Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Get larger or grow longer wings? Impacts of habitat area and habitat amount on orthopteran assemblages and populations in semi-natural grasslands

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Habitat loss and fragmentation are major threats to biodiversity and can change community composition, species traits and intraspecific morphology. Calcareous grasslands are hotspots of diversity for plants and invertebrates in Europe, but habitat area and habitat amount declined strongly over the last century.

Objectives

It is controversially discussed how habitat area and habitat amount independently affect species assemblages, traits and morphology.

Methods

With variable transects we recorded orthopteran assemblages on 22 calcareous grasslands along independent gradients of habitat area and habitat amount in a 1 km matrix. We measured male body size and wing length of two abundant grasshopper species.

Results

Orthopteran assemblages showed positive species–area and abundance–area relationships with habitat area and (extenuated) with habitat amount. We found a stronger effect of habitat area reduction on specialists and endangered species, compared to generalists and non-threatened species. The species Chorthippus biguttulus and Gomphocerippus rufus had a larger body size (fitness-related trait) in landscapes with high habitat area and habitat amount. Grasshoppers had longer wings in relation to body size (dispersal-related trait) in landscapes with a low amount of habitat.

Conclusions

Our findings emphasize the value of large patches and landscapes with high habitat amount to (i) enhance species richness and abundances, (ii) protect threatened species, (iii) ensure long term survival of habitat-specialists and (iv) preserve individuals with high fitness traits (large body size). Conservation strategies for Orthoptera should focus on large habitats and areas with a high habitat amount.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Batáry P, Orci KM, Baldi A, Kleijn D, Kisbenedek T, Erdos S (2007) Effects of local and landscape scale and cattle grazing intensity on Orthoptera assemblages of the Hungarian Great Plain. Basic Appl Ecol 8:280–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell AJ, Phillips ID, Nielsen SE, Spence JR (2017) Species traits modify the species–area relationship in ground-beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages on islands in a boreal lake. PLoS ONE 12:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwaerts K, Van Dyck H, Aerts P (2002) Does flight morphology relate to flight performance? An experimental test with the butterfly Pararge aegeria. Funct Ecol 16:484–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonte D, Lens L, Maelfait JP, Hoffmann M, Kuijken E (2003) Patch quality and connectivity influence spatial dynamics in a dune wolfspider. Oecologia 135:227–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WD, Wideman J, Andrade MCB, Mason AC, Gwynne DT (1996) Female choice for an indicator of male size in the song of the black-horned tree cricket Oecanthus nigricornis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Oecanthinae). Evolution 50:2400–2411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brückmann SV, Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Butterfly and plant specialists suffer from reduced connectivity in fragmented landscapes. J Appl Ecol 47:799–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2010) Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective. Biol Rev 85:139–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Classen A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kindeketa WJ, Peters MK (2017) Integrating intraspecific variation in community ecology unifies theories on body size shifts along climatic gradients. Funct Ecol 31:768–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denning KR, Foster BL (2018) Taxon-specific association of tallgrass prairie flower visitors with site-scale forb communities and landscape composition and configuration. Biol Conserv 227:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diacon-Bolli J, Dalang T, Holderegger R, Bürgi M (2012) Heterogeneity fosters biodiversity: linking history and ecology of dry calcareous grasslands. Basic Appl Ecol 13:641–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekötter T, Wamser S, Dörner T, Wolters V, Birkhofer K (2016) Organic farming affects the potential of a granivorous carabid beetle to control arable weeds at local and landscape scales. Agric For Entomol 18:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2013) Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis. J Biogeogr 40:1649–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Steinlechner D, Zehm A, Poniatowski D, Fartmann T, Beckmann A, Stettmer C (2016) Die Heuschrecken Deutschlands und Nordtirols: Bestimmen - Beobachten - Schützen. Quelle und Meyer, Wiebelsheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzén M, Schweiger O, Betzholtz PE (2012) Species–area relationships are controlled by species traits. PLoS ONE 7:10

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusser MS, Pfister SC, Entling MH, Schirmel J (2017) Effects of field margin type and landscape composition on predatory carabids and slugs in wheat fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 247:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu HN, Hughes J, Dorn S (2006) Trade-off between mobility and fitness in Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Ecol Entomol 31:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Gonzalez A, Brudvig LA, Burt MA, Levey DJ, Damschen EI (2017) Experimental evidence does not support the habitat amount hypothesis. Ecography 40:48–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzales A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL, Song DX, Townshend JR (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambäck PA, Summerville KS, Steffan-Dewenter I, Krauss J, Englund G, Crist TO (2007) Habitat specialization, body size, and family identity explain lepidopteran density-area relationships in a cross-continental comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:8368–8373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Saastamoinen M, Ovaskainen O (2006) Dispersal-related life-history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation. J Anim Ecol 75:91–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harz K (1975) Die Orthopteren Europas, vol 1. Dr. W. Junk B.V, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Harz K (1976) Die Orthopteren Europas, vol 2. Dr. W. Junk B.V, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidinger IMM, Hein S, Bonte D (2010) Patch connectivity and sand dynamics affect dispersal-related morphology of the blue-winged grasshopper Oedipoda caerulescens in coastal grey dunes. Insect Conserv Divers 3:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JK, Thomas CD, Blakeley DS (1999) Evolution of flight morphology in a butterfly that has recently expanded its geographic range. Oecologia 121:165–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JG, Montserrat-Martí G, Tallowin J, Thompson K, Díaz S, Cabido M, Grime JP, Wilson PJ, Band SR, Bogard A, Cabido R, Cáceres D, Castro-Díez P, Ferrer C, Maestro-Martínez M, Pérez-Rontomé MC, Charles M, Cornelissen JHC, Dabbert S, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Krimly T, Sijtsma FJ, Strijker D, Vendramini F, Guerrero-Campo, Hynd A, Jones G, Romo-Díez, de Torres Espuny L, Villar-Salvador P, Zak MR (2005) How much will it cost to save grassland diversity? Biol Conserv 122:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes CL, Hill JK, Dytham C (2003) Evolutionary trade-offs between reproduction and dispersal in populations at expanding range boundaries. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270:S147–S150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingrisch S, Köhler G (1998) Die Heuschrecken Mitteleuropas. Westarp Wissenschaften, Magdeburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison BE, Robel RJ, Pontius JS, Applegate RD (2002) Invertebrate biomass: associations with lesser prairie-chicken habitat use and sand sagebrush density in southwestern Kansas. Wildl Soc Bull 30:517–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentzsch A, Köhler G, Schumacher J (2003) Environmental stress and fluctuating asymmetry in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus (Acrididae: Gomphocerinae). Zoology 106:117–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston T, Pietrewicz A (2014) Issues in the ecological study of learning. Psychology Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen ID, Fahrig L (1997) Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure. Landscape Ecol 12:185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaňuch P, Jarčuška B, Schlosserová D, Sliacka A, Paule L, Krištín A (2012) Landscape configuration determines gene flow and phenotype in a flightless forest-edge ground-dwelling bush-cricket, Pholidoptera griseoaptera. Evol Ecol 26:1331–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller D, van Strien MJ, Herrmann M, Bolliger J, Edwards PJ, Ghazoul J, Holderegger R (2013) Is functional connectivity in common grasshopper species affected by fragmentation in an agricultural landscape? Agric Ecosyst Environ 175:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CD, Tawes BR, Worthington AM (2014) Evaluating indices of body condition in two cricket species. Ecol Evol 4:4476–4487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Alfert T, Steffan-Dewenter I (2009) Habitat area but not habitat age determines wild bee richness in limestone quarries. J Appl Ecol 46:194–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies? J Biogeogr 30:889–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1999) Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79:2503–2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold T, Scharlemann JPW, Butchart SHM, Şekercioğlu CH, Alkemade R, Booth H, Purves DW (2013) Ecological traits affect the response of tropical forest bird species to land-use intensity. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett J, Choimes A, Collen B, Day J, De Palma A, Díaz S, Echeverria-Londoño S, Edgar MJ, Feldman A, Garon M, Harrison MLK, Alhusseini T, Ingram DJ, Itescu Y, Kattge J, Kemp V, Kirkpatrick L, Kleyer M, Correia DLP, Martin CD, Meiri S, Novosolov M, Pan Y, Phillips HRP, Purves DW, Robinson A, Simpson J, Tuck SL, Weiher E, White HJ, Ewers RM, Mace GM, Scharlemann JPW, Purvis A (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Öckinger E, Schweiger O, Crist TO, Debinski DM, Krauss J, Kuussaari M, Petersen JD, Pöyry J, Settele J, Summerville KS, Bommarco R (2010) Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross-continental synthesis. Ecol Lett 13:969–979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2018) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

  • Perović D, Gámez-Virués S, Börschig C, Klein AM, Krauss J, Steckel J, Rothenwöhrer C, Erasmi S, Tscharntke T, Westphal C (2015) Configurational landscape heterogeneity shapes functional community composition of grassland butterflies. J Appl Ecol 52:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, Brooks TM, Gittleman JL, Joppa LN, Raven PH, Roberts CM, Sexton JO (2014) The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344:987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polilov AA, Makarova AA (2017) The scaling and allometry of organ size associated with miniaturization in insects: a case study for Coleoptera and Hymenoptera. Sci Rep 7:7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Preziosi RF, Fairbairn DJ, Roff DA, Brennan JM (1996) Body size and fecundity in the waterstrider Aquarius remigis: a test of Darwin’s fecundity advantage hypothesis. Oecologia 108:424–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Ries L, Sisk TD (2008) Butterfly edge effects are predicted by a simple model in a complex landscape. Oecologia 156:75–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1986) The genetic basis of wing dimorphism in the sand cricket, Gryllus firmus and its relevance to the evolution of wing dimorphism in insects. Heredity 57:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig M (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schlumprecht H, Waeber G (2003) Heuschrecken in Bayern. Ulmer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider G, Krauss J, Boetzl FA, Fritze MA, Steffan-Dewenter I (2016) Spillover from adjacent crop and forest habitats shapes carabid beetle assemblages in fragmented semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia 182:1141–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnell JK, Harris GM, Pimm SL, Russell GJ (2013) Estimating extinction risk with metapopulation models of large-scale fragmentation. Conserv Biol 27:520–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seibold S, Bässler C, Brandl R, Fahrig L, Förster B, Heurich M, Hothorn T, Scheipl F, Thorn S, Müller J (2017) An experimental test of the habitat-amount hypothesis for saproxylic beetles in a forested region. Ecology 98:1613–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2002) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83:1421–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PD, Merriam G (1995) Wing morphology of a forest damselfly is related to landscape structre. Oikos 73:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travassos-De-Britto B, da Rocha PLB (2013) Habitat amount, habitat heterogeneity, and their effects on arthropod species diversity. Ecoscience 20:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voith J, Beckmann A, Sachteleben J, Schlumprecht H, Waeber G (2016) Rote Liste und Gesamtartenliste der Heuschrecken (Saltatoria) Bayerns. Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt (LfU)

  • WallisDeVries MF, Poschlod P, Willems JH (2002) Challenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in northwestern Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna. Biol Conserv 104:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA, Asher J, Fox R, Huntley B, Roy DB, Telfer MG, Jeffcoate S, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Willis SG, Greatorex-Davies JN, Moss D, Thomas CD (2001) Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414:65–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warzecha D, Diekötter T, Wolters V, Jauker F (2016) Intraspecific body size increases with habitat fragmentation in wild bee pollinators. Landscape Ecol 31:1449–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss N, Zucchi H, Hochkirch A (2013) The effects of grassland management and aspect on Orthoptera diversity and abundance: site conditions are as important as management. Biodivers Conserv 22:2167–2178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal C, Bommarco R, Carré G, Lamborn E, Morison N, Petandidou T, Potts SG, Roberts SPM,  Szentgyörgyi H, Tscheulin T, Vaissière BE, Woyciechowski M, Biesmeijer JC, Kunin WE, Settele J, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Measuring bee diversity in different European habitats and biogeographical regions. Ecol Monogr 78:653–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein W, Schmid B (1999) Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: effect of altitude, habitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppers. J Appl Ecol 36:363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Gudrun Schneider for selecting the study sites, the editor, two anonymous reviewers, Jie Zhang, Fabian A. Boetzl and Natalie Foley for constructive comments on the manuscript, Fabian A. Boetzl for statistical advice, Julian Krause for assistance, and the Nature Conservation authorities for permissions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JK and SK designed the study, SK analysed the data, SK conducted the field work and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, SK determined Orthoptera, both authors interpreted the results and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian König.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 50 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 112 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

König, S., Krauss, J. Get larger or grow longer wings? Impacts of habitat area and habitat amount on orthopteran assemblages and populations in semi-natural grasslands. Landscape Ecol 34, 175–186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0762-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0762-5

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Jochen Krauss