Landscape Ecology

, Volume 32, Issue 10, pp 1987–1998 | Cite as

Functional connectivity of the white-footed mouse in Southern Quebec, Canada

  • Robby R. Marrotte
  • Andrew Gonzalez
  • Virginie Millien
Research Article
  • 276 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) is an important reservoir host for the pathogen responsible for Lyme disease in eastern North-America. Indigenous cases of Lyme disease in southern Quebec have increased from two cases in 2004 to 160 cases in 2015. Because of the strong relationship between the white-footed mouse occurrence and the Lyme disease pathogen prevalence, we can estimate the risk of Lyme disease by finding areas of high contact between mice. In this study, we inferred the movement patterns and contact rate of the white-footed mouse in southern Quebec.

Methods

We used pattern-orientated modelling to estimate a directional measure of functional connectivity from an Individual-Based Model. We replicated the spatial pattern observed in previously published molecular analysis of a white-footed mouse population.

Results

A perceptual range of 80 m best explained the genetic structure of the white-footed mouse in the region. The paths of individuals generally overlapped the edges of urban centers and the boundary of linear obstacles such as highways and water bodies. We show that the contact probability of mice was a good predictor of the number of mice caught in the field.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the usefulness of individual-based models to potentially predict high contact areas and disease hotspots across landscapes.

Keywords

Functional connectivity Individual-based model Lyme disease Pattern-oriented modelling Perceptual range Stochastic movement simulator 

Notes

Acknowledgements

RRM is supported by an NSERC Postgraduate Scholarship. AG is supported by a Killam Fellowship, the Liber Ero Chair in Conservation Biology, a Canada Research Chair and NSERC. VM is supported by a NSERC Discovery Grant. We wish to thank two anonymous reviewers, and SW Seagle for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.

Author contributions

RRM, AG and VM conceived the ideas; RRM designed methodology; RRM analysed the data; RRM led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.

Supplementary material

10980_2017_559_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 11 kb)
10980_2017_559_MOESM2_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 13 kb)
10980_2017_559_MOESM3_ESM.png (480 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PNG 479 kb)
10980_2017_559_MOESM4_ESM.png (11 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PNG 10 kb)
10980_2017_559_MOESM5_ESM.png (14 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PNG 14 kb)
10980_2017_559_MOESM6_ESM.png (87 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (PNG 87 kb)

References

  1. Aben J, Strubbe D, Adriaensen F, Palmer SC, Travis JM, Lens L, Matthysen E (2014) Simple individual-based models effectively represent Afrotropical forest bird movement in complex landscapes. J Appl Ecol 51:693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of “least-cost”modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert CH, Rayfield B, Dumitru M, Gonzalez A (2017) Applying network theory to prioritize multi-species habitat networks that are robust to climate and land-use change. Conserv Biol. doi:10.1111/cobi.12943 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson CS, Cady AB, Meikle DB (2003) Effects of vegetation structure and edge habitat on the density and distribution of white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) in small and large forest patches. Can J Zool 81:897–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andre A, Mouton A, Millien V, Michaux J (2017) Liver microbiome of Peromyscus leucopus, a key reservoir host species for emerging infectious diseases in North America. Infect Genet. Evol 52:10–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Andreassen HP, Ims RA (2001) Dispersal in patchy vole populations: role of patch configuration, density dependence, and demography. Ecology 82:2911–2926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barbour AG (2016) Infection resistance and tolerance in Peromyscus spp., natural reservoirs of microbes that are virulent for humans. Semin Cell Dev Biol. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.07.002 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bedford NL, Hoekstra HE (2015) Peromyscus mice as a model for studying natural variation. Elife 4:e06813CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchong JA, Samuel MD, Scribner KT, Weckworth BV, Langenberg LA, Filcek KB (2008) Landscape genetics and the spatial distribution of chronic wasting disease. Biol Lett 4:130–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown JH (1984) On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 124:255–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calisher CH, Sweeney WP, Root JJ, Beaty BJ (1999) Navigational instinct: a reason not to live trap deer mice in residences. Emerg Infect Dis 5:175–176PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Coulon A, Aben J, Palmer SCF, Stevens VM, Callens T, Strubbe D, Lens L, Matthysen E, Baguette M, Travis JMJ (2015) A stochastic movement simulator improves estimates of landscape connectivity. Ecology 96:2203–2213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cullingham CI, Kyle CJ, Pond BA, Rees EE, White BN (2009) Differential permeability of rivers to raccoon gene flow corresponds to rabies incidence in Ontario, Canada. Mol Ecol 18:43–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cullingham CI, Merrill EH, Pybus MJ, Bollinger TK, Wilson GA, Coltman DW (2011) Broad and fine-scale genetic analysis of white-tailed deer populations: estimating the relative risk of chronic wasting disease spread. Evol Appl 4:116–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummings JR, Vessey SH (1994) Agricultural Influences on Movement Patterns of White-Footed Mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Am Midl Nat 132:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Deyoung RW, Zamorano A, Kleberg C, Mesenbrink BT, Campbell TA, Leland BR, Moore GM, Honeycutt RL, Root JJ (2009) Landscape-genetic analysis of population structure in the Texas gray fox oral rabies vaccination zone United States. Wildl Manag 73:1292–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dias PC (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:326–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fahrig L (2007) Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct Ecol 21:1003–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fahrig L, Merriam G (1994) Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv Biol 8:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fried JH, Levey DJ, Hogsette JA (2005) Habitat corridors function as both drift fences and movement conduits for dispersing flies. Oecologia 143:645–651CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaitan J, Millien V (2016) Stress level, parasite load, and movement pattern in a small-mammal reservoir host for Lyme disease. Can J Zool 94:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grimm V, Railsback SF (2005) Individual-based modeling and ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grimm V, Revilla E, Berger U, Jeltsch F, Mooji WM, Railsback SF, DeAngelis DL (2005) Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: lessons from ecology. Science 310:987–991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Guo Q, Taper M, Schoenberger M, Brandle J (2005) Spatial-temporal population dynamics across species range: from centre to margin. Oikos 108:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haddad NM, Baum KA (1999) An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecol Appl 9:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall ER (1981) The mammals of North America. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  28. Hengeveld R, Haeck J (1982) The distribution of abundance I. Measurements. J Biogeogr. doi:10.2307/2844717 Google Scholar
  29. Hofmeister EK, Kolbert CP, Abdulkarim AS, Magera JM, Hopkins MK, Uhl JR, Ambyaye A, Telford SR, Cockerill FR, Persing DH (1998) Cosegregation of a novel Bartonella species with Borrelia burgdorferi and Babesia microti in Peromyscus leucopus. J Infect Dis 177:409–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Holt RD, Keitt TH, Lewis MA, Maurer BA, Taper ML (2005) Theoretical models of species’ borders: single species approaches. Oikos 108:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu H, Nigmatulina K, Eckhoff P (2013) The scaling of contact rates with population density for the infectious disease models. Math Biosci 244:125–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jaquiéry J, Broquet T, Hirzel H, Yearsley J, Perrin N (2011) Inferring landscape effects on dispersal from genetic distances: how far can we go? Mol Ecol 20:692–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jost L (2008) G ST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kanda LL, Fuller TK, Sievert PR, Kellogg RL (2009) Seasonal source–sink dynamics at the edge of a species’ range. Ecology 90:1574–1585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Keane B (1990) Dispersal and inbreeding avoidance in the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Anim Behav 40:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Keenan K, McGinnity P, Cross TF, Crozier WW, Prodohl PA (2013) diveRsity: an R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol Evol 4:782–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kelly AC, Mateus-Pinilla NE, Douglas M, Douglas W, Brown W, Ruiz M, Novakofski J (2010) Utilizing disease surveillance to examine gene flow and dispersal in white-tailed deer. J Appl Ecol 47:1189–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krohne DT, Hoch GA (1999) Demography of Peromyscus leucopus populations on habitat patches: the role of dispersal. Can J Zool 77:1247–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ledevin R, Millien V (2013) Congruent morphological and genetic differentiation as a signature of range expansion in a fragmented landscape. Ecol Evol 3:4172–4182CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Levi T, Massey AL, Holt RD, Keesing F, Ostfeld RS, Peres CA (2016) Does biodiversity protect humans against infectious disease? Comment. Ecology 97:536–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. LoGiudice K, Duerr STK, Newhouse MJ, Schmidt KA, Killilea ME, Ostfeld RS (2008) Impact of host community composition on Lyme disease risk. Ecology 89:2841–2849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Loreau M, Daufresne T, Gonzalez A, Gravel D, Guichard F, Loroux S, Mouquet N (2013) Unifying sources and sinks in ecology and Earth sciences. Biol Rev 88:365–379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Marrotte RR, Gonzalez A, Millien V (2014) Landscape resistance and habitat combine to provide an optimal model of genetic structure and connectivity at the range margin of a small mammal. Mol Ecol 23:3983–3998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Matthysen E (2005) Density-dependent dispersal in birds and mammals. Ecography 28:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McRae BH (2006) Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60:1551–1561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mech SG, Zollner PA (2002) Using body size to predict perceptual range. Oikos 98:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mineau P, Madison D (1977) Radio-tracking of Peromyscus leucopus. Can J Zool 55:465–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Myers P, Lundrigan BL, Hoffman SMG, Haraminac AP, Seto SH (2009) Climate-induced changes in the small mammal communities of the Northern Great Lakes Region. Glob Chang Biol 15:1434–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ostfeld RS (2013) A Candide response to Panglossian accusations by Randolph and Dobson: biodiversity buffers disease. Parasitology 140:1196–1198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ostfeld RS, Keesing F (2000) Biodiversity and disease risk: the case of Lyme disease. Conserv Biol 14:722–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ostfeld RS, Keesing F (2013) Straw men don’t get Lyme disease: response to Wood and Lafferty. Trends Ecol Evol 28:502–503CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Palmer SCF, Coulon A, Travis JMJ (2011) Introducing a “stochastic movement simulator” for estimating habitat connectivity. Methods Ecol Evol 2:258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Palmer SCF, Coulon A, Travis JMJ (2014) Inter-individual variability in dispersal behaviours impacts connectivity estimates. Oikos 123:923–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Randolph SE, Dobson ADM (2012) Pangloss revisited: a critique of the dilution effect and the biodiversity-buffers-disease paradigm. Parasitology 139:847–863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rees EE, Pond BA, Tinline RR, Bélanger D (2013) Modelling the effect of landscape heterogeneity on the efficacy of vaccination for wildlife infectious disease control. J Appl Ecol 50:881–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rogic A, Tessier N, Legendre P, Lapointe FJ, Millien V (2013) Genetic structure of the white-footed mouse in the context of the emergence of Lyme disease in southern Québec. Ecol Evol 3:2075–2088CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Root JJ, Calisher CH, Beaty BJ (1999) Relationships of deer mouse movement, vegetative structure, and prevalence of infection with Sin Nombre virus. J Wildl Dis 35:311–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Root JJ, Black WC, Calisher CH, Wilson KR, Mackie RS, Schountz T, Mills JN, Beaty BJ (2003) Analyses of gene flow among populations of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) at sites near hantavirus pulmonary syndrome case-patient residences. J Wildl Dis 39:287–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Root JJ, Black WC, Calisher CH, Wilson KR, Beaty BJ (2004) Genetic relatedness of deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) infected with Sin Nombre virus. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 4:149–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Root JJ, Puskas RB, Fischer JW, Swope CB, Neubaum MA, Reeder SA, Piaggio AJ (2009) Landscape genetics of raccoons (Procyon lotor) associated with ridges and valleys of Pennsylvania: implications for oral rabies vaccination programs. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 9:583–588CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Roy-Dufresne E, Logan T, Simon JA, Chmura GL, Millien V (2013) Poleward expansion of the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) under climate change: implications for the spread of lyme disease. PLoS ONE 8:e80724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Schartel TE, Schauber EM (2016) Relative preference and localized food affect predator space use and consumption of incidental prey. PLoS ONE 11:e0151483CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Simon JA, Marrotte RR, Desrosiers N, Fiset J, Gaitan J, Gonzalez A, Logan T (2014) Climate change and habitat fragmentation drive the occurrence of Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease, at the northeastern limit of its distribution. Evol Appl 7:750–764CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Sundqvist L, Zackrisson M, Kleinhans D (2013) Directional genetic differentiation and asymmetric migration. Ecol Evol. doi:10.1002/ece3.2096 Google Scholar
  65. Sundqvist L, Keenan K, Zackrisson M, Prodohl P, Kleinhans D (2016) Directional genetic differentiation and relative migration. Ecol Evol 6:3461–3475CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Teferi T, Millar JS (1993) Long distance homing by the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus. Can Field Nat 107:109–111Google Scholar
  67. Travis J, David MJ, Murrell J, Dytham C (1999) The evolution of density–dependent dispersal. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 266:1837–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Turney S, Gonzalez A, Millien V (2014) The negative relationship between mammal host diversity and Lyme disease incidence strengthens through time. Ecology 95:3244–3250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Urban MC, Bocedi G, Hendry AP, Mihoub JB, Singer A, Bridle JR, Crozier LG, De Meester L, Godsoe W, Gonzalez A, Hellmann JJ, Holt RD, Huth A, Johst K, Krug CB, Leadley PW, Palmer SCF, Pantel JH, Schmitz A, Zollner PA, Travis JMJ (2016) Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science 353:aad8466CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Wolf M, Batzli GO (2002) Effects of forest edge on populations of white-footed mice Peromyscus leucopus. Ecography (Cop) 25:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wolf M, Batzli G (2004) Forest edge: high or low quality habitat for white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus)? Ecology 85:756–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wolff JO (1992) Parents suppress reproduction and stimulate dispersal in opposite-sex juvenile white-footed mice. Nature 359:409–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Wolff JO, Lundy KI, Baccus R (1988) Dispersal, inbreeding avoidance and reproductive success in white-footed mice. Anim Behav 36:456–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wood CL, Lafferty KD (2013) Biodiversity and disease: a synthesis of ecological perspectives on Lyme disease transmission. Trends Ecol Evol 28:239–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Wood CL, Lafferty KD, DeLeo G, Young HS, Hudson PJ, Kuris AM (2014) Does biodiversity protect humans against infectious disease? Ecology 95:817–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landsc Ecol 27:777–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zollner PA, Lima SL (1997) Landscape-level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice: perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat. Oikos 80:51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zollner PA, Lima SL (1999) Illumination and the perception of remote habitat patches by white-footed mice. Anim Behav 58:489–500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robby R. Marrotte
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Andrew Gonzalez
    • 2
  • Virginie Millien
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental & Life Sciences Graduate ProgramTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Redpath MuseumMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations