Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 879–894 | Cite as

Divergent flows of avian-mediated ecosystem services across forest-matrix interfaces in human-modified landscapes

  • Fabio M. BarrosEmail author
  • Carlos A. Peres
  • Marco A. Pizo
  • Milton Cezar Ribeiro
Research Article
  • 230 Downloads

Abstract

Context

The ecological interplay between edge and matrix effects along forest-matrix interfaces is closed linked to landscape processes modulating biodiversity and ecosystem services provision in disturbed landscapes. Improving such knowledge is therefore essential to design more efficient land use management in multifunctional landscapes.

Objectives

Estimate the avian-mediated Ecosystem Service Provision (ESP) in contrasting types of forest-matrix interfaces in tropical landscapes, and examine how local habitat and landscape attributes can predict ESPs.

Methods

We sampled bird assemblages in forest-pasture (FP) and forest-eucalyptus plantation (FE) interfaces, and estimated their potential as pest control, seed dispersal and pollination agents across human-modified landscapes in southeastern Brazil. Using Random Forest algorithm, we also quantified the relative importance of local vs. landscape attributes in predicting ESPs.

Results

The overall ESPs was higher in FP than FE interfaces. Habitat generalist birds were important potential seed disperser and pollinator agents at both FP and FE. At forest edges, landscape forest cover best predicted pest control services, whereas the density of rural homesteads best predicted potential seed dispersal and pollination services. Local habitat features were particularly important in predicting all ESP in pastures.

Conclusions

We highlight the importance of matrix type and matrix habitat structure in modulating avian ESPs across forest-matrix interfaces in human-altered landscapes and suggest that forest cover and rural homestead density are key elements in multifunctional landscapes that consider avian ESP in both forest and matrix habitats.

Keywords

Cross-habitat spillover Functional traits Forest cover Rural homestead Seed dispersal Pollination Pest control Random Forest algorithm Pasture Eucalyptus plantation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

FMB is grateful to Brazil’s Ministry of Education (CAPES) for his Ph.D. studentship and FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Grant Numbers 2013/19732-1, 2013/50421-2 and 2016/15376-4) for all financial support. Danilo Freire assisted with statistical analyses. Instituto Florestal do Estado de São Paulo granted a research permit (260108-009.965/2014) to work at Parque Estadual do Itaberaba. Field ornithologists Eduardo Alexandrino, Fabio Schunk and Carlos Gussoni participated in the expert survey. We are grateful to Júlia Assis and Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas (IPE) for logistic support during fieldwork. MAP is supported by a research Grant from the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq). MCR thanks FAPESP (Process #2013/50421-2), CNPq (Processes #312045/2013-1; #312292/2016-3) and PROCAD/CAPES (Project #88881.068425/2014-01) for their financial support. We are thankful for all the comments and suggestions by the anonymous reviewers.

Supplementary material

10980_2019_812_MOESM1_ESM.docx (89 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 89 kb)
10980_2019_812_MOESM2_ESM.docx (2.1 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 2109 kb)

References

  1. Banks-Leite C, Pardini R, Tambosi LR, Pearse WD, Bueno AA, Bruscagin RT, Condez TH, Dixo M, Igari AT, Martensen AC, Metzger JP (2014) Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot. Science 80(345):1041–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett AF, Radford JQ, Haslem A (2006) Properties of land mosaics: implications for nature conservation in agricultural environments. Biol Conserv 133:250–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2002) Bird census techniques, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Biz M, Cornelius C, Metzger JPW (2017) Matrix type affects movement behavior of a Neotropical understory forest bird. Perspect Ecol Conserv 15:10–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2017.03.001 Google Scholar
  5. Blitzer EJ, Carsten FD, Holzschuh A, Klein AM, Rand TA, Tscharntke T (2012) Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats. Agric Ecosyst Environ 146:34–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boesing AL, Nichols E, Metzger JP (2017) Effects of landscape structure on avian-mediated insect pest control services: a review. Landscape Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0503-1 Google Scholar
  7. Boesing AL, Nichols E, Metzger JP (2018) Land use type, forest cover and forest edges modulate avian cross-habitat spillover. J Appl Ecol 55:1252–1264.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bovo AAA, Ferraz KMPMB, Magioli M, Alexandrino ER, Hasui E, Ribeiro MC, Tobias JA (2018) Habitat fragmentation narrows the distribution of avian functional traits associated with seed dispersal in tropical forest. Perspect Ecol Conserv 1:1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.03.004 Google Scholar
  9. Bregman TP, Lees AC, MacGregor HEA, Darski B, de Moura NG, Aleixo A, Barlow J, Tobias JA (2016) Using avian functional traits to assess the impact of land-cover change on ecosystem processes linked to resilience in tropical forests. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1289 Google Scholar
  10. Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Ferraz SFB (2012) Role of eucalypt and other planted forests in biodiversity conservation and the provision of biodiversity-related ecosystem services. For Ecol Manag 301:43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlo TA, Morales JM (2016) Generalist birds promote tropical forest regeneration and increase plant diversity via rare-biased seed dispersal. Ecology 97:1819–1831.  https://doi.org/10.1890/15-2147.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrara E, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Vega-Rivera JH, Schondube JE, de Freitas SM, Fahrig L (2015) Impact of landscape composition and configuration on forest specialist and generalist bird species in the fragmented Lacandona rainforest, Mexico. Biol Conserv 184:117–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crisci C, Ghattas B, Perera G (2012) A review of supervised machine learning algorithms and their applications to ecological data. Ecol Modell 240:113–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0539.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Camargo Barbosa KV, Knogge C, Develey PF, Jenkins CN, Uezu A (2017) Use of small Atlantic Forest fragments by birds in Southeast Brazil. Perspect Ecol Conserv 15:42–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2016.11.001 Google Scholar
  16. De Coster G, Banks-Leite C, Metzger JP (2015) Atlantic forest bird communities provide different but not fewer functions after habitat loss. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20142844.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ (2010) The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 47:377–385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01559.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galetti M, Alves-Costa CP, Cazetta E (2003) Effects of forest fragmentation, anthropogenic edges and fruit colour on the consumption of ornithocoric fruits. Biol Conserv 111:269–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00299-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL, Song DX, Townshend JR (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karp DS, Mendenhall CD, Sandí RF, Chaumont N, Ehrlich PR, Hadly EA, Daily GC (2013) Forest bolsters bird abundance, pest control and coffee yield. Ecol Lett 16:1339–1347.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kennedy CM, Zipkin EF, Marra PP (2016) Differential matrix use by Neotropical birds based on species traits and landscape condition. Ecol Appl 27:619–631.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lasky JR, Keitt TH (2012) The effect of spatial structure of pasture tree cover on avian frugivores in eastern Amazonia. Biotropica 44:489–497.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00857.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee MB, Martin JA (2017) Avian species and functional diversity in agricultural landscapes: does landscape heterogeneity matter? PLoS ONE 12:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170540 Google Scholar
  25. Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, MacGregor C, Crane M, Michael D, Fischer J, Montague-Drake R, Felton A, Manning A (2008) Temporal changes in vertebrates during landscape transformation: a large-scale “natural experiment”. Ecol Monogr 78:567–590.  https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0945.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luck GW, Lavorel S, Mcintyre S, Lumb K (2012) Improving the application of vertebrate trait-based frameworks to the study of ecosystem services. J Anim Ecol 81:1065–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01974.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maas B, Karp DS, Bumrungsri S, Darras K, Gonthier D, Huang JCC, Lindell CA, Maine JJ, Mestre L, Michel NL, Morrison EB, Perfecto I, Philpott SM, Sekercioglu CH, Silva RM, Taylor PJ, Tscharntke T, Van Bael SA, Whelan CJ, Williams-Guillén K (2016) Bird and bat predation services in tropical forests and agroforestry landscapes. Biol Rev 91:1081–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahood SP, Lees AC, Peres CA (2012) Amazonian countryside habitats provide limited avian conservation value. Biodivers Conserv 21:385–405.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0188-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html. Accessed 15 July 2016
  30. Millan CH, Develey PF, Verdade LM (2015) Stand-level management practices increase occupancy by birds in exotic Eucalyptus plantations. For Ecol Manag 336:174–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitchell MGE, Bennett EM, Gonzalez A (2013) Linking landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provision: current knowledge and research gaps. Ecosystems 16:894–908.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9647-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morante-Filho JC, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, de Souza Pessoa M, Cazetta E, Faria D (2018) Direct and cascading effects of landscape structure on tropical forest and non-forest frugivorous birds. Ecol Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1791 Google Scholar
  33. Morante-Filho JC, Faria D, Mariano-Neto E, Rhodes J (2015) Birds in anthropogenic landscapes: the responses of ecological groups to forest loss in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. PLoS ONE 10:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morellato LPC, Haddad CFB (2000) Introduction: the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 32:786–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muñoz JC, Aerts R, Thijs KW, Stevenson PR, Muys B, Sekercioglu CH (2013) Contribution of woody habitat islands to the conservation of birds and their potential ecosystem services in an extensive Colombian rangeland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 173:13–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muylaert RL, Vancine MH, Bernardo R, Oshima JEF, Sobral-Souza T, Tonetti VR, Niebuhr BB, Ribeiro MC (2018) Uma nota sobre os limites territoriais da Mata Atlântica. Oecol Aust 22(3):302–311.  https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2018.2203.09 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Boerger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, Day J, De Palma A, Diaz S, Echeverria-Londono S, Edgar MJ, Feldman A, Garon M, Harrison MLK, Alhusseini T, Ingram DJ, Itescu Y, Kattge J, Kemp V, Kirkpatrick L, Kleyer M, Correia DLP, Martin CD, Meiri S, Novosolov M, Pan Y, Phillips HRP, Purves DW, Robinson A, Simpson J, Tuck SL, Weiher E, White HJ, Ewers RM, Mace GM, Scharlemann JPW, Purvis A (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newbold T, Scharlemann JPW, Butchart SHM, Sekercioglu CH, Alkemade R, Booth H, Purves DW (2013) Ecological traits affect the response of tropical forest bird species to land-use intensity. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20122131.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oliveira AT, Fontes MAL (2000) Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic Forests in southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 32:793–810.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00619.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oosterhoorn M, Kappelle M (2000) Vegetation structure and composition along an interior-edge-exterior gradient in a Costa Rican montane cloud forest. For Ecol Manag 126:291–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00101-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pfeifer M, Lefebvre V, Peres CA, Wearn O, Marsh C, Banks-Leite C, Butchart S, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Barlow J, Cerezo A, Cisneros L, D'Cruze N, Faria D, Hadley A, Klingbeil B, Kormann U, Lens L, Range GM, Morante-Filho JC, Olivier P, Peters S, Pidgeon A, Ribeiro D, Scherber C, Schneider-Maunoury L, Struebig M, Urbina-Cardona N, Watling JI, Willig M, Wood E, Ewers R (2017) Creation of forest edges has a global impact on forest vertebrates. Nature 551:187–191.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pizo MA (2007) Frugivory by birds in degraded areas of Brazil. In: Dennis AJ, Schupp EW, Green RJ, Westcott DW (eds) Seed dispersal: theory and its application in a changing world. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 615–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pizo MA, dos Santos BTP (2011) Frugivory, post-feeding flights of frugivorous birds and the movement of seeds in a Brazilian fragmented landscape. Biotropica 43:335–342.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00695.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  45. Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142:1141–1153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sekercioglu CH (2012) Bird functional diversity and ecosystem services in tropical forests, agroforests and agricultural areas. J Ornithol 153:153–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-012-0869-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sekercioglu CH, Wenny DG, Whelan CJ (eds) (2016) Why birds matter: Avian ecological function and ecosystem services. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  48. Taft OW, Haig SM (2005) The value of agricultural wetlands as invertebrate resources for wintering shorebirds. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110:249–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Triviño M, Thuiller W, Cabeza M, Hickler T, Araújo MB (2011) The contribution of vegetation and landscape configuration for predicting environmental change impacts on iberian birds. PLoS ONE 6(12):e29373.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Batáry P, Bengtsson J, Clough Y, Crist TO, Dormann CF, Ewers RM, Fründ J, Holt RD, Holzschuh A, Klein AM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis DA, Laurance W, Lindenmayer D, Scherber C, Sodhi N, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C, van der Putten WH, Westphal C (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87:661–685.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Volpato GH, Prado VM, dos Anjos L (2010) What can tree plantations do for forest birds in fragmented forest landscapes? A case study in southern Brazil. For Ecol Manag 260:1156–1163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watling JI, Orrock JL (2010) Measuring edge contrast using biotic criteria helps define edge effects on the density of an invasive plant. Landscape Ecol 25:69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9416-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wenny DG, DeVault TL, Johnson MD, Kelly D, Sekercioglu CH, Tomback DF, Whelan CJ (2011) The need to quantify ecosystem services provided by birds. Auk 128:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2011.10248 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wethered R, Lawes MJ (2005) Nestedness of bird assemblages in fragmented Afromontane forest: the effect of plantation forestry in the matrix. Biol Conserv 123:125–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W (2014) EltonTraits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95(7):2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zurita GA, Bellocq MI (2010) Spatial patterns of bird community similarity: bird responses to landscape composition and configuration in the Atlantic forest. Landscape Ecol 25:147–158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9410-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EcologySão Paulo State University (UNESP)Rio ClaroBrazil
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East Anglia (UEA)NorwichUK
  3. 3.Department of ZoologySão Paulo State University (UNESP)Rio ClaroBrazil

Personalised recommendations