Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 323–340 | Cite as

Walkability in urban landscapes: a comparative study of four large cities in China

  • Peilei Fan
  • Guanghua Wan
  • Lihua Xu
  • Hogeun Park
  • Yaowen Xie
  • Yong Liu
  • Wenze Yue
  • Jiquan Chen
Research Article

Abstract

Context

Walkability is an important element for assessing the sustainability of urban landscapes. There are increased concerns that as the world becomes more urbanized, cities become less walkable.

Objectives

We aim to develop a composite walkability index to evaluate the spatio-temporal pattern of the walkability of cities. By using the index to evaluate four major cities China, we also aim to provide policy implications.

Methods

A comprehensive walkability index is developed to integrate five aspects of the urban built environment: dwelling density, street connectivity, land-use mix, access to public transit, and flatness. Shanghai, Hangzhou, Chongqing, and Lanzhou are chosen as case studies to evaluate the spatio-temporal patterns and changes of walkability in the context of rapid urban expansion.

Results

Great variations exist among the four cities in terms of speed, scale, and locations of changes of walkability. During 2000–2010, the inner cities of Hangzhou, Chongqing, and Lanzhou and the entire cities of Shanghai and Chongqing increased their walkability index, whereas the inner city of Shanghai had decreased walkability. Furthermore, while inner cities of Shanghai and Hangzhou experienced decreased or stable walkability, the inner cities of Lanzhou and Chongqing enjoyed moderate to high increases in walkability. For inner cities, Shanghai had the highest average walkability index, whereas Lanzhou held the lowest in 2010.

Conclusions

The spatiotemporal changes in walkability seem to be closely associated with governmental policies and planning. The walkability index method can be widely implemented for any urban landscape because of its comprehensiveness, simplicity, and flexibility.

Keywords

Walkability index Urban landscape Dwelling density Street connectivity Land-use mix Public transit Flatness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the direct funding support for this study from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) through the project “The Urbanization-Poverty-Inequality Triangle in Asia and the Pacific” (Contract # 117554-S83862). We also acknowledge financial support from the Land Cover and Land Use Program of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (NNX09AI32G and NNX15AD51G), the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Projects 71133004, 71063022, and 41771534), and Yunnan Province’s Bairen Jihua. We thank Huiqing Huang, Manjiang Shi and Yachao Mu for assistance in processing data from Shanghai and Lanzhou. We also thank Gabriela Shirkey and Connor Crank for editing the manuscript. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of ADB, NASA, or NSFC.

