Abstract
Contexts
An important feature of ecosystem service interaction is that it changes over time and across spatial scales.
Objectives
This research aims to find which ecosystem service interactions temporally vary and depend on spatial scale.
Methods
We calculated six ecosystem services of the Baota District on the central Loess Plateau of China for 2000, 2005, and 2010. Furthermore, we quantified the interactions among these services at the beginning and after the end of the first phase of the Grain for Green Program in this area, and across the pixel scale of 1 km2 and the town scale.
Results
Water yield decreased significantly, and habitat quality, net primary productivity, and evapotranspiration increased significantly across different land use types from 2000 to 2005. The synergy between food productivity and water yield, and the trade-off between water yield and evapotranspiration, greatly reduced from 2000 to 2010 at the pixel scale. Water yield was a trade-off to habitat quality, NPP, and recreation capacity in 2000 at the pixel scale while a synergy to the three services in 2010. The synergies between habitat quality and NPP, evapotranspiration, and recreation capacity at the pixel scale were enhanced from 2000 to 2010. Changes in the direction or significance of correlations among ecosystem services were observed across the pixel and town scales in 2000 and 2010.
Conclusions
This study contributes to increasing the understanding of the temporal variation of ecosystem service interactions caused by regional ecological restoration programs, and the spatial scale dependency of the interactions.




Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson BJ, Armsworth PR, Eigenbrod F, Thomas CD, Gillings S, Heinemeyer A, Roy DB, Gaston KJ (2009) Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J Appl Ecol 46:888–896
Bai H, Lan T, Wang D (2009) Grain for Green Program in Baota District: status and Future Trend. Shaanxi For Sci Technol 107:100–103 (in Chinese)
Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1394–1404
Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F (2014) Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands - Concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Offl J Int Assoc Landscape Ecol, Chapter Ger-Landscape Online 34:1–32
Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F (2009) Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services – A concept for land-cover based assessments. Off J Int Assoc Landscape Ecol, Chapter Ger-Landscape Online 15:1–22
Butler JRA, Wong GY, Metcalfe DJ, Honzák M, Pert PL, Rao N, van Grieken ME, Lawson T, Bruce C, Kroon FJ, Brodie JE (2013) An analysis of trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services and stakeholders linked to land use and water quality management in the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 180:176–191
Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260
Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Bode M, Richardson DM (2009) Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol Conserv 142:553–562
Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, van Jaarsveld AS (2008) Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 127:135–140
Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ (2010) The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 47:377–385
Felipe-Lucia MR, Comín FA (2015) Ecosystem services–biodiversity relationships depend on land use type in floodplain agroecosystems. Land Use Policy 46:201–210
Felipe-Lucia MR, Comín FA, Bennett EM (2014) Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem. Ecol Soc 19:20
Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, Kroll F, Seppelt R (2012) Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle region. Ger Ecol Soc 17:22
Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2010) The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Raffaelli D, Frid C (eds) Ecosystem Ecology: a new synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series. CUP, Cambridge, pp 110–139
Haines-Young R, Potschin M, Kienast F (2012) Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecol Ind 21:39–53
Hou Y, Burkhard B, Müller F (2013) Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. J Environ Manage 127(Supplement):S117–S131
Hou Y, Li B, Müller F, Chen W (2016) Ecosystem services of human-dominated watersheds and land use influences: a case study from the Dianchi Lake watershed in China. Environ Monit Assess 188:652
Hou Y, Müller F, Li B, Kroll F (2015) Urban-Rural Gradients of Ecosystem Services and the Linkages with Socioeconomics. Off J Int Assoc Landscape Ecol, Chapter Ger-Landscape Online 39:1–31
Hou Y, Zhou S, Burkhard B, Müller F (2014) Socioeconomic influences on biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being: a quantitative application of the DPSIR model in Jiangsu, China. Sci Total Environ 490:1012–1028
Ingraham MW, Foster SG (2008) The value of ecosystem services provided by the U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System in the contiguous U.S. Ecol Econ 67:608–618
Jia X, Fu B, Feng X, Hou G, Liu Y, Wang X (2014) The tradeoff and synergy between ecosystem services in the Grain-for-Green areas in Northern Shaanxi, China. Ecol Ind 43:103–113
Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Müller F (2013) Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecol Ind 28:54–78
Koschke L, Furst C, Frank S, Makeschin F (2012) A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol Ind 21:54–66
Lauf S, Haase D, Kleinschmit B (2014) Linkages between ecosystem services provisioning, urban growth and shrinkage - A modeling approach assessing ecosystem service trade-offs. Ecol Ind 42:73–94
Lester SE, Costello C, Halpern BS, Gaines SD, White C, Barth JA (2013) Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 38:80–89
Li S, Zhang C, Liu J, Zhu W, Ma C, Wang J (2013) The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geogr Res 32:1379–1390 (in Chinese)
Li T, Li W, Qian Z (2010) Variations in ecosystem service value in response to land use changes in Shenzhen. Ecol Econ 69:1427–1435
Li X, Li M, Dong S, Shi J (2015) Temporal-spatial changes in ecosystem services and implications for the conservation of alpine rangelands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Rangel J 37:31
Liu S, Gong P (2012) Change of surface cover greenness in China between 2000 and 2010. Chin Sci Bull 57:2835–2845
Lü Y, Fu B, Feng X, Zeng Y, Liu Y, Chang R, Sun G, Wu B (2012) A Policy-Driven Large Scale Ecological Restoration: Quantifying Ecosystem Services Changes in the Loess Plateau of China. PLoS ONE 7(2):e31782
Lü Y, Sun F, Wang J, Zeng Y, Holmberg M, Bottcher K, Vanhala P, Fu B (2015) Managing landscape heterogeneity in different socio-ecological contexts: contrasting cases from central Loess Plateau of China and southern Finland. Landscape Ecol 30:463–475
Martin-Lopez B, Iniesta-Arandia I, Garcia-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Garcia Del Amo D, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, González JA (2012) Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 7(6):e38970
Melillo JM, McGuire AD, Kicklighter DW, Moore B, Vorosmarty CJ, Schloss AL (1993) Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production. Nature 363:234–240
Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan K, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11
Potter CS, Randerson JT, Field CB, Matson PA, Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Klooster SA (1993) Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochem Cycles 7:811–841
Qiu J, Turner MG (2013) Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:12149–12154
Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242–5247
Schröter M, Barton DN, Remme RP, Hein L (2014) Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: a conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecol Ind 36:539–551
Statistics Bureau of Yan’an (2011) Yan’an Statistical Yearbook 2011. China Statistics Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Tallis H, Kareiva P, Marvier M, Chang A (2008) An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:9457–9464
Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Sharp R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, Vigerstol K, Pennington D (2013). InVEST 2.5.5 User’s Guide: The Natural Capital Project, Stanford
Tilman D (2000) Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405:208–211
van Jaarsveld AS, Biggs R, Scholes RJ, Bohensky E, Reyers B, Lynam T, Musvoto C, Fabricius C (2005) Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:425–441
Vigerstol KL, Aukema JE (2011) A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. J Environ Manage 92:2403–2409
Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM (2013) Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol Complex 15:114–121
Wang J, Lü Y, Zeng Y, Zhao Z, Zhang L, Fu B (2014) Spatial heterogeneous response of land use and landscape functions to ecological restoration: the case of the Chinese loess hilly region. Environ Earth Sci 72:2683–2696
Wang, Y., Sun, X., Feng, Q., & Chen, J. (1995). Analysis of the natural precipitation characteristics and the water budget in the Yan’an region. Journal of Shaanxi Meteorology, 6-7 (in Chinese)
Wu B, Xiong J, Yan N (2011) ETWatch: models and methods. J Remote Sens 15:224–230
Wu J, Li H, Jones KB, Loucks OL (2006) Scaling with knowledge uncertainty: A synthesis. In: Wu J, Jones KB, Li H, Loucks OL (eds) Scaling and uncertainty analysis in ecology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 329–346
Wu K, Ye X, Qi Z, Zhang H (2013) Impacts of land use/land cover change and socioeconomic development on regional ecosystem services: the case of fast-growing Hangzhou metropolitan area, China. Cities 31:276–284
Xie G, Zhen L, Lu C, Xiao Y, Chen C (2008) Expert knowledge based valuation methods of ecosystem services in China. J Nat Resour 23:911–919
Xue H, Li S, Chang J (2015) Combining ecosystem service relationships and DPSIR framework to manage multiple ecosystem services. Environ Monit Assess 187:1–15
Yang G, Ge Y, Xue H, Yang W, Shi Y, Peng C, Du Y, Fan X, Ren Y, Chang J (2015) Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban–rural complexes. Landscape and Urban Plan 136:110–121
Yang Q, He L, Bao Q (2014) Characteristics of annual change in temperature and precipitation in Yan’an region during 1980–2010. J Nanjing For Univ 38:179–183 (in Chinese)
Yuan J, Niu Z, Wang C (2006) Vegetation NPP distribution based on MODIS data and CASA model—A case study of northern Hebei Province. Chinese Geogr Sci 16:334–341
Yue TX, Liu JY, Li ZQ, Chen SQ, Ma SN, Tian YZ, Ge F (2005) Considerable effects of diversity indices and spatial scales on conclusions relating to ecological diversity. Ecol Model 188:418–431
Zhang Y, Holzapfel C, Yuan X (2016) Scale-dependent ecosystem service. In: Wratten S, Sandhu H, Cullen R, Costanza R (eds) Ecosystem Services in Agricultural and Urban Landscapes. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp 105–121
Zhao M, Zhou G (2005) Estimation of biomass and net primary productivity of major planted forests in China based on forest inventory data. For Ecol Manage 207:295–313
Zheng Z, Fu B, Hu H, Sun G (2014) A method to identify the variable ecosystem services relationship across time: a case study on Yanhe Basin, China. Landscape Ecol 29:1689–1696
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571130083 and 41601556). We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hou, Y., Lü, Y., Chen, W. et al. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of ecosystem service interactions: a case study on the central Loess Plateau of China. Landscape Ecol 32, 1201–1217 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0497-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0497-8


