Despite continued forest cover losses in many parts of the world, Atlantic Forest, one of the largest of the Americas, is increasing in some locations. Economic factors are suggested as causes of forest gain, while enforcement has reduced deforestation.
We examine three aspects of this issue: the relative importance of biophysical versus anthropogenic factors in driving forest dynamics; role of forest mean patch age influencing areas targeted for losses; and what future forest mean patch age mosaic we can expect (more forest cover and full forest maturity?).
Three land cover maps from 1990, 2000 and 2010, were used in the study. We selected six biophysical and six anthropogenic spatial determinants to analyze by means of weights of evidence, using Dinamica software.
Results show that forest regrowth is influenced by multiple factors, working in synergy. Biophysical variables are related to forest gain while anthropogenic are associated with loss. Clear patterns of regrowth on pasture and sugarcane plantations occurred, especially near rivers and forest patches, on steeper slopes and with sufficient rainfall. Forest loss has targeted both older and newer forests. Future projections reveal forest gain in a slow pace, followed by specific ecosystem service losses, due to continuous trends of older mature forest loss.
Regrowth is linked to land abandonment, and to neighboring environmental conditions. It is important to question which mechanisms will guarantee and potentiate new regrowth, thus contributing to landscape restoration and reestablishment of ecosystem services in the Atlantic Forest.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Balvanera P, Uriarte M, Almeida-Leñero L, Altesor A, DeClerck F, Gardner T, Hall J, Lara A, Laterra P, Peña-Claros M, Silva Matos DM, Vogl AL, Romero-Duque LP, Arreola LF, Caro-Borrero ÁP, Gallego F, Jain M, Little C, de Oliveira Xavier R, Paruelo JM, Peinado JE, Poorter L, Ascarrunz N, Correa F, Cunha-Santino MB, Hernández-Sánchez AP, Vallejos M (2012) Ecosystem services research in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosyst Serv 2:56–70
Banks-Leite C, Pardini R, Tambosi LR, Pearse WD, Bueno AA, Bruscagin RT, Condez TH, Dixo M, Igari AT, Martensen AC, Metzger JP (2014) Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot. Science 345(6200):1041–1045
Baptista SR, Rudel TK (2006) A re-emerging Atlantic forest? Urbanization, industrialization and the forest transition in Santa Catarina, southern Brazil. Environ Conserv 33(03):195–202
Bawa KS, Dayanandan S (1997) Socioeconomic factors and tropical deforestation. Nature 386(6625):562–563
Brasil (1965) Federal Law 4.771. 15 September 1965
Brasil (2012) Federal Law 12.651, 25 May 2012
Brown S, Zarin D (2013) What does zero deforestation mean? Science 342(6160):805–807
Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM (2011) Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 26(10):541–549
Cancado JE, Saldiva PH, Pereira LA, Lara LB, Artaxo P, Martinelli LA, Arbex MA, Zanobetti A, Braga AL (2006) The impact of sugar cane-burning emissions on the respiratory system of children and the elderly. Environ Health Perspect 114(5):725–734
Cassiano CC, de Barros Ferraz SF, Molin PG, Voigtlaender M, de Barros Ferraz PM, Maria K (2013) Spatial assessment of water-related ecosystem services to prioritize restoration of forest patches. Nat Conserv 11(2):176
Chazdon RL (2008) Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320(5882):1458–1460
Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–260
de Oliveira JB (1999) Mapa pedológico do Estado de São Paulo: legenda expandida. IAC/Embrapa, Campinas/Rio de Janeiro
de Rezende CL, Uezu A, Scarano FR, Araujo DSD (2015) Atlantic forest spontaneous regeneration at landscape scale. Biodivers Conserv 24(9):2255–2272
DeFries RS, Rudel T, Uriarte M, Hansen M (2010) Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat Geosci 3(3):178–181
Durigan G, Siqueira MFd, Franco GADC (2007) Threats to the Cerrado remnants of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Sci Agric 64:355–363
Farinaci JS, Batistella M (2012) Variação na cobertura vegetal nativa em São Paulo: um panorama do conhecimento atual. Rev Árvore 36:695–705
Ferraz SB, Ferraz KPMB, Cassiano C, Brancalion P, Luz DA, Azevedo T, Tambosi L, Metzger J (2014) How good are tropical forest patches for ecosystem services provisioning? Landscape Ecol 29(2):187–200
Ferraz SFB, Vettorazzi CA, Theobald DM, Ballester MVR (2005) Landscape dynamics of Amazonian deforestation between 1984 and 2002 in central Rondônia, Brazil: assessment and future scenarios. For Ecol Manag 204(1):69–85
Freitas SR, Hawbaker TJ, Metzger JP (2010) Effects of roads, topography, and land use on forest cover dynamics in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For Ecol Manag 259(3):410–417
Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52(2):143–150
Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, Peres CA, Bradshaw CJA, Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Sodhi NS (2011) Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478(7369):378–381
Goldemberg J, Coelho ST, Guardabassi P (2008) The sustainability of ethanol production from sugarcane. Energy Policy 36(6):2086–2097
Gomez MV, Beuchle R, Shimabukuro Y, Grecchi R, Simonetti D, Eva H, Achard F (2015) A long-term perspective on deforestation rates in the Brazilian Amazon. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci 40(7):539
Howe HF, Smallwood J (1982) Ecology of seed dispersal. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:201–228
IBGE (2010) Census 2010. http://censo2010.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 3 July 2014
IBGE (2013) IBGE downloads. IBGE, Brasilia. http://downloads.ibge.gov.br. Accessed 3 July 2014
Instituto Florestal - SP (2014) São Paulo State Forest Information System. São Paulo. http://www.iflorestal.sp.gov.br/sifesp/. Accessed 3 June 2014
Isbell F, Calcagno V, Hector A, Connolly J, Harpole WS, Reich PB, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Tilman D, van Ruijven J, Weigelt A, Wilsey BJ, Zavaleta ES, Loreau M (2011) High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477(7363):199–202
Lamb D (2014) Large-scale forest restoration. Earthscan-Routledge, London
Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta JA (2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310(5754):1628–1632
Lira PK, Tambosi LR, Ewers RM, Metzger JP (2012) Land-use and land-cover change in Atlantic Forest landscapes. For Ecol Manag 278:80–89
Martinelli LA, Filoso S (2008) Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. Ecol Appl 18(4):885–898
Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF (2011) Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36(1):343–371
Molin PG, Miranda FTSE, Sampaio JV, Fransozi AA, Ferraz SFB (2015) Mapeamento de uso e cobertura do solo da bacia do rio Piracicaba, SP: Anos 1990, 2000 e 2010. Circular tecnica/Instituto de Pesquisas e Estudos Florestais 207:11
NASA, METI (2011) ASTER GDEM. Soux Falls, oputh Dakota. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/data_access. Accessed 10 Dec 2014
Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333(6047):1289–1291
Pinto LFG, McDermott C (2013) Equity and forest certification—a case study in Brazil. For Policy Econ 30:23–29
Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142(6):1141–1153
Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran E, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J, Lambin E (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Glob Environ Change 15(1):23–31
Rudorff BFT, Aguiar DA, Silva WF, Sugawara LM, Adami M, Moreira MA (2010) Studies on the rapid expansion of sugarcane for ethanol production in São Paulo State (Brazil) using Landsat data. Remote Sensing 2(4):1057–1076
Silva AMd, Nalon MA, Kronka FJdN, Alvares CA, Camargo PBd, Martinelli LA (2007) Historical land-cover/use in different slope and riparian buffer zones in watersheds of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Sci Agricola 64:325–335
Soares-Filho BS, Coutinho Cerqueira G, Lopes Pennachin C (2002) DINAMICA—a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier. Ecol Model 154(3):217–235
Soares-Filho BS, Rajão R, Macedo M, Carneiro A, Costa W, Coe M, Rodrigues H, Alencar A (2014) Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code. Science 344(6182):363–364
Teixeira AMG, Soares-Filho BS, Freitas SR, Metzger JP (2009) Modeling landscape dynamics in an Atlantic Rainforest region: implications for conservation. For Ecol Manag 257(4):1219–1230
Theobald DM (2001) Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geogr Rev 91(3):544–564
Williams MR, Filoso S, Martinelli LA, Lara LB, Camargo PB (2001) Precipitation and river water chemistry of the Piracicaba River Basin. Southeast Brazil. J Environ Qual 30(3):967–981
Woltzenlogel AA (1990) Isoietas de precipitação média anual. DAEE, Piracicaba
This study was supported by FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation), under project number 2010/19670-8. The authors would also like to thank the CSR (Remote Sensing Center at Federal University of Minas Gerais), for their support on the Dinamica EGO software. We also thank graduate student Renata Siqueira Melo, for her support on running the sample plots.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Molin, P.G., Gergel, S.E., Soares-Filho, B.S. et al. Spatial determinants of Atlantic Forest loss and recovery in Brazil. Landscape Ecol 32, 857–870 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0490-2
- Forest transition
- Weights of evidence