Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Loss of winter wonderland: proximity to different road types has variable effects on winter soundscapes

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Most data collection and analyses in soundscape ecology have focused on summer or breeding seasons in urban or protected landscapes, missing important acoustic dynamics in winter, non-breeding periods and in agricultural landscapes, a land-use that constitutes 39% of ice-free surface globally.

Objectives

To address these gaps, we examined the variation of winter soundscapes across a rural agricultural landscape of Nebraska, USA. We compared high and low traffic sites, testing if traffic levels affected soundscape structure.

Methods

We recorded sound over two winters at 19 sites located adjacent to major and minor roadways. We calculated eight unique soundscape indexes to quantify the soundscape over time as a function of traffic and land cover. We applied filters at 80, 1000, and 2000 Hz.

Results

We found clear statistical differences between high and low traffic sites in 7 of 8 soundscape indexes. Soundscape varied throughout the day, but not throughout the season. There was a clear negative correlation between technophony (human-derived sounds) and biophony (ecologically derived sounds) across sites. We found that not all indices may be suitable for all ecosystems.

Conclusions

We quantified the effects of noise pollution on the soundscape of understudied habitats during winter months. By using soundscape indexes as surrogates for biodiversity, acoustic sampling could be an effective method for monitoring biodiversity when traditional methods may be ineffective or too costly. However, caution needs to be taken when choosing indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Balph MH (1977) Winter social behaviour of dark-eyed juncos: communication, social organization, and ecological implications. Anim Behav 25:859–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez-López A, Alkemade R, Verweij PA (2010) The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. Biol Cons 143(6):1307–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boelman NT, Asner GP, Hart PJ, Martin RE (2007) Multi-trophic invasion resistance in Hawaii: Bioacoustics, field surveys, and airborne remote sensing. Ecol Appl 17(8):2137–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradfer-Lawrence T, Gardner N, Bunnefeld L, Bunnefeld N, Willis SG, Dent DH (2019) Guidelines for the use of acoustic indices in environmental research. Methods Ecol Evol 10(10):1796–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradfer-Lawrence T, Bunnefeld N, Gardner N, Willis SG, Dent DH (2020) Rapid assessment of avian species richness and abundance using acoustic indices. Ecol Ind 115:106400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley EMB, Caven AJ, Gottesman BL, Harner MJ, Pijanowski BC, Forsberg ML (2018) Assessing biological and environmental effects of a total solar eclipse with passive multimodal technologies. Ecol Ind 95:353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) A practical information-theoretic approach. Model Select Multimodel Inference 2.

  • Buxton RT, McKenna MF, Mennitt D et al (2017) Noise pollution is pervasive in US protected areas. Science 356(6337):531–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers-Jones J, Eldridge A, Guyot P, Hassall C, Holmes G (2019) The call of the wild: Investigating the potential for ecoacoustic methods in mapping wilderness areas. Sci Total Environ 695:133797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cimprich DA, Grubb TC Jr (1994) Consequences for Carolina chickadees of foraging with tufted titmice in winter. Ecology 75(6):1615–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doser JW, Hannam KM, Finley AO (2020) Characterizing functional relationships between anthropogenic and biological sounds: a western New York state soundscape case study. Landsc Ecol 1–19

  • Dowling JL, Luther DA, Marra PP (2012) Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs. Behav Ecol 23(1):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis EC, Klein Goldewijk K, Siebert S, Lightman D, Ramankutty N (2010) Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecol Biogeog 19(5):589–606

  • Ernstes R, Quinn JE (2015) Variation in bird vocalizations across a gradient of traffic noise as a measure of an altered urban soundscape. Cities Environ 8(1):7

    Google Scholar 

  • Faaborg J, Holmes RT, Anders AD, Bildstein KL, Dugger KM, Gauthreaux SA Jr, Heglund P, Hobson KA, Jahn AE, Johnson DH, Latta SC (2010) Conserving migratory land birds in the New World: Do we know enough? Ecol Appl 20(2):398–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Rytwinski T (2009) Effects of roads on animal abundance: an empirical review and synthesis. Ecol Soc 14(1):21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734):570–574

  • Fuller S, Axel AC, Tucker D, Gage SH (2015) Connecting soundscape to landscape: which acoustic index best describes landscape configuration? Ecol Ind 58:207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage SH, Axel AC (2014) Visualization of temporal change in soundscape power of a Michigan lake habitat over a 4-year period. Eco Inform 21:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage SH, Napoletano BM (2004) Envirosonics equipment and operations manual. Michigan State University, Computational Ecology and Visualization Laboratory, p 30

    Google Scholar 

  • Gage SH, Napoletano BM, Cooper MC (2001) Assessment of ecosystem biodiversity by acoustic diversity indices. J Acoust Soc Am 109(5):2430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasc A, Sueur J, Jiguet F et al (2013) Assessing biodiversity with sound: do acoustic diversity indices reflect phylogenetic and functional diversities of bird communities? Ecol Ind 25:279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber J, Howard D, Quinn JE (2020) Shifts in acoustic indices during the 2017 total solar eclipse: an application of dispersed automated recording units to study ephemeral acoustic events. Biodiversity. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2020.1715834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer CG, Dewitz JA, Yang L, Jin S, Danielson P, Xian G, Coulston J, Herold ND, Wickham JD, Megown K (2015) Completion of the 2011 national land cover database for the conterminous United States—representing a decade of land cover change information: photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, vol 81, no 5, pp 345–354

  • Kasten EP, Gage SH, Fox J, Joo W (2012) The remote environmental assessment laboratory’s acoustic library: an archive for studying soundscape ecology. Ecol Inform 12:50–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanaposhtani MG, Gasc A, Francomano D, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Jung J, Mossman MJ, Pijanowski BC (2019) Effects of highways on bird distribution and soundscape diversity around Aldo Leopold’s shack in Baraboo, Wisconsin, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 192:103666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Clements GR, Sloan S, O’connell CS, Mueller ND, Goosem M, Venter O, Edwards DP, Phalan B, Balmford A, Van Der Ree R (2014) A global strategy for road building. Nature 513(7517):229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ligges U, Sebastian K, Olaf M, Sarah S (2016) tuneR: analysis of music. http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/tuner/.

  • Metcalf OC, Barlow J, Devenish C, Marsden S, Berenguer E, Lees AC (2021) Acoustic indices perform better when applied at ecologically meaningful time and frequency scales. Methods Ecol Evol 12(3):421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullet TC, Gage SH, Morton JM, Huettmann F (2016) Temporal and spatial variation of a winter soundscape in south-central Alaska. Landscape Ecol 31(5):1117–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oden AI, Brown MB, Burbach ME, Brandle JR, Quinn JE (2015) Variation in avian vocalizations during the non-breeding season in response to traffic noise. Ethology 121(5):472–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oden AI, Brandle JR, Burbach ME, Brown MB, Gerber JE, Quinn JE (2019) Soundscapes and anthromes: a review of proximate effects of traffic noise on avian vocalization and communication. Ref Module Earth Syst Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11999-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieretti N, Farina A (2013) Application of a recently introduced index for acoustic complexity to an avian soundscape with traffic noise. J Acoust Soc Am 134:891–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieretti N, Farina A, Morri D (2011) A new methodology to infer the singing activity of an avian community: the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI). Ecol Ind 11(3):868–873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieretti N, Duarte MHL, Sousa-Lima RS, Rodrigues M, Young RJ, Farina A (2015) Determining temporal sampling schemes for passive acoustic studies in different tropical ecosystems. Trop Conserv Sci 8(1):215–234

  • Pijanowski BC, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Dumyahn SL, Farina A, Krause BL, Napoletano BM, Gage SH, Pieretti N (2011) Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. Bioscience 61:203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JE, Brandle JR, Johnson RJ, Tyre AJ (2011) Application of detectability in the use of indicator species: a case study with birds. Ecol Ind 11(5):1413–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JE, Wood JM (2017) Application of a coupled human natural system framework to organize and frame challenges and opportunities for biodiversity conservation on private lands. Ecol Soc 22(1).

  • Quinn JE, Awada T, Trindade F, Fulginiti L, Perrin R (2017) Combining habitat loss and agricultural intensification improves our understanding of drivers of change in avian abundance in a North American cropland anthrome. Ecol Evolut 7(3):803–814

  • Quinn JE, Markey AJ, Howard D, Crummett S, Schindler AR (2018) Intersections of soundscapes and conservation: ecologies of sound in naturecultures. MUSICultures 45(1–2).

  • R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Ross SRJ, Friedman NR, Yoshimura M, Yoshida T, Donohue I, Economo EP (2020) Utility of acoustic indices for ecological monitoring in complex sonic environments. Ecol Indicators 107114.

  • Schindler AR, Gerber JE, Quinn JE (2020) An ecoacoustic approach to understand the effects of human sound on soundscapes and avian communication. Biodiversity. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2020.1713889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur J, Aubin T, Simonis C (2008a) Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics 18(2):213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueur J, Pavoine S, Hamerlynck O, Duvail S (2008b) Rapid acoustic survey for biodiversity appraisal. PLoS ONE 3(12):e4065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton CN, Greene E (2007) Nuthatches eavesdrop on variations in heterospecific chickadee mobbing alarm calls. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(13):5479–5482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Pijanowski BC, Doucette J, Pekin B (2011) A primer of acoustic analysis for landscape ecologists. Landscape Ecol 26(9):1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Pijanowski BC, Villanueva-Rivera MLJ (2015) Package ‘soundecology’.

  • Whalen CE, Brown MB, McGee J, Powell LA, Walsh EJ (2019) Effects of wind turbine noise on the surrounding soundscape in the context of greater-prairie chicken courtship vocalizations. Appl Acoust 153:132–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham H, et al (2019) Welcome to the tidyverse. J Open Source Softw 4(43): 1686

  • Zhao Z, Xu ZY, Bellisario K, Zeng RW, Li N, Zhou WY, Pijanowski BC (2019) How well do acoustic indices measure biodiversity? Computational experiments to determine effect of sound unit shape, vocalization intensity, and frequency of vocalization occurrence on performance of acoustic indices. Ecol Indic 107:105588

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Amy Oden for collecting the original data. We thank Mary Bomburger Brown and Jim Brandle for advice on-site location and study design. We thank Anne Axel and Stuart Gage for hosting a workshop at the US-IALE meeting on soundscapes and kindly sharing their code.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Quinn.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 398 kb)

Supplementary file1 (CSV 1kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quinn, J.E., Schindler, A.R., Blake, L. et al. Loss of winter wonderland: proximity to different road types has variable effects on winter soundscapes. Landsc Ecol 37, 381–391 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01364-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01364-x

Keywords

Navigation