References

  1. Blaschke T (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65(1):2–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaschke T, Hay GJ, Kelly M, Lang S, Hofmann P, Addink E, Feitosa RQ, van der Meer F, van der Werff H, van Coillie F, Tiede D (2014) Geographic object-based image analysis–towards a new paradigm. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 87:180–191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown BB, Yamada I, Smith KR, Zick CD, Kowaleski-Jones L, Fan JX (2009) Mixed land use and walkability: variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. Health Place 15(4):1130–1141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Cortright J (2009) Walking the walk: How walkability raises home values in US cities. http://www.citeulike.org/group/11305/article/5541951, Accesssed 1 Mar 2015
  5. De Meester F, Van Dyck D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Cardon G (2012) Active living neighborhoods: is neighborhood walkability a key element for Belgian adolescents? BMC Public Health 12(1):7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Doyle S, Kelly-Schwartz A, Schlossberg M, Stockard J (2006) Active community environments and health: the relationship of walkable and safe communities to individual health. J Am Plann Assoc 72(1):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan P, Xie Y, Qi J, Chen J, Huang H (2014) Vulnerability of a coupled natural and human system in a changing environment: dynamics of Lanzhou’s urban landscape. Landscape Eco 29(10):1709–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fan P, Xu L, Yue W, Chen J (2017) Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: the case of Shanghai. Landsc Urban Plan 165:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frank LD, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Chapman JE, Saelens BE, Bachman W (2006) Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. J Am Plann Assoc 72(1):75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frank LD, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Leary L, Cain K, Conway TL, Hess PM (2010) The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. Br J Sports Med 44(13):924–933CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank LD, Schmid TL, Sallis JF, Chapman J, Saelens BE (2005) Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. Am J Prev Med 28(2):117–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hay GJ, Blaschke T (2010) Special issue: geographic objectbased image analysis (GEOBIA). Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 76(2):121–122Google Scholar
  13. La Rosa D, Takatori C, Shimizu H, Privitera R (2018) A planning framework to evaluate demands and preferences by different social groups for accessibility to urban greenspaces. Sustain Cities Soc 36:346–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lake A, Townshend T (2006) Obesogenic environments: exploring the built and food environments. J R Soc Promot Health 126(6):262–267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee LO (1999) Shanghai modern: The flowering of a new urban culture in China, 1930-1945. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Leslie E, Saelens B, Frank L, Owen N, Bauman A, Coffee N, Hugo G (2005) Residents’ perceptions of walkability attributes in objectively different neighbourhoods: a pilot study. Health Place 11(3):227–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li X, Zhou W, Ouyang Z (2013) Forty years of urban expansion in Beijing: what is the relative importance of physical, socioeconomic, and neighborhood factors? Appl Geogr 38:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Litman T (1994) Quantifying the benefits for non-motorized transport for achieving TDM objectives. Transp Res Rec 1441:134–140Google Scholar
  19. Litman T (2003) Economic value of walkability. Transp Res Rec 1828:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu G, Deng M, Lv S (1999) Chorographic Book of Lanzhou City: Organizational system division. Lanzhou University Press, LanzhouGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Y, Yue W, Fan P, Song Y (2015) Suburban residential development in the era of market-oriented land reform: the case of Hangzhou, China. Land Use Policy 42:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu Y, Yue W, Fan P, Zhang Z, Huang J (2017) Assessing the urban environmental quality of mountainous cities: a case study in Chongqing, China. Ecol Indic 81:132–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lovasi GS, Neckerman KM, Quinn JW, Weiss CC, Rundle A (2009) Effect of individual or neighborhood disadvantage on the association between neighborhood walkability and body mass index. Am J Public Health 99(2):279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Marshall JD, Brauer M, Frank LD (2009) Healthy neighborhoods: walkability and air pollution. Environ Health Perspect 117(11):1752–1759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Owen N, Cerin E, Leslie E, DuToit L, Coffee N, Frank LD, Sallis JF (2007) Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. Am J Prev Med 33(5):387–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pan H, Shen Q, Zhang M (2009) Influence of urban form on travel behaviour in four neighbourhoods of Shanghai. Urban Stud 46(2):275–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med 25(2):80–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider A, Mertes CM (2014) Expansion and growth in Chinese cities, 1978–2010. Environ Res Lett 9(2):024008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider A, Seto KC, Webster DR (2005) Urban growth in Chengdu, western China: application of remote sensing to assess planning and policy outcomes. Environ Plan B Plan Des 32(3):323–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shen S, Lei N, Wang W (2001) Chorographic Book of Lanzhou City: Urban Planning. Lanzhou University Press, LanzhouGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith KR, Brown BB, Yamada I, Kowaleski-Jones L, Zick CD, Fan JX (2008) Walkability and body mass index: density, design, and new diversity measures. Am J Prev Med 35(3):237–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith KR, Zick CD, Kowaleski-Jones L, Brown BB, Fan JX, Yamada I (2011) Effects of neighborhood walkability on healthy weight: assessing selection and causal influences. Soc Sci Res 40(5):1445–1455CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Southworth M (2005) Designing the walkable city. J Urban Plan D 131(4):246–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sturm R, Cohen DA (2004) Suburban sprawl and physical and mental health. Public Health 118(7):448–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun Z, Bell S, Scott I (2016) How Does Street Vending Contribute to Walkability? A report on a study in Yuncheng, China. Environ Behav Proc J 1(4):203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Transport for London (TfL) (2004) Making London a Walkable City: The Walking Plan for London’. Available at www.rudi.net/files/walking-plan-2004.pdf. Accessed on March 1, 2015
  37. United Nations (2016) The World Cities in 2016. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang L, Jiang YL, Li ZJ (2012) The walkability assessment of Lishan road: a case study in Jinan, China. Appl Mech Mater 178:1838–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yue W, Fan P, Wei YD, Qi J (2014) Economic development, urban expansion, and sustainable development in Shanghai. Stoch Envl Res Risk A 28(4):783–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yue W, Liu Y, Fan P (2010) Polycentric urban development: the case of Hangzhou. Env Plan A 42(3):563–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yue W, Liu Y, Fan P (2013) Measuring urban sprawl and its drivers in large Chinese cities: the case of Hangzhou. Land Use Policy 31:358–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhai Y, Baran PK (2017) Urban park pathway design characteristics and senior walking behavior. Urban For Urban Green 21:60–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peilei Fan
    • 1
  • Guanghua Wan
    • 2
  • Lihua Xu
    • 3
  • Hogeun Park
    • 1
  • Yaowen Xie
    • 4
  • Yong Liu
    • 5
  • Wenze Yue
    • 6
  • Jiquan Chen
    • 7
  1. 1.School of Planning, Design, and Construction and Center for Global Change and Earth ObservationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Asian Development Bank InstituteTokyoJapan
  3. 3.College of Resource and EnvironmentZhejiang University of Agriculture and ForestryHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.School of Earth and Environment ScienceLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
  5. 5.School of Construction Management and Real EstateChongqing UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China
  6. 6.Institute of Land Science and Property ManagementZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  7. 7.Department of Geography, Environment and Spatial Science and Center for Global Change and Earth ObservationMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations