Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of cropland encroachment on prairie pothole wetlands: numbers, density, size, shape, and structural connectivity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Agricultural expansion is the greatest source of wetland loss in the Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North and South Dakota, a critical waterfowl production area in North America. It is unknown how wetland losses from grassland conversion may alter structural connectivity in the prairie pothole network, however.

Objectives

We examined how agricultural expansion over the period 2001–2011 altered the number, size, shape, and structural connectivity of PPR wetlands. We hypothesized that the loss of wetlands or wetland area would decrease structural connectivity on the landscape.

Methods

We analyzed a published raster database that quantified 2001–2011 agricultural conversion of wetlands in the Dakotas. A suite of structural connectivity metrics was computed using the igraph R package.

Results

Wetland area decreased by 25% within the study area, density decreased by 16%, and average size decreased from 2.41 to 2.16 ha with no increase in perimeter:area ratios, thus indicating changes more from the splitting of larger wetlands (accounting for 23% of area lost) and “nibbling” at patch area (38%) than from complete wetland elimination (39%). Despite loss of wetlands and wetland area to cropland, however, the network did not display constrained structural connectivity.

Conclusions

Structural connectivity has not been significantly affected by wetland losses because of the large number of remaining wetlands, but wetlands will continue to be lost with ongoing grassland conversion and climate shifts. It is unknown where the tipping point of wetland losses lies in the PPR that will incur ecological costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albanese G, Haukos DA (2017) A network model framework for prioritizing wetland conservation in the great plains. Landscape Ecol 32:115–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bélisle M (2005) Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 86:1988–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop-Taylor R, Tulbure MG, Broich M (2015) Surface water network structure, landscape resistance to movement and flooding vital for maintaining ecological connectivity across Australia’s largest river basin. Landscape Ecol 30:2045–2065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boryan C, Yang Z, Mueller R, Craig M (2011) Monitoring US agriculture: the US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cropland Data Layer Program. Geocarto Int 26:341–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claassen R, Carriazo F, Cooper JC, Hellerstein D, Ueda K (2011) Grassland to cropland conversion in the Northern Plains: the role of crop insurance, commodity, and disaster programs. USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins SD, Heintzman LJ, Starr SM, Wright CK, Henebry GM, McIntyre NE (2014) Hydrological dynamics of temporary wetlands in the southern Great Plains as a function of surrounding land use. J Arid Environ 109:6–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJ Complex Syst 1695:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl TE (2014) Status and trends of prairie wetlands in the United States 1997 to 2009. Department of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service, Ecological Services, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing JA, Prairie YT, Cole JJ, Duarte CM, Tranvik LJ, Striegl RG, McDowell WH, Kortelainen P, Caraco NF, Melack JM, Middelburg JJ (2006) The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnol Oceanogr 51:2388–2397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JC, Griffis-Kyle KL, McIntyre NE (2017) Graph theory as an invasive species management tool: case study in the Sonoran Desert. Landscape Ecol 32:1739–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2017) ArcGIS v10.5. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

  • Faber S, Rundquist S, Male T (2012) Plowed under: how crop subsidies contribute to massive habitat losses. Environmental Working Group, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2007) Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct Ecol 21:1003–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbairn SE, Dinsmore JJ (2001) Local and landscape-level influences on wetland bird communities of the Prairie Pothole Region of Iowa, USA. Wetlands 21:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fall A, Fortin M-J, Manseau M, O’Brien D (2007) Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems 10:448–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausti SW (2015) The causes and unintended consequences of a paradigm shift in corn production practices. Environ Sci Policy 52:41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galpern P, Manseau M, Fall A (2011) Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biol Cons 144:44–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JP (1993) Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animals. Wetlands 13:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girvan M, Newman MEJ (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:7821–7826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Homer C, Dewitz J, Fry J, Coan M, Hossain N, Larson C, Herold N, McKerrow A, VanDriel JN, Wickham J (2007) Completion of the 2001 national land cover database for the conterminous United States. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 73:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1957) A tretise on limnology, vol 1. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WC, Boettcher SE, Poiani KA, Guntenspergen G (2004) Influence of weather extremes on the water levels of glaciated prairie wetlands. Wetlands 24:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WC, Millett BV, Gilmanov T, Voldseth RA, Guntenspergen GR, Naugle DE (2005) Vulnerability of northern prairie wetlands to climate change. Bioscience 55:863–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WC, Werner B, Guntenspergen GR, Voldseth RA, Millett B, Naugle DE, Tulbure M, Carroll RWH, Tracy J, Olawsky C (2010) Prairie wetland complexes as landscape functional units in a changing climate. Bioscience 60:128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston CA (1994) Cumulative impacts to wetlands. Wetlands 14:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston CA (2013) Wetland losses due to row crop expansion in the Dakota Prairie Pothole Region. Wetlands 33:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston CA (2014) Agricultural expansion: land use shell game in the US Northern Plains. Landscape Ecol 29:81–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantrud HA, Stewart RE (1977) Use of natural basin wetlands by breeding waterfowl in North Dakota. J Wildl Manag 41:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Keitt T, Urban D, Milne B (1997) Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Ecol 1(1):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korcak J (1940) Deux types fondamentaux de distribution statistique. Bull L’Inst Int Stat 30:295–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Krapu GL, Greenwood RJ, Dwyer CP, Kraft KM, Cowardin LM (1997) Wetland use, settling patterns, and recruitment in mallards. J Wildl Manag 61:736–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laita A, Kotiaho JA, Monkkonen M (2011) Graph-theoretic connectivity measures: what do they tell us about connectivity? Landscape Ecol 26:951–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake PS (2000) Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson DL (1995) Effects of climate on numbers of northern prairie wetlands. Clim Change 30:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtinen RM, Galatowitsch SM, Tester JR (1999) Consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation for wetland amphibian assemblages. Wetlands 19:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Schwartz FW (2012) Climate-driven variability in lake and wetland distribution across the Prairie Pothole Region: from modern observations to long-term reconstructions with space-for-time substitution. Water Resour Res 48:W08526

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre NE, Collins SD, Heintzman LJ, Starr SM, van Gestel N (2018) The challenge of assaying landscape connectivity in a changing world: a 27-year case study in the southern Great Plains (USA) playa network. Ecol Ind 91:607–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre NE, Drake JC, Griffis-Kyle KL (2016) A connectivity and wildlife management conflict in isolated desert waters. J Wildl Manag 80:655–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre NE, Wright CK, Swain S, Hayhoe K, Liu G, Schwartz FW, Henebry GM (2014) Climate forcing of wetland landscape connectivity in the great plains. Front Ecol Environ 12:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millett B, Johnson W, Guntenspergen G (2009) Climate trends of the North American Prairie Pothole Region 1906–2000. Clim Change 93:243–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor ES, Urban DL (2007) Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. Ecol Appl 17:1771–1782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naugle DE, Johnson RR, Estey ME, Higgins KF (2001) A landscape approach to conserving wetland bird habitat in the Prairie Pothole Region of eastern South Dakota. Wetlands 21:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCEI (2018) Plot time series. National Centers for Environmental Information, NOAA. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/time-series/. Accessed May 2018

  • NRC (National Research Council) (1995) Wetlands: characteristics and boundaries. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (2001) Compensating for wetland losses under the clean water act. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Oslund FT, Johnson RR, Hertel DR (2010) Assessing wetland changes in the Prairie Pothole Region of Minnesota from 1980 to 2007. J Fish Wildl Manag 1:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 3.1.1 edn. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashford BS, Adams RM, Wu J, Voldseth RA, Guntenspergen GR, Werner B, Johnson WC (2016) Impacts of climate change on land use and wetland productivity in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America. Reg Environ Change 16:515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringelman JK (1990) 13.4.4. Habitat management for molting waterfowl. In: Cross DH, Vohs P (eds) Waterfowl management handbook 24. US Fish & Wildlife Service, Fort Collins, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (2001) Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conserv Biol 12:1129–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skagen SK, Burris LE, Granfors DA (2016) Sediment accumulation in prairie wetlands under a changing climate: the relative roles of landscape and precipitation. Wetlands 36:383–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson LG, Goldberg R, Root TL, Anderson MG (1998) Potential effects of global warming on waterfowl populations breeding in the Northern Great Plains. Clim Change 40:343–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA (2006) Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tulbure MG, Kininmonth S, Broich M (2014) Spatiotemporal dynamics of surface water networks across a global biodiversity hotspot—implications for conservation. Environ Res Lett 9:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA NASS (2011) CropScape—cropland data layer. US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/. Accessed Jan 2012

  • USDA NRCS (2018) Wetland conservation provisions (Swampbuster). https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/national/water/wetlands/?cid=stelprdb1043554

  • USEPA (2016) National wetland condition assessment 2011: a collaborative survey of the Nation’s Wetlands. Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • USGS (2018) National agriculture imagery program (NAIP). https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/NAIP. Accessed Jun 2018

  • Van Meter KJ, Basu NB (2015) Signatures of human impact: size distributions and spatial organization of wetlands in the Prairie Pothole landscape. Ecol Appl 25:451–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhoof MK, Alexander LC (2016) The role of lake expansion in altering the wetland landscape of the Prairie Pothole Region, United States. Wetlands 36:309–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voldseth RA, Johnson WC, Gilmanov T, Guntenspergen GR, Millett BV (2007) Model estimation of land-use effects on water levels of northern prairie wetlands. Ecol Appl 17:527–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voldseth RA, Johnson WC, Guntenspergen GR, Gilmanov T, Millett BV (2009) Adaptation of farming practices could buffer effects of climate change on Northern Prairie wetlands. Wetlands 29:635–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Luri M, Janssen L, Hennessy DA, Feng H, Wimberly MC, Arora G (2017) Determinants of motives for land use decisions at the margins of the Corn Belt. Ecol Econ 134:227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham JD, Stehman SV, Fry JA, Smith JH, Homer CG (2010) Thematic accuracy of the NLCD 2001 land cover for the conterminous United States. Remote Sens Environ 114:1286–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright CK (2010) Spatiotemporal dynamics of prairie wetland networks: power-law scaling and implications for conservation planning. Ecology 91:1924–1930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright CK, Wimberly MC (2013) Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:4134–4139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler JB (2003) Wetlands at your service: reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Front Ecol Environ 1:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Schwartz FW, Liu G (2009) Systematics in the size structure of prairie pothole lakes through drought and deluge. Water Resour Res 45:W04421

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by National Science Foundation collaborative grants EF-1340548 and EF-1340583. We thank Michael Wimberly (Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma) for advice on statistical analyses, and the Handling Editor and two anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier manuscript drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy E. McIntyre.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnston, C.A., McIntyre, N.E. Effects of cropland encroachment on prairie pothole wetlands: numbers, density, size, shape, and structural connectivity. Landscape Ecol 34, 827–841 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00806-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00806-x

Keywords

Navigation