Abstract
Context
With accelerated land-use change throughout the world, increased understanding of the relative effects of landscape composition and configuration on biological system and bioinvasion in particular, is needed to design effective management strategies. However, this topic is poorly understood in part because empirical studies often fail to account for large gradients of habitat complexity and offer insufficient or even no replication across habitats.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to disentangle the independent and interactive effects of landscape composition and landscape configuration on the establishment and spread of invasive insect species.
Methods
We explore a spatially-explicit, mechanistic modeling framework that allows for systematic investigation of the impact of changes in landscape composition and landscape configuration on establishment and spread of invasive insect species. Landscape metrics are used as an indicators of invasive insect establishment and spread.
Results
We showed that the presence of an Allee effect leads to a balance between the effectiveness of spread and invasion success. Spread is maximized at an intermediate dispersal level and inhibited at both low and high levels of dispersal. The landscape, by either increasing or mitigating the dispersal abilities of a species, can lead to a rate of spread under a dispersal threshold for which density and spread is at the highest.
Conclusion
Our study proposes that change in landscape structure is an additional explanation of the highly variable spread dynamics observed in natural and anthropogenic landscapes. Consequently, a landscape-scale perspective could significantly improve spread risk assessment and the design of control or containment strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartoń K (2016) MuMIn: multi-model inference, version 1.15.6. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, Christensen RHB, Singmann H, Dai B, Eigen adn Grothendieck G (2015) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using ’Eigen’ and S4, version 1.1-10. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
Betts MG, Fahrig L, Hadley AS, Halstead KE, Bowman J, Robinson WD, Wiens JA, Lindenmayer DB (2014) A species-centered approach for uncovering generalities in organism responses to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecography 37(6):517–527
Bocedi G, Palmer SC, Pe’er G, Heikkinen RK, Matsinos YG, Watts K, Travis JM (2014) Rangeshifter: a platform for modelling spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics and species’ responses to environmental changes. Methods Ecol Evol 5(4):388–396
Bradley BA (2010) Assessing ecosystem threats from global and regional change: hierarchical modeling of risk to sagebrush ecosystems from climate change, land use and invasive species in Nevada, USA. Ecography 33(1):198–208
Brown GP, Phillips BL, Webb JK, Shine R (2006) Toad on the road: use of roads as dispersal corridors by cane toads (Bufo marinus) at an invasion front in tropical Australia. Biol Conserv 133(1):88–94
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York
Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2004) Lost in time, lonely, and single: reproductive asynchrony and the Allee effect. Am Nat 164(1):25–37
Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486(7401):59–67
Chaplin-Kramer R, O’Rourke ME, Blitzer EJ, Kremen C (2011) A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. Ecol Lett 14(9):922–932
Christen D, Matlack G (2006) The role of roadsides in plant invasions: a demographic approach. Conserv Biol 20(2):385–391
Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36(1):27–46
Ewers RM, Thorpe S, Didham RK (2007) Synergistic interactions between edge and area effects in a heavily fragmented landscape. Ecology 88(1):96–106
Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14(2):101–112
Garden J, Mcalpine C, Peterson A, Jones D, Possingham H (2006) Review of the ecology of Australian urban fauna: a focus on spatially explicit processes. Aust Ecol 31(2):126–148
Gardner RH (1999) RULE: map generation and a spatial analysis program. Landscape ecological analysis. Springer, New York, pp 280–303
Gardner RH, Urban DL (2007) Neutral models for testing landscape hypotheses. Lands Ecol 22(1):15–29
González-Moreno P, Pino J, Gassó N, Vilá M (2013) Landscape context modulates alien plant invasion in Mediterranean forest edges. Biol Invas 15(3):547–557
González-Moreno P, Diez JM, Ibáñez I, Font X, Vilà M (2014) Plant invasions are context-dependent: multiscale effects of climate, human activity and habitat. Divers Distrib 20(6):720–731
Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8(9):993–1009
Hanski IA, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, San Diego
Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen PA (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19(3):768–782
Hastings A, Cuddington K, Davies KF, Dugaw CJ, Elmendorf S, Freestone A, Harrison S, Holland M, Lambrinos J, Malvadkar U (2005) The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. Ecol Lett 8(1):91–101
Heimpel GE, Asplen MK (2011) A ‘Goldilocks’ hypothesis for dispersal of biological control agents. BioControl 56(4):441–450
Herrando-Pérez S, Delean S, Brook BW, Bradshaw CJ (2012) Density dependence: an ecological Tower of Babel. Oecologia 170(3):585–603
Huntley B, Barnard P, Altwegg R, Chambers L, Coetzee BW, Gibson L, Hockey PA, Hole DG, Midgley GF, Underhill LG, Willis SG (2010) Beyond bioclimatic envelopes: dynamic species’ range and abundance modelling in the context of climatic change. Ecography 33(3):621–626
Jaeger JA (2000) Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Lands Ecol 15(2):115–130
Jankovic M, Petrovskii S (2013) Gypsy moth invasion in North America: a simulation study of the spatial pattern and the rate of spread. Ecol Complex 14:132–144
Johnson DM, Liebhold AM, Tobin PC, Bjørnstad ON (2006) Allee effects and pulsed invasion by the gypsy moth. Nature 444(7117):361–363
Jonsen ID, Taylor PD (2000) Fine-scale movement behaviors of calopterygid damselflies are influenced by landscape structure: an experimental manipulation. Oikos 88(3):553–562
Jonsson M, Straub CS, Didham RK, Buckley HL, Case BS, Hale RJ, Gratton C, Wratten SD (2015) Experimental evidence that the effectiveness of conservation biological control depends on landscape complexity. J Appl Ecol 52(5):1274–1282
Jules ES, Kauffman MJ, Ritts WD, Carroll AL (2002) Spread of an invasive pathogen over a variable landscape: a nonnative root rot on Port Orford cedar. Ecology 83(11):3167–3181
La Morgia V, Malenotti E, Badino G, Bona F (2011) Where do we go from here? Dispersal simulations shed light on the role of landscape structure in determining animal redistribution after reintroduction. Lands Ecol 26(7):969–981
Liebhold A, Bascompte J (2003) The allee effect, stochastic dynamics and the eradication of alien species. Ecol Lett 6(2):133–140
Lustig A, Stouffer DB, Roigé M, Worner SP (2015) Towards more predictable and consistent landscape metrics across spatial scales. Ecol Indic 57:11–21
Lustig A, Worner SP, Pitt JPW, Doscher C, Stouffer DB, Senay SD (2017) A modelling framework for the establishment and spread of invasive species in heterogeneous environments. Ecol Evol 10.1002/ece3.2915
Margosian ML, Garrett KA, Hutchinson JS (2009) Connectivity of the American agricultural landscape: assessing the national risk of crop pest and disease spread. BioScience 59(2):141–151
Martin PH, Canham CD, Marks PL (2008) Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front Ecol Environ 7(3):142–149
McGarigal K, Cushman S, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
Meier ES, Dullinger S, Zimmermann NE, Baumgartner D, Gattringer A, Hülber K (2014) Space matters when defining effective management for invasive plants. Divers Distrib 20(9):1029–1043
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC
Morel-Journel T, Girod P, Mailleret L, Auguste A, Blin A, Vercken E (2015) The highs and lows of dispersal: how connectivity and initial population size jointly shape establishment dynamics in discrete landscapes. Oikos 0:01–009
Mundt CC, Sackett KE, Wallace LD (2011) Landscape heterogeneity and disease spread: experimental approaches with a plant pathogen. Ecol Appl 21(2):321–328
Nesslage GM, Maurer BA, Gage SH (2007) Gypsy moth response to landscape structure differs from neutral model predictions: implications for invasion monitoring. Biol Invas 9(5):585–595
Pitt JPW (2008) Modelling the spread of invasive species across heterogeneous landscapes. PhD thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand
Pitt JPW, Worner SP, Suarez AV (2009) Predicting argentine ant spread over the heterogeneous landscape using a spatially explicit stochastic model. Ecol Appl 19(5):1176–1186
Pyšek P, Richardson DM (2010) Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Ann Rev Environ Res 35:25–55
Radeloff VC, Mladenoff DJ, Boyce MS (2000) The changing relation of landscape patterns and jack pine budworm populations during an outbreak. Oikos 90(3):417–430
Richter R, Dullinger S, Essl F, Leitner M, Vogl G (2013) How to account for habitat suitability in weed management programmes? Biol Invas 15(3):657–669
Rigot T, van Halder I, Jactel H (2014) Landscape diversity slows the spread of an invasive forest pest species. Ecography 37(7):648–658
Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Klein EK, Muller-Landau HC, Santamaría L (2014) Space, time and complexity in plant dispersal ecology. Mov Ecol 2(1):16
Saupe D (1988) Algorithms for random fractals. The science of fractal images. Springer, New York, pp 71–136
Schurr FM, Pagel J, Cabral JS, Groeneveld J, Bykova O, O’Hara RB, Hartig F, Kissling WD, Linder HP, Midgley GF, Schröder B (2012) How to understand species’ niches and range dynamics: a demographic research agenda for biogeography. J Biogeogr 39(12):2146–2162
Sebert-Cuvillier E, Simon-Goyheneche V, Paccaut F, Chabrerie O, Goubet O, Decocq G (2008) Spatial spread of an alien tree species in a heterogeneous forest landscape: a spatially realistic simulation model. Landsc Ecol 23(7):787–801
Sharov AA, Liebhold AM (1998) Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecol Appl 8(4):1170–1179
Shigesada N, Kawasaki K (1997) Biological invasions: theory and practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Smith R, Tan C, Srimani JK, Pai A, Riccione KA, Song H, You L (2014) Programmed Allee effect in bacteria causes a tradeoff between population spread and survival. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 111(5):1969–1974
Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP, Godfray HCJ, Beissinger SR, Benton T, Cameron DD, Carmel Y, Coomes DA, Coulson T, Emmerson MC (2013) Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions. J Ecol 101(1):58–67
Thies C, Haenke S, Scherber C, Bengtsson J, Bommarco R, Clement LW, Ceryngier P, Dennis C, Emmerson M, Gagic V, Hawro V (2011) The relationship between agricultural intensification and biological control: experimental tests across europe. Ecol Appl 21(6):2187–2196
Tobin PC, Blackburn LM (2007) Slow the spread: a national program to manage the gypsy moth. General Technical Report-Northern Research Station, USDA Forest Service (NRS-6)
Tobin PC, Liebhold AM, Anderson E (2015) Estimating spread rates of non-native species: the gypsy moth as a case study. In: Venette RC (ed) Pest Risk Modelling and Mapping for Invasive Alien Species. CAB International and USDA, Wallingford, pp 131–144
Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Batary P, Bengtsson J, Clough Y, Crist TO, Dormann CF, Ewers RM (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87(3):661–685
Vilà M, Ibáñez I (2011) Plant invasions in the landscape. Landsc Ecol 26(4):461–472
Wang L, Jackson DA (2014) Shaping up model transferability and generality of species distribution modeling for predicting invasions: implications from a study on Bythotrephes longimanus. Biol Invas 16:1–25
Wang Z, Wu J, Shang H, Cheng J (2011) Landscape connectivity shapes the spread pattern of the rice water weevil: a case study from Zhejiang, China. Environ Manag 47(2):254–262
With KA (2002) The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conserv Biol 16(5):1192–1203
With KA (2004) Assessing the risk of invasive spread in fragmented landscapes. Risk Anal 24(4):803–815
With KA, King AW (1999a) Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds. Landsc Ecol 14(1):73–82
With KA, King AW (1999b) Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. Conserv Biol 13(2):314–326
Zhang QH, Schlyter F (2004) Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles. Agric For Entomol 6(1):1–20
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to all involved, including Ursula Torres, Mariona Roige and Marona Rovira Capdevila for their help with the interpretation of the results. Work was supported by Bio-Protection Research Centre, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lustig, A., Stouffer, D.B., Doscher, C. et al. Landscape metrics as a framework to measure the effect of landscape structure on the spread of invasive insect species. Landscape Ecol 32, 2311–2325 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0570-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0570-3