Locating wildlife crossings for multispecies connectivity across linear infrastructures
- 614 Downloads
Linear transportation infrastructures traverse and separate wildlife populations, potentially leading to their short- and long-term decline at local and regional scales. To attenuate such effects, we need wildlife crossings suitable for a wide range of species.
We propose a method for identifying the best locations for wildlife crossings along linear infrastructures so as to improve the connectivity of species with varying degrees of mobility and living in different habitats. We evaluate highway impacts on mammal species.
The study area is the Grésivaudan Valley, France. We used allometric relationships to create eight virtual species and model their connectivity networks, developing a nested method defining populations by daily travel distances and connecting them by dispersal. We tested the gain in connectivity for each species produced by 100 and 600 crossing locations respectively in crossable, i.e. with crossing infrastructures, and uncrossable highway scenarios. We identified the crossings that optimize the connectivity of the maximum number of species combining the results in multivariate analyses.
Highly mobile species needing a large habitat area were the most sensitive to highways. The importance of locomotive performance in structuring the graphs decreased with highway impermeability. Depending on the species, the best locations improved connectivity by 0–10 and 2–75 % respectively in the crossable and uncrossable scenarios. Compromise locations were found for seven of the eight species in both scenarios.
This method could guide planners in identifying crossing locations to increase the connectivity of different species at regional scales over the long term.
KeywordsMultispecies Connectivity Allometric relationships Highway Population Dispersal Daily distance Slope Local and regional impacts
- Brown B, Aaron M (2001) The politics of nature. In: Smith J (ed) The rise of modern genomics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 2–11Google Scholar
- Clevenger AP, Waltho N (2000) Factors influencing the effectiveness of wildlife underpasses in Banff National Park, Alberta. Canada. 14:47–56Google Scholar
- Loro M, Ortega E, Arce RM, Geneletti D (2015) Ecological connectivity analysis to reduce the barrier effect of roads. An innovative graph-theory approach to define wildlife corridors with multiple paths and without bottlenecks. Landsc Urban Plan 139:149–162. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Noss F (2007) Focal species for determining connectivity requirements in conservation planning. In: Mannaging and designing landscapes for conservation: moving from perspectives to principles, Blackwell, Oxford, pp 263-279Google Scholar
- Sutherland G, Harestad AS, Price K, Lertzman KP (2000) Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv Ecol 4:16Google Scholar
- Van Der Ree R, Heinze D, Mccarthy M, Mansergh I (2009) Wildlife tunnel enhances population viability. Ecol Soc 14:7Google Scholar