Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 31, Issue 7, pp 1581–1599 | Cite as

The potential to restore native woody plant richness and composition in a reforesting landscape: a modeling approach in the Ecuadorian Andes

  • Romaike S. MiddendorpEmail author
  • Alvaro J. Pérez
  • Armando Molina
  • Eric F. Lambin
Research Article

Abstract

Context

Natural regenerating forests are rapidly expanding in the tropics. Forest transitions have the potential to restore biodiversity. Spatial targeting of land use policies could improve the biodiversity benefits of reforesting landscapes.

Objective

We explored the relative importance of landscape attributes in influencing the potential of tree cover increase to restore native woody plant biodiversity at the landscape scale.

Methods

We developed land use scenarios that differed in spatial patterns of reforestation, using the Pangor watershed in the Ecuadorian Andes as a case study. We distinguished between reforestation through natural regeneration of woody vegetation in abandoned fallows and planted forests through managed plantations of exotic species on previously cultivated land. We simulated the restoration of woody plant biodiversity for each scenario using LANDIS-II, a process-based model of forest dynamics. A pair-case comparison of simulated woody plant biodiversity for each scenario was conducted against a random scenario.

Results

Species richness in natural regenerating fallows was considerably higher when occurring in: (i) close proximity to remnant forests; (ii) areas with a high percentage of surrounding forest cover; and (iii) compositional heterogeneous landscapes. Reforestation at intermediate altitudes also positively affected restoration of woody plant species. Planted exotic pine forests negatively affected species restoration.

Conclusions

Our research contributes to a better understanding of the recolonization processes of regenerating forests. We provide guidelines for reforestation policies that aim to conserve and restore woody plant biodiversity by accounting for landscape attributes.

Keywords

Biodiversity restoration Landscape planning LANDIS-II Planted forest Reforestation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Programme BELSPO (Project Stereo II SR/00/133) and the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS, Brussels, Belgium). We acknowledge the collaboration and hospitality offered by the communities living in the study area, in particular the family Paguay. We are grateful for the data provided by Jorge Caranqui from the Herbario Politecnico CHEP in Riobamba, Ecuador, for the contribution of Dr. Vincent Balthazar, and for the advices of Prof. Veerle Vanacker and Dr. Patrick Meyfroidt. We thank the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador and the Ecuadorian Ministerio del Ambiente for their collaboration. This manuscript was greatly improved thanks to constructive comments by two anonymous reviewers.

Supplementary material

10980_2016_340_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1738 kb)

References

  1. Amici V, Santi E, Filibeck G, Diekmann M, Geri F, Landi S, Scoppola A, Chiarucci A (2013) Influence of secondary forest succession on plant diversity patterns in a Mediterranean landscape. J Biogeogr 40(12):2335–2347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71(3):355–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Pineda E, Escobar F, Benítez-Malvido J (2009) Value of small patches in the conservation of plant-species diversity in highly fragmented rainforest. Conserv Biol 23(3):729–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Asner GP, Rudel TK, Aide TM, Defries R, Emerson R (2009) A contemporary assessment of change in humid tropical forests. Conserv Biol 23(6):1386–1395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Balthazar V, Vanacker V, Molina A, Lambin EF (2015) Impacts of forest cover change on ecosystem services in high Andean mountains. Ecol Indic 48:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barlow J, Gardner TA, Araujo IS, Ávila-Pires TC, Bonaldo AB, Costa JE, Esposito MC, Ferreira LV, Hawes J, Hernandez MIM, Hoogmoed MS, Leite RN, Lo-Man-Hung NF, Malcolm JR, Martins MB, Mestre LAM, Miranda-Santos R, Nunes-Gutjahr AL, Overal WL, Parry L, Peters SL, Ribeiro-Junior MA, da Silva MNF, da Silva Motta C, Peres CA (2007) Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests. PNAS 104(47):18555–18560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Birch JC, Newton AC, Aquino CA, Cantarello E, Echeverría C, Kitzberger T, Schiappacasse I, Garavito NT (2010) Cost-effectiveness of dryland forest restoration evaluated by spatial analysis of ecosystem services. PNAS 107(50):21925–21930CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonet A, Pausas J (2004) Species richness and cover along a 60-year chronosequence in old-fields of southeastern Spain. Plant Ecol 174(2):257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowen ME, McAlpine CA, House APN, Smith GC (2007) Regrowth forests on abandoned agricultural land: a review of their habitat values for recovering forest fauna. Biol Conserv 140(3–4):273–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27(4):325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bremer L, Farley K (2010) Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodivers Conserv 19(14):3893–3915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buytaert W, Wyseure G, De Bièvre B, Deckers J (2005) The effect of land-use changes on the hydrological behaviour of Histic Andosols in south Ecuador. Hydrol Process 19(20):3985–3997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cantarello E, Newton AC, Hill RA, Tejedor-Garavito N, Williams-Linera G, López-Barrera F, Manson RH, Golicher DJ  (2011) Simulating the potential for ecological restoration of dryland forests in Mexico under different disturbance regimes. Ecol Model 222(5):1112–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chazdon RL (2003) Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspect Plant Ecol 6(1–2):51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chazdon RL (2008) Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320(5882):1458–1460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chazdon RL (2014) Second growth: the promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chazdon RL, Harvey CA, Komar O, Griffith DM, Ferguson BG, Martínez-Ramos M, Morales H, Nigh R, Soto-Pinto L, Van Breugel M, Philpott SM (2009a) Beyond reserves: a research agenda for conserving biodiversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Biotropica 41(2):142–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chazdon RL, Peres CA, Dent D, Sheil D, Lugo AE, Lamb D, Stork NE, Miller SE (2009b) The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests. Conserv Biol 23(6):1406–1417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chokkalingam U, de Jong W (2001) Secondary forest: a working definition and typology. International Forestry Review 3(1):19–26Google Scholar
  20. Crk T, Uriarte M, Corsi F, Flynn D (2009) Forest recovery in a tropical landscape: what is the relative importance of biophysical, socioeconomic, and landscape variables? Landscape Ecol 24(5):629–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Koning F, Aguiñaga M, Bravo M, Chiu M, Lascano M, Lozada T, Suarez L (2011) Bridging the gap between forest conservation and poverty alleviation: the Ecuadorian Socio Bosque program. Environ Sci Policy 14(5):531–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DeClerck FAJ, Chazdon R, Holl KD, Milder JC, Finegan B, Martinez-Salinas A, Imbach P, Canet L, Ramos Z (2010) Biodiversity conservation in human-modified landscapes of Mesoamerica: past, present and future. Biol Conserv 143(10):2301–2313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dent DH, Wright SJ (2009) The future of tropical species in secondary forests: a quantitative review. Biol Conserv 142(12):2833–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunn RR (2004) Recovery of faunal communities during tropical forest regeneration. Conserv Biol 18(2):302–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ellstrand NC, Elam DR (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:217–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Evelyn MJ, Stiles DA (2003) Roosting requirements of two frugivorous bats (Sturnira lilium and Arbiteus intermedius) in fragmented Neotropical forest. Biotropica 35(3):405–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fahrig L (1998) When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival? Ecol Model 105(2–3):273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 34:487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14(2):101–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. FAO (2015) Global forest resources assessment 2015. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  31. Farley KA (2007) Grasslands to tree plantations: forest transition in the Andes of Ecuador. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 97(4):755–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Farley KA (2010) Pathways to forest transition: local case studies from the Ecuadorian Andes. J Lat Am Geogr 9(2):7–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Farley KA, Bremer LL, Harden CP, Hartsig J (2013) Changes in carbon storage under alternative land uses in biodiverse Andean grasslands: implications for payment for ecosystem services. Conserv Lett 6(1):21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Farley KA, Kelly E, Hofstede R (2004) Soil organic carbon and water retention after conversion of grasslands to pine plantations in the Ecuadorian Andes. Ecosystems 7(7):729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feeley KJ, Silman MR (2010) Land-use and climate change effects on population size and extinction risk of Andean plants. Glob Change Biol 16(12):3215–3222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol Biogeogr 16(3):265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gardner TA, Barlow J, Chazdon R, Ewers RM, Harvey CA, Peres CA, Sodhi NS (2009) Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. Ecol Lett 12(6):561–582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Guariguata MR, Ostertag R (2001) Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecol Manag 148(1–3):185–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Günter S, Weber M, Erreis R, Aguirre N (2007) Influence of distance to forest edges on natural regeneration of abandoned pastures: a case study in the tropical mountain rain forest of Southern Ecuador. Eur J Forest Res 126(1):67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gustafson EJ (2013) When relationships estimated in the past cannot be used to predict the future: using mechanistic models to predict landscape ecological dynamics in a changing world. Landscape Ecol 28(8):1429–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gustafson EJ, Shifley SR, Mladenoff DJ, Nimerfro KK, He HS (2000) Spatial simulation of forest succession and timber harvesting using LANDIS. Can J Forest Res 30(1):32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hall J, Van Holt T, Daniels A, Balthazar V, Lambin EF (2012) Trade-offs between tree cover, carbon storage and floristic biodiversity in reforesting landscapes. Landscape Ecol 27(8):1135–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen PA (2005) Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 19(3):768–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harrison S (1999) Local and regional diversity in a patchy landscape: native, alien, and endemic herbs on serpentine. Ecology 80(1):70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harvey CA, Komar O, Chazdon R, Ferguson BG, Finegan B, Griffith DM, MartÍNez-Ramos M, Morales H, Nigh R, Soto-Pinto L, Van Breugel M, Wishnie M (2008) Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conserv Biol 22(1):8–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. He HS, Mladenoff DJ, Boeder J (1999) An object-oriented forest landscape model and its representation of tree species. Ecol Model 119(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Dupuy J, Tun-Dzul F, May-Pat F (2011) Influence of landscape structure and stand age on species density and biomass of a tropical dry forest across spatial scales. Landscape Ecol 26(3):355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hijmans RJ (2014) raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 2.3-12 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster
  50. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25(15):1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hofstede RGM, Groenendijk JP, Coppus R, Fehse JC, Sevink J (2002) Impact of pine plantations on soils and vgetation in the Ecuadorian high Andes. Mt Res Dev 22(2):159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Holl KD (2007) Old field vegetation succession in the Neotropics. In: Cramer VA, Hobbs RJ (eds) Old fields: dynamics and restoration of abandoned farmland. Island Press, Washington, pp 93–118Google Scholar
  53. Holl KD, Loik ME, Lin EHV, Samuels IA (2000) Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: overcoming barriers to dispersal and establishment. Restor Ecol 8(4):339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Horn HS (1974) The ecology of secondary succession. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jesus FM, Pivello VR, Meirelles ST, Franco GADC, Metzger JP (2012) The importance of landscape structure for seed dispersal in rain forest fragments. J Veg Sci 23:1126–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Jørgensen PM, León-Yánez S (1999) Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador. Monogr Syst Bot Missouri Bot Gard 75: i–viii, 1–1182Google Scholar
  57. Jørgensen PM, Ulloa Ulloa C (1994) Seed plants of the High Andes of Ecuador: a checklist. University of Aarhus, AarhusGoogle Scholar
  58. Kanowski JJ, Reis TM, Catterall CP, Piper SD (2006) Factors affecting the use of reforested sites by reptiles in cleared rainforest landscapes in tropical and subtropical Australia. Restor Ecol 14(1):67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ, Chong GW (2006) Spatial heterogeneity influences native and nonnative plant species richness. Ecology 87(12):3186–3199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2010) Land use transitions: socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy 27(2):108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lauer W, Rafiqpoor MD (2000) Páramo de Papallacta: a physiogeographical map 1: 50,000 of the area around the Antisana (Eastern Cordillera of Ecuador). Erdkunde 54:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Leite MdS, Tambosi LR, Romitelli I, Metzger JP (2013) Landscape ecology perspective in restoration projects for biodiversity conservation: a review. Brazilian Journal Nature Conservation 11(2):108–118Google Scholar
  63. Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, Cunningham RB, Crane M, Macgregor C, Michael D, Montague-Drake R (2009) Experimental evidence of the effects of a changed matrix on conserving biodiversity within patches of native forest in an industrial plantation landscape. Landscape Ecol 24(8):1091–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lôbo D, Leão T, Melo FPL, Santos AMM, Tabarelli M (2011) Forest fragmentation drives Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil to biotic homogenization. Divers Distrib 17(2):287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  66. MacLaren C, Buckley H, Hale R (2014) Conservation of forest biodiversity and ecosystem properties in a pastoral landscape of the Ecuadorian Andes. Agrofor Syst 88(2):369–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McGarigal K, Cushman S, Ene E (2012) FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  68. Melo FPL, Arroyo-Rodríguez V, Fahrig L, Martínez-Ramos M, Tabarelli M (2013) On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 28(8):462–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Mesquita RCG, Ickes K, Ganade G, Williamson GB (2001) Alternative successional pathways in the Amazon Basin. J Ecol 89(4):528–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Metzger JP, Brancalio PHS (2013) Challenges and opportunities in applying a landscape ecology perspective in ecological restoration: a powerful approach to shape Neolandscapes. Brazilian Journal Nature Conservation 11(2):103–107Google Scholar
  71. Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF (2011) Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36(1):343–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mishra R (1968) Ecology workbook. Oxford and IBH Company, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  73. Mladenoff DJ (2004) LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecol Model 180(1):7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Molina A, Vanacker V, Balthazar V, Mora D, Govers G (2012) Complex land cover change, water and sediment yield in a degraded Andean environment. J Hydrol 472–473:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Munro NT, Fischer J, Wood J, Lindenmayer DB (2009) Revegetation in agricultural areas: the development of structural complexity and floristic diversity. Ecol Appl 19(5):1197–1210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Newton AC, Echeverría C, Cantarello E, Bolados G (2011) Projecting impacts of human disturbances to inform conservation planning and management in a dryland forest landscape. Biol Conserv 144(7):1949–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Norden N, Chazdon RL, Chao A, Jiang Y-H, Vílchez-Alvarado B (2009) Resilience of tropical rain forests: tree community reassembly in secondary forests. Ecol Lett 12(5):385–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Stevens MHH, Oksanen MJ, Suggests M (2007) The vegan package. Community ecology package 2013Google Scholar
  79. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190(3–4):231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Posada JM, Aide TM, Cavelier J (2000) Cattle and weedy shrubs as restoration tools of tropical montane rainforest. Restor Ecol 8(4):370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, VienaGoogle Scholar
  82. Rapp JM, Silman MR, Clark JS, Girardin CAJ, Galiano D, Tito R (2012) Intra- and interspecific tree growth across a long altitudinal gradient in the Peruvian Andes. Ecology 93(9):2061–2072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Robiglio V, Sinclair F (2011) Maintaining the conservation value of shifting cultivation landscapes requires spatially explicit interventions. Environ Manag 48(2):289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rodrigues RR, Lima RAF, Gandolfi S, Nave AG (2009) On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol Conserv 142(6):1242–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rudel TK, Coomes OT, Moran M, Achard F, Angelsen A, Xu J, Lambin EF (2005) Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environ Change 15(1):23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sarmiento FO (2002) Antrhopogenic change in th elandscapes of highland Ecuador. Geogr Rev 92(2):213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Scheller RM, Domingo JB, Sturtevant BR, Williams JS, Rudy A, Gustafson EJ, Mladenoff DJ (2007) Design, development, and application of LANDIS-II, a spatial landscape simulation model with flexible temporal and spatial resolution. Ecol Model 201(3–4):409–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sekhon JS (2011) Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: the matching package for R. J Stat Softw 42(7):1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Steiner NC, Köhler W (2003) Effects of landscape patterns on species richness: a modelling approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98(1–3):353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tabarelli M, Aguiar AV, Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Peres CA (2010) Prospects for biodiversity conservation in the Atlantic Forest: lessons from aging human-modified landscapes. Biol Conserv 143(10):2328–2340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tabarelli M, Santos BA, Arroyo-Rodríguez Victor, Melo FPL (2012) Secondary forests as biodiversity repositories in human-modified landscapes: insights from the Neotropics. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi: Ciências Naturais 7(3):319–328Google Scholar
  92. Thompson JR, Foster DR, Scheller R, Kittredge D (2011) The influence of land use and climate change on forest biomass and composition in Massachusetts. USA. Ecol Appl 21(7):2425–2444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Batáry P, Bengtsson J, Clough Y, Crist TO, Dormann CF, Ewers RM, Fründ J, Holt RD, Holzschuh A, Klein AM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis DA, Laurance W, Lindenmayer D, Scherber C, Sodhi N, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C, van der Putten WH, Westphal C (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87(3):661–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. van Breugel M, Hall JS, Craven D, Bailon M, Hernandez A, Abbene M, van Breugel P (2013) Succession of ephemeral secondary forests and their limited role for the conservation of floristic diversity in a human-modified tropical landscape. PLoS ONE 8(12):e82433CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Vanacker V, Balthazar V, Molina A (2013) Anthropogenic activity triggering landslides in densely populated mountain areas. In: Margottini C, Canuti P, Sassa K (eds) Landslide science and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 163–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vetaas OR (1997) The effect of canopy disturbance on species richness in a central Himalayan oak forest. Plant Ecol 132(1):29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wagner H, Wildi O, Ewald K (2000) Additive partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscape. Landscape Ecol 15(3):219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. White S (2013) Grass páramo as hunter-gatherer landscape. The Holocene 23(6):898–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wirth C, Messier C, Bergeron Y, Frank D, Fankhänel A (2009) Old-growth forest definitions: a pragmatic view. In: Wirth C, Gleixner G, Heimann M (eds) Old-growth forests, ecological studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Young KR (1993) Tropical timberlines: changes in forest structure and regeneration between two Peruvian timberline margins. Arctic Alpine Res 25(3):167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Zimmerman JK, Pascarella JB, Aide TM (2000) Barriers to forest regeneration in an abandoned pasture in Puerto Rico. Restor Ecol 8(4):350–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life InstituteUniversity of LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Ecología de Plantas, Herbario QCA, Escuela de Ciencias BiológicasPontificia Universidad Católica del EcuadorQuitoEcuador
  3. 3.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesKU LeuvenHeverleeBelgium
  4. 4.School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences and Woods Institute for the EnvironmentStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations