Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 953–969 | Cite as

Spatial resilience of forested landscapes under climate change and management

  • Melissa S. LucashEmail author
  • Robert M. Scheller
  • Eric J. Gustafson
  • Brian R. Sturtevant
Research Article

Abstract

Context

Resilience, the ability to recover from disturbance, has risen to the forefront of scientific policy, but is difficult to quantify, particularly in large, forested landscapes subject to disturbances, management, and climate change.

Objectives

Our objective was to determine which spatial drivers will control landscape resilience over the next century, given a range of plausible climate projections across north-central Minnesota.

Methods

Using a simulation modelling approach, we simulated wind disturbance in a 4.3 million ha forested landscape in north-central Minnesota for 100 years under historic climate and five climate change scenarios, combined with four management scenarios: business as usual (BAU), maximizing economic returns (‘EcoGoods’), maximizing carbon storage (‘EcoServices’), and climate change adaption (‘CCAdapt’). To estimate resilience, we examined sites where simulated windstorms removed >70% of the biomass and measured the difference in biomass and species composition after 50 years.

Results

Climate change lowered resilience, though there was wide variation among climate change scenarios. Resilience was explained more by spatial variation in soils than climate. We found that BAU, EcoGoods and EcoServices harvest scenarios were very similar; CCAdapt was the only scenario that demonstrated consistently higher resilience under climate change. Although we expected spatial patterns of resilience to follow ownership patterns, it was contingent upon whether lands were actively managed.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that resilience may be lower under climate change and that the effects of climate change could overwhelm current management practices. Only a substantial shift in simulated forest practices was successful in promoting resilience.

Keywords

Carbon cycle Century Climate change adaptation Forest simulation model Forest management Wind disturbance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by USDA AFRI (2012-68002-19896) and USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station. We acknowledge substantial contributions by the Staff of the Chippewa National Forest, particularly Kelly Barrett, Jim Gries, Audrey Gustafson, Gary Swanson, Sharon Klinkhammer, Barb Knight, Rose Johnson and John Rickers. We thank Brian Miranda for coding the Linear Wind Extension. Drs. Louis Iverson, Matt Hurteau and Matthew Duveneck provided comments that helped us substantively improve the manuscript. We greatly benefited from Matthew Duveneck’s expertise in R and LANDIS-II parameterization. Thanks also for GIS assistance by Sue Lietz and John Richardson.

Supplementary material

10980_2017_501_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (703 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 703 kb)

References

  1. Allen CR, Angeler DG, Cumming GS, Folke C, Twidwell D, Uden DR (2016) Quantifying spatial resilience. J Appl Ecol 53(3):625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson KJ, Allen AP, Gillooly JF, Brown JH (2006) Temperature-dependence of biomass accumulation rates during secondary succession. Ecol Lett 9(6):673–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson MG, Ferree CE (2010) Conserving the stage: climate change and the geophysical underpinnings of species diversity. PLoS ONE 5(7):e11554CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson-Teixeira KJ, Miller AD, Mohan JE, Hudiburg TW, Duval BD, DeLucia EH (2013) Altered dynamics of forest recovery under a changing climate. Glob Change Biol 19(7):2001–2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brand FS, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc 12(1):23. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art23/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buma B, Wessman C (2013) Forest resilience, climate change, and opportunities for adaptation: a specific case of a general problem. For Ecol Manag 306:216–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter S, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cumming GS (2011) Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability. Landscape Ecol 26(7):899–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Amato A, Bolton WR, Blinn CR, Ek AR (2008) Current status and long-term trends of silvicultural practices in Minnesota: a 2008 assessment. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, p 58Google Scholar
  10. Duveneck MJ, Scheller RM (2015) Climate-suitable planting as a strategy for maintaining forest productivity and functional diversity. Ecol Appl 25(6):1653–1668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Duveneck MJ, Scheller RM (2016) Measuring and managing resistance and resilience under climate change in northern Great Lake Forests (USA). Landscape Ecol 31(3):669–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EPA (2012) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency climate change adaption plan. Public review draft. http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/pdfs/EPA-climate-change-adaptation-plan-final-for-public-comment-2-713.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2015
  13. Fisichelli NA, Frelich LE, Reich PB (2014) Temperate tree expansion into adjacent boreal forest patches facilitated by warmer temperatures. Ecography 37(2):152–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frelich LE (2002) Forest dynamics and disturbance regimes: studies from temperate evergreen-deciduous forests. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frelich LE, Reich PB (2009) Will environmental changes reinforce the impact of global warming on the prairie-forest border of central North America? Front Ecol Environ 8(7):371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garner G, Reed P, Keller K (2016) Climate risk management requires explicit representation of societal trade-offs. Clim Chang 134(4):713–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grimm V, Calabrese JM (2011) What is resilience? A short introduction. In: Viability and resilience of complex systems. Springer, Berlin, p 3–13Google Scholar
  19. Gustafson EJ (2016) LANDIS-II Linear Wind Extension v1.0 extension user guide. Portland State University, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  20. Gustafson EJ, Sturtevant BR, Fall A (2006) A collaborative, iterative approach to transferring modeling technology to land managers. In: Perera AH, Buse LJ, Crow TR (eds) Forest landscape ecology: transferring knowledge to practice. Springer, New York, pp 43–64Google Scholar
  21. Gustafson EJ, De Bruijn AM, Miranda BR, Sturtevant BR (2016) Implications of mechanistic modeling of drought effects on growth and competition in forest landscape models. Ecosphere 7(4):e01253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haeussler S, Kneeshaw D (2003) Comparing forest management to natural processes. In: Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, p 307–368Google Scholar
  23. Handler S, Duveneck MJ, Iverson L, Peters E, Scheller RM, Wythers KR. Brandt L.  Butler P, Janowiak M. Shannon, PD (2014) Minnesota forest ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the Northwoods Climate Change Response Framework project. In: Minnesota forest ecosystem vulnerability assessment and synthesis: a report from the Northwoods Climate Change Response Framework project. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-129. USDA Forest Service. Newtown SquareGoogle Scholar
  24. He HS (2008) Forest landscape models: definitions, characterization, and classification. For Ecol Manag 254(3):484–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holling CS (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze P (ed) Engineering within ecological constraints. National Academy, Washington, DC, pp 31–44Google Scholar
  27. Kimmins J (2004) Emulating natural forest disturbance: What does this mean? In: Perera AH, Buse LJ, Weber MG (eds) Emulating natural forest landscape disturbances: concepts and applications. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 8–28Google Scholar
  28. Kolbert E (2014) The sixth extinction: an unnatural history. Bloomsbury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishnan P, Black TA, Grant NJ, Barr AG, Hogg EH, Jassal RS, Morgenstern K (2006) Impact of changing soil moisture distribution on net ecosystem productivity of a boreal aspen forest during and following drought. Agric For Meteorol 139(3):208–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lenihan JM, Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Drapek R (2008) Response of vegetation distribution, ecosystem productivity, and fire to climate change scenarios for California. Clim Change 87(1):215–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levine NM, Zhang K, Longo M, Woodall CW, Butler BJ, Piva RJ, Meneguzzo DM, Perry CH, Gormanson DD, Barnett CJ (2016) Ecosystem heterogeneity determines the ecological resilience of the Amazon to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(3):793–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucash MS, Scheller RM (2015) LANDIS-II Climate Library v1.0 user guide. Portland State University, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  33. Lucash MS, Scheller RM, Kretchun AM, Clark KL, Hom J (2014) Impacts of fire and climate change on long-term nitrogen availability and forest productivity in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. Can J For Res 44:404–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin PA, Newton AC, Bullock JM (2013) Carbon pools recover more quickly than plant biodiversity in tropical secondary forests. Proc R Soc Lond B 280(1773):20132236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miles PD, Heinzen D, Mielke ME, Woodall CW. Butler BJ. Piva RJ. Meneguzzo DM.  Perry CH. Gormanson DD. Barnett CJ (2011) Minnesota’s forests 2008. Resource Bulletin NRS-50. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Northern Research Station, Newtown SquareGoogle Scholar
