Evaluating connectivity between Natura 2000 sites within the montado agroforestry system: a case study using landscape genetics of the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus)
- 719 Downloads
The Natura 2000 network is the centerpiece of European nature conservation policy but its effectiveness is challenged by ongoing landscape change.
Our objective was to assess landscape connectivity between Natura 2000 sites in the biodiversity-rich western Mediterranean region.
We used the wood mouse as a focal species with short-range dispersal and obtained genetic data for 393 individuals uniformly distributed between two Natura 2000 sites in SW Portugal. We created a map of connectivity between the two sites that was based on a stack of analyses including reciprocal causal modeling and least-cost path modeling coupled with resistant kernel analysis.
Wood mice in the study area were genetically diverse and connected by gene flow over a large area. We did not find evidence of major population subdivision in the study area. Gene flow was limited by geographic distance, with significant genetic similarity between individuals within 3 km of each other. Vegetation cover and land use explained more of the variation in genetic distance than geographic distance alone. In particular, agroforestry areas and transitional woodland were associated with higher costs to movement than forest or arable land uses. This result may have been influenced by the difficulty in classifying land use in the open montado.
The Natura 2000 sites we studied are well connected by multiple corridors for dispersal. Our analysis also highlighted the importance of the Serra de Grândola, part of the European Long Term Ecological Research Network but not yet included in Natura 2000.
KeywordsPopulation connectivity Landscape genetics Isolation-by-resistance Reciprocal causal modeling Small mammal UNICOR
We thank the anonymous reviewers and Denise O’ Meara for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Fabiana Marques and Ana Catarina Silva provided fieldwork support. This study was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) projects PTDC/BIA-BEC/101511/2008 and LTER/BIA-BEC/0048/2009, and individual contracts C2007-UL-342-CBA1 (CF) and SFRH/BD/38053/2007 (FA). Fieldwork was carried out under license from the Portuguese Institute for Nature Conservation and Biodiversity (ICNB; Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e Biodiversidade).
- Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (2004) GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Lab Gén, Popul, Interact, CNRS UMR 5000:1996–2004Google Scholar
- Bennett AF, Saunders DA (2010) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change. In: Sodhi NS, Ehrlich PR (eds) Conservation biology for all. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 88–106Google Scholar
- Bonnet E, van de Peer Y (2002) ZT: a software tool for simple and partial Mantel tests. J Stat Softw 7:1–12Google Scholar
- Büttner G, Feranec J, Jaffrain G (2006) CORINE land cover nomenclature illustrated guide—addendum 2006. Instituto Geográfico PortuguêsGoogle Scholar
- Caetano M, Mata F, Freire S, Campagnolo M (2006) Accuracy assessment of the Portuguese CORINE Land Cover map. In: global developments in environmental earth observation from space. Proceedings of the 25th EARSeL Symposium, Porto, Portugal, 2005. Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 459–467Google Scholar
- EEA (2010) 10 messages for 2010 agricultural ecosystems. EEA, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- Gortat T, Rutkowski R, Gryczyńska Siemiątkowska A, Kozakiewicz, Kozakiewicz M (2012) Genetic structure in urban and rural populations of Apodemus agrarius in Poland. Mammal Biol 78:171–177Google Scholar
- Goslee SC, Urban DL (2007) The ECODIST package for dissimilarity-based analysis of ecological data. J Stat Softw 22:1–19Google Scholar
- Landguth EL, Cushman SA, Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS, Murphy M, Luikart G (2010) Quantifying the lag time to detect barriers in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 19:4179–4191Google Scholar
- Mullins J, McDevitt AD, Kowalczyk R, Ruczyńska I, Górny M, Wójcik JM (2014) The influence of habitat structure on genetic differentiation in red fox populations in north-eastern Poland. Acta Theriol 59:367–376Google Scholar
- Munshi-South J, Kharchenko K (2010) Rapid, pervasive genetic differentiation of urban white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) populations in New York City. Mol Ecol 19:4242–4254Google Scholar
- Olea L, San Miguel-Ayanz A (2006) The Spanish dehesa. A traditional Mediterranean silvopastoral system linking production and nature conservation. Grassl Sci Eur 11:3–13Google Scholar
- Pereira PM, Pires da Fonseca M (2003) Nature vs nurture: the making of the montado ecosystem. Conservation Ecol 7:7Google Scholar
- Quantum GIS Development Team (2012) Quantum GIS geographic information system. Open source geospatial foundation. Available at http://qgis.osgeo.org
- Rosalino LM, Ferreira D, Leitâo I, Santos-Reis M (2011b) Usage patterns of Mediterranean agro-forest habitat components by wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. Mammalian Biol 76:268–273Google Scholar
- Schlitter D, van der Straeten E, Amori G, Hutterer R, Kryštufek B, Yigit N, Mitsain G (2008) Apodemus sylvaticus. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 23 April 2014
- Shah VB, McRae BH (2008) Circuitscape: A tool for landscape ecology. In: Varoquaux G, Vaught T, Millman J (Eds) Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science conference (SciPy 2008), pp 62–66Google Scholar
- Spear SF, Balkenhol N, Scribner KIM (2010) Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis. Mol Ecol 3576–3591Google Scholar
- Thuiller W, Georges D, Engler R (2014) biomod2: Ensemble platform for species distribution modeling. R package version 3-1.48 URL:http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=biomod2