Skip to main content
Log in

Informed selection of corridors through network and graph analyses to enhance dispersal potential through an agricultural matrix

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Climate change is causing range shifts in the distribution of many species, but fragmentation and human-altered landscapes are preventing the movement of many of these affected species to more suitable environments. The establishment of corridors to enable dispersal are often costly and laborious and generally prioritize large or highly mobile animals and trees but are rarely considered for herbaceous species which often have associated native insect communities. Further, assessing the quality of habitats is not often considered in landscape connectivity modeling but is important to ensure that species of interest are not only able to move through a landscape but are able to survive as well. Here, we present a novel concept of using road verges as corridors to connect high quality habitats.

Objectives

Using a fragmented agricultural landscape in the southwest Western Australian wheatbelt as a case study, we aim to assess the current level of connectedness of remnant woodlands to support dispersal potential and propose an ecologically (corridors supporting herbaceous species) and economically (shortest links along already existing corridors) feasible way of connecting suitable remnants using road verges.

Methods

We assessed the landscape for the presence of native herbaceous plants in woodland remnants and along road verges as an ecological indicator of habitat suitability. We established a fixed maximum dispersal distance of 100 m based on existing literature in our models to evaluate the dispersal potential of herbaceous annual forbs. We then assessed remnants for habitat quality and level of connectedness across the landscape to come up with ‘importance scores’ for each remnant (or remnant importance). Using graph theory and network analyses, we identified the shortest possible paths to connect remnants of high importance.

Results

Our results show that the current level of fragmentation in the landscape is not able to support single dispersal events based on biologically realistic dispersal distances of 100 m. In addition, majority of the remnants were unlikely to support the herbaceous plants that we included in this study and, by proxy, other species with similar ecological requirements. This unsuitability is primarily due to soil type and high levels of residual phosphorus fertilizer. Roadside verges may be used to support recruitment of herbaceous plants in this system compared to abandoned agricultural fields as they are often already maintained by the local governments and have not been altered by agricultural development. Given this, the use of road verges as corridors should be considered for some species, particularly in cases where industrialized fields are not able to support native flora. Our results point to the need to consider alternative corridor options and to incorporate remnant importance in landscape connectivity studies in order to prioritize connecting remnants that can support both movement and survival of the target species. Assessing remnant importance also enables more efficient placements of corridors across an industrialized landscape particularly when resources may be lacking.

Conclusions

Evaluating the quality and connectedness of habitat fragments and determining the most efficient dispersal pathway using readily available software and analytical approaches are effective ways to strategically establish dispersal corridors for native plants. This study advances our understanding of how common features in heavily modified agricultural landscapes can be used to connect remaining suitable habitats and facilitate the dispersal and survival of herbaceous annual plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used in this study are available for free online.

References

  • Alatalo JM, Little CJ, Jägerbrand AK, Molau U (2014) Dominance hierarchies, diversity and species richness of vascular plants in an alpine meadow: contrasting short and medium term responses to simulated global change. PeerJ 2:e406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M, Primack RB, Gerwein J (2003) Are roads and railroads barriers to bumblebee movement in a temperate suburban conservation area? Biol Cons 109:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks HH, Ammann B (2000) Two terrestrial records of rapid climatic change during the glacial–Holocene transition (14,000–9000 calendar years BP) from Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(4):1390–1394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brás R, Cerdeira JO, Alagador D, Araújo MB (2013) Linking habitats for multiple species. Environ Model Softw 40:336–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buse J, Boch S, Hilgers J, Griebeler EM (2015) Conservation of threatened habitat types under future climate change–Lessons from plant-distribution models and current extinction trends in southern Germany. J Nat Conserv 27:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen IC, Hill JK, Ohlemüller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333(6045):1024–1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JS, Fastie C, Hurtt G, Jackson ST, Johnson C, King GA, Wyckoff P (1998) Reid’s paradox of rapid plant migration: dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological records. Bioscience 48(1):13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csardi, G. & Nepusz, T. (2006). The igraph software package for complex network research, InterJournal, Complex Systems 1695.

  • Damschen EI, Baker DV, Bohrer G, Nathan R, Orrock JL, Turner JR, Tewksbury JJ (2014) How fragmentation and corridors affect wind dynamics and seed dispersal in open habitats. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(9):3484–3489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. 2022. Climate trends in Western Australia. https://www.agric.wa.gov.au/climate-change/climate-trends-western-australia.

  • Diffenbaugh NS, Field CB (2013) Changes in ecologically critical terrestrial climate conditions. Science 341(6145):486–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer JM, Erickson TE (2016) Warmer seed environments increase germination fractions in Australian winter annual plant species. Ecosphere. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu W, Liu S, Degloria SD, Dong S, Beazley R (2010) Characterizing the “fragmentation-barrier” effect of road networks on landscape connectivity: a case study in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Landsc Urban Plan 95:122–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs M, Saastamoinen M, Coulon A, Stevens VM (2010) Organisms on the move: ecology and evolution of dispersal. Biol Lett 6:146–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas CA (1995) Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conserv Biol 9(4):845–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CA (2000) Colonization of agricultural windbreaks by forest trees: effects of connectivity and remnant trees. Ecol Appl 10(6):1762–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann JJ, Byers JE, Bierwagen BG, Dukes JS (2008) Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conserv Biol 22(3):534–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ, Atkins L (1988) Effect of disturbance and nutrient addition on native and introduced annuals in plant communities in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Aust J Ecol 13(2):171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hock K, Wolff NH, Beeden R, Hoey J, Condie SA, Anthony KR, Mumby PJ (2017) Controlling range expansion in habitat networks by adaptively targeting source populations. Conserv Biol 30(4):856–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper SD, Gioia P (2004) The southwestern Australian floristic region: evolution and conservation of a global hotspot of biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:623–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • https://catalogue.data.wa.gov.au/dataset/native-vegetation-extent.

  • Jackson ST, Weng C (1999) Late Quaternary extinction of a tree species in eastern North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(24):13847–13852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kathleen Lyons S, Amatangelo KL, Behrensmeyer AK, Bercovici A, Blois JL, Davis M, Gotelli NJ (2016) Holocene shifts in the assembly of plant and animal communities implicate human impacts. Nature 529(7584):80–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht A, Semenchuk PR, Steinbauer K, Winkler M, Pauli H (2018) Climate change leads to accelerated transformation of high-elevation vegetation in the central Alps. New Phytol 220(2):447–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus ED, McGill BJ (2014) Pushing the pace of tree species migration. PLoS ONE 9(8):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis OT (2006) Climate change, species-area curves and the extinction crisis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 361B:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Main BY (1992) Social history and impact on landscape (with Trayning: case history of a shire by D. Couper). In: Hobbs RJ, Saunders DA (eds) Reintegrating Fragmented Landscapes Towards Sustainable Production and Nature Conservation. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 23–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier ES, Lischke H, Schmatz DR, Zimmermann NE (2012) Climate, competition and connectivity affect future migration and ranges of European trees. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:164–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor ES, Urban DL (2007) Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. Ecol Appl 17:1771–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor ES, Urban DL (2008) A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. Conserv Biol 22:297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neteler M, Bowman MH, Landa M, Metz M (2012) GRASS GIS: A multi-purpose open source GIS. Environ Model Softw 31:124–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pakeman RJ (2001) Plant migration rates and seed dispersal mechanisms. J Biogeogr 28:795–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauli H, Gottfried M, Dullinger S, Abdaladze O, Akhalkatsi M, Alonso JLB, Grabherr G (2012) Recent plant diversity changes on Europe’s mountain summits. Science 336(6079):353–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Primack RB, Miao SL (1992) Dispersal can limit local plant distribution. Conserv Biol 6(4):513–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Raymundo M, Pastore A, HilleRisLambers J, Mayfield MM (2021) Annual rainfall variation and dispersal limitation combine to alter invaded plant community diversity, dominance hierarchies and seeding phenology. Clim Change Ecol 2:100024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Stuart Chapin FIII, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459):1770–1774

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sessions J (1992) Solving for habitat connections as a Steiner network problem. Forest Sci 38(1):203–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder CW (2010) The value of paleoclimate research in our changing climate. Clim Change 100(3):407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standish RJ, Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ, Kobryn HT (2006) Legacy of land-use evident in soils of western Australia’s wheatbelt. Plant Soil 280:189–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Standish RJ, Cramer VA, Wild SL, Hobbs RJ (2007) Seed dispersal and recruitment limitation are barriers to native recolonization of old-fields in western Australia. J Appl Ecol 44(2):435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbauer MJ, Grytnes JA, Jurasinski G, Kulonen A, Lenoir J, Pauli H, Wipf S (2018) Accelerated increase in plant species richness on mountain summits is linked to warming. Nature 556(7700):231–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Lett Nat 427:145–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araujo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC (2005) Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:8245–8250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tikka PM, Högmander H, Koski PS (2001) Road and railway verges serve as dispersal corridors for grassland plants. Landscape Ecol 16(7):659–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban MC (2015) Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348(6234):571–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JJ (2016) Climate-related local extinctions are already widespread among plant and animal species. PLoS Biol 14(12):e2001104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates CJ, Hobbs RJ (1997) Woodland restoration in the western Australian wheatbelt: a conceptual framework using a state and transition model. Restor Ecol 5:28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates CJ, Hobbs RJ (2000) Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia – an overview. In: Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (eds) Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates CJ, Hobbs RJ, True DT (2000a) Temperate eucalypt woodlands in Australia: biology, conservation, management and restoration. In: Hobbs RJ, Yates CJ (eds) The distribution and status of eucalypt woodlands in Western Australia. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, pp 86–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates CJ, Norton DA, Hobbs RJ (2000b) Grazing effects on plant cover, soil and microclimate in fragmented woodlands in south-western Australia: implications for restoration. Austral Ecol 25(1):36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We first would like to acknowledge the Southern Yamatji Peoples as the Traditional Custodians of Amangu Country, on which this work was based on and pay our respects to all Aboriginal Elders, past and present. We would also like to thank the Northern Agricultural Catchments Council in the Shire of Perenjori for their valuable insight into our research. This work was funded by a University of Queensland Postgraduate Scholarship awarded to MR.

Funding

The article was funded by University of Queensland Postgraduate Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MR, KH—Conceptualization and design. MR, CC—Data analyses. MR—Writing – original draft. MR, CC, KH, MM—Writing – review/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maia Raymundo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2384 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raymundo, M., Caballes, C.F., Mayfield, M.M. et al. Informed selection of corridors through network and graph analyses to enhance dispersal potential through an agricultural matrix. Landsc Ecol 38, 449–461 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01563-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01563-0

Keywords

Navigation