Landscape Ecology

, Volume 32, Issue 8, pp 1705–1721 | Cite as

A multi-method approach to delineate and validate migratory corridors

  • Monica L. Bond
  • Curtis M. Bradley
  • Christian Kiffner
  • Thomas A. Morrison
  • Derek E. Lee
Research Article



Managers are faced with numerous methods for delineating wildlife movement corridors, and often must make decisions with limited data. Delineated corridors should be robust to different data and models.


We present a multi-method approach for delineating and validating wildlife corridors using multiple data sources, which can be used conserve landscape connectivity. We used this approach to delineate and validate migration corridors for wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) in the Tarangire Ecosystem of northern Tanzania.


We used two types of locational data (distance sampling detections and GPS collar locations), and three modeling methods (negative binomial regression, logistic regression, and Maxent), to generate resource selection functions (RSFs) and define resistance surfaces. We compared two corridor detection algorithms (cost-distance and circuit theory), to delineate corridors. We validated corridors by comparing random and wildebeest locations that fell within corridors, and cross-validated by data type.


Both data types produced similar RSFs. Wildebeest consistently selected migration habitat in flatter terrain farther from human settlements. Validation indicated three of the combinations of data type, modeling, and corridor detection algorithms (detection data with Maxent modeling, GPS collar data with logistic regression modeling, and GPS collar data with Maxent modeling, all using cost-distance) far outperformed the other seven. We merged the predictive corridors from these three data-method combinations to reveal habitat with highest probability of use.


The use of multiple methods ensures that planning is able to prioritize conservation of migration corridors based on all available information.


Connectivity Connochaetes taurinus Circuit theory Cost distance Land-use planning Least Cost Path Analysis Maxent Migration Resource selection functions Wildebeest 



This research was conducted with permission from Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH), Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, and villages of Selela, Engaruka, and Mbaash, under COSTECH permits 2014-53-ER-90-172 and 2015-22-ER-90-172, and Wildlife Division permit NO.HA/403/563/0l/104. DEL and MLB received funding from Fulbright U.S. Scholar Program, ERM Group Foundation, Columbus Zoo, Rufford Foundation, and TRIAS. TAM received funds for GPS collaring from Wildlife Conservation Society Tarangire Elephant Project, Tembo Foundation, and Earthwatch Institute.

Supplementary material

10980_2017_537_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (336 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 336 kb)


  1. Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulnick H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of “least cost” modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64:233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beier P, Majka DR, Spencer WD (2008) Forks in the road: choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conserv Biol 22:836–851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger J (2004) The last mile: how to sustain long-distance migration in mammals. Conserv Biol 18:320–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry HH, Louw GN (1982) Seasonal nutritive status of wildebeest in Etosha National Park. Modoqua 13:127–139Google Scholar
  5. Bolger DT, Newmark WD, Morrison TA, Doak DF (2008) The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates. Ecol Lett 11:63–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Borner M (1985) The increasing isolation of Tarangire National Park. Oryx 19:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Caro T, Jones T, Davenport T (2009) Realities of documenting wildlife corridors in tropical countries. Biol Conserv 142:2807–2811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cushman SA, McRae B, Adriaensen F, Beier P, Shirley M, Zeller K (2013) Biological corridors and connectivity. In: Macdonald DW, Willis KJ (eds) Key topics in conservation biology 2, 1st edn. Wiley, Oxford, pp 384–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee Yung En, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epps CW, Mutayoba BM, Gwin L, Brashares JS (2011) An empirical evaluation of the African elephant as a focal species for connectivity planning in East Africa. Divers Distrib 17:603–6012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ESRI Environmental Systems Research Institute (2016) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.4. RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. Estes RD (2014) The Gnu’s World: Serengeti wildebeest ecology and life history. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  14. Foley CA, Faust LJ (2010) Rapid population growth in an elephant Loxodonta africana population recovering from poaching in Tarangire National Park, Tanzania. Oryx 44:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fryxell JM, Greever J, Sinclair ARE (1988) Why are migratory ungulates so abundant? Am Nat 131:781–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Georgiadis N (1995) Population structure of wildebeest: implications for conservation. In: Sinclair ARE, Arcese P (eds) Serengeti II: dynamics, management and conservation of an ecosystem. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton EW, Giovannini MS, Moses SA, Coleman JS, McNaughton SJ (1998) Biomass and mineral element responses of a Serengeti short-grass species to nitrogen supply and defoliations: compensation requires a critical [N]. Oecologia 116:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harris G, Thirgood S, Hopcraft JGC, Cromsigt JPGM, Berger J (2009) Global decline in aggregated migrations of large terrestrial mammals. Endanger Species Res 7:55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hebblewhite M, Haydon DT (2010) Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology. Philios Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:2303–2312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holdo RM, Holt RD, Fryxell JM (2009) Opposing rainfall and plant nutritional gradients best explain the wildebeest migration in the Serengeti. Am Nat 173:431–445CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hopcraft J, Morales J, Beyer H, Borner M, Mwangomo E, Sinclair A, Olff H, Haydon D (2014) Competition, predation and migration: individual choice patterns of Serengeti migrants captured by hierarchical models. Ecol Monogr 84:355–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Horne JS, Garton EO, Krone SM, Lewis JS (2007) Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88:2354–2363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kiffner C, Albertini M, Ede A, Donnellan B, Hahn N, McGinnis MA, Nietlisbach NA, Tate J, Kioko J (2015) Performance of individual species as indicators of large mammal species richness in Northern Tanzania. Ecol Indic 53:70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lamprey HF (1964) Estimation of the large mammal densities, biomass and energy exchange in the Tarangire Game Reserve and the Masai Steppe in Tanganyika. East Afr J Wildl 2:1–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. LaPoint S, Gallery P, Wikelski M, Kays R (2013) Animal behavior, cost-based corridor models, and real corridors. Landscape Ecol 28:1615–1630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee DL, Kissui BM, Kiwango YA, Bond ML (2016) Migratory herds of wildebeests and zebras indirectly affect calf survival of giraffes. Ecol Evol 6:8402–8411CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Manly BF, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald DL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical analysis and design for field studies. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  28. McClure ML, Hanson AJ, Inman RM (2016) Connecting models to movements: testing connectivity model predictions against empirical migration and dispersal data. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-016-0347-0 Google Scholar
  29. McNaughton SJ (1985) Ecology of a grazing ecosystem: the Serengeti. Ecol Monogr 55:259–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McRae B, Dickson B, Keitt T, Shah V (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology 89:2712–2724CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McRae B, Shah V (2008) Circuitscape User Guide. University of California, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  32. McRae BH, Kavanagh DM (2011) Linkage Mapper Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle.
  33. Morales JM, Haydon DT, Frair J, Holsiner KE, Fryxell JM (2004) Extracting more out of relocation data: building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85:2436–2445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morrison TA, Bolger DT (2012) Wet season range fidelity in a tropical migratory ungulate. J Anim Ecol 81:543–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Morrison TA, Bolger DT (2014) Connectivity and bottlenecks in a migratory wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus population. Oryx 48:613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morrison TA, Link WA, Newmark WD, Foley CAH, Bolger DT (2016) Tarangire revisited: consequences of declining connectivity in a tropical ungulate population. Biol Conserv 197:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Msoffe FU, Said MY, Ogutu JO, Kifugo SC, de Leeuw J, van Gardingen P, Reid RS (2011) Spatial correlates of land-use changes in the Maasai-Steppe of Tanzania: implications for conservation and environmental planning. Int J Biodiver Conserv 3:280–290Google Scholar
  38. Newmark WD (2008) Isolation of African protected areas. Front Ecol Environ 6:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nielson RM, Sawyer H (2013) Estimating resource selection with count data. Ecol Evol 3:2233–2240CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poor EE, Loucks C, Jakes A, Urban DL (2012) Comparing habitat suitability and connectivity modeling methods for conserving pronghorn migrations. PLoS ONE 7(11):e49390CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Prins HHT (1987) Nature conservation as an integral part of optimal land use in East Africa: action plan for the Masai ecosystem of northern Tanzania. Biol Conserv 40:141–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pullinger MG, Johnson CJ (2010) Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information. Landscape Ecol 25:1547–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R Core Development Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna AustriaGoogle Scholar
  45. Reid R (2012) Savannas of our birth: people, wildlife, and change in East Africa. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  46. Sawyer H, Kauffman MJ (2011) Stopover ecology of a migratory ungulate. J Anim Ecol 80:1078–1087CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Sawyer H, Kauffman MJ, Nielson RM, Horne JS (2009) Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscape-level conservation. Ecol Appl 19:2016–2025CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh NJ, Börger L, Dettki H, Bunnefeld N, Ericsson G (2012) From migration to nomadism: movement variability in a northern ungulate across its latitudinal range. Ecol Appl 22:2007–2020CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh NJ, Milner-Gulland EJ (2011) Conserving a moving target: planning protection for a migratory species as its distribution changes. J Appl Ecol 48:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stabach JA, Wittemyer G, Boone RB, Reid RS, Worden JS (2016) Variation in habitat selection by white-bearded wildebeest across different degrees of human disturbance. Ecosphere 7:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Voeten MM, Prins HHT (1999) Resource partitioning between sympatric wild and domestic herbivores in the Tarangire region of Tanzania. Oecologia 120:287–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Worden J, Mose V, Western D (2010) Aerial census of wildlife and livestock in Eastern Kajiado. African Conservation Centre, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeller KA, McGarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecol 27:777–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monica L. Bond
    • 1
  • Curtis M. Bradley
    • 2
  • Christian Kiffner
    • 3
  • Thomas A. Morrison
    • 4
  • Derek E. Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Wild Nature InstituteConcordUSA
  2. 2.Center for Biological DiversityTucsonUSA
  3. 3.The School for Field StudiesCenter for Wildlife Management StudiesKaratuTanzania
  4. 4.Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative MedicineUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations