Landscape Ecology

, Volume 30, Issue 7, pp 1257–1271 | Cite as

Modeling predator habitat to enhance reintroduction planning

  • Shiloh M. HalseyEmail author
  • William J. Zielinski
  • Robert M. Scheller
Research Article



The success of species reintroduction often depends on predation risk and spatial estimates of predator habitat. The fisher (Pekania pennanti) is a species of conservation concern and populations in the western United States have declined substantially in the last century. Reintroduction plans are underway, but the ability of the species to establish a self-sustaining population is affected by predation from its primary predator, the bobcat (Lynx rufus).


To develop a habitat model that incorporates both habitat of the focal species and the spatial patterning of predator habitat. To locate areas of densely aggregated habitat that would be suitable for reintroduction.


Using camera survey data, we modeled the association between bobcat presence and environmental features using a classification tree. We applied this model to a spatial analysis of fisher habitat and identified reintroduction areas in the southern Washington Cascade Range.


The classification tree predicted bobcat detection based on elevation and mean tree diameter. The final model identified fisher reintroduction locations primarily in or near existing wilderness areas. Fisher habitat areas identified considering both habitat and predation risk differed from those identified without considering predation.


Our spatial approach is unique among fisher reintroduction plans by accounting for both resource requirements and risk of predation. It can be used as a template for future reintroduction efforts in other regions and for other species. Using similar models to refine population management and reintroduction should improve the probability of successful population establishment and stability.


Fisher (Pekania pennantiBobcat (Lynx rufusReintroduction Predation Habitat modeling Classification tree 



The Gifford Pinchot Task Force ( generously supplied survey equipment and funding for this research. Survey data from the National Park Service and the Cascades Carnivore Project were valuable additions to the work. Greta Wengert offered important insights from fisher and bobcat studies in California, and Jeffrey Lewis (WA-DFW) provided valuable review comments.


  1. Atwood TC, Gese EM, Kunkel KE (2009) Spatial partitioning of predation risk in a multiple predator-multiple prey system. J Wildl Manag 73:876–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubry KB, Houston DB (1992) Distribution and status of the fisher (Martes pennanti) in Washington. Northwest Nat 73:69–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aubry KB, Lewis JC (2003) Extirpation and reintroduction of fishers (Martes pennanti) in Oregon: implications for their conservation in the Pacific states. Biol Conserv 114:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aubry KB, Raley CM, Buskirk SW, Zielinski WJ, Schwartz MK, Golightly RT, Purcell KL, Weir RD, Yaeger JS (2013) Meta-analyses of habitat selection by fishers at resting sites in the pacific coastal region. J Wildl Manag 77:965–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker C, Lawrence R, Montagne C, Patten D (2006) Mapping wetlands and riparian areas using landsat ETM+ imagery and decision-tree-based models. Wetlands 26:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banks PB, Norrdahl K, Korpimäki E (2002) Mobility decisions and the predation risks of reintroduction. Biol Conserv 103:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benson JF, Chamberlain MJ, Leopold BD (2004) Land tenure and occupation of vacant home ranges by bobcats (Lynx rufus). J Mammal 85:983–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blankenship TL, Haines AM, Tewes ME, Silvy NJ (2006) Comparing survival and cause-specific mortality between resident and transient bobcats (Lynx rufus). Wildl Biol 12:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchanan JB, Lundquist RW, Aubry KB (2013) Winter populations of Douglas’ squirrels in different-aged Douglas-fir forests. J Wildl Manag 54:577–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buskirk SW, Bowman J, Gilbert JH (2012) Population biology and matrix demographic modeling of American martens and fishers. In: Aubry KB, Zielinski WJ, Raphael MG, Proulx G, Buskirk SW (eds) Biology and conservation of martens, sables, and fishers: a new synthesis. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 77–92Google Scholar
  11. Caro T, Hunter J (2008) Interspecific competition and predation in American carnivore families. Ethol Ecol Evol 20:295–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll C, Zielinski WJ, Noss RF (1999) Using presence-absence data to build and test spatial habitat models for the Fisher in the Klamath Region, USA. Conserv Biol 13:1344–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coonan TJ, Schwemm CA, Roemer GW, Garcelon DK, Munson L (2005) Decline of an island fox subspecies to near extinction. Southwestern Nat 50:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Creel S, Creel NM (1996) Limitation of African wild dogs by competition with larger carnivores. Conserv Biol 10:526–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis FW, Seo C, Zielinski WJ (2007) Regional variation in home-range-scale habitat models for fisher (Martes pennanti) in California. Ecol Appl 17:2195–2213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De’ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ewen JG, Armstrong DP, Parker KA, Seddon PJ (eds) (2012) Reintroduction biology, 1st edn. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert JH (2000) Impacts of reestablished fishers on bobcat populations in Wisconsin. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorini L, Linnell JD, May R, Panzacchi M, Boitani L, Odden M, Nilsen EB (2012) Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator-prey interactions. Mamm Rev 42:55–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen K (2007) Bobcat: master of survival, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Heezik YV, Seddon PJ, Maloney RF (1999) Helping reintroduced houbara bustards avoid predation: effective anti-predator training and the predictive value of pre-release behavior. Anim Conserv 2:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingram R (1973) Wolverine, fisher, and marten in Central Oregon. Central Region Administrative Report. Oregon State Game Commission, SalemGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacobson JE, Lewis JC, Snyder MC (2003) Assessment of fisher habitat in Washington State. Tier 1 Refinement and Tier 2 Final Report. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  24. Knick ST, Brittell JD, Sweeney SJ (1985) Population characteristics of bobcats in Washington state. J Wildl Manag 49:721–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koehler GM, Hornocker MG (1989) Influences of seasons on bobcats in Idaho. J Wildl Manag 53:197–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koehler GM, Hornocker MG (1991) Seasonal resource use among mountain lions, bobcats, and coyotes. J Mammal 72:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krohn WB, Elowe KD, Boone RB (1995) Relations among fishers, snow, and martens: development and evaluation of two hypotheses. For Chron 71:97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis JC (2013) Implementation plan for reintroducing fishers to the Cascade Mountain Range in Washington. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  29. Lewis JC (2014) Post-release movements, survival, and resource selection of fishers (Pekania pennanti) translocated to the Olympic Peninsula of Washington. Dissertation, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis JC, Hayes GE (2004) Feasibility assessment for reintroducing fishers to Washington. Final Report. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  31. Lewis JC, Happe PJ, Jenkins KJ, Manson DJ (2011) Olympic fisher reintroduction project: progress report 2008–2011. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis JC, Powell RA, Zielinski WJ (2012) Carnivore translocations and conservation: insights from population models and field data for fishers (Martes pennanti). PLoS One 7:e32726PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Litvaitis JA, Tash JP, Stevens CL (2006) The rise and fall of bobcat populations in New Hampshire: relevance of historical harvests to understanding current patterns of abundance and distribution. Biol Conserv 128:517–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lofroth EC, Raley CM, Finley LL, Naney RH (2010) Conservation of fishers (Martes pennanti) in south-central British Columbia, western Washington, western Oregon, and California. USDI Bureau of Land Management, DenverGoogle Scholar
  35. Long RA, Donovan TM, MacKay P, Zielinski WJ, Buzas JS (2010) Predicting carnivore occurrence with noninvasive surveys and occupancy modeling. Landscape Ecol 26:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mao JS, Boyce MS, Smith DW, Singer FJ, Vales DJ, Vore JM, Merrill EH (2005) Habitat selection by elk before and after wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park. J Wildl Manag 69:1691–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCleery R, Oli MK, Hostetler JA, Karmacharya B, Greene D, Winchester C, Gore J, Sneckenberger S, Castleberry SB, Mengak MT (2013) Are declines of an endangered mammal predation-driven and can a captive breeding and release program aid their recovery? J Zool 291:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moehrenschlager A, List R, Macdonald DW (2007) Escaping intraguild predation: Mexican kit foxes survive while coyotes and golden eagles kill Canadian swift foxes. J Mammal 88:1029–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moseby KE, Read JL, Paton DC, Copley P, Hill BM, Crisp HA (2011) Predation determines the outcome of 10 reintroduction attempts in arid South Australia. Biol Conserv 144:2863–2872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muñoz J, Felicísimo ÁM (2004) Comparison of statistical methods commonly used in predictive modelling. J Veg Sci 15:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neale JCC, Sacks BN (2001) Resource utilization and interspecific relations of sympatric bobcats and coyotes. Oikos 94:236–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ormerod SJ (2002) Applied issues with predators and predation: editor’s introduction. J Appl Ecol 39:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poessel SA, Breck SW, Biggins DE, Livieri TM, Crooks KR, Angeloni L (2011) Landscape features influence postrelease predation on endangered black-footed ferrets. J Mammal 92:732–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Powell R (1993) The fisher: life history, ecology, and behavior, 2nd edn. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  45. Purcell KL, Mazzoni AK, Mori SR, Boroski BB (2009) Resting structures and resting habitat of fishers in the southern Sierra Nevada, CA. For Ecol Manag 258:2696–2706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roy KD (1991) Ecology of reintroduced fishers in the Cabinet Mountains of northwestern Montana. Thesis, University of Montana, MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwartz MK (2007) Ancient DNA confirms native Rocky Mountain fisher (Martes pennanti) avoided early 20th century extinction. J Mammal 88:921–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scheller RM, Spencer WD, Rustigian-Romsos H, Syphard AD, Ward BC, Strittholt JR (2011) Using stochastic simulation to evaluate competing risks of wildfires and fuels management on an isolated forest carnivore. Landscape Ecol 26:1491–1504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwartz MK, DeCesare NJ, Jimenez BS, Copeland JP, Melquist WE (2013) Stand- and landscape-scale selection of large trees by fishers in the Rocky Mountains of Montana and Idaho. For Ecol Manage 305:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seddon PJ, Armstrong DP, Maloney RF (2007) Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conserv Biol 21:303–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Slauson KM, Baldwin JA, Zielinski WJ (2012) Occupancy estimation and modeling in martes research and monitoring. In: Aubry KB, Zielinski WJ, Raphael MG, Proulx G, Buskirk SW (eds) Biology and conservation of martens, sables, and fishers: a new synthesis. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 343–368Google Scholar
  52. Spencer WD, Rustigian-Romsos H, Strittholt J, Scheller R, Zielinski WJ, Truex R (2011) Using occupancy and population models to assess habitat conservation opportunities for an isolated carnivore population. Biol Conserv 144:788–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tucker SA, Clark WR, Gosselink TE (2008) Space use and habitat selection by bobcats in the fragmented landscape of South-Central Iowa. J Wildl Manag 72:1114–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vinkey RS, Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, Foresman KR, Pilgrim KL, Giddings BJ, Lofroth EC (2006) When reintroductions are augmentations: the genetic legacy of fisher (Martes pennanti) in Montana. J Mammal 87:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wengert G (2013) Ecology of intraguild predation on fishers (Martes pennanti) in California. Dissertation, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  56. Wengert GM, Gabriel MW, Matthews SM, Higley JM, Sweitzer RA, Thompson CM, Purcell KL, Barrett RH, Woods LW, Green RE, Keller SM, Gaffney PM, Jones M, Sacks BN (2014) Using DNA to describe and quantify interspecific killing of fishers in California. J Wildl Manag 78:603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yackulic CB, Reid J, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Davis R, Forsman E (2014) The roles of competition and habitat in the dynamics of populations and species distributions. Ecology 95:265–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zielinski WJ, Kucera TE (1995) American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine: survey methods for their detection. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-157. USDA Forest Service-Pacific Southwest Research Station, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  59. Zielinski WJ, Truex RL, Ogan C, Busse K (1997) Detection surveys for fishers and American martens in California, 1989-1994: summary and interpretations. In: Proulx G, Bryant HN, Woodard PM (eds) Martes: taxonomy, ecology, techniques, and management. The Provincial Museum of Alberta, Edmonton, pp 372–392Google Scholar
  60. Zielinski WJ, Truex RL, Schmidt GA, Schelexer FV, Schmidt KN, Barrett RH (2004) Home range characteristics of fishers in California. J Mammal 85:649–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zielinski WJ, Dunk JR, Yaeger JS, LaPlante DW (2010) Developing and testing a landscape-scale habitat suitability model for fisher (Martes pennanti) in forests of interior northern California. For Ecol Manag 260:1579–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shiloh M. Halsey
    • 1
    Email author
  • William J. Zielinski
    • 2
  • Robert M. Scheller
    • 1
  1. 1.Dynamic Ecosystems and Landscapes LabPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Redwood Sciences LaboratoryUSDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research StationArcataUSA

Personalised recommendations