Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulating the response of a threatened amphibian to climate-induced reductions in breeding habitat

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Amphibians are declining worldwide due to disease, invasive species, and habitat loss. Climate change may exacerbate habitat loss by altering the availability or suitability of aquatic breeding habitat through changes in precipitation, temperature, and the biophysical factors they influence. Measuring biological vital rates and the environmental covariates that affect them are crucial to understanding amphibian responses to a changing climate. However, doing so can be difficult due to access constraints, funding limitations, and difficulty of measuring spatially structured populations at landscape scales. Simulation-based approaches may provide reliable approximations of amphibian responses to changing environmental conditions.

Objectives

In this study, we constructed a spatially explicit individual based model to simulate the response of the Arizona treefrog (Hyla wrightorum), a species of conservation concern, to reductions in breeding habitat availability. The Arizona treefrog metapopulation in the Huachuca Mountains and Canelo Hills of Arizona is known to breed at fewer than 20 breeding ponds that may become unsuitable due to climate change-induced shifts in hydroperiod, increased rates of invasion by non-native predators, or filling by sedimentation.

Methods

We simulated Arizona treefrog response to bioclimatically realistic scenarios that included reduced breeding habitat availability, failed recruitment, and a combination of both. Simulations included variable landscape configuration through space and time that were informed by an empirical hydroperiod dataset.

Results

We found that climate-driven reductions in breeding habitat alone resulted in mean population declines of nearly 65%, even when reductions targeted the ponds least likely to fill with water. However, scenarios with concurrent breeding habitat loss and recruitment failure or very high recruitment failure resulted in 79% and 83% population declines, respectively. Reduced breeding habitat also increased spatial synchrony of occupancy through time and among simulations, pointing to a potential transition from a metapopulation to multiple isolated populations.

Conclusions

In the face of anthropogenically driven climate change and continually emerging management challenges, individual-based models provide a useful, mechanistic tool to explore how a combination of biological and environmental factors may interact to influence the future of species of conservation concern. We found evidence of a potential transition to isolated populations that may lead to limited functional connectivity and an increased risk of regional extinction for this species of conservation concern. Sensitivity analyses suggest our model was robust to uncertainty in model parameters and point to the critical role of dispersal in maintaining demographic and landscape connectivity among spatiotemporally heterogeneous habitat. A spatially explicit approach also enabled identification of specific habitat patches that may be less sensitive to climate change as well as those that may require more intensive management to conserve key populations or preserve metapopulation dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen D, Yi Y, Borzée A, Kim K, Moon K-S, Kim J-J, Jang Y (2021) Use of a spatially explicit individual-based model to predict population trajectories and habitat connectivity for a reintroduced ursid. Oryx, 56(2):298–307.

  • Arizona Game and Fish Department (2012) Arizona’s state wildlife action plan: 2012-2022. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Phoenix

  • Becker FS, Tolley KA, Measey GJ, Altwegg R (2018) Extreme climate-induced life-history plasticity in an Amphibian. Am Nat 191(2):250–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertassello LE, Jawitz JW, Bertuzzo E, Botter G, Rinaldo A, Rao PSC (2022) Persistence of amphibian metapopulation occupancy in dynamic wetlandscapes. Landsc Ecol 37:695–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Walls SC, Bancroft BA, Lawler JJ, Searle CL, Gervasi SS (2010) Direct and indirect effects of climate change on amphibian populations. Diversity 2:281–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa P, Schumaker NH, Brandon KR, Bager A, Grilo C (2019) Simulating the consequences of roads for wildlife population dynamics. Landsc Urban Plan 193:103672.

  • Bradford DF, Jaeger JR, Shanahan SA (2005) Distributional changes and population status of amphibians in the eastern Mojave Desert. Western North American Naturalist 65(4):462–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley GA, Rosen PC, Sredl MJ, Jones TR, Longcore JE (2002) Chytridiomycosis in native Arizona frogs. J Wildl Dis 38:206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brannelly LA, Ohmer MEB, Saenz V, Richards-Zawacki CL (2019) Effects of hydroperiod on growth, development, survival, and immune defense in a temperate amphibian. Funct Ecol 33(10):1952–1961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks GC, Smith JA, Frimpong EA, Gorman TA, Chandler HC, Hass CA (2019) Indirect connectivity estimates of amphibian breeding wetlands from spatially explicit occupancy models. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 29:1815–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton EC, Gray MJ, Schmutzer AC, Miller DL (2009) Differential responses of postmetamorphic amphibians to cattle grazing in wetlands. J Wildl Manag 73:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayuela H, Valenzuela-Sanchez A, Teulier L, Martinez-Salano I, Lena J-P, Schmidt BR (2020) Determinants and consequences of dispersal in vertebrates with complex life cycles: a review of pond-breeding amphibians. Q Rev Biol 95:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan LM, Zamudio KR (2009) Population differentiation of temperate amphibians in unpredictable environments. Mol Ecol 18:3185–3200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapel, W. L. 1939. Field notes on Hyla wrightorum (Taylor). Copeia, 225–227.

  • Cohen JM, Civitello DJ, Venesky MD, McMahon TA, Rohr JR (2019) An Interaction between climate change and infectious disease drove widespread amphibian declines. Glob Chang Biol 25:927–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coster SS, Veysey Powell JS, Babbitt KJ (2014) Characterizing the width of amphibian movements during postbreeding migration. Conserv Biol 28:756–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM (2005) Individual-based modeling of ecological and evolutionary processes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degenhardt WG, Painter CW, Price AH (2005) Amphibians and reptiles of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennison PE, Brewer SC, Arnold JD, Moritz MA (2014) Large wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984–2011. Geophys Res Lett 41:2928–2933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JC, Griffis-Kyle KL, McIntyre NE (2017a) Graph theory as an invasive species management tool: case study in the Sonoran Desert. Landsc Ecol 32:1739–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JC, Griffis-Kyle KL, McIntyre NE (2017b) Using nested connectivity models to resolve management conflicts of isolated water networks in the Sonoran Desert. Ecosphere 8:e01652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake J, Lambin X, Sutherland C (2021) The value of considering demographic contributions to connectivity: a review. Ecography 44:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE (1970) The hylid frogs of Middle America. Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas.

  • Elias E, Rango A, Smith R, Maxwell C, Steele C, Havstad K (2016) Climate change, agriculture and water resources in the southwestern United States. J Contemp Water Res Educ 158:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fordham DA, Shoemaker KT, Schumaker NH, Reşit Akçakaya H, Clisby N, Brook BW (2014) How interactions between animal movement and landscape processes modify local range dynamics and extinction risk. Biol Lett 10:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau KL, Buxton VL, Moore CE, Mims MC (2021) Temperature loggers capture intraregional variation of inundation timing for intermittent ponds. Water Resour Res 57(11):e2021WR029958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergus EWA (1999) Geographic variation in hylid frogs of southwestern North America: taxonomic and population genetic implications. Ph.D. Dissertation. Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

  • Gervasi S, Foufopoulos J (2007) Costs of plasticity: responses to desiccation decrease post-metamorphic immune function in a pond-breeding amphibian. Funct Ecol 22(1):100–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant EHC, Miller DAW, Muths E (2020) A synthesis of evidence of drivers of amphibian declines. Herpetologica 76(2):101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant EHC, Miller DAW, Schmidt BR, Adams MJ, Amburgey SM, Chambert T, Muths E (2016) Quantitative evidence or the effects of multiple drivers on continental-scale amphibian declines. Sci Rep 6:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffis-Kyle KL, Kovatch JJ, Bradatan C (2014) Water quality: a hidden danger in anthropogenic desert catchments. Wildl Soc Bull 38:148–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale J, Mims MC, Bogan MT, Olden JD (2015) Links between two interacting factors—novel habitats and non-native predators—and aquatic invertebrate communities in a dryland environment. Hydrobiologia 746:313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs JA, Lawler JJ, Schumaker NH (2018) A multi-species test of source-sink indicators to prioritize habitat for declining populations. Conserv Biol 32:648–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hocking DJ, Babbitt KJ (2014) Amphibian contributions to ecosystem services. Herpetol Conserv Biol 9(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden ZA, Swanson A, Luce CH, Jolly WM, Maneta M, Oyler JW, Warren DA, Parsons R, Affleck D (2018) Decreasing fire season precipitation increased recent western US forest wildfire activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115(36):E8349–E8357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hossack BR, Lemos-Espinal JA, Sigafus BH, Muths E, Arroyo GC, Martinez DT, Félix DH, Padilla GM, Goldberg CS, Jones TR, Sredl MJ, Chambert T, Rorabaugh JC (2021) Distribution of tiger salamanders in northern Sonora, Mexico: comparison of sampling methods and possible implications for an endangered subspecies. Amphibia-Reptilia 42(2021):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossack BR, Pilliod DS (2011) Amphibian responses to wildfire in the western United States: emerging patterns from short-term studies. Fire Ecol 7:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell PE, Muths E, Hossack BR, Sigafus BH, Chandler RB (2018) Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology. Ecology 99:1119–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings MR, Hayes MP (1994) The decline of native ranid frogs in the desert southwest. In: Brown PR, Wright JW (eds) Herpetology of the North American Deserts: Proceedings of a Symposium (pp 183–211). Special publication No. 5. Van Nuys, CA: Southwestern Herpetologists Society.

  • Jaeger KL, Olden JD, Pelland NA (2014) Climate change poised to threaten hydrologic connectivity in dryland streams. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:13894–13899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JR, Knouft JH, Semlitsch RD (2007) Sex and seasonal differences in the spatial terrestrial distribution of gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) populations. Biol Conserv 140:250–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joly P (2019) Behavior in a changing landscape: using movement ecology to inform the conservation of pond-breeding amphibians. Front Ecol Evol 7:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TR, Timmons RJ (2010) Hyla wrightorum (Arizona treefrog): predation. Herpetol Rev 41:473–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer DC (1973) Movements of western chorus frogs, Pseudacris triseriata triseriata tagged with CO60. J Herpetol 7:231–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantyka-Pringle CS, Martin TG, Rhodes JR (2012) Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 18:1239–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marra PP, Cohen EB, Loss SR, Rutter JE, Tonra CM (2015) A call for full annual cycle research in animal ecology. Biol Let 11:2015552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall RM, Robles MD, Majka DR, Haney JA (2010) Sustainable water management in the southwestern United States: reality or rhetoric? PLoS ONE 5:e11687

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meixner T, Manning AH, Stonestrom DA, Allen DM, Ajami H, Walvoord MA (2016) Implications of projected climate change for groundwater recharge in the western United States. J Hydrol 534:124–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller OL, Putman AL, Alder J, Miller M, Jones DK, Wise DR (2021) Changing climate drives future streamflow declines and challenges in meeting water demand across the southwestern United States. J Hydrol 11:100074

    Google Scholar 

  • Mims MC, Phillipsen IC, Lytle DA, Hartfield Kirk EE, Olden JD (2015) Ecological strategies predict associations between aquatic and genetic connectivity for dryland amphibians. Ecology 96:1371–1382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mims MC, Hauser L, Goldberg CS, Olden JD (2016) Genetic differentiation, isolation-by-distance, and indications of a metapopulation of the Arizona treefrog (Hyla wrightorum) in an isolated portion of its range. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0160655

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mims MC, Moore CE, Shadle EJ (2020) Threats to aquatic taxa in an arid landscape: knowledge gaps and areas of understanding for amphibians of the American Southwest. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 7:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss WE, McDevitt-Galles T, Muths E, Bobzien S, Purificato J, Johnson PTJ (2021) Resilience of native amphibian communities following catastrophic drought: evidence from a decade of regional-scale monitoring. Biol Conserv 263:109352

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy MA, Evans JS, Storfer A (2010) Quantifying Bufo boreas connectivity in Yellowstone National Park with landscape genetics. Ecology 91:252–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muths E, Bailey LL, Lambert BA, Schneider SC (2018) Estimating the probability of movement and partitioning seasonal survival in an amphibian metapopulation. Ecosphere, 9(10):e02480.

  • Parsley MB, Torres ML, Banerjee SM, Tobias ZJC, Goldberg CS, Murphy MA, Mims MC (2020) Multiple lines of genetic inquiry reveal effects of local and landscape factors on an amphibian metapopulation. Landsc Ecol 35:319–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendergrass AG, Knutti R, Lehner F, Deser C, Sanderson BM (2017) Precipitation variability increases in a warmer climate. Sci Rep 7:17966

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pounds JA, Bustamante MR, Coloma LA, Consuegra JA, Fogden MPL, Young BE (2006) Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature 439:161–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rosen PC, Schwalbe CR (1998) Using managed waters for conservation of threatened frogs. In: Environmental, economic, and legal issues related to rangeland water developments. Arizona State University, College of Law, Tempe, AZ

  • Schmutzer AC, Gray MJ, Burton EC, Miller DL (2008) Impacts of cattle on amphibian larvae and the aquatic environment. Freshw Biol 53:2613–2625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumaker NH (2015) Version 3.2.2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. http://www.hexsim.net

  • Schumaker NH, Brookes A (2018) HexSim: a modeling environment for ecology and conservation. Landsc Ecol 33:197–211

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scroggie MP, Preece K, Nicholson E, McCarthy MA, Parris KM, Heard GW (2019) Optimizing habitat management for amphibibians: From simple models to complex decisions. Biol Conserv 236:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seager R, Ting M, Li C, Naik N, Nakamura J, Liu H (2013) Projections of declining surface-water availability for the southwestern United States. Nat Clim Chang 3:482–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28(1):110–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi NS, Bickford D, Diesmos AC, Lee TM, Koh LP, Bradshaw CJ (2008) Measuring the meltdown: drivers of global amphibian extinction and decline. PLoS ONE 3:e1636

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sredl MJ, Collins JP (1992) The interaction of predation, competition, and habitat complexity in structuring an amphibian community. Copeia 1992:607–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins RC (2003) Western reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Storfer A, Mech SG, Reudink MW, Lew K (2014) Inbreeding and strong population subdivision in an endangered salamander. Conserv Genet 15:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tevis L (1966) Unsuccessful breeding by desert toads (Bufo punctatus) at the limit of their ecological tolerance. Ecology 47:766–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson BK, Olden JD, Converse SJ (2021) Mechanistic invasive species management models and their application in conservation. Conserv Sci Pract 3(11):e533

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkin JD, Altermatt F, Finn DS, Heino J, Olden JD, Pauls SU, Lytle DA (2018) The role of dispersal in river network metacommunities: patterns, processes, and pathways. Freshw Biol 63:141–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner FB (1959) Some features of the ecology of Bufo punctatus in Death Valley, California. Ecology 40:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USFWS 50 CFR Part 17 (2016) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month findings on petitions to list 10 species as endangered or threatened species. Fed Reg 81(194):69425–69442

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdez JW, Gould J, Garnham JI (2021) Global assessment of artificial habitat use by amphibian species. Biol Conserv 257:109129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (2007) The ecology and behavior of amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger SJ, Som NA, Dauwalter DC, Isaak DJ, Neville HM, Reiman BE (2013) Probabilistic accounting of uncertainty in forecasts of species distributions under climate change. Global Change Biology 19:3343–3354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science 13:940–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AP, Cook ER, Smerdon JE, Cook BI, Abatzoglou JT, Livneh B (2020) Large contribution from anthropogenic warming to an emerging North American megadrought. Science 368:317–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler SL, Fagan WF (2014) Transient windows for connectivity in a changing world. Mov Ecol 2:1–14

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zylstra ER, Swann DE, Hossack BR, Muths E, Steidl RJ (2019) Drought-mediated extinction of an arid-land amphibian: insights from a spatially explicit dynamic occupancy model. Ecol Appl 29(3):e01859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by the Hall Conservation Genetics Graduate Research Award at the University of Washington’s College of the Environment; the U.S. Army Award Number W9214A-14-P-0048; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Cooperative Agreement Number F20AC11469-00. A. Leaché and L. Hauser provided helpful comments and feedback on early versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.C.M. led study design, analyses, and manuscript authorship. J.C.D. assisted in analyses. J.J.L. assisted in study and analytical design. J.D.O. co-led study and analytical design. All authors helped write, edit, and review the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meryl C. Mims.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 4692 kb)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 99 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mims, M.C., Drake, J.C., Lawler, J.J. et al. Simulating the response of a threatened amphibian to climate-induced reductions in breeding habitat. Landsc Ecol 38, 1051–1068 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01599-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01599-w

Keywords

Navigation