Advertisement

Landscape Ecology

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 753–755 | Cite as

Applying historical range of variability concepts

J.A. Weins, G.D. Hayward, H.D. Safford, and C.M Giffen (eds.), Historical Environmental Variation in Conservation and Natural Resource Management. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK, 2012, 352 pp. illus., maps. Cloth, USD $176, ISBN 978-1-4443-3792-1; Paper, USD $72.95, ISBN 978-1-4443-3793-8; E-book, 360 pp. USD $58.99, ISBN 978-1-118-32975-7
  • Paul F. HessburgEmail author
  • Nicholas A. Povak
Book Review

The historical range of variability (HRV) has been a core theme of landscape ecology and natural resource management for at least two decades. Early papers that allude to the applicability of historical ecology to management go back more than five decades. However, application of the concepts to management has not been without caveat and controversy. Most conspicuous is the idea that ecological history never repeats itself in space or time. Consequently, is history dead and its’ application to management simply misguided? This question is especially germane when considering the lagged effects of climatic changes on evolving landscape patterns and processes.

The literature argues that much can be learned through the study of applied historical ecology, suggesting that it is relevant to understanding the nature of historical pattern and process interactions, how climatic periods influence disturbances and successional dynamics, and to understanding the direction, rate, and magnitude of...

References

  1. Everett RL, Hessburg PF, Jensen ME, Bormann B (1994) vol. I, Executive summary. Eastside Forest Ecosystem Health Assessment. General Technical Reports PNW-GTR-317. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, p 61Google Scholar
  2. McKelvey KS, Skinner CN, Chang C, Erman DC, Husari SJ, Parsons DJ, van Wagtendonk JW, Weatherspoon CP (1996) An overview of fire in the Sierra Nevada. In Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final report to Congress, vol II: assessments and scientific basis for management options. Water Resources Center Report No. 37. Centers for Water and Wildland Resources, University of California, Davis, pp 1033–1040Google Scholar
  3. Quigley TM, Graham RT, Haynes RW (1996) An integrated scientific assessment for ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia River Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-382. Portland OR. p 126Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA-Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research StationWenatcheeUSA
  2. 2.College of Environment, SEFSUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations