Spatial configuration matters: a test of the habitat amount hypothesis for plants in calcareous grasslands
- 687 Downloads
A recent hypothesis, the habitat amount hypothesis, predicts that the total amount of habitat in the landscape can replace habitat patch size and isolation in studies of species richness in fragmented landscapes.
To test the habitat amount hypothesis by first evaluating at which spatial scale the relationship between species richness in equal-sized sample quadrats and habitat amount was the strongest, and then test the importance of spatial configuration of habitat—measured as local patch size and isolation—when habitat amount was taken into account.
A quasi-experimental setup with 20 habitat patches of dry calcareous grasslands varying in patch size, patch isolation and habitat amount at the landscape scale was established in the inner Oslo fjord, Southern Norway. We recorded species richness of habitat specialists of vascular plants in equal-sized sample quadrats and analysed the relationship between species richness, habitat amount in the landscape and patch size and isolation.
Although the total amount of habitat in a 3 km-radius around the local patch was positively related to species richness in the sample quadrats, local patch size had an additional positive effect, and the effect of patch size was higher when the amount of habitat within the 3 km-radius was high than when it was low.
In our study system of specialist vascular plants in dry calcareous grasslands, we do not find support for the habitat amount hypothesis.
KeywordsConnectivity Conservation Fragmentation Habitat amount Plant diversity Spatial configuration
This study was carried out under the projects ‘‘Survey and monitoring of red-listed species’’ (ARKO, funded by the Norwegian Environment Agency), and ‘‘Management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in spatially structured landscapes’’ (funded by the Norwegian Research Council, grant 208434/F40). We are grateful to A. Often, O. Skarpaas, O.E. Stabbetorp and J. Wesenberg for fieldwork contributions, and to three referees for valuable comments to earlier versions of this manuscript.
- Bakkestuen V, Stabbetorp O, Molia A, Evju M (2014) The hotspot dry calcareous grassland in the Oslofjord region. Description of the habitat and a monitoring method developed in the ARKO project. NINA Report 1102Google Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Evju M, Stange E (eds) (2016) Når artenes leveområder splittes opp-eksempler fra øyene i indre Oslofjord. Sluttrapport fra strategisk instituttsatsing (SIS) 2011-2015. NINA Temahefte 65Google Scholar
- Lid J, Lid DT (2005) Norsk flora, 7th edn. Det Norske Samlaget, OsloGoogle Scholar
- MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Mazerolle MJ (2016) AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2:0–4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AICcmodavg
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team (2013) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effect models. R package version 3:1–109. http://www.r-project.org
- R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
- Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Wollan AK, Bakkestuen V, Bjureke K, Bratli H, Endrestøl A, Stabbetorp OE, Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Halvorsen R (2011a) Open calcareous ground with shallow soil in the Oslo fjord region-a hotspot habitat. Final report from period II of the ARKO project. NINA Report 713Google Scholar
- Wollan AK, Bakkestuen V, Halvorsen R (2011b) Spatial predictive modelling of dry calcareous grasslands in the Oslofjord area. In: Halvorsen R (ed) The scientific basis for habitat monitoring in Norway-baseline surveys. University of Oslo, OlsoGoogle Scholar