Modeling local spatial patterns of wild bee diversity in Pennsylvania apple orchards
The positive correlation between landscape area of semi-natural habitat and wild pollinator richness and abundance in agroecosystems has been well studied. However, we lack a deep understanding of local scale floral resource and nest provisioning for wild bees necessary to optimize implementation of pollinator conservation practices.
The primary objective of this study was to use a spatially interactive landscape pollination model (hereafter, the Lonsdorf model) to represent field scale spatial patterns of wild bee abundance and richness within a heterogeneous landscape in the mid-Atlantic USA.
We parameterized the Lonsdorf model with high resolution aerial imagery and insight from a previously published floristic study. To test the Lonsdorf model predictions, field studies were conducted to measure wild bee abundance and species richness in apple orchards as a function of distance from a forest edge.
Field measurements indicated apple pollinator abundance and species richness significantly decreased with increasing distance from the forest edge. The Lonsdorf model pollination service score was highly sensitive to changes in resource provisioning in orchard and non-crop areas, and including resource rich forest and forest edge habitats in the model significantly improved pollination service estimates.
We demonstrated a novel application of the Lonsdorf model at a field scale to predict trends in pollination service provisioning as a factor of local habitat features. With sufficiently detailed inputs, the Lonsdorf model is a promising tool to quantify field scale pollination service deficits, guiding more cost effective habitat supplementation and other conservation efforts.
KeywordsForest edge Lonsdorf model Malus domestica Pollination Spatial modeling Wild bees
- Ascher JS, Pickering J (2013) Discover Life bee species guide and world checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?guide=Apoidea_species
- Core Team R (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Austria, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Crassweller R (ed) (2012) Pennsylvania Tree Fruit Production Guide. Pennsylvania State University. AGRS-045, 357 p. http://extension.psu.edu/plants/tree-fruit/tfpg
- ESRI (2013) ArcMap 10.1. Environmental Systems Resource Institute, Redlands, CAGoogle Scholar
- Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, Aizen MA, Bommarco R, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Carvalheiro LG, Harder LD, Afik O, Bartomeus I, Benjamin F, Boreux V, Cariveau D, Chacoff NP, Dudenhöffer JH, Freitas BM, Ghazoul J, Greenleaf S, Hipólito J, Holzschuh A, Howlett B, Isaacs R, Javorek SK, Kennedy CM, Krewenka KM, Krishnan S, Mandelik Y, Mayfield MM, Motzke I, Munyuli T, Nault BA, Otieno M, Petersen J, Pisanty G, Potts SG, Rader R, Ricketts TH, Rundlöf M, Seymour CL, Schüepp C, Szentgyörgyi H, Taki H, Tscharntke T, Vergara CH, Viana BF, Wanger TC, Westphal C, Williams N, Klein AM (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339:1608–1611Google Scholar
- Joshi NK, Biddinger DJ, Rajotte EG (2011) A survey of apple pollination practices, knowledge and attitudes of fruit growers in Pennsylvania. 10th International Pollination Symposium, Puebla, MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, Díaz M, De Esteban J, Fernández F, Gabriel D, Herzog F, Holzschuh A, Jöhl R, Knop E, Kruess A, Marshall EJP, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J, West TM, Yela JL (2006) Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol Lett 9:243–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- LaBerge WE (1989) A Revision of the Bees of the Genus Andrena of the Western Hemisphere. Part XIII. Subgenera Simandrena and Taeniandrena. Transactions of the American Entomological Society (1890-) 115:1–56. doi: 10.2307/25078446
- Michener CD (2007) The Bees of the World, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
- Michener CD, McGinley RJ, Danforth BN (1994) The bee genera of North and Central America (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smithsonian Inst Pr, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Natural Capital Project (2014) InVEST: Crop Pollination Model. Version 3.1.0. http://naturalcapitalproject.org/models/crop_pollination.html
- PAMAP Program, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey (2007) PAMAP Program- County Mosaics 2007Google Scholar
- Park M, Danforth B, Losey J, Biddinger D, Vaughan M, Dollar J, Rajotte E, Agnello A (2015) Wild Pollinators of Eastern Apple Orchards and How to Conserve Them. 2nd edition. Cornell University, Penn State University, and The Xerces Society. http://www.xerces.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Wild-Pollinators-of-Eastern-Apple-Orchards1.pdf
- Ricketts TH, Regetz J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Bogdanski A, Gemmill-Herren B, Greenleaf SS, Klein AM, Mayfield MM, Morandin LA, Ochieng’ A, Potts SG, Viana BF (2008) Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecol Lett 11:499–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sidhu CS (2013) Farm and landscape-level effects on cucurbit pollinators on small farms in a diversified agroecosystem. PhD Thesis. Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Skaug H, Fournier D, Bolker B, Magnusson A, Nielsen A (2014) glmmADMB: generalized linear mixed models using AD Model BuilderGoogle Scholar
- The Pennsylvania State Climatologist (2013) National Weather Service Cooperative Observer (COOP) Program. http://climate.psu.edu/data/ida/. Accessed 12 Jun 2013
- Vaughan M, Skinner M (2008) Using Farm Bill Programs for Pollinator Conservation. NRCS National Plant Data Center, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation, and San Francisco State UniversityGoogle Scholar