is the experience of using these tools, considering the success of different visually-based methods in engaging a broad cross section of the school community and revealing useful information. Using a range of visual methods allows a complex, but coherent, understanding of the particular school environment to be constructed and developed. It is further argued that such a range of visual and spatial methods is needed to develop appropriate understanding. The study, therefore, contributes to knowledge about specific visual research methods, appreciation of the relationship between tools, and a general methodological understanding of visual methods’ utility for developing understanding of the learning environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage.
Baumfield, V., Hall, E., Higgins, S., & Wall, K. (2007, August). Catalytic tools: Understanding the interaction of enquiry and feedback in teachers’ learning. Paper presented at EARLI Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
Bennett, N., Andreae, J., Hegarty, P., & Wade, B. (1980). Open plan schools. Windsor, UK: Schools Council Publishing/NFER.
Blundell Jones, P., Petrescu, D., & Till, J. (Eds.). (2005). Architecture and participation. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, UK/New York: Spon Press.
Burke, C. (2007). The view of the child: Releasing “visual voices” in the design of learning environments. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28, 359–372.
Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2003). The school I’d like. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Clark, A. (2005). Talking and listening to children. In M. Dudek (Ed.), Children’s spaces (pp. 1–13). Oxford, UK: Elsevier/Architectural Press.
Clark, J. (2004). Participatory research with children and young people: Philosophy, possibilities and perils. Action Research Expeditions, 4, 1–18.
Cohen, S., & Trostle, S. L. (1990). Young children’s preferences for school related physical-environmental setting characteristics. Environment and Behavior, 22, 753–766.
Collier, M. (2001). Approaches to analysis in visual anthropology. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 35–60). London: Sage.
Commission for the Built Environment (CABE). (2006). Assessing secondary school design quality. London: Commission for the Built Environment (CABE).
Curtis, E. (2003). School builders. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Department for Education and Employment [DfEE]. (2001). Framework for teaching mathematics: Years 7, 8 and 9. London: Author. Accessed 1 November 2007, from http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/secondary/keystage3/respub/mathsframework/foreword/.
Department for Education and Skills [DfES]. (2002). Schools for the future: Designs for learning communities building bulletin 95. London: Stationery Office.
Dewey, J. (1938/1991). Logic, the theory of enquiry. The later works of John Dewey (Vol. 12, J. A. Boydston, Ed.). Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dudek, M. (2000). Architecture of schools. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
Durán-Narucki, V. (2008). School building condition, school attendance, and academic achievement in New York City public schools: A mediation model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 278–286.
Estyn. (2007). An evaluation of performance of schools before and after moving into new buildings or significantly refurbished premises. Cardiff, Wales: Estyn.
Evans, G. W., & Stecker, R. (2004). Motivational consequences of environmental stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 143–165.
Flutter, J. (2006). ‘This place could help you learn’: Student participation in creating better learning environments. Educational Review, 58, 183–193.
Hallam, S. (1996). Improving school attendance. Oxford, UK: Heinemann Educational.
Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
Hart, R. A. (1979). Children’s experience of place. New York: Irvington.
Hartnell-Young, E., & Fisher, T. (2007). Circling the Square; six activities for listening to teachers and students. Nottingham, UK: Learning Sciences Research Institute and School of Education, University of Nottingham.
Heppell, S., Chapman, C., Millwood, R., Constable, M., & Furness, J. (2004). Building learning futures: A research project at Ultralab within the CABE/RIBA “Building Futures” programme. Chelmsford, UK: Ultralab. Accessed on 3 December 2009, from http://rubble.heppell.net/cabe/final_report.pdf.
Hickman, L. (1990). John Dewey’s pragmatic technology. Bloomington, IN: University Press.
Horne-Martin, S. (2002). The classroom environment and its effects on the practice of teachers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 139–156.
Hunt, E. (1994). Theoretical models for the study of intelligence. In D. K. Detterman (Ed.), Current topics in human intelligence (Vol. 4, pp. 233–256). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. London: Basic Books.
Könings, K. D., Van Zundert, M. J., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Participatory design in secondary education: Is it a good idea? Students’ and teachers’ opinions on its desirability and feasibility. Educational Studies, 33, 445–465.
Koralek, B., & Mitchell, M. (2005). The schools we’d like: Young people’s participation in architecture. In M. Dudek (Ed.), Children’s spaces (pp. 114–153). Oxford, UK: Elsevier/Architectural Press.
Kumar, R., O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2008). Association between physical environment of secondary schools and student problem behaviour. Environment and Behavior, 40(4), 455–486.
Lodge, C. (2007). Regarding learning: Children’s drawings of learning in the classroom. Learning Environments Research, 10, 145–156.
Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going relational: Why “listening to children” and children’s participation needs reframing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28, 405–420.
Maxwell, L. E. (2000). A safe and welcoming school: What students, teachers, and parents think. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17, 271–282.
Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ornstein, S. W. (1997). Postoccupancy evaluation performed in elementary and high schools of Greater Sao Paulo, Brazil. The occupants and the quality of the school environment. Environment and Behavior, 29, 236–263.
Prosser, J. (Ed.). (1998). Image-based research. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Prosser, J. (2007). Visual methods and the visual culture of schools. Visual Studies, 22(1), 13–30.
Richardson, T., & Connelly, S. (2005). Reinventing public participation: Planning in the age of concensus. In P. Blundell Jones, D. Petrescu, & J. Till (Eds.), Architecture and participation (pp. 87–110). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, UK/New York: Spon Press.
Rivlin, L. G., & Rothenberg, M. (1976). The use of space in open classrooms. In H. M. Proshansky, W. H. Ittelson, & L. G. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental psychology: People and their physical settings (pp. 479–489). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Rockett, M., & Percival, S. (2002). Thinking for learning. Stafford, UK: Network Educational Press.
Rudd, P., Reed, F., & Smith, P. (2008). The effects of the school environment on young people’s attitudes to education and learning. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Weinstein, C. S. (1979). The physical environment of the school: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 49, 577–610.
Woolner, P., Hall, E., Higgins, S., McCaughey, C., & Wall, K. (2007a). A sound foundation? What we know about the impact of environments on learning and the implications for building schools for the future. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 47–70.
Woolner, P., Hall, E., Wall, K., & Dennison, D. (2007b). Getting together to improve the school environment: User consultation, participatory design and student voice. Improving Schools, 10, 233–248.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woolner, P., Clark, J., Hall, E. et al. Pictures are necessary but not sufficient: Using a range of visual methods to engage users about school design. Learning Environ Res 13, 1–22 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-009-9067-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-009-9067-6