Landscape Ecology

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 289–305 | Cite as

Forest recovery since 1860 in a Mediterranean region: drivers and implications for land use and land cover spatial distribution

  • Juliet Abadie
  • Jean-Luc Dupouey
  • Catherine Avon
  • Xavier Rochel
  • Thierry Tatoni
  • Laurent Bergès
Research Article



Land use and land cover (LULC) change is a major part of environmental change. Understanding its long-term causes is a major issue in landscape ecology.


Our aim was to characterise LULC transitions since 1860 and assess the respective and changing effects of biophysical and socioeconomic drivers on forest, arable land and pasture in 1860, 1958 and 2010, and of biophysical, socioeconomic and distance from pre-existing forest on forest recovery for the two time intervals.


We assessed LULC transitions by superimposing 1860, 1958 and 2010 LULCs using a regular grid of 1 × 1 km points, in a French Mediterranean landscape (195,413 ha). We tested the effects of drivers using logistic regressions, and quantified pure and joint effects by deviance partitioning.


Over the whole period, the three main LULCs were spatially structured according to land accessibility and soil productivity. LULC was driven more by socioeconomic than biophysical drivers in 1860, but the pattern was reversed in 2010. A widespread forest recovery mainly occurred on steeper slopes, far from houses and close to pre-existing forest, due to traditional practice abandonment. Forest recovery was better explained by biophysical than by socioeconomic drivers and was more dependent on distance from pre-existing forest between 1958 and 2010.


Our results showed a shift in drivers of LULC and forest recovery over the last 150 years. Contrary to temperate regions, the set-aside of agricultural practices on difficult land has strengthened the link between biophysical drivers and LULC distribution over the last 150 years.


Forest transition Historical maps Land cover change Land use change Logistic regression Long-term Northern Mediterranean Transition matrix 



The 1860 LULC and lithology maps were provided by the PNRL, and 1958 orthophotographs were provided by the National Institute of Geographic and Forestry Information. This work is part of a PhD Thesis supported by the Région Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur and IRSTEA. The UMR 1137 Forest Ecology and Ecophysiology is supported by a Grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the “Investissements d’Avenir” Program (ANR-11-LABX-0002-01, Lab of Excellence ARBRE). The authors thank J. Wu and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and helpful comments. We also thank P. K. Roche and K. Verheyen for their advice.

Supplementary material

10980_2017_601_MOESM1_ESM.docx (374 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 373 kb)


  1. Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70(1–2):21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballabio C, Panagos P, Monatanarella L (2016) Mapping topsoil physical properties at European scale using the LUCAS database. Geoderma 261(1):110–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier EB, Burgess JC, Grainger A (2010) The forest transition: towards a more comprehensive theoretical framework. Land Use Policy 27(2):98–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beale CM, Lennon JJ, Yearsley JM, Brewer MJ, Elston DA (2010) Regression analysis of spatial data. Ecol Lett 13(2):246–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bender O, Boehmer HJ, Jens D, Schumacher KP (2005) Analysis of land-use change in a sector of Upper Franconia (Bavaria, Germany) since 1850 using land register records. Landscape Ecol 20(2):149–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bieling C, Plieninger T, Schaich H (2013) Patterns and causes of land change: empirical results and conceptual considerations derived from a case study in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Land Use Policy 35:192–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bivand RS (2013) Applied spatial data analysis with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bürgi M, Hersperger AM, Schneeberger N (2004) Driving forces of landscape change—current and new directions. Landscape Ecol 19(8):857–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalvet M (2006) Paysages et conflits en Provence. Rives nord-méditerr 23:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cousins SAO (2001) Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs. Landscape Ecol 16(1):41–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crk T, Uriarte M, Corsi F, Flynn D (2009) Forest recovery in a tropical landscape: what is the relative importance of biophysical, socioeconomic, and landscape variables? Landscape Ecol 24(5):629–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Keersmaeker L, Onkelinx T, De Vos B, Rogiers N, Vandekerkhove K, Thomaes A, De Schrijver A, Hermy M, Verheyen K (2015) The analysis of spatio-temporal forest changes (1775–2000) in Flanders (northern Belgium) indicates habitat-specific levels of fragmentation and area loss. Landscape Ecol 30(2):247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dupouey JL, Dambrine E, Laffite JD, Moares C (2002) Irreversible impact of past land use on forest soils and biodiversity. Ecology 83(11):2978–2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eitzel MV, Kelly M, Dronova I, Valachovic Y, Quinn-Davidson L, Solera J, de Valpine P (2016) Challenges and opportunities in synthesizing historical geospatial data using statistical models. Ecol Inform 31:100–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fabre E, Vernet C (2006) Évolution de l’occupation du sol dans les Alpes-de-Haute-Provence (début du XIXe siècle - fin du XXe siècle). Méditerranée 3(4):35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Boitani L (2007) Changes in land-use/land-cover patterns in Italy and their implications for biodiversity conservation. Landscape Ecol 22(4):617–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Flinn KM, Vellend M, Marks PL (2005) Environmental causes and consequences of forest clearance and agricultural abandonment in central New York, USA. J Biogeogr 32(3):439–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin S, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH, Holloway T, Howard EA, Kucharik CJ, Monfreda C, Patz JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N, Snyder PK (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fourchy P (1963) Les lois du 28 juillet 1860 et 8 juin 1864 sur le reboisement et le gazonnement des montagnes. Rev géogr alp 51(1):19–41Google Scholar
  20. Gilbert Y (1989) Elevage, forêt et société. Analyse socio-historique. For Méditerr XI(3):203–216Google Scholar
  21. Jenness J, Brost B, Beier P (2013) Land facet corridor designer: extension for ArcGIS, June 2016 edition. Jenness Enterprises.
  22. Kaim D, Kozak J, Kolecka N, Ziolkowska E, Ostafin K, Ostapowicz K, Gimmi U, Munteanu C, Radeloff VC (2016) Broad scale forest cover reconstruction from historical topographic maps. Appl Geogr 67:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaplan JO, Krumhardt KM, Zimmermann N (2009) The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quat Sci Rev 28(27–28):3016–3034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaplan JO, Pfeiffer M, Kolen JCA, Davis BAS (2016) Large scale anthropogenic reduction of forest cover in last glacial maximum Europe. PLoS ONE 11(11):e0166726CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kareiva P, Watts S, McDonald R, Boucher T (2007) Domesticated nature: shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science 316(5833):1866–1869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Koerner W, Cinotti B, Jussy JH, Benoît M (2000) Evolution des surfaces boisées en France depuis le début du XIXe siècle: identification et localisation des boisements des territoires agricoles abandonnés. Rev For Fr LII(3):249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lambin EF, Geist HJ (2006) Land-use and land-cover change—local processes and global impacts. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2010) Land use transitions: socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy 27(2):108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folk C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skånes H, Steffen W, Stone GD, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change Hum Policy Dimens 11(4):261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lasanta T, Arnaez J, Pascual N, Ruiz-Flano P, Errea MP, Lana-Renault N (2017) Space–time process and drivers of land abandonment in Europe. CATENA 149:810–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leyk S, Boesch R, Weibel R (2006) Saliency and semantic processing: extracting forest cover from historical topographic maps. Pattern Recognit 39(5):953–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lieskovsky J, Bezak P, Spulerova J, Lieskovsky T, Koleda P, Dobrovodska M, Bürgi M, Gimmi U (2015) The abandonment of traditional agricultural landscape in Slovakia—analysis of extent and driving forces. J Rural Stud 37:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marraccini E, Debolini M, Moulery M, Abrantes P, Bouchier A, Chéry J-P, Sanz Sanz E, Sabbatini T, Napoleone C (2015) Common features and different trajectories of land cover changes in six Western Mediterranean urban regions. Appl Geogr 62:347–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mather AS (1992) The forest transition. Area 24(4):367–379Google Scholar
  35. Mather AS, Fairbairn J, Needle CL (1999) The course and drivers of the forest transition: the case of France. J Rural Stud 15:65–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mitsuda Y, Ito S (2011) A review of spatial-explicit factors determining spatial distribution of land use/land-use change. Landsc Ecol Eng 7(1):117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nash MS, Chaloud DJ, Kepner WG, Sarri S (2008) Regional assessment of landscape and land use change in the Mediterranean region—Morocco case study (1981–2003). In: Liotta PH, Mouat DA, Kepner WG, Lancaster JM (eds) Environmental change and human security: recognizing and acting on hazard impacts. NATO science for peace and security series C: environmental security. Springer, Dordrecht, p 143Google Scholar
  38. Nogues-Bravo D (2006) Assessing the effect of environmental and anthropogenic factors on land-cover diversity in a Mediterranean mountain environment. Area 38(4):432–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Odgaard MV, Bocher PK, Dalgaard T, Moeslund JE, Svenning JC (2014) Human-driven topographic effects on the distribution of forest in a flat, lowland agricultural region. J Geogr Sci 24(1):76–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Panagos P, Van Liedekerke M, Jones A, Montanarella L (2012) European Soil Data Centre: response to European policy support and public data requirements. Land Use Policy 29(2):329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paulet JP (1982) Forêts et pression démographique en Basse Provence. Méditerranée 2:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pontius RG, Shusas E, McEachern M (2004) Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101(2–3):251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Price B, Kienast F, Seidl I, Ginzler C, Verburg PH, Bolliger J (2015) Future landscapes of Switzerland: risk areas for urbanisation and land abandonment. Appl Geogr 57:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Puddu G, Falcucci A, Maiorano L (2012) Forest changes over a century in Sardinia: implications for conservation in a Mediterranean hotspot. Agrofor Syst 85(3):319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. R Development Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Google Scholar
  46. Saas Y, Gosselin F (2014) Comparison of regression methods for spatially-autocorrelated count data on regularly-and irregularly-spaced locations. Ecography 37(5):476–489Google Scholar
  47. Salvaudon A, Hamel A, Grel A, Rossi M, Vallauri D (2012) Notice de la carte des forêts anciennes du Parc Naturel Régional du Lubéron (1:40000) avec référence aux autres usages du sol. p 18Google Scholar
  48. Sandel B, Svenning JC (2013) Human impacts drive a global topographic signature in tree cover. Nat Commun. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sanz ASR, Fernandez C, Mouillot F, Ferrat L, Istria D, Pasqualini V (2013) Long-term forest dynamics and land-use abandonment in the Mediterranean mountains, Corsica, France. Ecol Soc. Google Scholar
  50. Schweizer PE, Matlack GR (2014) Factors driving land use change and forest distribution on the coastal plain of Mississippi, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 121:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sereda S, Lukan M (2009) Assessment of changes in landuse development in the Magura and the Eastern Tatras in the years 1772–2003. Oecol Mont 18:1–13Google Scholar
  52. Serra P, Pons X, Saurí D (2008) Land-cover and land-use change in a Mediterranean landscape: a spatial analysis of driving forces integrating biophysical and human factors. Appl Geogr 28(3):189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taillefumier F, Piegay H (2003) Contemporary land use changes in prealpine Mediterranean mountains: a multivariate GIS-based approach applied to two municipalities in the Southern French Prealps. CATENA 51(3–4):267–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Doorn AM, Bakker MM (2007) The destination of arable land in a marginal agricultural landscape in south Portugal: an exploration of land use change determinants. Landscape Ecol 22(7):1073–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Varese P (1990) Pré-étude en vue d’une typologie des stations forestières du Luberon. Parc Naturel Régional du Luberon, Apt, p 141Google Scholar
  56. Verdier A (2013) Redécouvrir le saltus: l’exemple des pâquis lorrains. Revue de géographie historiqueGoogle Scholar
  57. Vos W, Meekes H (1999) Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future. Landsc Urban Plan 46(1–3):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vuorela N, Alho P, Kalliola R (2002) Systematic assessment of maps as source information in landscape-change research. Landsc Res 27(2):141–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  60. Wulf M, Jahn U, Meier K (2016) Land cover composition determinants in the Uckermark (NE Germany) over a 220-year period. Reg Environ Change 16(6):1793–1805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wulf M, Sommer M, Schmidt R (2010) Forest cover changes in the Prignitz region (NE Germany) between 1790 and 1960 in relation to soils and other driving forces. Landscape Ecol 25(2):299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhou WQ, Huang GL, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2011) 90 Years of forest cover change in an urbanizing watershed: spatial and temporal dynamics. Landscape Ecol 26(5):645–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Irstea, UR RECOVERAix-en-Provence Cedex 5France
  2. 2.SemperflorisPrivasFrance
  3. 3.University of LorraineNancy CedexFrance
  4. 4.Forest Ecology and Ecophysiology Unit, French National Institute for Agronomical Research (INRA)University of LorraineChampenouxFrance
  5. 5.Mediterranean Institute of Marine and Terrestrial Biodiversity and Ecology (IMBE), Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, IRDUniv. AvignonMarseille Cedex 20France
  6. 6.Université Grenoble Alpes, Irstea, UR EMGRSt-Martin-d’HèresFrance

Personalised recommendations