Cities are a challenging habitat for obligate nocturnal mammals because of the ubiquitous use of artificial light at night (ALAN). How nocturnal animals move in an urban landscape, particularly in response to ALAN is largely unknown.
We studied the movement responses, foraging and commuting, of common noctules (Nyctalus noctula) to urban landscape features in general and ALAN in particular.
We equipped 20 bats with miniaturized GPS loggers in the Berlin metropolitan area and related spatial positions of bats to anthropogenic and natural landscape features and levels of ALAN.
Common noctules foraged close to ALAN only next to bodies of water or well vegetated areas, probably to exploit swarms of insects lured by street lights. In contrast, they avoided illuminated roads, irrespective of vegetation cover nearby. Predictive maps identified most of the metropolitan area as non-favoured by this species because of high levels of impervious surfaces and ALAN. Dark corridors were used by common noctules for commuting and thus likely improved the permeability of the city landscape.
We conclude that the spatial use of common noctules, previously considered to be more tolerant to light than other bats, is largely constrained by ALAN. Our study is the first individual-based GPS tracking study to show sensitive responses of nocturnal wildlife to light pollution. Approaches to protect urban biodiversity need to include ALAN to safeguard the larger network of dark habitats for bats and other nocturnal species in cities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Data will be made available on dryad data repository.
Azam C, Le Viol I, Julien JF, Bas Y, Kerbiriou C (2016) Disentangling the relative effect of light pollution, impervious surfaces and intensive agriculture on bat activity with a national-scale monitoring program. Landsc Ecol 31:2471–2483
Baker PJ, Harris S (2007) Urban mammals: what does the future hold? An analysis of the factors affecting patterns of use of residential gardens in Great Britain. Mamm Rev 37:297–315
Bartoniĉka T, Zukal J (2003) Flight activity and habitat use of four bat species in a small town revealed by bat detectors. Folia Zool 52:155–166
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48
Beyer HL, Haydon DT, Morales HM, Frair HL, Hebblewhite M, Mitchell M, Matthiopoulos J (2010) The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use—availability designs. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:2245–2254
Bivand RS, Pebesma E, Gomez-Rubio V (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Calenge C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R Software: a tool for the analysis of space habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519
Ciechanowski M (2015) Habitat preferences of bats in anthropogenically altered, mosaic landscapes of northern Poland. Eur J Wildl Res 61:415–428
Gaisler J, Zukal J, Rehak Z, Homolka M (1998) Habitat preference and flight activity of bats in a city. J Zool 244(3):439–445
Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760
Hale JD, Fairbrass AJ, Matthews TJ, Davies G, Sadler JP (2015) The ecological impact of city lighting scenarios: exploring gap crossing thresholds for urban bats. Glob Change Biol 21:2467–2478
Hale JD, Fairbrass AJ, Matthews TJ, Sadler JP (2012) Habitat composition and connectivity predicts bat presence and activity at foraging sites in a large UK conurbation. PLoS ONE 7:e33300
Hartig F (2018) DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package version 0.2.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa
Heim O, Lenski J, Schulze J, Jung K, Kramer-Schadt S, Eccard JA, Voigt CC (2017) The relevance of vegetation structures and small bodies of water for bats foraging above farmland. Basic Appl Ecol 27:9–19
Heim O, Schröder A, Eccard J, Jung K, Voigt CC (2016) Seasonal activity patterns of European bats above intensively used farmland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 233:130–139
Hirzel AH, Hausser J, Chessel D, Perrin N (2002) Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data? Ecology 83:2027–2036
Hölker F, Wolter C, Perkin EK, Tockner K (2010) Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends Ecol Evol 25:681–682
Jacobs J (1974) Quantiative measurement of food selection: a modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev’s electivity index. Oecologia 14:413–417
Kronwitter F (1988) Population structure, habitat use and activity patterns of the noctule bat, Nyctalus noctula Schreb., 1774 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) revealed by radotracking. Myotis 26:23–85
Kuechly HU, Kyba CC, Ruhtz T, Lindemann C, Wolter C, Fischer J, Hölker F (2012) Aerial survey and spatial analysis of sources of light pollution in Berlin, Germany. Remote Sens Environ 126:39–50
Kyba CC, Hölker F (2013) Do artificially illuminated skies affect biodiversity in nocturnal landscapes? Landsc Ecol 28:1637–1640
Laforge A, Pauwels J, Faure B, Bas Y, Kerbiriou C, Fonderflick J, Besnard A (2019) Reducing light pollution improves connectivity for bats in urban landscapes. Landsc Ecol 34:793–809
Lehnert LS, Kramer-Schadt S, Teige T, Hoffmeister U, Popa-Lisseanu A, Bontadina F, Ciechanowski M, Dechmann DKN, Kravchenko K, Presetnik P, Starrach M, Straube M, Zoephel U, Voigt CC (2018) Variability and repeatability of noctule bat migration in Central Europe: evidence for partial and differential migration. Proc R Soc Lond B 285:20182174
LfU (2015) Kartierung von Biotopen, Gesetzlich Geschützten Biotopen (§ 30 Bnatschg Und § 18 Bbgnatschag) Und Ffh-Lebensraumtypen im Land Brandenburg. http://www.mlul.brandenburg.de/lua/gis/biotope_lrt.zip
Longcore T, Rich C (2004) Ecological light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 2:191–198
Lowry H, Lill A, Wong B (2013) Behavioural responses of wildlife to urban environments. Biol Rev 88:537–549
Luck GW, Smallbone L, Threlfall C, Law B (2013) Patterns in bat functional guilds across multiple urban centres in south-eastern Australia. Landsc Ecol 28:455–469
Mackie IJ, Racey PA (2007) Habitat use varies with reproductive state in noctule bats (Nyctalus noctula): implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 140:70–77
Martin J, Calenge C, Quenette PY, Allainé D (2008) Importance of movement constraints in habitat selection studies. Ecol Model 213:257–262
Mathews F, Roche N, Aughney T, Jones N, Day J, Baker J, Langton S (2015) Barriers and benefits: implications of artificial night-lighting for the distribution of common bats in Britain and Ireland. Phil Trans R Soc B 370:20140124
McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK (2015) Adaptation and adaptedness of organisms to urban environments. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 46:261–280
Michelot T, Langrock R, Patterson TA (2016) moveHMM: an Rpackage for the statistical modelling of animal movement data using hidden Markov models. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1308–1315
Michelot T, Langrock R, Patterson T, Rexstadt E (2015) moveHMM: animal movement modelling using hidden marcov models. R Package Version 11
Pauwels J, Le Viol I, Azam C, Valet N, Julien JF, Bas Y, Kerbiriou C (2019) Accounting for artificial light impact on bat activity for a biodiversity-friendly urban planning. Landsc Urban Plan 183:12–25
Pebesma EJ, Bivand RS (2005) Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5(2):9–13
Polak T, Korine C, Yair S, Holderied MW (2011) Differential effects of artificial lighting on flight and foraging behaviour of two sympatric bat species in a desert. J Zool 285:21–27
QGIS Development Team (2017) QGIS geographic information system. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org
R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Core Team, Vienna
Rich C, Longcore T (2006) Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island Press, New York
Roeleke M, Blohm T, Kramer-Schadt S, Yovel Y, Voigt CC (2016) Habitat use of bats in relation to wind turbines revealed by GPS tracking. Sci Rep 6:28961
Roeleke M, TeigeT Hoffmeister H, Klingler F, Voigt CC (2018) Aerial-hawking bats adjust their use of space to the lunar cycle. Mov Ecol 6:11
Russo D, Ancilotto L (2015) Sensitivity of bats to urbanization: a review. Mamm Biol 80:205–212
Russo D, Cistrone L, Libralato N, Korine C, Jones G, Ancilotto L (2017) Adverse effects of artificial illumination on bat drinking activity. Anim Conserv 20:492–501
Rydell J (1992) Exploitation of insects around streetlamps by bats in Sweden. Funct Ecol 6:744–750
Sadler JP, Small EC, Fiszpan H, Telfer MG, Niemela J (2006) Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban-rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages. J Biogeogr 33:1126–1138
Seto KC, Fragkias M, Guneralp B, Reilly MK (2011) A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 6:9
Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Nat Acad Sci 109:16083–16088
Siemers BM, Schaub A (2011) Hunting at the highway: traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:1646–1652
Spoelstra K, van Grunsven RHA, Ramakers JJC, Ferguson KB, Raap T, Donners M, Veenendaal EM, Visser ME (2017) Response of bats to light with different spectra: light-shy and agile bat presence is affected by white and green, but not red light. Proc R Soc B 284:20170075
Stone EL, Jones G, Harris S (2009) Street lighting disturbs commuting bats. Curr Biol 19:1123–1127
Straka TM, Lentini PE, Lumsden LF, Wintle BA, van der Ree R (2016) Urban bat communities are affected by wetland size, quality, and pollution levels. Ecol Evol 6:4761–4774
Straka TM, Wolf M, Gras P, Buchholz S, Voigt CC (2019) Tree cover mediates the effect of artificial light on urban bats. Front Ecol Evol 7:91
Threlfall C, Law B, Penman T, Banks PB (2011) Ecological processes in urban landscapes: mechanisms influencing the distribution and activity of insectivorous bats. Ecography 34:814–826
Tigas LA, Van Vuren DH, Sauvajot RM (2002) Behavioral responses of bobcats and coyotes to habitat fragmentation and corridors in an urban environment. Biol Conserv 108:299–306
Umweltatlas Berlin (2010) Umweltatlas Berlin/Stadtstruktur-Flächentypen differenziert 2010 (Umweltatlas). http://fbinter.stadt-berlin.de/fb/index.jsp
UNPD (2012) World urbanization prospects: the 2011 revision. United Nations Population Division, New York
Voigt CC, Azam C, Dekker J, Ferguson J, Fritze M, Gazaryan S, Hölker F, Jones G, Leader N, Lewanzik D, Limpens HJGA, Mathews F, Rydell J, Schofield H, Spoelstra K, Zagmajster M (2018) Guidelines for consideration of bats in lighting projects. EUROBATS Publication Series No. 8. UNEP/EUROBATS Secretariat, Bonn, p 62
Zeale MRK, Stone EL, Zeale E, Browne WJ, Harris S, Jones G (2018) Experimentally manipulating light spectra reveals the importance of dark corridors for commuting bats. Glob Change Biol 24:5909–5918
The work was partly funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBF within the Collaborative Project Bridging in Biodiversity Science-BIBS (Funding No. 01LC1501A-H).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Voigt, C.C., Scholl, J.M., Bauer, J. et al. Movement responses of common noctule bats to the illuminated urban landscape. Landscape Ecol 35, 189–201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00942-4
- GPS tracking
- Artificial light at night
- Habitat use
- Common noctule bat