Abstract
Context
To safeguard insect pollinators and their pollination services, we need to understand how landscape structure regulates the distribution of resources that sustain pollinator populations. However, evidence of how pollinator communities benefit from the variety of resources distributed across different habitat types is scarce.
Objectives
To explore complementary resource provision, we conducted a field study to examine the resources available to pollinators in fruit orchards and woody semi-natural habitat.
Methods
We studied 13 landscapes containing both habitat types in Flanders, Belgium. In every habitat element, we surveyed nesting resources, floral resources and wild pollinators (i.e. wild bees and hover flies) during three consecutive time periods in the season (once before- and twice after mass-flowering of the fruit orchards).
Results
We concluded that the composition of nesting resources for wild bees was clearly different between both habitat types. Woody semi-natural habitat also provided more diverse- and a higher cover of floral resources compared to fruit orchards. In addition, the composition of these floral resources became more and more distinct between the two habitat types as the season progressed. Based on the plant − pollinator network we identified key plant species for inclusion in management schemes to support pollinators.
Conclusions
Our study highlights that fruit orchards and woody semi-natural habitat provide a set of different, complementary resources during the flight season, for pollinating insects. Due to the higher diversity and abundance of resources in woody semi-natural habitat, conservation of woody semi-natural habitat is essential for the support of pollinators in agricultural landscapes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data is available from the Dryad Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.44j0zpcbh
References
Anderson MJ, Walsh DCI (2013) PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: What null hypothesis are you testing? Ecol Monogr 83:557–574
Baldock KCR, Goddard MA, Hicks DM et al (2019) A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities. Nat Ecol Evol 3:363–373
Balfour NJ, Ollerton J, Castellanos MC, Ratnieks FLW (2018) British phenological records indicate high diversity and extinction rates among late-summer-flying pollinators. Biol Conserv 222:278–283
Batáry P, Gallé R, Riesch F et al (2017) The former Iron Curtain still drives biodiversity-profit trade-offs in German agriculture. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1279–1284
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B and Walker S (2019) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version 1.1-21. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2020
Bertrand C, Eckerter PW, Ammann L et al (2019) Seasonal shifts and complementary use of pollen sources by two bees, a lacewing and a ladybeetle species in European agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 56:2431–2442
Buckles BJ, Harmon-Threatt AN (2019) Bee diversity in tallgrass prairies affected by management and its effects on above- and below-ground resources. J Appl Ecol 56:2443–2453
Carvalheiro LG, Kunin WE, Keil P et al (2013) Species richness declines and biotic homogenisation have slowed down for NW-European pollinators and plants. Ecol Lett 16:870–878
Dainese M, Montecchiari S, Sitzia T et al (2017) High cover of hedgerows in the landscape supports multiple ecosystem services in Mediterranean cereal fields. J Appl Ecol 54:380–388
Dainese M, Martin EA, Aizen MA et al (2019) A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Sci Adv 5(eaax0121):16
De Cáceres M, Legendre P, Moretti M (2010) Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos 119:1674–1684
De Saeger S and K Scheers (2016) The Biological Valuation Map of the Flemish Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO). https://www.inbo.be/en/inbobiological-valuation-map. Accessed 12 Feb 2020
Dormann CF, Fruend J and Gruber B (2020) Package ‘bipartite’. R Package Version 2.15. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bipartite/bipartite.pdf. Accessed 6 April 2020
Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175
Eeraerts M, Meeus I, Van Den Berge S, Smagghe G (2017) Landscapes with high intensive fruit cultivation reduce wild pollinator services to sweet cherry. Agric Ecosyst Environ 239:342–348
Eeraerts M, Smagghe G, Meeus I (2019) Pollinator diversity, floral resources and semi-natural habitat, instead of honey bees and intensive agriculture, enhance pollination service to sweet cherry. Agric Ecosyst Environ 284:106586
Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L et al (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science (-80) 309:570–574
Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R et al (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339:1608–1611
Goulson D, Nicholls E, Botías C, Rotheray EL (2015) Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 347:1–16
Hartig F (2019) DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package version 0.2.6. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DHARMa/vignettes/DHARMa.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2019
Hass AL, Kormann UG, Tscharntke T et al (2018) Landscape configurational heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture, not crop diversity, maintains pollinators and plant reproduction in western Europe. Proc R Soc B 285:20172242
Hennekens S (2009) Protocol ‘Vegetatieopname.’ Wageningen, Alterra, p 12
Kells AR, Goulson D (2003) Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK. Biol Conserv 109:165–174
Kennedy CM, Lonsdorf E, Neel MC et al (2013) A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecol Lett 16:584–599
Kleijn D, Winfree R, Bartomeus I et al (2015) Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nat Commun 6:1–8
Mallinger RE, Gibbs J, Gratton C (2016) Diverse landscapes have a higher abundance and species richness of spring wild bees by providing complementary floral resources over bees’ foraging periods. Landsc Ecol 31:1523–1535
Mandelik Y, Winfree R, Neeson T, Kremen C (2012) Complementary habitat use by wild bees in agro-natural landscapes. Ecol Appl 22:1535–1546
Martin EA, Dainese M, Clough Y et al (2019) The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe. Ecol Lett 22:1083–1094
Martins KT, Albert CH, Lechowicz MJ, Gonzalez A (2018) Complementary crops and landscape features sustain wild bee communities. Ecol Appl 28:1093–1105
O’connor S, Park KJ, Goulson D (2017) Location of bumblebee nests is predicted by counts of nest-searching queens. Ecol Entomol 42:731–736
Öckinger E, Smith HG (2007) Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 44:50–59
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al (2019) Vegan: Community ecology package. R package Version 2.5-6. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2019
Ollerton J, Erenler H, Edwards M, Crockett R (2014) Extinctions of aculeate pollinators in Britain and the role of large-scale agricultural changes. Science 346:1360–1362
Park MG, Blitzer EJ, Gibbs J et al (2015) Negative effects of pesticides on wild bee communities can be buffered by landscape context. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20150299
Pinheiro J and Bates D (2019) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package Version 3.1-143. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/nlme.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2019
Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Roberts S et al (2005) Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecol Entomol 30:78–85
Powney GD, Carvell C, Edwards M et al (2019) Widespread losses of pollinating insects in Britain. Nat Commun 10:1018
Proesmans W, Smagghe G, Meeus I et al (2019) The effect of mass-flowering orchards and semi-natural habitat on bumblebee colony performance. Landsc Ecol 34:1033–1044
Proesmans W (2019) The importance of small forest fragments for pollination services in agricultural landscapes. PhD Thesis. Ghent University, Belgium
Purvis EEN, Meehan ML, Lindo Z (2020) Agricultural field margins provide food and nesting resources to bumble bees (Bombus spp., Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Insect Conserv Divers 13:219–228
QGIS Development Team (2018) QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.
R Development Core Team (2018) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Rader R, Cunningham SA, Howlett BG, Inouye DW (2020) Non-bee insects as visitors and pollinators of crops: biology, ecology and management. Annu Rev Entomol 65:1–17
Requier F, Leonhardt SD (2020) Beyond flowers: including non-floral resources in bee conservation schemes. J Insect Conserv 24:5–16
Roulston TH, Goodell K (2011) The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. Annu Rev Entomol 56:293–312
Sardiñas HS, Kremen C (2014) Evaluating nesting microhabitat for ground-nesting bees using emergence traps. Basic Appl Ecol 15:161–168
Scheper J, Holzschuh A, Kuussaari M et al (2013) Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss—a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 16:912–920
Scheper J, Reemer M, Van Kats R et al (2014) Museum specimens reveal loss of pollen host plants as key factor driving wild bee decline in the Netherlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:17552–17557
Science for Environment Policy (2017) Agri-environmental schemes: how to enhance the agriculture-environment relationship. Thematic Issue 57. Issue produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. Available at: Retrieved on 8 January 2020 from http://ec.europa.eu/science-environmentpolicy
Senapathi D, Carvalheiro LG, Biesmeijer JC et al (2015) The impact of over 80 years of land cover changes on bee and wasp pollinator communities in England. Proc R Soc B 282:20150294
Sirami C, Gross N, Baillod AB et al (2019) Increasing crop heterogeneity enhances multitrophic diversity across agricultural regions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:16442–16447
Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2000) Resource overlap and possible competition between honey bees and wild bees in central Europe. Oecologia 122:288–296
Steffan-Dewenter I, Schiele S (2008) Do resources or natural enemies drive bee population dynamics in fragmented habitats? Ecology 89:1375–1387
Sutter L, Jeanneret P, Bartual AM et al (2017) Enhancing plant diversity in agricultural landscapes promotes both rare bees and dominant crop-pollinating bees through complementary increase in key floral resources. J Appl Ecol 54:1856–1864
Timberlake TP, Vaughan IP, Memmott J (2019) Phenology of farmland floral resources reveals seasonal gaps in nectar availability for bumblebees. J Appl Ecol 56:1585–1596
Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A et al (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity—ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874
Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA et al (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87:661–685
Van Den Berge S, Baeten L, Vanhellemont M et al (2018) Species diversity, pollinator resource value and edibility potential of woody networks in the countryside in northern Belgium. Agric Ecosyst Environ 259:119–126
Van Den Berge S, Tessens S, Baeten L et al (2019) Contrasting vegetation change (1974–2015) in hedgerows and forests in an intensively used agricultural landscape. Appl Veg Sci 22:269–281
Williams NM, Kremen C (2007) Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. Ecol Appl 17:910–921
Winfree R, Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP (2011) Native pollinators in anthropogenic habitats. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:1–22
Wood TJ, Holland JM, Goulson D (2015) Pollinator-friendly management does not increase the diversity of farmland bees and wasps. Biol Conserv 187:120–126
Acknowledgement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. ME was funded by the Research Foundation Flanders PhD grant 1S71416N. We gratefully acknowledge Delphine Parmentier, Anne-Sophie Sacré, Veerle Stro and Lieve Van Lysebettens for their assistance in the field. We also thank the farmers for providing access to their orchards, and Jonathan Willow for his useful comments and linguistic review of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eeraerts, M., Van Den Berge, S., Proesmans, W. et al. Fruit orchards and woody semi-natural habitat provide complementary resources for pollinators in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol 36, 1377–1390 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01220-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01220-y