Lines in the sand: quantifying the cumulative development footprint in the world’s largest remaining temperate woodland
- 369 Downloads
The acceleration of infrastructure development presents many challenges for the mitigation of ecological impacts. The type, extent, and cumulative effects of multiple developments must be quantified to enable mitigation.
We quantified anthropogenic development footprints in a globally significant and relatively intact region. We identified the proportion accounted for by linear infrastructure (e.g. roads) including infrastructure that is currently unmapped; investigated the importance of key landscape drivers; and explored potential ramifications of offsite impacts (edge effects).
We quantified direct development footprints of linear and ‘hub’ infrastructure in the Great Western Woodlands (GWW) in south-western Australia, using digitisation and extrapolation from a stratified random sample of aerial imagery. We used spatial datasets and literature resources to identify predictors of development footprint extent and calculate hypothetical ‘edge effect zones’.
Unmapped linear infrastructure, only detectable through manual digitisation, accounts for the greatest proportion of the direct development footprint. Across the 160,000 km2 GWW, the estimated development footprint is 690 km2, of which 67% consists of linear infrastructure and the remainder is ‘hub’ infrastructure. An estimated 150,000 km of linear infrastructure exists in the study area, equating to an average of ~1 km per km2. Beyond the direct footprint, a further 4000–55,000 km2 (3–35% of the region) lies within edge effect zones.
This study highlights the pervasiveness of linear infrastructure and hence the importance of managing its cumulative impacts as a key component of landscape conservation. Our methodology can be applied to other relatively intact landscapes worldwide.
KeywordsGIS Road ecology Great Western Woodlands Linear infrastructure Ecological impact assessment Development footprint Cumulative impacts Offsite impacts Indirect impacts
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Gledden Postgraduate Research Scholarship, the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The Wilderness Society, Gondwana Link, the Natural Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions Hub, and the Great Western Woodlands Supersite, part of Australia’s Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. We thank Ophir Levin, Julia Waite, Brad Desmond, and Rachel Omodei for assistance in digitising the unmapped development footprint. We also thank Fiona Westcott for her assistance in ground-truthing, Cliffs Natural Resources for in-kind support in the field, and Amanda Keesing (Gondwana Link), Judith Harvey (DPaW) and Katherine Zdunic (DPaW) for their assistance in supplying spatial information. Ashley Sparrow, Richard Forman, Andrew Bennett, John Bissonette, and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable reviews that improved this manuscript. All fieldwork was carried out under Department of Parks and Wildlife Regulation 4 lawful authority CE003548.
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1)Google Scholar
- Barton K (2015) MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.15.1Google Scholar
- Berry S, Keith H, Mackey B, Brookhouse M, Jonson J (2010) Green carbon: the role of natural forests in carbon storage. Part 2. Biomass carbon stocks in the Great Western Woodlands. The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University E Press, Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Booth C, Traill B (2008) Conservation of Australia’s outback wilderness. Pew Environment Group & The Nature Conservancy. Wild Australia Program, SydneyGoogle Scholar
- Core Team R (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Department of Environment and Conservation (2010) A biodiversity and cultural conservation strategy for the Great Western Woodlands. Government of Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Department of Mines and Petroleum (2013) Prospecting, exploration and mining on pastoral leases. Government of Western Australia, Perth, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- Department of Mines and Petroleum (2015) Record spike in mining and exploration applications for June/July. Environment eNewsletter, 15th edn. Government of Western Australia, Perth, p 12Google Scholar
- Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA, Clevenger AP, Cutshall CD (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Freudenberger L, Hobson PR, Rupic S, Pe’er G, Schluck M, Sauermann J, Kreft S, Selva N, Ibisch PL (2013) Spatial road disturbance index (SPROADI) for conservation planning: a novel landscape index, demonstrated for the State of Brandenburg. Germany. Landscape Ecol 28(7):1353–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goosem M (2007) Fragmentation impacts caused by roads through rainforests. Curr Sci 93(11):1587Google Scholar
- Jaeger JAG (2015) Improving environmental impact assessment and road planning at the landscape scale. In: van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (eds) Handbook of Road Ecology. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 32–42Google Scholar
- Johnson CJ, Boyce MS, Case RL, Cluff HD, Gau RJ, Gunn A, Mulders R (2005) Cumulative effects of human developments on arctic wildlife. Wildl Monogr 160:1–36Google Scholar
- Laurance WF, Goosem M (2008) Impacts of habitat fragmentation and linear clearings on Australian rainforest biota. In: Stork NE, Turton SM (eds) Living in a dynamic tropical forest landscape. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 295–306Google Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team (2017) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1–131. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
- Prober SM, Thiele KR, Rundel PW, Yates CJ, Berry SL, Byrne M, Christidis L, Gosper CR, Grierson PF, Lemson K, Lyons T (2012) Facilitating adaptation of biodiversity to climate change: a conceptual framework applied to the world’s largest Mediterranean-climate woodland. Climatic Change 110(1):227–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raiter KG (2017) Spatial analysis data for ‘Lines in the sand: quantifying the cumulative development footprint in the world’s largest remaining temperate woodland’. AEKOS - TERN Ecoinformatics. https://doi.org/10.4227/05/59893d248decc
- Roche C, Mudd G (2014) An overview of mining and the environment in Western Australia. In: Brueckner M, Durey A, Mayes R, Pforr C (eds) Resource curse or cure?, CSR, sustainability, ethics & governance. Springer, Berlin, pp 179–194Google Scholar
- Runge CA, Tulloch AIT, Gordon A, Rhodes JR (2017) Quantifying the conservation gains from shared access to linear infrastructure. Conserv Biol Accepted Author ManuscriptGoogle Scholar
- Schneider R, Dyer S (2006) Death by A Thousand Cuts: The Impacts of In Situ Oil Sands Development on Alberta’s Boreal Forest. Oil Sands Fever Series, 1st Edition edn. Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society and The Pembina Institute, Edmonton, p. 50Google Scholar
- Suring LH, Barber KR, Schwartz CC, Bailey TN, Shuster WC, Tetreau MD (1998) Analysis of cumulative effects on brown bears on the Kenai Peninsula, Southcentral Alaska. Ursus 10:107–117Google Scholar
- The Chamber of Mineral and Energy, Association of Mining and Exploration Companies, The Pastoralists and Graziers Association of W.A. (1999) Code of conduct for mineral exploration on pastoral leases. Perth, Australia, pp. 1–10Google Scholar
- van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (2015a) The ecological effects of linear infrastructure and traffic. In: van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (eds) Handbook of Road Ecology. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 1–9Google Scholar
- van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (eds) (2015b) Handbook of Road Ecology. JWiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
- Watson A, Judd S, Watson J, Lam A, Mackenzie D (2008) The extraordinary nature of the Great Western Woodlands. The Wilderness Society, PerthGoogle Scholar