  36. Millar CI, Stephenson NL (2015) Temperate forest health in an era of emerging megadisturbance. Science 349(6250):823–826CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Minckley TA, Shriver RK, Shuman B (2012) Resilience and regime change in a southern Rocky Mountain ecosystem during the past 17000 years. Ecol Monogr 82(1):49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mladenoff DJ (2004) LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecol Model 180(1):7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Newton AC, Cantarello E (2015) Restoration of forest resilience: an achievable goal? N For 46(5–6):645–668Google Scholar
  40. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed Nov 2014
  41. Oliver TH, Heard MS, Isaac NJ, Roy DB, Procter D, Eigenbrod F, Freckleton R, Hector A, Orme CDL, Petchey OL (2015) Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol Evol 30(11):673–684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Park A, Puettmann K, Wilson E, Messier C, Kames S, Dhar A (2014) Can boreal and temperate forest management be adapted to the uncertainties of 21st century climate change? Crit Rev Plant Sci 33(4):251–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Parton WJ, Anderson DW, Cole CV, Steward JWB (1983) Simulation of soil organic matter formation and mineralization in semiarid agroecosystems. In: Lowrance RR, Todd RL, Asmussen LE, Leonard RA (eds) Nutrient cycling in agricultural ecosystems. The University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, AthensGoogle Scholar
  44. Pastor J, Post WM (1988) Response of northern forests to CO2-induced climate change. Nature 334(6177):55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. PRISM Climate Group (2013) Oregon State University. http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/. Accessed 20 May 2013
  46. R Development Core Team (2014) R: a S language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  47. Roberts DW (1996) Modelling forest dynamics with vital attributes and fuzzy systems theory. Ecol Model 90(2):161–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scheffer M, Carpenter SR, Lenton TM, Bascompte J, Brock W, Dakos V, van de Koppel, J, van de Leemput IA, Levin SA, van Nes, EH, Pascual M, Vandermeer J (2012) Anticipating critical transitions. Science 338(6105):344–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Scheller RM, Domingo JB (2003) LANDIS-II Base Wind v2.1 extension user guideGoogle Scholar
  50. Scheller RM, Domingo JB (2015) LANDIS-II Base Harvest v3.0 user guide. Portland State University, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  51. Scheller RM, Domingo JB (2016) LANDIS-II Leaf Biomass Harvest (v2.1) user guide. Portland State University, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  52. Scheller RM, Domingo JB, Sturtevant BR, Williams JS, Rudy A, Gustafson EJ, Mladenoff DJ (2007) Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible spatial and temporal resolution. Ecol Model 201(3–4):409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scheller RM, Hua D, Bolstad PV, Birdsey RA, Mladenoff DJ (2011) The effects of forest harvest intensity in combination with wind disturbance on carbon dynamics in Lake States mesic forests. Ecol Model 222:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scheller RM, Kretchun AM, Van Tuyl S, Clark KL, Lucash MS, Hom J (2012) Divergent carbon dynamics under climate change in forests with diverse soils, tree species, and land use histories. Ecosphere 3(11):art110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scheller RM, Lucash MS, Creutzburg M, Loudermilk EL (2015) LANDIS-II Century Extension v4.0 User Guide. Portland State University, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  56. Scheller RM, Mladenoff D (2005) A spatially interactive simulation of climate change, harvesting, wind, and tree species migration and projected changes to forest composition and biomass in northern Wisconsin, USA. Glob Change Biol 11:307–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seidl R, Spies TA, Peterson DL, Stephens SL, Hicke JA (2016) REVIEW: searching for resilience: addressing the impacts of changing disturbance regimes on forest ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 53:120–129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Shinneman DJ, Cornett MW, Palik BJ (2010) Simulating restoration strategies for a southern boreal forest landscape with complex land ownership patterns. For Ecol Manag 259(3):446–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thompson JR, Foster DR, Scheller R, Kittredge D (2011) The influence of land use and climate change on forest biomass and composition in Massachusetts, USA. Ecol Appl 21(7):2425–2444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner MG, Collins SL, Lugo AL, Magnuson JJ, Rupp TS, Swanson FJ (2003) Disturbance dynamics and ecological response: the contribution of long-term ecological research. Bioscience 53(1):46–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. USDA Forest Service (2007) Chippewa National Forest, national forest management plan. http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/chippewa/landmanagement/planning/?cid=fsm9_016569. Accessed Mar 2014
  62. USDA Forest Service (2010) Chapter 2020, ecological restoration and resilience, interim directive 2020–2010. In: Forest service manual 2000, national forest research management. https://fs.usda.gov/FSI_Directives/wo_id_2020-2011-1.doc
  63. Vano JA, Nijssen B, Lettenmaier DP (2015) Seasonal hydrologic responses to climate change in the Pacific Northwest. Water Resour Res 51(4):1959–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. White MA, Host GE (2008) Forest disturbance frequency and patch structure from pre-European settlement to present in the Mixed Forest Province of Minnesota, USA. Can J For Res 38(8):2212–2226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and ManagementPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Applied Ecosystem Studies, Northern Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceRhinelanderUSA

Personalised recommendations