Landscape Ecology

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 255–269 | Cite as

Landscape, fire and habitat: which features of recently burned heathland influence site occupancy of an early successional specialist?

  • Felicia Pereoglou
  • Christopher MacGregor
  • Sam C. Banks
  • Jeff Wood
  • Fred Ford
  • David B. Lindenmayer
Research Article



Multiple ecological drivers generate spatial patterns in species’ distributions. Changes to natural disturbance regimes can place early successional habitat specialists at an increased risk of extinction by altering landscape patterns of habitat suitability.


We developed a series of hypotheses to evaluate the effects of landscape structure, fire history, and site-level habitat quality on site occupancy by an early successional specialist, the eastern chestnut mouse (Pseudomys gracilicaudatus).


We obtained eight years of monitoring data from 26 sites in recently burned heathland in southeast Australia. We used generalised linear models to determine which explanatory variables were related to occupancy. We also explored predictability in patterns of small mammal species co-occurrence.


Landscape structure (patch area, landscape heterogeneity) was strongly related to site occupancy. Site occupancy was associated with dead shrubs in the understory and rock cover on ground layer, but was not directly influenced by recent or historical fire. Contrary to contemporary ecological theory, we found no predictable species associations in our early successional community.


We recommend surveys take account of landscape configuration and proximity to suitable habitat for optimal results. Fire regimes expected to promote eastern chestnut mouse population growth should encourage the retention of critical habitat features rather than be based on temporal rates of successional stages. For management to adequately account for post-disturbance patterns in early successional communities, a species-by-species, multi-scaled approach to research is necessary.


Fire Succession Heathland Patch area Landscape heterogeneity Habitat specialist 



We most gratefully acknowledge the Wreck Bay Aboriginal Community and the Wandandian People of the Dharawal and Dhurga language groups on whose lands this study was conducted. Mason Crane, Damien Michael, Rebecca Montague-Drake, and Sachiko Okada provided fieldwork assistance. This project is part of a major study in Booderee National Park funded by the Australian Research Council, the Department of Environment and Water Resources and the Department of Defence.

Supplementary material

10980_2015_240_MOESM1_ESM.docx (114 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 114 kb)
10980_2015_240_MOESM2_ESM.docx (77 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 77 kb)
10980_2015_240_MOESM3_ESM.docx (110 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 110 kb)


  1. Baker J, Whelan RJ, Evans L, Moore S, Norton M (2010) Managing the ground parrot in its fiery habitat in south-eastern Australia. Emu 110:279–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks SC, Finlayson GR, Lawson SJ, Lindenmayer DB, Paetkau D, Ward SJ, Taylor AC (2005a) The effects of habitat fragmentation due to forestry plantation establishment on the demography and genetic variation of a marsupial carnivore, Antechinus agilis. Biol Conserv 122:581–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks SC, Ward SJ, Lindenmayer DB, Finlayson GR, Lawson SJ, Taylor AC (2005b) The effects of habitat fragmentation on the social kin structure and mating system of the agile antechinus, Antechinus agilis. Mol Ecol 14:1789–1801CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks SC, Dujardin M, McBurney L, Blair D, Barker M, Lindenmayer DB (2011) Starting points for small mammal population recovery after wildfire: recolonisation or residual populations? Oikos 120:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks SC, Cary GJ, Smith AL, Driscoll DA, Lindenmayer DB, Davies ID, Gill AM, Peakall R (2013) How does ecological disturbance influence genetic diversity? Trends Ecol Evol 28:670–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradstock RA, Williams J, Gill AM (eds) (2012) Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Braithwaite RW (1982) Small marginal groups of Rattus lutreolus in good and poor habitat. J Zool 198:529–532Google Scholar
  8. Breed B, Ford F (2007) Native mice and rats. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  9. Burel F, Baudry J (2003) Landscape ecology: concepts, methods and applications. Science Publishers, EnfieldGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-modal inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Catling PC (1986) Rattus lutreolus, colonizer of heathland after fire in the absence of Pseudomys species. Aust Wildl Res 13:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Catling PC (1991) Ecological effects of prescribed burning practices on the mammals of southeastern Australia. In: Lunney D (ed) Conservation of Australia’s forest fauna. Royal Zoological Society of NSW, NSW, pp 353–363Google Scholar
  13. Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cockburn A (1978) Distribution of Pseudomys shortridgei (Muridae: Rodentia) and its relevance to that of other heathland Pseudomys. Aust Wildl Res 5:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cockburn A (1981) Diet and habitat preference of the silky desert mouse Pseudomys apodemoides (Rodentia). Aust Wildl Res 8:475–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cockburn A, Lazenby-Cohen KA (1992) Use of nest trees by Antechinus stuartii, a semelparous lekking marsupial. J Zool London 226:657–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cockburn A, Braithwaite RW, Lee AK (1981) The response of the heath rat, Pseudomys shortridgei, to pyric succession—a temporally dynamic life-history strategy. J Anim Ecol 50:649–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111:1119–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Crowther MS (2002) Distributions of species of the Antechinus stuartii-A. flavipes complex as predicted by bioclimatic modelling. Aust J Zool 50:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crowther MS, Braithwaite RW (2008) Brown antechinus, Antechinus stuartii. In: Van Dyck S, Strahan R (eds) The mammals of Australia. Reed New Holland, Sydney, pp 94–96Google Scholar
  22. Delmoral R, Bliss LC (1993) Mechanisms of primary succession: insights resulting from the eruption of Mount St Helens. Adv Ecol Res 24:1–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Di Stefano J, Owen L, Morris R, Duff T, York A (2011) Fire, landscape change and models of small mammal habitat suitability at multiple spatial scales. Aust Ecol 36:638–649Google Scholar
  24. Dickman CR (2008) Agile antechinus, Antechinus agilis. In: Van Dyck S, Strahan R (eds) The mammals of Australia. Reed New Holland, Sydney, pp 83–84Google Scholar
  25. Driscoll DA, Henderson MK (2008) How many common reptile species are fire specialists? A replicated natural experiment highlights the predictive weakness of a fire succession model. Biol Conserv 141:460–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ESRI 2009. ArcMap 9.2. Environmental Systems Resource Institute, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  27. Fox BJ (1982) Fire and mammalian secondary succession in an Australian coastal heath. Ecology 63:1332–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fox BJ (2008) Eastern chestnut mouse, Pseudomys gracilicaudatus. In: Van Dyck S, Strahan R (eds) The mammals of Australia. Reed New Holland, Sydney, pp 634–635Google Scholar
  29. Fox BJ, Archer E (1984) The diets of Sminthopsis murina and Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae) in sympatry. Aust Wildl Res 11:235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fox BJ, Kemper CM (1982) Growth and development of Pseudomys gracilicaudatus (Rodentia: Muridae) in the laboratory. Aust J Zool 30:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fox BJ, Taylor JE, Thompson PT (2003) Experimental manipulation of habitat structure: a retrogression of the small mammal succession. J Anim Ecol 72:927–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Franklin JF, Lindenmayer D, MacMahon JA, McKee A, Magnuson J, Perry DA, Waide R, Foster D (2000) Threads of continuity. Conserv Pract 1:8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gill AM, Allan G (2008) Large fires, fire effects and the fire-regime concept. Intern J Wildl Fire 17:688–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Higgs P, Fox BJ (1993) Interspecific competition: a mechanism for rodent succession after fire in wet heathland. Aust J Ecol 18:193–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hutto RL (2008) The ecological importance of severe wildfires: some like it hot. Ecol Appl 18:1827–1834CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Keith DA, McCaw WL, Whelan RJ (2002) Fire regimes in Australian heathlands and their effects on plants and animals. In: Bradstock RA, Williams JE, Gill AM (eds) Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 199–237Google Scholar
  37. Lee Y, Nelder JA, Pawitan Y (2006) Generalized linear models with random effects: unified analysis via h-likelihood. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Letnic M, Dickman CR (2005) The responses of small mammals to patches regenerating after fire and rainfall in the Simpson Desert, central Australia. Aust Ecol 30:24–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Letnic M, Dickman CR, Tischler MK, Tamayo B, Beh CL (2004) The responses of small mammals and lizards to post-fire succession and rainfall in arid Australia. J Arid Environ 59:85–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Letnic M, Tischler M, Gordon C (2013) Desert small mammal responses to wildfire and predation in the aftermath of a La Nina driven resource pulse. Aust Ecol 38:841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology 73:1943–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lindenmayer DB, Cunningham RB, Peakall R (2005) The recovery of populations of bush rat Rattus fuscipes in forest fragments following major population reduction. J Appl Ecol 42:649–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lindenmayer DB, MacGregor C, Welsh A, Donnelly C, Crane M, Michael D, Montague-Drake R, Cunningham RB, Brown D, Fortescue M, Dexter N, Hudson M, Gill AM (2008a) Contrasting mammal responses to vegetation type and fire. Wildl Res 35:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindenmayer DB, Wood JT, MacGregor C, Michael DR, Cunningham RB, Crane M, Montague-Drake R, Brown D, Muntz R, Driscoll DA (2008b) How predictable are reptile responses to wildfire? Oikos 117:1086–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lindenmayer DB, MacGregor C, Wood JT, Cunningham RB, Crane M, Michael D, Montague-Drake R, Brown D, Fortescue M, Dexter N, Hudson M, Gill AM (2009) What factors influence rapid post-fire site re-occupancy? A case study of the endangered eastern bristlebird in eastern Australia. Intern J Wildl Fire 18:84–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lunney D (2008a) Bush rat, Rattus fuscipes. In: Van Dyck S, Strahan R (eds) The mammals of Australia. Reed New Holland, Sydney, pp 685–687Google Scholar
  47. Lunney D (2008b) Swamp rat, Rattus lutreolus. In: Van Dyck S, Strahan R (eds) The mammals of Australia. Reed New Holland, Sydney, pp 690–692Google Scholar
  48. Luo JIA, Fox BJ (1996) Seasonal and successional dietary shifts of two sympatric rodents in coastal heathland: a possible mechanism for coexistence. Aust Ecol 21:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luo J, Fox BJ, Jefferys E (1994) Diet of the Eastern Chestnut Mouse (Pseudomys gracilicaudatus) I composition, diversity and individual variation. Wildl Res 21:401–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  51. Masters P (1993) The effects of fire driven succession and rainfall on small mammals in spinifex grassland at Uluru National Park, Northern Territory. Wildl Res 20:803–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McCarthy MA, Gill AM, Lindenmayer DB (1999) Fire regimes in mountain ash forest: evidence from forest age structure, extinction models and wildlife habitat. For Ecol Manage 124:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Monamy V, Fox BJ (2000) Small mammal succession is determined by vegetation density rather than time elapsed since disturbance. Aust Ecol 25:580–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Monamy V, Fox BJ (2010) Responses of two species of heathland rodents to habitat manipulation: vegetation density thresholds and the habitat accommodation model. Aust Ecol 35:334–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Newsome AE, McIlroy J, Catling PC (1975) The effects of an extensive wildfire on populations of twenty ground vertebrates in southeast Australia. Proc Ecol Soc Aust 9:107–123Google Scholar
  57. Pereoglou F, MacGregor C, Banks SC, Ford FD, Wood JT, Lindenmayer DB (2011) Refuge site selection by the eastern chestnut mouse in recently burned heath. Wildl Res 38:290–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pereoglou F, Lindenmayer DB, MacGregor C, Ford F, Wood J, Banks SC (2013) Landscape genetics of an early successional specialist in a disturbance-prone environment. Mol Ecol 22:1267–1281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Peterson GD (2002) Contagious disturbance, ecological memory, and the emergence of landscape pattern. Ecosystems 5:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pickett STA, White PS (eds) (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press Inc, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  61. Prugh LR, Hodges KE, Sinclair ARE, Brashares JS (2008) Effect of habitat area and isolation on fragmented animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:20770–20775PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Robinson AC (1987) The ecology of the bush rat, Rattus fuscipes (Rodentia: Muridae), in Sherbrooke Forest, Victoria. Aust Mammal 11:35–49Google Scholar
  63. Robinson NM, Leonard SWJ, Ritchie EG, Bassett M, Chia EK, Buckingham S, Gibb H, Bennett AF, Clarke MF (2013) Refuges for fauna in fire-prone landscapes: their ecological function and importance. J Appl Ecol 50:1321–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rossi F, Forster RM, Montserrat F, Ponti M, Terlizzi A, Ysebaert T, Middelburg JJ (2007) Human trampling as short-term disturbance on intertidal mudflats: effects on macrofauna biodiversity and population dynamics of bivalves. Mar Biol 151:2077–2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rota CT, Millspaugh JJ, Rumble MA, Lehman CP, Kesler DC (2014) The role of wildfire, prescribed fire, and mountain pine beetle infestations on the population dynamics of black-backed woodpeckers in the Black Hills, South Dakota. PLoS ONE 9:e94700PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sousa WP (1979) Disturbance in intertidal boulder fields: the non-equilibrium maintenance of species diversity. Ecology 60:1225–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Specht RL (1981) Responses to fire in heathlands and related shrublands. In: Gill AM, Groves RH, Noble IR (eds) Fire and the Australian biota. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, pp 395–415Google Scholar
  69. Swanson ME, Franklin JF, Beschta RL, Crisafulli CM, DellaSala DA, Hutto RL, Lindenmayer DB, Swanson FJ (2011) The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front Ecol Environ 9:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taws N (1997) Vegetation survey and mapping of Jervis Bay Territory. Report, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  71. Templeton AR, Brazeal H, Neuwald JL (2011) The transition from isolated patches to a metapopulation in the eastern collared lizard in response to prescribed fires. Ecology 92:1736–1747CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Thomas CD (1994) Extinction, colonization, and metapopulations: environmental tracking by rare species. Conserv Biol 8:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thomas CD, Thomas JA, Warren MS (1992) Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes. Oecologia 92:563–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thornton DH, Branch LC, Sunquist ME (2011) The influence of landscape, patch, and with-in patch factors on species presence and abundance: a review of focal patch studies. Landscape Ecol 26:7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Townley SJ (2000) The ecology of the Hastings River mouse Pseudomys oralis (Rodentia: Muridae) in northeastern New South Wales and southeastern Queensland. PhD, Southern Cross University, LismoreGoogle Scholar
  76. Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turner MG (2005) Landscape ecology: what is the state of the science. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 36:319–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Turner MG, Baker WL, Peterson CJ, Peet RK (1998) Factors influencing succession: lessons from large, infrequent natural disturbances. Ecosystems 1:511–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Velle LG, Vandvik V (2014) Succession after prescribed burning in coastal Calluna heathlands along a 340-km latitudinal gradient. J Veg Sci 25:546–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vieira EM, Briani DC (2013) Short-term effects of fire on small rodents in the Brazillian Cerrad and their relation with feeding habits. International Journal of Wildland Fire. 22:1063–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Warneke RM (1971) Field study of the bush rat (Rattus fuscipes). Wildl Contrib Vic 14:1–115Google Scholar
  82. Watson SJ, Taylor RS, Nimmo DG, Kelly LT, Clarke MF, Bennett AF (2012) The influence of unburnt patches and distance from refuges on post-fire bird communities. Anim Conserv 15:499–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Watts CHS, Aslin HJ (1981) The rodents of Australia. Angus & Robertson Publishers, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  84. Whelan RJ (1995) The ecology of fire. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  85. Whelan RJ, Rodgerson L, Dickman CR, Sutherland EF (2002) Critical life cycles of plants and animals: developing a process-based understanding of population changes in fire-prone landscapes. In: Bradstock RA, Williams JE, Gill AM (eds) Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 94–124Google Scholar
  86. Williams DG (1995) Heaths and scrubs. In: Cho G, Georges A, Stoutjesdijk R, Longmore R (eds) Jervis Bay. A place of cultural, scientific and educational value. Kowari 5. Australian Nature Conservation Agency, Canberra, pp 83–90Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fenner School of Environment and SocietyThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Directorate of Heritage and Biodiversity Conservation, Defence Support GroupCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations