Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extent-dependent habitat selection in a migratory large herbivore: road avoidance across scales

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

In southwestern Alberta, human development, including roads, is encroaching on the landscape and into the range of a partially migratory population of elk (Cervus elaphus).

Objectives

To quantify factors influencing among- and within-home-range selection of winter range in this population.

Methods

We studied individual habitat selection and road avoidance at two biologically relevant spatial scales. We outlined availability extents for 107 individual elk-years based on observed fall migration distance, and based on a minimum convex polygon around winter telemetry relocations. To model the response by elk to road disturbance, we fit a habitat-selection model to each elk-year at each of the two availability extents, and examined population-level and individual variation in space-use. We then evaluated the relationship between inferred selection at the two scales and the functional response in selection.

Results

Roads had a ubiquitous influence on elk across scales. Elk, individually and as a population, avoided roads when migrating to their winter range and within this seasonal home range. Individual elk that avoided roads more strongly relative to the population did so at both scales of analysis.Further, the avoidance of low-use roads decreased with increasing road density. These results support bottom-up habitat-selection patterns (i.e., scale-independent) and functional response in habitat selection.

Conclusions

Overall, using a multi-scale habitat selection analysis, we show that road avoidance is a major determinant of elk space-use behaviour across multiple scales. Consequently, any new road construction or increases in road-use intensity could have detrimental effects on migratory elk populations by restricting space-use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts G, Fieberg J, Matthiopoulos J (2012) Comparative interpretation of count, presence-absence and point methods for species distribution models. Methods Ecol Evol 3:177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F (eds) Second Int. Symp. Inf. Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur SM, Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Garner GW (1996) Assessing habitat selection when availability changes. Ecology 77:215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avgar T, Baker JA, Brown GS, Hagens JS, Kittle AM, Mallon EE, McGreer MT, Mosser A, Newmaster SG, Patterson BR, Reid DE (2015) Space-use behaviour of woodland caribou based on a cognitive movement model. J Anim Ecol 84:1059–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avgar T, Potts JR, Lewis MA, Boyce MS (2016) Integrated step selection analysis: bridging the gap between resource selection and animal movement. Methods Ecol Evol 7:619–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avgar T, Street G, Fryxell JM (2014) On the adaptive benefits of mammal migration. Can J Zool 92:481–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey DW, Gross JE, Laca EA, Rittenhouse LR, Coughenour MB, Swift DM, Sims PL (1996) Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. J Range Manag 49:386–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastille-Rousseau G, Potts JR, Schaefer JA, Lewis MA, Ellington EH, Rayl ND, Mahoney SP, Murray DL (2015) Unveiling trade-offs in resource selection of migratory caribou using a mechanistic movement model of availability. Ecography (Cop) 38:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J (2004) The last mile: how to sustain long-distance migration in mammals. Conserv Biol 18:320–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer HL, Haydon DT, Morales JM, Frair JL, Hebblewhite M, Mitchell M, Matthiopoulos J (2010) The interpretation of habitat preference metrics under use-availability designs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 365:2245–2254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bischof R, Loe LE, Meisingset EL, Zimmermann B, Van Moorter B, Mysterud A (2012) A migratory northern ungulate in the pursuit of spring: jumping or surfing the green wave? Am Nat 180:407–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (1991) Migratory behavior and management of elk (Cervus elaphus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 29:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (2006) Scale for resource selection functions. Divers Distrib 12:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce M, Mao J, Merrill E, Fortin D, Turner MG, Fryxell J, Turchin P (2003) Scale and heterogeneity in habitat selection by elk in Yellowstone National Park. Ecoscience 10:421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christianson D, Creel S (2007) A review of environmental factors affecting elk winter diets. J Wildife Manag 71:164–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciarniello LM, Boyce MS, Seip DR, Heard DC (2007) Grizzly bear habitat selection is scale dependent. Ecol Appl 17:1424–1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciuti S, Muhly TB, Paton DG, McDevitt AD, Musiani M, Boyce MS (2012a) Human selection of elk behavioural traits in a landscape of fear. Proc R Soc B 279:4407–4416

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ciuti S, Northrup JM, Muhly TB, Simi S, Musiani M, Pitt JA, Boyce MS (2012b) Effects of humans on behaviour of wildlife exceed those of natural predators in a landscape of fear. PLoS One 7:e50611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeCesare NJ, Hebblewhite M, Schmiegelow F, Hervieux D, McDermid GJ, Neufeld L, Bradley M, Whittington J, Smith KG, Morgantini LE, Wheatley M (2012) Transcending scale dependence in identifying habitat with resource selection functions. Ecol Appl 22:1068–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fieberg J, Matthiopoulos J, Hebblewhite M, Boyce MS, Frair JL (2010) Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 365:2233–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortin D, Beyer H, Boyce M, Smith D (2005) Wolves influence elk movements: behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86:1320–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frid A, Dill L (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM, Greever J, Sinclair ARE (1988) Why are migratory ungulates so abudant? Am Nat 131:781–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudry W, Saïd S, Gaillard J-M, Chevrier T, Loison A, Maillard D, Bonenfant C (2015) Partial migration or just habitat selection? Seasonal movements of roe deer in an alpine population. J Mammal 96:502–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gude JA, Garrott RA, Borkowski JJ, King F (2006) Prey risk allocation in a grazing ecosystem. Ecol Appl 16:285–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebblewhite M, Merrill EH (2007) Multiscale wolf predation risk for elk: does migration reduce risk? Oecologia 152:377–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebblewhite M, Merrill E (2008) Modelling wildlife – human relationships for social species with mixed-effects resource selection models. J Appl Ecol 45:834–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebblewhite M, Merrill EH, Morgantini LE, White CA, Allen JR, Bruns E, Thurston L, Hurd TE (2006) Is the migratory behavior of montane elk herds in peril? The case of Alberta’s Ya Ha Tinda elk herd. Wildl Soc Bull 34:1280–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herfindal I, Tremblay J-P, Hansen BB, Solberg EJ, Heim M, Sæther BE (2009) Scale dependency and functional response in moose habitat selection. Ecography 32:849–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs NT (2003) Challenges and opportunities in integrating ecological knowledge across scales. For Ecol Manag 181:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopcraft JGC, Morales JM, Beyer HL, Borner M, Mwangomo E, Sinclair AR, Olff H, Haydon DT (2014) Competition, predation, and migration: individual choice patterns of Serengeti migrants captured by hierarchical models. Ecol Monogr 84:355–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne JS, Garton EO, Krone SM, Lewis JS (2007) Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88:2354–2363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins DA, Schaefer JA, Rosatte R, Bellhouse T, Hamr J, Mallory FF (2007) Winter resource selection of reintroduced elk and sympatric white-tailed deer at multiple spatial scales. J Mammal 88:614–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C, Nielsen S, Merrill EH, McDonald TL, Boyce MS (2006) Resource selection functions based on use-availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods. J Wildl Manag 70:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CJ, Parker KL, Heard DC (2001) Foraging across a variable landscape: behavioral decisions made by woodland caribou at multiple spatial scales. Oecologia 127:590–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killeen J, Thurfjell H, Ciuti S, Paton D, Musiani M, Boyce MS (2014) Habitat selection during ungulate dispersal and exploratory movement at broad and fine scale with implications for conservation management. Mov Ecol 2:15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Knopff AA, Knopff KH, Boyce MS, St. Clair CC (2014) Flexible habitat selection by cougars in response to anthropogenic development. Biol Conserv 178:136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lele SR, Merrill EH, Keim J, Boyce MS (2013) Selection, use, choice, and occupancy: clarifying concepts in resource selection studies. J Anim Ecol 82:1183–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies, 2nd edn. Kluwer Academic, Dordrect

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor SJ, Schneider DC, Schaefer JA, Mahoney SP (2009) Habitat selection at multiple scales. Ecoscience 16:238–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Wan HY, Zeller KA, Timm BC, Cushman SA (2016) Multi-scale habitat selection modeling: a review and outlook. Landscape Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10980-016-0374-x

    Google Scholar 

  • McGreer MT, Mallon EE, Vander Vennen LM, Wiebe PA, Baker JA, Brown GS, Avgar T, Hagens J, Kittle AM, Mosser A, Street GM (2015) Selection for forage and avoidance of risk by woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) at coarse and local scales. Ecosphere 6:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin PD, Case RL, Gau RJ, Cluff DH, Mulders R, Messier F (2002) Hierarchical habitat selection by barren-ground grizzly bears in the central Canadian Arctic. Oecologia 132:102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morehouse AT, Boyce MS (2011) From venison to beef: seasonal changes in wolf diet composition in a livestock grazing landscape. Front Ecol Environ 9:440–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Ims RA (1998) Functional responses in habitat use: availability influences relative use in trade-off situations. Ecology 79:1435–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke NJD (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78:691–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naugle D (2010) Energy development and wildlife conservation in western North America. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Neigh CSR, Tucker CJ, Townshend JRG (2008) North American vegetation dynamics observed with multi-resolution satellite data. Remote Sens Environ 112:1749–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson RM, Sawyer H (2013) Estimating resource selection with count data. Ecol Evol 3:2233–2240

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Northrup JM, Hooten MB, Anderson CR, Wittemyer G (2013) Practical guidance on characterizing availability in resource selection functions under a use-availability design. Ecology 94:1456–1463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Northrup JM, Pitt J, Muhly TB, Stenhouse GB, Musiani M, Boyce MS (2012) Vehicle traffic shapes grizzly bear behaviour on a multiple-use landscape. J Appl Ecol 49:1159–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orians GH, Wittenberger JF (1991) Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. Am Nat 137:S29–S49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N, Fryxell JM, Merrill EH (2010) Foraging theory upscaled: the behavioural ecology of herbivore movement. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:2267–2278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paton RS, Matthiopoulos J (2015) Defining the scale of habitat availability for models of habitat selection. Ecology 14–2241:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Mysterud A, Duncan P, Delorme D, Van Laere G, Toïgo C, Klein F (2006) Using a proxy of plant productivity (NDVI) to find key periods for animal performance: the case of roe deer. Oikos 112:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Ryan S, Mueller T, Bunnefeld N, Jędrzejewska B, Lima M, Kausrud K (2011) The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI): unforeseen successes in animal ecology. Clim Res 46:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Vik JO, Mysterud A, Gaillard JM, Tucker CJ, Stenseth NC (2005) Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change. Trends Ecol Evol 20:503–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renner IW, Elith J, Baddeley A, Fithian W, Hastie T, Phillips SJ, Popovic G, Warton DI (2015) Point process models for presence-only analysis—a review. Methods Ecol Evol. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12352

    Google Scholar 

  • Rettie WJ, Messier F (2000) Hierarchical habitat selection by woodland caribou: its relationship to limiting factors. Ecography 23:466–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogala JK, Hebblewhite M, Whittington J, White CA, Coleshill J, Musiani M (2011) Human activity differentially redistributes large mammals in the Canadian Rockies National Parks. Ecol Soc 16:16

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland M, Wisdom M (2000) Elk distribution and modeling in relation to roads. J Wildl Manag 64:672–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer H, Nielson RM, Lindzey FG, Keith L, Powell JH, Abraham AA (2007) Habitat selection of Rocky Mountain elk in a nonforested environment. J Wildl Manag 71:868–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel DP, Boyce MS (2015) Patch-use dynamics by a large herbivore. Mov Ecol 3:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel DP, Boyce MS (2016) Varied tastes: home range implications of foraging-patch selection. Oikos 125:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senft RL, Coughenour MB, Bailey DW, Rittenhouse LR, Sala OE, Swift DM (1987) Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37:789–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street GM, Vander Vennen LM, Avgar T, Mosser A, Anderson ML, Rodgers AR, Fryxell JM (2015) Habitat selection following recent disturbance: model transferability with implications for management and conservation of moose (Alces alces). Can J Zool 93:813–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Beest FM, Mysterud A, Loe LE, Milner JM (2010) Forage quantity, quality and depletion as scale-dependent mechanisms driving habitat selection of a large browsing herbivore. J Anim Ecol 79:910–922

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warton DI, Shepherd LC (2010) Poisson point process models solve the “pseudo-absence problem” for presence-only data in ecology. Ann Appl Stat 4:1383–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley M, Johnson C (2009) Factors limiting our understanding of ecological scale. Ecol Complex 6:150–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White KS, Barten NL, Crouse S, Crouse J (2014) Benefits of migration in relation to nutritional condition and predation risk in a partially migratory moose population. Ecology 95:225–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickstrom M, Robbins C (1984) Food intake and foraging energetics of elk and mule deer. J Wildl Manag 48:1285–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by Royal Dutch Shell and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Safari Club International—Northern Alberta Chapter, and the Alberta Fish and Game Association. TA gratefully acknowledges support by the Banting PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina M. Prokopenko.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 5782 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prokopenko, C.M., Boyce, M.S. & Avgar, T. Extent-dependent habitat selection in a migratory large herbivore: road avoidance across scales. Landscape Ecol 32, 313–325 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0451-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0451-1

Keywords

Navigation