Landscape Ecology

, Volume 31, Issue 7, pp 1395–1417 | Cite as

Agricultural outsourcing or land grabbing: a meta-analysis

  • Erika Vandergeten
  • Hossein AzadiEmail author
  • Dereje Teklemariam
  • Jan Nyssen
  • Frank Witlox
  • Eric Vanhaute
Review Article



The phenomenon of known as ‘land grabbing’ is not a new process. Especially, since the 1990s, some capital-rich countries have started to buy or lease foreign lands to be able to produce food and biofuels.


This article aimed at investigating the (un)sustainability of ‘transnational land deals’ (TLDs) for investors, host governments and local communities. Given the three dimensions of sustainability, the “social acceptability”, “economic viability” and “environmental conservation” of the TLDs have been studied.


To understand whether and to what extent the TLD is sustainable in each dimension a meta-analysis was conducted on 73 journal articles.


Results showed that tenure arrangements and livelihoods were the main drivers for the matter’s social acceptability. Accordingly, local communities are affected by losing and receiving little or no compensation for their land, and making them have to face the increasing vulnerability of their livelihoods. This results in a win–win–loss situation for investors, host governments and local communities, respectively. Economic (un)sustainability mainly depends on capital flow, infrastructure and employment. This aspect is evidenced as a win for investors and host governments and implies the aforementioned win–win–loss situation. The main aspects of environmental (un)sustainability are considered as biodiversity, ecosystem services, and climate change.


According to the results, both host governments and local communities experience loss. This results in a win–loss–loss status of the TLDs. The major challenge remains in establishing good land governance, which can guarantee the benefits to local people and their access to land.


Transnational land deal Rural land use planning Agricultural investment Land investments Sustainable land use Land dispossession 



The authors wish to thank Ms. Bethany Gardner from the Department of Linguistics, the State University of New York at Binghamton, for her kind help in improving the English of this text.


References marked with an asterisk indicate case studies included in the meta-analysis

  1. *Adamczewski A, Jamin J, Burnod P, Ly EHB, Tonneau J (2013) Land, water and capital: investments or land grabbing in the Office du Niger area (Mali)? Cah Agric 22:22–32Google Scholar
  2. *Alonso-Fradejas A (2012) Land control-grabbing in Guatemala: the political economy of contemporary agrarian change. Revue canadienned’études du développement 33(4):509–528Google Scholar
  3. *Amanor KS (2012) Global resource grabs, agribusiness concentration and the smallholder: two West African case studies. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):731–749Google Scholar
  4. *Apiyo LO (1998) Land-grabbing and evictions in Kenya. Habitat Debate 4(1):18–19Google Scholar
  5. *Arduino S, Combolo G, Ocampo OM, Panzeri L (2012) Contamination of community potable water from land grabbing: a case study from rural Tanzania. Water Altern 5(2):344–359Google Scholar
  6. *Aryeetey E, Lewis Z (2010) African land grabbing: whose interests are served?. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Azadi H, Ho P, Hasfiati L (2011) Agricultural land conversion drivers: a comparison between less developed, developing and developed countries. Land Degrad Dev 22:596–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azadi H, de Jong S, Derudder B, De Maeyer P, Witlox F (2012) Bitter sweet: how sustainable is bio-ethanol production in Brazil? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(6):3599–3603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azadi H, Houshyar E, Zarafshani K, Hosseininia G, Witlox F (2013) Agricultural outsourcing: a two-headed coin? Global Planet Change 100:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. *Barham N (2012) The diverse facets of land grabbing with special reference to the middle east. ANALYSISGoogle Scholar
  11. *Bazuin S, Azadi H, Witlox F (2011) Application of GM crops in Sub-Saharan Africa: lessons learned from green revolution. Biotechnol Adv 29:908–912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bellù LG, Liberati P (2006) Social welfare analysis of income distributions: social welfare, social welfare functions and inequality aversion. Accessed Nov 2012
  13. *Benjaminsen TA, Bryceson I, Mangana F, Refseth T (2011) Conservation and land grabbing in Tanzania. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. *Beyene A (2011) Biofuels production and their implication on livelihoods: Ethiopia. Uppsala, 15–18 JuneGoogle Scholar
  15. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. *Borras SJ, Franco J (2011) Political dynamics of land grabbing in Southeast Asia: understanding Europe’s role. Transnational Institute, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  17. *Borras S Jr, Cristóbal K, Sergio G, John W (2012a) Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: key features in Latin America. Can J Dev Stud 33(4):402–416Google Scholar
  18. *Borras SJ, Franco JC, Gómez S, Kay C, Spoor M (2012b) Land grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):845–872Google Scholar
  19. Casey S (2005) Establishing standard for social infrastructure. The University of Queensland, IpswichGoogle Scholar
  20. Ceccarelli T, Bajocco S, Salvati L, Perini L (2014) Investigating syndromes ofagricultural land degradation through past trajectories and future scenarios. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 60(1):60–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Champernowne DG, Cowell FA (1998) Economic inequality and income distribution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. *Clausing P, Goschenhofer C (2011) Land grabbing in Mexico: confusion in the World Bank’s line of argument. Peripherie 31(124):447–469Google Scholar
  23. *Clements EA, Fernandes BM (2012) Land grabbing, agribusiness and the peasantry in Brazil and Mozambique. In: International conference on global land grabbing II, 17–19 Oct 2012, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  24. Clover J, Eriksen S (2009) The effects of land tenure change on sustainability: human security and environmental change in southern African savannas. Environ Sci Policy 12:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cotula L, Vermeulen S, Leonard R, Keeley J (2009) Land grab or development opportunity? Agricultural investment and international land deal in Africa. FAO, IFAD & IIED. Accessed 18 Jan 2014
  26. *Deng DK (2011) Land belongs to the community: demystifying the ‘global land grab’ in Southern Sudan. LDPI Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  27. Di Gregorio A, Jansen LJM (2000) Land cover classification system (LCCS): classification concepts and user manual. FAO. Accessed Nov 2012
  28. Dillard J, Dujon V, King MC (2009) Understanding the social dimension of sustainability. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. *Duangklad P (2012) The ease of doing business and land grabbing: critique of the investing-across-borders indicators. IRPA Working Paper—GAL Series No. 8Google Scholar
  30. *Duvail S, Médard C, Hamerlynck O, Nyingi DW (2012) Land and water grabbing in an east African coastal wetland: the case of the tana delta. Water Alternatives 5(2):322–343Google Scholar
  31. *El Hadary YAE, Obeng-Odoom F (2012) Conventions, changes, and contradictions in land governance in Africa: the story of land grabbing in North Sudan and Ghana. Afr Today 59(2):58–78Google Scholar
  32. Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. *Engels B, Dietz K (2011) Land Grabbing analysieren: ansatzpunkte für eine politisch-ökologische Perspektive am Beispiel Äthiopiens. PERIPHERIE 124(31):399–420Google Scholar
  34. Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I (2012) Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? J Peasant Stud 39(2):237–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. FAO (2002) Land tenure and rural development. FAO land tenure studies, vol 3. University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  36. *Feldman S, Geisler C (2011) Land grabbing in Bangladesh: in-situ displacement of peasant holdings. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. FIAN (2012) Land grabbing in Kenya and Mozambique. Accessed May 2012
  38. Fox C (2008) Content Analysis: the hows & whys to understanding your content. In: Euro IA (ed.) Chiaraogan. Accessed June 2012
  39. *Galaty JG (2011) The modern motility of pastoral land rights: tenure transitions and land-grabbing in East Africa. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  40. *Gasteyer S, Isaac J, Hillal J, Walsh S (2012) Water grabbing in colonial perspective: land and water in Israel/Palestine. Water Altern 5(2):450–468Google Scholar
  41. Gerlach AC, Liu P (2010) Resource-seeking foreign direct investment in African agriculture. FAO Commodity and Trade Policy Resesrch Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  42. Gerstter C, KaphengstT, Knoblauch D, Timeus K (2011) An assessment of the effects on land ownership and land grab on development.
  43. *GRAIN (2012) Land grabbing and food sovereignty in West and Central Africa. Against the Grain, AugustGoogle Scholar
  44. *Grajales J (2013) Speaking law to land grabbing land contention and legal repertoire in Colombia. The Land Deal Politics Initiative Institute for Development Studies (IDS)Google Scholar
  45. *Grandia L (2011) Projecting smallholders: roads, the Puebla to Panama plan and land grabbing in the Q’eqchi’ lowlands of Northern Guatemala. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  46. *Guillozet K, Bliss JC (2011) Household livelihoods and increasing foreign investment pressure in Ethiopia’s natural forests. LDPI working paperGoogle Scholar
  47. *Hall R (2011) Land grabbing in Southern Africa: the many faces of the investor rush. Rev Afr Polit Econ 38(128):193–214Google Scholar
  48. *Hall R (2012) The next Great Trek? South African commercial farmers move north. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):823–843Google Scholar
  49. Hallam D (2009) Foreign investment in developing country agriculture: issues, policy implications and international response. Accessed May 2012
  50. Harris JM, Wise TA, Gallagher KP, Goodwin NR (2001) A survey of sustainable development: social and economic dimensions. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  51. Heathfield SM (2012) What is employment or a job. Accessed Nov 2012
  52. Herold M, Latham JS, Di Gregorio A, Schmullius CC (2006) Evolvingstandards in land cover characterization. J Land Use Sci 1(2–4):157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. *Hertzog T, Adamczewski A, Molle F, Poussin J, Jamin J (2012) Ostrich-like strategies in Sahelian sands? Land and water grabbing in the office du Niger, Mali. Water Altern 5(2):304–321Google Scholar
  54. Hervieu S (2009) A Madagascar, une Société Indienne Compte Louer près de 500000 Hectares.
  55. Hofman I, Ho P (2012) China’s ‘Developmental outsourcing’: a critical examination of Chinese global ‘land grabs’ discourse. J Peasant Stud 39(1):1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. *Huggins C (2013) Consolidating land, consolidating control State-facilitated ‘agricultural investment’ through the ‘Green Revolution’ in Rwanda. The Land Deal Politics Initiative Institute for Development Studies (IDS)Google Scholar
  57. IFAD (2010) Responding to ‘land grabbing’ and promoting responsible investment in agriculture.
  58. ISS (2012) Critical agrarian studies colloquium no. 4. Global land grabbing: towards broader and deeper theoretical and empirical perspectives. Accessed July 2014
  59. *Kaarhus R (2011) Agricultural growth corridors equals land-grabbing? Models, roles and Accountabilities in a Mozambican case. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  60. *Kachika T (2010) Land grabbing in Africa. A review of the impacts and the possible policy responses. Pan Africa Programme of Oxfam International, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  61. *Kenney-Lazar M (2012) Plantation rubber, land grabbing and social-property transformation in southern Laos. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):1017–1037Google Scholar
  62. Kersting E (2011) Dealing with the race for agricultural land. Accessed February 2012
  63. *Keulertz M (2012) Drivers and actors in large-scale farmland acquisitions in Sudan. LDPI working paperGoogle Scholar
  64. *Klopp J (2000) Pilfering the public: the problem of land grabbing in contemporary Kenya. Afr Today 47(1): 7–26Google Scholar
  65. Kulkarni A, Karnataka H, Deshpande A, Karnataka D (2013) Sustainable development: roles of societies governments and NGOs. Int J Environ Sci 4(2):2231–2289Google Scholar
  66. *Lamonge M (2012) Neo-liberalism, social conflict and identity of papuan indigenous people case study of Merauke integrated food & energy estate (MIFEE) in Papua references. ISSGoogle Scholar
  67. *Lavers T (2012) Patterns of agrarian transformation in Ethiopia: state-mediated commercialisation and the land grab. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):795–822Google Scholar
  68. *Levien M (2012) The land question: special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):933–969Google Scholar
  69. *Mabikke SB (2011) Escalating land grabbing in post-conflict regions of Northern Uganda: a need for strengthening good land governance in Acholi Region. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  70. MacInnes M (2012) Corruption and large-scale land acquisitions: an analysis of the role high level corruption plays in enabling elite capture of land. Paper presented at the International conference on global land grabbing II,17–19 Oct, 2012.
  71. *Makki F, Geisler C (2011) Development by dispossession: land grabbing as new enclosures in contemporary Ethiopia. In: International Conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  72. *Makombe EK (2013) Subaltern voices and corporate/state land grab in the save valley. LDPI working paperGoogle Scholar
  73. *Mamonova N (2012) Challenging the dominant assumptions about peasants’ responses to land grabbing: a study of diverse political reactions from below on the example of Ukraine. In: International conference on global land grabbing II, 17–19 Oct 2012, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  74. Margulis ME, McKeon N, Borras SJ (2013) Land grabbing and global governance: critical perspectives. Globalizations 10(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Miceli TJ, Sirmans CF, Kieyah J (2001) The demand for land title registration: theory with evidence from Kenya. Am Law Econ Assoc 3(2):275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. *Mishra DK (2011) Behind dispossession: state, land grabbing and agrarian change in rural Orissa. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  77. Montgomery DR (2007) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. PNAS 104(33):13268–13272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. *Mousseau F, Sosnoff G (2011) Understanding land investment deals in Africa: country report: Ethiopia. The Oakland InstituteGoogle Scholar
  79. *Murmis M, Murmis MR (2012) Land concentration and foreign land ownership in Argentina in the context of global land grabbing. Can J Dev Stud 33(4):490–508Google Scholar
  80. *Mutch T (2011) Land grabbing, a growing menace. New Afr 506:p58Google Scholar
  81. *Neef A, Touch S, Chienthong J (2013) The politics and ethics of land concessions in rural Cambodia. J Agric Environ Ethics 26(6):1085–1103Google Scholar
  82. *Nelson F, Sulle E, Lekaita E (2012) Land grabbing and political transformation in Tanzania. In: International conference on global land grabbing II, 17–19 Oct 2012, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  83. *Odendaal W (2011) Land grabbing in Namibia: a case study from the Omusati Region, Northern Namibia. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  84. *Ojeda D (2011) Whose paradise? Conservation, tourism and land grabbing in Tayrona Natural Park, Colombia. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  85. *Ojeda D (2012) Green pretexts: ecotourism, neoliberal conservation and land grabbing in Tayrona National Natural Park, Colombia. J Peasant Stud 39(2):357–375Google Scholar
  86. *Palm A (2012) Escaping the bulldozers—land-grabbing in Phnom Penh. J Urban Cult ResGoogle Scholar
  87. *Palmer R (2011) Would Cecil Rhodes have signed a code of conduct? Reflections on global land grabbing and land rights in Africa, past and present. In: International conference on global land grabbing, 6–8 April 2011, University of Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  88. Peluso N, Lund C (2011) New frontiers of land control: introduction. J Peasant Stud 38(4):667–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. *Perrone NM (2013) Restrictions to Foreign acquisitions of agricultural land in Argentina and Brazil. Globalizations 10(1):205–209Google Scholar
  90. *Piñeiro DE (2012) Land grabbing: concentration and foreignisation of land in UruguayGoogle Scholar
  91. *Reydon BF (2006) Social embeddedness, Institutions for rural land management and land grabbing: the cases of Afghanistan and Brazil. Colloque international “Les frontières de la question foncièreGoogle Scholar
  92. Rudi LM, Azadi H, Witlox F (2012) Reconcilability of socio-economic development and environmental conservation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Planet Change 86(87):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. *Sauer S (2012) Agrarian structure, foreign investment in land, and land prices in Brazil. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):873–898Google Scholar
  94. *Settle AC (2013) Agricultural land acquisition by foreign investors in Pakistan. LDPI Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  95. *Sikor T (2012) Tree plantations, politics of possession and the absence of land grabs in Vietnam. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):1077–1101Google Scholar
  96. *Smillie I, Brownell A, Létourneau J (2009) Land grabbing and land reform. Partnership Africa CanadaGoogle Scholar
  97. Sohl TL, Loveland TR, Sleeter BM, Sayler KL, Barnes CA (2010) Addressing foundational elements of regional land-use change forecasting. Landscape Ecol 25(2):233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. *Steggerda M, Visser O (2012) A farm manager should get his hands dirty: global land acquisitions and the export of western farm models to Russia. In: International conference on global land grabbing II, 17–19 Oct 2012, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  99. STWR (2012) Land grabbing the end of sustainable agriculture. Accessed May 2012
  100. Subbotina TP (2004) Beyond economic growth: an introduction to sustainable development. World Bank Publications, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. *Sulieman HM (2013) Land grabbing along livestock migration routes in Gadarif State, Sudan impacts on pastoralism and the environment. LDPIGoogle Scholar
  102. *Tenga R (1992) Pastoral land rights in Tanzania: a review. Drylands programme: pastoral land tenure series. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
  103. Toulmin C (2008) Securing land and property rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: the role of local institutions. Land Use Policy 26:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Trikalinos TA, Salant G, Zintzaras E, Ioannidis JPA (2008) Meta-analysis methods. Adv Genet 60:311–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. United Nations (1992) Convention on biological diversity. Accessed 28 March, 2014
  106. *Urioste M (2012) Concentration and “foreignisation” of land in Bolivia. Revue canadienne d’études du développement 33(4):439–457Google Scholar
  107. Verburg PH, van Berkel DB, van Doorn AM, van Eupen M, van den Heiligenberg HARM (2010) Trajectories of land use change in Europe: a model-based exploration of rural futures. Landscape Ecol 25(2):217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. *Visser O, Spoor M (2010) Land grabbing in Eastern Europe: global food security and land governance in post-soviet Eurasia. In: 118th seminar of the EAAE (European Association of Agricultural Economists), ‘Rural development: governance, policy design and delivery’ 25–27 Aug 2010, Ljubljana, SloveniaGoogle Scholar
  109. *Visser O, Spoor M (2011) Land grabbing in post-Soviet Eurasia: the world’s largest agricultural land reserves at stake. J Peasant Stud 38(2):299–323Google Scholar
  110. *Visser O, Mamonova N, Spoor M (2012) Oligarchs, megafarms and land reserves: understanding land grabbing in Russia. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):899–931Google Scholar
  111. *Vitale A (2013) Land grabbing e turismo di caccia. Il caso di Loliondo, Tanzania. Agriregionieuropa Anno 9, Numero 32, MarzoGoogle Scholar
  112. *Wehrmann B (2009) Much coveted investment or unwelcome land grabbing? Two views on the rubber boom in Laos. Rural 21(5):34–37Google Scholar
  113. *White B, White J (2012) Gendered experiences of dispossession: oil palm expansion in a Dayak Hibun community in West Kalimantan. J Peasant Stud 39(3–4):995–1016Google Scholar
  114. *Wilkinson J, Reydon B, Di Sabbato A (2012) Concentration and foreign ownership of land in Brazil in the context of global land grabbing. Can J Dev Stud 33(4):417–438Google Scholar
  115. *Zolin MB (2013) Land grabbing, food security and energy security in Asia: the cases of China and India. 3rd Asia-Pacific business research conference 25–26 February 2013, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  116. *Zoomers A (2011) Food security strategies in South and Southeast Asia: improving food security in a context of land grabbing? Newsletter 58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erika Vandergeten
    • 1
  • Hossein Azadi
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Dereje Teklemariam
    • 1
    • 4
  • Jan Nyssen
    • 1
  • Frank Witlox
    • 1
  • Eric Vanhaute
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of GeographyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  2. 2.Centre for Environmental SciencesHasselt UniversityHasseltBelgium
  3. 3.Economics and Rural DevelopmentUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium
  4. 4.Department of ManagementMekelle UniversityMekelleEthiopia
  5. 5.Department of HistoryGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations