Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Changing habitat areas and static reserves: challenges to species protection under climate change

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

When climate changes, species’ distributions may either shift spatially or expand/contract around continuously-occupied refugia, altering the effectiveness of previously-fixed conservation reserve networks.

Objectives

We characterise the nature of climate-induced changes in species’ distributions and the extent of protected habitat, using a topographically diverse, subtropical case-study region.

Methods

Bioclimatic species’ distribution models were developed for 13 representative forest-dependent species spanning four vertebrate classes. We used a fine-scale 0.25 km grid with nine environmental and eight climatic predictor variables, selected for biological and land-use realism and statistical independence. Downscaled climate data for future climate regimes were quantified from regional climate data together with the IPCC A1FI predictions for 2040 and 2090.

Results

Range limits and centroids of individual species’ modelled habitat areas changed little between present (2000) and future climates. However the total amount of suitable habitat shrank within the initial range limits. Species with the greatest habitat reductions had the smallest proportions of their present habitat areas in refugia (habitat areas suitable under present and future climates), but the largest proportions of their future habitat areas. The absolute areas of species’ habitat protected by legislation decreased, whereas the proportions that were protected changed little.

Conclusions

Regional-scale climate change is likely to cause substantial species declines, together with reduced areas of protected suitable habitat. The observed nature of distributional change indicates that long-term regional species conservation will depend more on identifying, protecting, and restoring habitat refugia than on actions to facilitate larger-scale movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RP, Gonzalez I Jr (2011) Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: an implementation with MaxEnt. Ecol Model 222:2796–2811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araújo MB, Cabeza M, Thuiller W, Hannah L, Williams PH (2004) Would climate change drive species out of reserves? An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods. Glob Change Biol 10:1618–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin MP, van Niel KP (2010) Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale. J Biogeogr 38:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi R, Crosby M, Huntley B, Hole DG, Butchart SHM, Collingham Y, Kalra M, Rajkumar J, Rahmani A, Pandey M, Gurung H, Trai LT, Quang NV, Willis SG (2013) Evaluating the effectiveness of conservation site networks under climate change: accounting for uncertainty. Glob Chang Biol 19:1236–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beale CM, Baker NE, Brewer MJ, Lennon JJ (2013) Protected area networks and savannah bird biodiversity in the face of climate change and land degradation. Ecol Lett 16:1061–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berry PM, Dawson TP, Harrison PA, Pearson RG (2002) Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11:453–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo AF, Joly CA (2010) Brazilian Atlantic Forest lato sensu: the most ancient Brazilian forest, and a biodiversity hotspot, is highly threatened by climate change. Braz J Biol 70:697–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Kearney M, Phillips S (2010) The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol Evol 1:330–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudik M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint LE, Flint AL (2012) Downscaling future climate scenarios to fine scales for hydrologic and ecological modelling and analysis. Ecol Process 1:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin J, Davis FW, Ikegami M, Syphard AD, Flint LE, Flint AL, Hannah L (2013) Modeling plant species distributions under future climates: how fine scale do projections need to be? Glob Chang Biol 19:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garden JG, Catterall CP (in review) Climate change, urbanisation and biodiversity: a review of impacts, interactions, and research trends. Environ Conserv

  • Hampe A, Petit RJ (2005) Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. Ecol Lett 8:461–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L, Midgley G, Hughes G, Bomhard B (2005) The view from the Cape: extinction risk, protected areas, and climate change. Bioscience 55:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L, Midgley G, Andelman S, Araújo M, Hughes G, Martinez-Meyer E, Pearson R, Williams P (2007) Protected area needs in a changing climate. Front Ecol Environ 5:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller NE, Zavaleta ES (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv 142:14–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L (2011) Climate change and Australia: key vulnerable regions. Reg Environ Change 11:S189–S195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007a) In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva

  • IPCC (2007b) In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds). Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • IPCC (2013) Annex II: Climate system scenario tables (In: Prather M, Flato G, Friedlingstein P, Jones C, Lamarque J-F, Liao H, Rasch P). In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Jongsomjit D, Stralberg D, Gardali T, Salas L, Wiens J (2013) Between a rock and a hard place: the impacts of climate change and housing development on breeding birds in California. Landscape Ecol 28:187–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan R, James DA (2009) Effects of climate change on global biodiversity: a review of key literature. Trop Ecol 50:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel G, Wardell-Johnson GW (2012) Refugia: keys to climate change management. Glob Chang Biol 18:2389–2391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li MH, Krauchi N, Gao SP (2006) Global warming: can existing reserves really preserve current levels of biological diversity? J Integr Plant Biol 48:255–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loarie SR, Carter BE, Hayhoe K, McMahon S, Moe R, Knight CA, Ackerly DD (2008) Climate change and the future of California’s endemic flora. PLoS One 3:e2502

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey B, Berry S, Hugh S, Ferrier S, Harwood TD, Williams KJ (2012) Ecosystem greenspots: identifying potential drought, fire, and climate-change micro-refuges. Ecol Appl 22:1852–1864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mantyka-Pringle CS, Martin TG, Rhodes JR (2012) Interactions between climate and habitat loss effects on biodiversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 18:1239–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod E, Poulter B, Hinkel J, Reyes E, Salm R (2010) Sea-level rise impact models and environmental conservation: a review of models and their applications. Ocean Coast Manag 53:507–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovich JR, Peterman WE, Nibbelink NP, Maerz JC (2010) Projected loss of a salamander diversity hotspot as a consequence of projected global climate change. PLoS One 5:e12189

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakao K, Higa M, Tsuyama I, Matsui T, Horikawa M, Tanaka N (2013) Spatial conservation planning under climate change: using species distribution modeling to assess priority for adaptive management of Fagus crenata in Japan. J Nat Conserv 21:406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 42:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters GP, Andrew RM, Boden T, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Le Quéré C, Marland G, Raupach MR, Wilson C (2013) The challenge to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nat Clim Chang 3:4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Museum (2007) Wildlife of Greater Brisbane. Queensland Museum, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Raes N, ter Steege H (2007) A null-model for significance testing of presence-only species distribution models. Ecography 30:727–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reside AE, VanDerWal J, Phillips BL et al (2013) Climate change refugia for terrestrial biodiversity: defining areas that promote species persistence and ecosystem resilience in the face of global climate change. National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility, Gold Coast

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan EC, Rundel PW (2014) Land use compounds habitat losses under projected climate change in a threatened Californian ecosystem. PLoS One 9:e86487

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogelj J, Meinshausen M, Knutti R (2012) Global warming under old and new scenarios using IPCC climate sensitivity range estimates. Nat Clim Chang 2:248–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo C, Thorne JH, Hannah L, Thuiller W (2009) Scale effects in species distribution models: implications for conservation planning under climate change. Biol Lett 5:39–43

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (2010) Climate, climate change and range boundaries. Divers Distrib 16:488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CD (2011) Translocation of species, climate change, and the end of trying to recreate past ecological communities. Trends Ecol Evol 26:216–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • VanDerWal J, Murphy HT, Kutt AS, Perkins GC, Bateman BL, Perry JJ, Reside AE (2013) Focus on poleward shifts in species’ distribution underestimates the fingerprint of climate change. Nat Clim Chang. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1688

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Stralberg D, Jongsomjit D, Howell CA, Snyder MA (2009) Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19729–19736

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young N, Carter L, Evangelista P (2011) A MaxEnt Model v3.3.3e Tutorial (ArcGIS v10). Available from http://ibis.colostate.edu/WebContent/WS/ColoradoView/TutorialsDownloads/A_Maxent_Model_v7.pdf. Accessed Nov 2012

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Peter Urich and Yinpeng Li (CLIMSystems Pty Ltd) for developing the climate data set and providing advice and information on climate-related issues, Robin Thwaites for advice and assistance with the formulation and assessment of geomorphic and topographic variables, and Pat Dale and Darryl Jones (GU) for useful early discussions. Queensland DERM (Wayne Martin) and SEQ Catchments Ltd (Shannon Mooney) provided access to the Wildnet and environmental databases respectively. Comments provided by the editor and two anonymous reviewers greatly improved this paper’s clarity and general relevance to an international readership. This project was supported by the Griffith University Climate Change Response Program and the Environmental Futures Research Institute. Funding was also provided by Logan City Council, Redland Shire Council, and Gold Coast City Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia

    Jenni G. Garden, Tim O’Donnell & Carla P. Catterall

  2. School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia

    Carla P. Catterall

Authors
  1. Jenni G. Garden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tim O’Donnell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carla P. Catterall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenni G. Garden.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garden, J.G., O’Donnell, T. & Catterall, C.P. Changing habitat areas and static reserves: challenges to species protection under climate change. Landscape Ecol 30, 1959–1973 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0223-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0223-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation