Land-cover changes (LCCs) could impact wildlife populations through gains or losses of natural habitats and changes in the landscape mosaic. To assess such impacts, we need to focus on landscape connectivity from a diachronic perspective.
We propose a method for assessing the impact of LCCs on landscape connectivity through a multi-species approach based on graph theory. To do this, we combine two approaches devised to spatialize the variation of multi-species connectivity and to quantify the importance of types of LCCs for single-species connectivity by highlighting the possible contradictory effects.
We begin with a list of landscape species and create virtual species with similar ecological requirements. We model the ecological network of these virtual species at two dates and compute the variation of a local and global connectivity metric to assess the impacts of the LCCs on their dispersal capacities.
The spatial variation of multi-species connectivity showed that local impacts range from −6.4% to +3.2%. The assessment of the impacts of types of LCCs showed a variation in global connectivity ranging from −45.1% for open-area reptiles to +170.2% for natural open-area birds with low-dispersion capacities.
This generic approach can be reproduced in a large variety of spatial contexts by adapting the selection of the initial species. The proposed method could inform and guide conservation actions and landscape management strategies so as to enhance or maintain connectivity for species at a landscape scale.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Baillie J, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN (2004) 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species: a global species assessment
Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manag 59:265–278
Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2004) A comparison-shopper’s guide to connectivity metrics. Front Ecol Environ 2:529–536
Chamberlain DE, Fuller RJ, Bunce RG, Duckworth JC, Shrubb M (2000) Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J Appl Ecol 37(5):771–788
Clauzel C, Bannwarth C, Foltete J-C (2015) Integrating regional-scale connectivity in habitat restoration: an application for amphibian conservation in eastern France. J Nat Conserv 23:98–107
Clauzel C, Girardet X, Foltête J-C (2013) Impact assessment of a high-speed railway line on species distribution: application to the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) in Franche-Comté. J Environ Manag 127:125–134
Coffin AW (2007) From roadkill to road ecology: a review of the ecological effects of roads. J Transp Geogr 15:396–406
Cushman SA, Landguth EL (2012) Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Ecol Modell 231:101–112
Cushman SA, Landguth EL, Flather CH (2013) Evaluating population connectivity for species of conservation concern in the American Great Plains. Biodivers Conserv 22:2583–2605
Dunford W, Freemark K (2005) Matrix matters: effects of Surrounding Land Uses on Forest Birds Near Ottawa, Canada. Landscape Ecol 20:497–511
Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142
Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manag 61:603–610
Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574
Foltête J-C, Clauzel C, Vuidel G (2012) A software tool dedicated to the modelling of landscape networks. Environ Model Softw 38:316–327
Foltete J-C, Clauzel C, Vuidel G, Tournant P (2012) Integrating graph-based connectivity metrics into species distribution models. Landscape Ecol 27:557–569
Foltête J-C, Girardet X, Clauzel C (2014) A methodological framework for the use of landscape graphs in land-use planning. Landsc Urban Plan 124:140–150
Forman RTT (1995) Land Mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231
Fu W, Liu S, Degloria SD, Dong S, Beazley R (2010) Characterizing the “fragmentation–barrier” effect of road networks on landscape connectivity: A case study in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Landsc Urban Plann 95(3):122–129
Galpern P, Manseau M, Fall A (2011) Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biol Conserv 144:44–55
Geneletti D (2006) Some common shortcomings in the treatment of impacts of linear infrastructures on natural habitat. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26:257–267
Giplin M, Hanski I (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press, London
Girardet X, Foltête J-C, Clauzel C (2013) Designing a graph-based approach to landscape ecological assessment of linear infrastructures. Environ Impact Assess Rev 42:10–17
Goetz SJ, Jantz P, Jantz CA (2009) Connectivity of core habitat in the Northeastern United States: parks and protected areas in a landscape context. Remote Sens Environ 113:1421–1429
Gurrutxaga M, Rubio L, Saura S (2011) Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: a transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe). Landsc Urban Plan 101:310–320
Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755–758
Hirzel AH, Helfer V, Metral F (2001) Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecol Modell 145:111–121
Hirzel AH, Le Lay G (2008) Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J Appl Ecol 45:1372–1381
Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–856
Lislevand T, Figuerola J, Szekely T (2007) Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behavior, and resource sharing. Ecology 88:1605
Martin TG, Burgman MA, Fidler F, Kuhnert PM, Low-Choy SA, McBride M, Mengersen K (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv Biol 26(1):29–38
Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: general synthesis. Island Press, Washington
Mimet A, Clauzel C, Foltête J-C (2016) Locating wildlife crossings for multispecies connectivity across linear infrastructures. Landscape Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-016-0373-y
Minor ES, Lookingbill TR (2010) A multiscale network analysis of protected-area connectivity for mammals in the United States. Conserv Biol 24:1549–1558
MNHN (2011) Trame verte et bleue. Critères nationaux de cohérence. Contribution à la définition du critère sur les espèces
Nathan R (2001) The challenges of studying dispersal. Trends Ecol Evol 16:481–483
Opdam P, Pouwels R, Steingröver S, Vos C (2008) Setting biodiversity targets in participatory regional planning: introducing ecoprofiles. Ecol Soc 13:20
Paradis E, Baillie SR, Sutherland WJ (2002) Modeling large-scale dispersal distances. Ecol Model 151:279–292
Pereira M, Segurado P, Neves N (2011) Using spatial network structure in landscape management and planning: a case study with pond turtles. Landsc Urban Plan 100:67–76
Pontius RG, Shusas E, McEachern M (2004) Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:251–268
Rayfield B, Fortin MJ, Fall A (2011) Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. Ecology 92:847–858
Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459):1770–1774
Sanderson EW, Redford KH, Vedder A, Coppolillo PB, Ward SE (2002) A conceptual model for conservation planning based on landscape species requirements. Landsc Urban Plan 58:41–56
Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landsc Urban Plan 83:91–103
Saura S, Vogt P, Velásquez J, Hernando A, Tejera R (2011) Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses. For Ecol Manag 262:150–160
Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28:110–128
Smith FA, Lyons SK, Ernest SK, Jones KE, Kaufman DM, Dayan T, Marquet PA, Brown JH, Haskell JP (2003) Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84(12):3403
Solé RV, Bascompte J (2006) Self-organization in complex ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Sordello R, Conruyt-Rogeon G, Merlet F, Houard X, Touroult J (2013) Synthèses bibliographiques sur les traits de vie de 39 espèces proposées pour la cohérence nationale de la Trame verte et bleue relatifs à leurs déplacements et besoins de continuité écologique. Paris
Sutherland G, Harestad AS, Price K, Lertzman KP (2000) Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv Ecol 4(1):16
Tannier C, Bourgeois M, Houot H, Foltête J (2016) Land Use Policy Impact of urban developments on the functional connectivity of forested habitats: a joint contribution of advanced urban models and landscape graphs. Land Use Policy 52:76–91
Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA (2006) Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–43
Turner BL, Lambin EF, Reenberg A (2007) The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability. PNAS 104:20666–20671
UN General Assembly (2012) The Future we want (Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012). United Nations 53
Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218
Vasas V, Magura T, Jordan F, Tothmeresz B (2009) Graph theory in action: evaluating planned highway tracks based on connectivity measures. Landscape Ecol 24:581–586
Vogt P, Riitters KH, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade TG, Wickham JD (2007) Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecol 22:171–177
Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PF, Ter Braak CJ (2001) Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am Nat 157:24–41
Yager R (1977) Multiple objective decision-making using fuzzy sets. Int J Man Mach Stud 9:375–382
Zeller KA, Mcgarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecol 27:777–797
Zetterberg A, Mortberg UM, Balfors B (2010) Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design. Landsc Urban Plan 95:181–191
The authors thank the reviewers for their relevant suggestions that have improved the manuscript. They are very grateful to Anne Mimet for constructive discussions about allometric relationships and Gilles Vuidel for the technical improvement of Graphab software by implementing the transition decomposition process and the spatial generalization of local connectivity metrics. Land-cover data were provided by the Institut d’Aménagement et d’Urbanisme de la Région Île-de-France (IAU-IDF). The graph analysis was performed using the Graphab software, developed by Gilles Vuidel (UMR 6049 ThéMA), in the framework of the ODIT project of the USR 3124 MSHE Ledoux, funded by European FEDER funds. Computations were performed on the supercomputer facilities of the Mésocentre de calcul de Franche-Comté.
About this article
Cite this article
Sahraoui, Y., Foltête, J. & Clauzel, C. A multi-species approach for assessing the impact of land-cover changes on landscape connectivity. Landscape Ecol 32, 1819–1835 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0551-6
- Landscape graphs
- Land-cover changes
- Impact assessment