Biodiversity and direct ecosystem service regulation in the community gardens of Los Angeles, CA
- 972 Downloads
Urban community gardens are globally prevalent urban agricultural areas and have the potential to fulfill human needs in impoverished neighborhoods, such as food security and access to open space. Despite these benefits, little research has been conducted evaluating environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing community garden plant biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES).
Our study investigated the drivers of managed plant richness, abundance, and ES production in community gardens across Los Angeles County, CA from 2010 to 2012 at regional, garden, and plot scales.
Fourteen community gardens were visited in the summers of 2010–2012 for comprehensive species surveys across regional, garden, and plot scales. We compared biodiversity to household income, plot size, and gardener ethnicity.
In total, 707 managed plant species were recorded in summer surveys over a 3-year period. Ornamental plant richness increased with neighborhood income, while edible and medicinal richness increased with size of garden plots. Gardener ethnicity also influenced the composition of managed species, especially edible species.
We explain these patterns through a hierarchy of needs framework; gardeners preferentially plant species progressively less connected to human need. Ornamental plant increases in high-income regions may be explained by their requirement for financial investment and maintenance time. Cultural and provisioning ES are important for immigrant populations, resulting in ethnically distinct crop assemblages. Finally, distinct species–area relationships imply high demand for food abundance and biodiversity. Our quantitative results indicate that community gardens contribute to a biologically diverse urban ecosystem and provide valued ecosystem services in food insecure regions.
KeywordsHierarchy of need Beta diversity Species–area relationship Socioeconomics Urban agriculture Food security
For field research and data support, we thank Liangtao Li, Cara Fertitta, Lauren Velasco, and members of the Jenerette lab at UC Riverside. We also thank Derick Fay, Edith Allen, Norm Ellstrand, and Exequiel Ezcurra for ongoing research discussion. Finally, we thank UC Riverside herbarium director, Andrew Sanders for extensive aid in species identification and archiving samples. This project was supported by the US National Science Foundation (DEB 0919006), and the University of California, Riverside.
- Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJ, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Austin MP (2005) Vegetation and environment: discontinuities and continuities. In: van der Maarel E (ed) Vegetation ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Ltd, Oxford, pp 52–84Google Scholar
- Azuma AM, Gilliland S, Vallianatos M, Gottlieb R (2010) Food access, availability, and affordability in 3 Los Angeles communities, Project CAFE, 2004–2006. Prev Chronic Dis 7:1–9Google Scholar
- Fedick SL (ed) (1996) The managed mosaic: ancient Maya agriculture and resource use. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake CityGoogle Scholar
- Fraser EDG, Kenney WA (2000) Cultural background and landscape history as factors affecting perceptions of the urban forest. J Arboric 26:106–113Google Scholar
- Galluzzi G (2012) Agrobiodiversity and protected areas: another approach to synergies between conservation and use? On-farm conservation of neglected and underutilized species: status, trends and novel approaches to cope with climate change—Proceedings of the international conference, Friedrichsdorf, Frankfurt, pp 14–16Google Scholar
- Gaston KJ, Gaston S (2011) Urban gardens and biodiversity. In: Douglas I, Goode D, Houck MC, Wang R (eds) The Routledge handbook of urban ecology. Routledge, London, pp 450–458Google Scholar
- Gottlieb R (2006) Reinventing Los Angeles; nature and community in the global city. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Heraty JM (2010) Conservation of maize germplasm as a result of food tradition in southern California’s immigrant gardens. Master’s Thesis, UC DavisGoogle Scholar
- Hynes P (1996) Patch of Eden: America’s inner city gardens. Chelsea Green Publishing Company, White River JunctionGoogle Scholar
- Jackson J, Rytel K, Brookover I, Efron N, Hernandez G, Johnson E, Kim Y, Lai W, Navarro M, Pena A, Rehm Z, Yoo H, Zabel Z (2013) Cultivate L.A.; an assessment of urban agriculture in Los Angeles county. University of California Cooperative Extension, Los Angeles. http://www.cultivatelosangeles.org
- Jansson A, Polasky S (2010) Quantifying biodiversity for building resilience for food security in urban landscapes: getting down to business. Ecol Soc 15(3):20Google Scholar
- Kinzig AP, Warren P, Martin C, Hope D, Katti M (2005) The effects of human socioeconomic status and cultural characteristics on urban patterns of biodiversity. Ecol Soc 10:23–36Google Scholar
- Lawson L, Drake L (2013) Community Garden Organization Survey, 2011–2012. Commun Green Rev 18:20–41Google Scholar
- Lowry, JH, Baker, ME, Ramsey, RD (2012). Determinants of urban tree canopy in residential neighborhoods: Household characteristics, urban form, and the geophysical landscape. Urban Ecosyst 15:247–266Google Scholar
- Lubbe CS, Siebert SJ, Cilliers SS (2011) Socio-economic drivers of plant diversity patterns in domestic gardens of the Tlokwe City Municipality. S Afr J Bot 77:538–539Google Scholar
- Marco A, Barthelemy C, Dutoit T, Bertaudière-Montes V (2010) Bridging human and natural sciences for a better understanding of urban floral patterns: the role of planting practices in Mediterranean gardens. Ecol Soc 15:2Google Scholar
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 0–155 Google Scholar
- Peña D (2005) Farmers feeding families: agroecology in South Central Los Angeles. Lecture presented to the Environmental Science, Policy and Management ColloquiumGoogle Scholar
- Peña D (2006) Toward a critical political ecology of Latina/o urbanism. The Acequia Institute. http://www.acequiainstitute.org/researchreports.html
- Shaffer A (2002) The persistence of L.A.’s grocery gap: the need for a new food policy and approach to market development. Center for Food and Justice Report. UEPI, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Soleri D, Cleveland DA (2004) Farmer selection and conservation of crop varieties. In: Goodman RM (ed) Encyclopedia of plant and crop science. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 433–438Google Scholar
- United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- United States Census Bureau (2010). American FactFinder Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics for Los Angeles County. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml
- USDA (2014) Food Access Research Atlas. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas.aspx
- Vavilov NI (1949) The origin, variation, immunity, and breeding of cultivated plants. Chron Bot 13:1–364Google Scholar