The use of traits to interpret responses to large scale - edge effects: a study of epigaeic beetle assemblages across a Eucalyptus forest and pine plantation edge
Edge effects due to habitat loss and fragmentation have pervasive impacts on many natural ecosystems worldwide.
We aimed to explore whether, in tandem with the resource-based model of edge effects, species feeding-guild and flight-capacity can help explain species responses to an edge.
We used a two-sided edge gradient that extended from 1000 m into native Eucalyptus forest to 316 m into an exotic pine plantation. We used generalised additive models to examine the continuous responses of beetle species, feeding-guild species richness and flight-capable group species richness to the edge gradient and environmental covariates.
Phytophagous species richness was directly related to variation in vegetation along the edge gradient. There were more flight-capable species in Eucalyptus forest and more flightless species in exotic pine plantation. Many individual species exhibited multiple-peaked edge-profiles.
The resource based model for edge effects can be used in tandem with traits such as feeding-guild and flight-capacity to understand drivers of large scale edge responses. Some trait-groups can show generalisable responses that can be linked with drivers such as vegetation richness and habitat structure. Many trait-group responses, however, are less generalisable and not explained by easily measured habitat variables. Difficulties in linking traits with resources along the edge could be due to unmeasured variation and indirect effects. Some species’ responses reached the limits of the edge gradient demonstrating the need to examine edge effects at large scales, such as kilometres.
KeywordsBiodiversity Community ecology Feeding-guild Habitat fragmentation Flight-capacity
- Austin MP, Nicholls AO (1988) Species associations within herbaceous vegetation in an Australian eucalypt forest. In: During HJ, Werger MJA, Willems JH (eds) Diversity and pattern in plant communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 95–114Google Scholar
- Barton PS, Manning AD, Gibb H, Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham SA (2010) Fine-scale heterogeneity in beetle assemblages under co-occurring Eucalyptus in the same subgenus. J Biogeogr 37:1927–1937Google Scholar
- Bivand R (2014) spdep: spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics and models. R package version 0.5-71Google Scholar
- Bjornstad ON (2013) ncf: spatial nonparametric covariance functions. R package version 1.1-5Google Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson D (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Chalfoun AD, Ratnaswamy MJ, Thompson FR III (2002) Songbird nest predators in forest-pasture edge and forest interior in a fragmented landscape. Ecol Appl 12:858–867Google Scholar
- Dormann CF, McPherson JM, Araújo BM, Bivand R, Bolliger J, Carl G, Davies RG, Hirzel A, Jetz W, Daniel Kissling W, Kühn I, Ohlemüller R, Peres-Neto PR, Reineking B, Schröder B, Schurr FM, Wilson R (2007) Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30:609–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Franc V (1997) Mycetophilous beetles (Coleoptera mycetophila)—indicators of well preserved ecosystems. Biologia 52:181–186Google Scholar
- Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, Lovejoy TE, Sexton JO, Austin MP, Collins CD, Cook WM, Damschen EI, Ewers RM, Foster BL, Jenkins CN, King AJ, Laurance WF, Levey DJ, Margules CR, Melbourne BA, Nicholls AO, Orrock JL, Song D-X, Townshend JR (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kotze DJ, Brandmayr P, Casale A, Dauffy-Richard E, Dekoninck W, Koivula MJ, Lövei GL, Mossakowski D, Noordijk J, Paarmann W, Pizzolotto R, Saska P, Schwerk A, Serrano J, Szyszko J, Taboada A, Turin H, Venn S, Vermeulen R, Zetto T (2011) Forty years of carabid beetle research in Europe—from taxonomy, biology, ecology and population studies to bioindication, habitat assessment and conservation. Zookeys 100:55–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krauss J, Bommarco R, Guardiola M, Heikkinen RK, Helm A, Kuussaari M, Lindborg R, Öckinger E, Pärtel M, Pino J, Pöyry J, Raatikainen KM, Sang A, Stefanescu C, Teder T, Zobel M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. Ecol Lett 13:597–605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lambert TD, Sumpter KL, Dittel JW, Dupre S, Casanova K, Winker A, Adler GH (2014) Roads as barriers to seed dispersal by small mammals in a neotropical forest. Trop Ecol 55:263–269Google Scholar
- Lange M, Türke M, Pašalić E, Boch S, Hessenmöller D, Müller J, Prati D, Socher SA, Fischer M, Weisser WW, Gossner MM (2014) Effects of forest management on ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in Central Europe are mainly mediated by changes in forest structure. For Ecol Manag 329:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ohwaki A, Kaneko Y, Ikeda H (2015) Seasonal variability in the response of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to a forest edge in a heterogeneous agricultural landscape in Japan. Eur J Entomol 112:135Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Tóthmérész B, Nagy DD, Mizser S, Bogyó D, Magura T (2014) Edge effects on ground-dwelling beetles (Carabidae and Staphylinidae) in oak forest–forest edge–grassland habitats in Hungary. Eur J Entomol 111:686–691Google Scholar
- van der Ree R, Jaeger JAG, van der Grift EA, Clevenger AP (2011) Effects of roads and traffic on wildlife populations and landscape function: road ecology is moving towards larger scales. Ecol Soc 16:48Google Scholar