The ecosystem services concept: a new Esperanto to facilitate participatory planning processes?
- 339 Downloads
Several case studies investigated the role of ecosystem services in participatory planning processes. However, no systematic study exists that cuts across a large number of empirical cases to identify the implications of using ecosystem services in participatory planning.
This study explores the potential of the ecosystem services concept to act as a boundary concept (“new Esperanto”) to facilitate the integration of actors’ perceptions and objectives into planning goals.
We analyzed eleven case studies to explore how the ecosystem services concept has been operationalized to support participatory planning processes, and to identify lessons from successful applications. We characterized the case studies according to contextual and methodological criteria. Each case study was assessed through a codified score card method in order to detect success or failure criteria in using the ecosystem services concept in participatory planning. We compared the case study criteria with the results of the balanced score card method.
We identified several positive effects of applying the ecosystem services concept in participatory planning, including the facilitation of knowledge sharing and consideration of local experiences, the support towards a shared vision, and the increased awareness among local actors concerning their role as ecosystem services suppliers or beneficiaries. Among the drawbacks, we identified the risk of overemphasizing specific ecosystem goods or services during the process.
We conclude by providing some recommendations to enhance future practice related to issues such as communication, use of local knowledge and integration of ecosystem services in existing legal instruments.
KeywordsCase studies Comparative analysis Ecosystem services Landscape planning Participatory planning Stakeholders
Authors would like to express their gratitude to the guest editors of this special issue of Landscape Ecology journal and to the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier version of this manuscript.
- García-Llorente M, Harrison PA, Berry P, Palomo I, Gómez-Baggethun E, Iniesta-Arandia I, Martín-López B (2016) What can conservation strategies learn from the ecosystem services approach? Insights from ecosystem assessments in two Spanish protected areas. Biodivers Conserv 27(7):1575–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- La Rosa, D. (2018). Is spatial planning taking advantage of Ecosystem services? A review of Italian experiences. Urbanistica Quaderni Google Scholar
- Opdam P, Albert C, Fürst C, Grêt-Regamey A, Kleemann J, Parker D, Walz A (2015) Ecosystem services for connecting actors—lessons from a symposium. Change Adapt Socio-Ecol Syst 2(1):1–7Google Scholar
- Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Montes C (2012) National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosyst Serv 4(2005):104–116Google Scholar
- Pelorosso R, Gobattoni F, Lopez N, Leone A (2016) Verde Urbano e regolazione delle acque meteoriche. L’approccio modellistico come base per nuovi standard urbanistici. Sentieri Urbani 19:71–77Google Scholar
- Rodríguez JP, Beard Jr TD, Bennett EM, Cumming GS, Cork S, Agard J, Dobson AP, Peterson GD (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol Soc 11(1):28. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art28/. Accessed 4 Jan 2011
- TEEB, 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. In: Kumar, P. (Ed.), Earthscan London and WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- von Haaren C, Albert C, Barkmann J, de Groot RS, Spangenberg JH, Schröter-Schlaack C, Hansjürgens B (2014) From explanation to application: introducing a practice-oriented ecosystem services evaluation (PRESET) model adapted to the context of landscape planning and management. Landscape Ecol 29(8):1335–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar